The presence of correlations in noisy quantum circuits will be an inevitable side effect as quantum devices continue to grow in size and depth. Randomized Benchmarking (RB) is arguably the simplest method to initially assess the overall performance of a quantum device, as well as to pinpoint the presence of temporal-correlations, so-called non-Markovianity; however, when such presence is detected, it hitherto remains a challenge to operationally quantify its features. Here, we demonstrate a method exploiting the power of machine learning with matrix product operators to deduce the minimal average non-Markovianity displayed by the data of a RB experiment, arguing that this can be achieved for any suitable gate set, as well as tailored for most specific-purpose RB techniques.
The presence of correlations in noisy quantum circuits will be an inevitable side effect as quantum devices continue to grow in size and depth. Randomized Benchmarking (RB) is arguably the simplest method to initially assess the overall performance of a quantum device, as well as to pinpoint the presence of temporal-correlations, so-called non-Markovianity; however, when such presence is detected, it hitherto remains a challenge to operationally quantify its features. Here, we demonstrate a method exploiting the power of machine learning with matrix product operators to deduce the minimal average non-Markovianity displayed by the data of a RB experiment, arguing that this can be achieved for any suitable gate set, as well as tailored for most specific-purpose RB techniques.
Abstract A crucial task to obtain optimal and reliable quantum devices is to quantify their overall performance. The average fidelity of quantum gates is a particular figure of merit that can be estimated efficiently by randomized benchmarking (RB). However, the concept of gate-fidelity itself relies on the crucial assumption that noise behaves in a predictable, time-local, or so-called Markovian manner, whose breakdown can naturally become the leading source of errors as quantum devices scale in size and depth. We analytically show that error suppression techniques such as dynamical decoupling (DD) and Pauli-twirling can operationally Markovianize RB: (i) fast DD reduces non-Markovian RB to an exponential decay plus longer-time corrections, while on the other hand, (ii) Pauli-twirling generally does not affect the average, but (iii) it always suppresses the variance of such RB outputs. We demonstrate these effects numerically with a qubit noise model. Our results show that simple and efficient error suppression methods can simultaneously tame non-Markovian noise and allow for standard and reliable gate quality estimation, a fundamentally important task in the path toward fully functional quantum devices.
Estimating the features of noise is the first step in a chain of protocols that will someday lead to faulttolerant quantum computers.The randomized benchmarking (RB) protocol is designed with this exact mindset, estimating the average strength of noise in a quantum processor with relative ease in practice.However, RB, along with most other benchmarking and characterization methods, is limited in scope because it assumes that the noise is temporally uncorrelated (Markovian), which is increasingly evident not to be the case.Here, we combine the RB protocol with a recent framework describing non-Markovian quantum phenomena to derive a general analytical expression of the average sequence fidelity (ASF) for non-Markovian RB with the Clifford group.We show that one can identify non-Markovian features of the noise directly from the ASF through its deviations from the Markovian case, proposing a set of methods to collectively estimate these deviations, non-Markovian memory time scales, and diagnose (in)coherence of non-Markovian noise in a RB experiment.Finally, we demonstrate the efficacy of our proposal by means of several proof-of-principle examples.Our methods are directly implementable and pave the way for a better understanding of correlated noise in quantum processors.
Randomized benchmarking (RB) is a widely adopted protocol for estimating the average gate fidelity in quantum hardware. However, its standard formulation relies on the assumption of temporally uncorrelated noise, an assumption often violated in current devices. In this work, we derive analytic expressions for the average sequence fidelity (ASF) in the presence of temporally correlated (non-Markovian) noise with classical memory, including cases where such correlations originate from interactions with a quantum environment. We show how the ASF can be interpreted to extract meaningful benchmarking parameters under such noise and identify classes of interaction Hamiltonians that render temporal correlations completely invisible to RB. We further provide operational criteria for witnessing temporal correlations due to quantum memory through RB experiments. Importantly, while classical correlations may remain undetectable in the ASF data, they can nonetheless significantly affect worst-case errors quantified by the diamond norm, a metric central to fault-tolerant quantum computing. In particular, we demonstrate that temporal correlations may suppress worst-case errors, highlighting that temporal correlations may not always have detrimental effects on gate performance.
Estimating the features of noise is the first step in a chain of protocols that will someday lead to fault tolerant quantum computers. The randomised benchmarking (RB) protocol is designed with this exact mindset, estimating the average strength of noise in a quantum processor with relative ease in practice. However, RB, along with most other benchmarking and characterisation methods, is limited in scope because it assumes that the noise is temporally uncorrelated (Markovian), which is increasingly evident not to be the case. Here, we combine the RB protocol with a recent framework describing non-Markovian quantum phenomena to derive a general analytical expression of the average sequence fidelity (ASF) for non-Markovian RB with the Clifford group. We show that one can identify non-Markovian features of the noise directly from the ASF through its deviations from the Markovian case, proposing a set of methods to collectively estimate these deviations, non-Markovian memory time-scales, and diagnose (in)coherence of non-Markovian noise in an RB experiment. Finally, we demonstrate the efficacy of our proposal by means of several proof-of-principle examