Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2208.03001 · Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical

Born–Oppenheimer and the geometry of ray space: an application to cold atoms

Joseph Samuel

Published Nov 25, 2022• 1 citation
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

Abstract It is known that, within the Born–Oppenheimer approximation, the slow modes of the nuclear motion are altered by three effects that emerge from integrating out the fast modes of the electronic motion. The first is an effective scalar potential V d y n coming from the eigenvalue of the electronic state, the second is an effective magnetic field coming from the Berry phase vector potential A . The third term is an additional potential V g e o m originating in the geometry of ray space and the Fubini–Study metric. In this article, we illustrate these effects and their geometric origin in the context of a simple toy model of a slow neutron interacting with a strong, spatially varying magnetic field. Regarding the neutron spin as a fast degree of freedom, we work out the slow dynamics of the motion of the neutron. Our treatment is geometrical and brings out the effects originating in the Kähler geometry of ray space and the Fubini–Study metric. We then give examples of magnetic field configurations which isolate these three separate effects. Finally we apply these ideas to the trapping of cold atoms. Our main result is that the geometric electric potential V g e o m dominates for smaller traps and can be used to confine cold atoms in static traps. This observation could result in better and smaller atomic clocks. This paper is dedicated to Michael Berry on his 80th birthday.

DOI
10.1088/1751-8121/aca63b

Related papers

Classical geometric forces of reaction: an exactly solvable model

Michael Berry, Jonathan M. Robbins

Abstract We illustrate the effects of the classical ‘magnetic’ and ‘electric’ geometric forces that enter into the adiabatic description of the slow motion of a heavy system coupled to a light one, beyond the Born–Oppenheimer approximation of simple averaging. When the fast system is a spin S and the slow system is a massive particle whose spatial position R is coupled to S with energy (fast hamiltonian) S · R, the magnetic force is that of a monopole of strength I (= adiabatic invariant S · R/R) centred at R = 0, and the electric force is inverse-cube repulsion with strength S2 – I2. Confining the slow particle to the surface of a sphere eliminates the Born–Oppenheimer and electric forces, and generates motion with precession and nutation exactly equivalent to that of a heavy symmetrical top. In the adiabatic limit the nutation is small and the averaged precession is precisely reproduced by the magnetic force. Alternatively, choosing the exactly conserved total angular momentum to vanish eliminates the Born–Oppenheimer and magnetic forces, and generates as exact orbits a one-parameter family of curly ‘antelope horns’ coiling in from infinity, reversing hand, and receding to infinity. In the adiabatic limit the repulsion of the ‘guiding centre’ of these coils is exactly reproduced by the electric force. A by-product of the ‘antelope horn’ analysis is a determination of the shape of a curve with a given curvature k and torsion T in terms of the evolution of a quantum 2-spinor driven by a planar ‘magnetic field’ with components k and T.

Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series A Mathematical and Physical Sciences•Sep 8, 1993•68 citations

Nature of geometric (Berry) potentials

Andrey Krakovsky, Joseph L. Birman

We derive geometric electriclike and vectorlike potentials arising in studies of the Berry phase and the Born-Oppenheimer approximation, using a local inertial frame. The potentials result from a careful averaging over fast degrees of freedom. This method is applied to two exactly integrable models: coupled harmonic oscillators and a fast gyroscope, which illustrate the general results.

Physical Review A•Jan 1, 1995•9 citations

Adiabatic Approximation for Path Integrals and Geometrical Potentials

Takashi Ohnishi, Naoto Nagaosa

Geometrical concepts have played an important role in quantum mechanics. In the Schrodinger representation, the Berry–Simon connection and the quantum geometric tensor appear as gauge potentials in the effective Hamiltonian for a heavy system under the Born–Oppenheimer approximation. On the other hand, the Berry phase should arise as the amplitude of each path in the pathintegral formalism. In their pioneering work, Kuratsuji and Iida have developed the treatment of the Born– Oppenheimer approximation in the path integral quantization, where the Berry phase of the light system naturally appears in the effective action for the heavy system. However, they did not derive the gauge potentials themselves in the effective Hamiltonian. In this short note, we show that the gauge potentials which relate to the geometry of the Hilbert space of the light system are also derived in the adiabatic scheme of path integrals. Our result presents the path-integral formalism to consider the effective dynamics of the heavy system under the adiabatic approximation. Let us consider the following Hamiltonian:

Journal of the Physical Society of Japan•Dec 25, 2006•2 citations

Spin Evolution in the Born‐Oppenheimer Approximation

Jean‐Philippe Ansermet, Klaus Maschke, F. Reuse

Abstract The first part of this article attempts to highlight in chronological order some prominent papers that have direct connexion with the Born‐Oppenheimer approximation. This timeline successively points to the role of level crossing, the notions of gauge field and geometrical or Berry phase, early experiments that were accounted for with that concept, and its major role in understanding anomalous transport in solids. The second part analyzes the time evolution of states under the adiabatic approximation when the states are spin degenerate. The geometrical phase thus found entails an electron spin evolution. Then, we examine the case of moleclar dynamics. Starting from the Born‐Oppenheimer approximation, we obtain a spin evolution by replacing the classical nuclear positions by their quantum mechanical counterparts in the terms that describe electrostatic interactions between nuclei and electrons.

Israel Journal of Chemistry•Dec 1, 2022•0 citations

Quantum theory of large amplitude collective motion and the Born-Oppenheimer method

Abraham Klein, Niels R. Walet

We study the quantum foundations of a theory of large amplitude collective motion for a Hamiltonian expressed in terms of canonical variables. In previous work the separation into slow and fast (collective and noncollective) variables was carried out without the explicit intervention of the Born-Oppenheimer approach. The addition of the Born-Oppenheimer assumption not only provides support for the results found previously in leading approximation, but also facilitates an extension of the theory to include an approximate description of the fast variables and their interaction with the slow ones. Among other corrections, one encounters the Berry vector and scalar potential. The formalism is illustrated with the aid of some simple examples, where the potentials in question are actually evaluated and where the accuracy of the Born-Oppenheimer approximation is tested. Variational formulations of both Hamiltonian and Lagrangian type are described for the equations of motion for the slow variables.

arXiv:nucl-th/9303017•Physical Review C•Jul 1, 1993•10 citations

The Berry phase in molecular physics

Arno Böhm, Brian K. Kendrick, Mark E. Loewe

Abstract The geometric phase of quantum mechanics is introduced, and its physical effects are then studied in the context of molecular physics. By performing the most general Born–Oppenheimer procedure, we show how gauge groups appear in the study of molecules. This method is then applied to the doubly degenerate Λ‐levels of a diatomic molecule. The resulting dynamics for the slow angular motion of the dumbbell is equivalent to that of a Dirac monopole.

International Journal of Quantum Chemistry•Jan 5, 1992•39 citations
Abstract It is known that, within the Born–Oppenheimer approximation, the slow modes of the nuclear motion are altered by three effects that emerge from integrating out the fast modes of the electronic motion. The first is an effective scalar potential V d y n coming from the eigenvalue of the electronic state, the second is an effective magnetic field coming from the Berry phase vector potential A . The third term is an additional potential V g e o m originating in the geometry of ray space and the Fubini–Study metric. In this article, we illustrate these effects and their geometric origin in the context of a simple toy model of a slow neutron interacting with a strong, spatially varying magnetic field. Regarding the neutron spin as a fast degree of freedom, we work out the slow dynamics of the motion of the neutron. Our treatment is geometrical and brings out the effects originating in the Kähler geometry of ray space and the Fubini–Study metric. We then give examples of magnetic field configurations which isolate these three separate effects. Finally we apply these ideas to the trapping of cold atoms. Our main result is that the geometric electric potential V g e o m dominates for smaller traps and can be used to confine cold atoms in static traps. This observation could result in better and smaller atomic clocks. This paper is dedicated to Michael Berry on his 80th birthday.
Abstract We illustrate the effects of the classical ‘magnetic’ and ‘electric’ geometric forces that enter into the adiabatic description of the slow motion of a heavy system coupled to a light one, beyond the Born–Oppenheimer approximation of simple averaging. When the fast system is a spin S and the slow system is a massive particle whose spatial position R is coupled to S with energy (fast hamiltonian) S · R, the magnetic force is that of a monopole of strength I (= adiabatic invariant S · R/R) centred at R = 0, and the electric force is inverse-cube repulsion with strength S2 – I2. Confining the slow particle to the surface of a sphere eliminates the Born–Oppenheimer and electric forces, and generates motion with precession and nutation exactly equivalent to that of a heavy symmetrical top. In the adiabatic limit the nutation is small and the averaged precession is precisely reproduced by the magnetic force. Alternatively, choosing the exactly conserved total angular momentum to vanish eliminates the Born–Oppenheimer and magnetic forces, and generates as exact orbits a one-parameter family of curly ‘antelope horns’ coiling in from infinity, reversing hand, and receding to infinity. In the adiabatic limit the repulsion of the ‘guiding centre’ of these coils is exactly reproduced by the electric force. A by-product of the ‘antelope horn’ analysis is a determination of the shape of a curve with a given curvature k and torsion T in terms of the evolution of a quantum 2-spinor driven by a planar ‘magnetic field’ with components k and T.
Geometrical concepts have played an important role in quantum mechanics. In the Schrodinger representation, the Berry–Simon connection and the quantum geometric tensor appear as gauge potentials in the effective Hamiltonian for a heavy system under the Born–Oppenheimer approximation. On the other hand, the Berry phase should arise as the amplitude of each path in the pathintegral formalism. In their pioneering work, Kuratsuji and Iida have developed the treatment of the Born– Oppenheimer approximation in the path integral quantization, where the Berry phase of the light system naturally appears in the effective action for the heavy system. However, they did not derive the gauge potentials themselves in the effective Hamiltonian. In this short note, we show that the gauge potentials which relate to the geometry of the Hilbert space of the light system are also derived in the adiabatic scheme of path integrals. Our result presents the path-integral formalism to consider the effective dynamics of the heavy system under the adiabatic approximation. Let us consider the following Hamiltonian:
Abstract The first part of this article attempts to highlight in chronological order some prominent papers that have direct connexion with the Born‐Oppenheimer approximation. This timeline successively points to the role of level crossing, the notions of gauge field and geometrical or Berry phase, early experiments that were accounted for with that concept, and its major role in understanding anomalous transport in solids. The second part analyzes the time evolution of states under the adiabatic approximation when the states are spin degenerate. The geometrical phase thus found entails an electron spin evolution. Then, we examine the case of moleclar dynamics. Starting from the Born‐Oppenheimer approximation, we obtain a spin evolution by replacing the classical nuclear positions by their quantum mechanical counterparts in the terms that describe electrostatic interactions between nuclei and electrons.
We study the quantum foundations of a theory of large amplitude collective motion for a Hamiltonian expressed in terms of canonical variables. In previous work the separation into slow and fast (collective and noncollective) variables was carried out without the explicit intervention of the Born-Oppenheimer approach. The addition of the Born-Oppenheimer assumption not only provides support for the results found previously in leading approximation, but also facilitates an extension of the theory to include an approximate description of the fast variables and their interaction with the slow ones. Among other corrections, one encounters the Berry vector and scalar potential. The formalism is illustrated with the aid of some simple examples, where the potentials in question are actually evaluated and where the accuracy of the Born-Oppenheimer approximation is tested. Variational formulations of both Hamiltonian and Lagrangian type are described for the equations of motion for the slow variables.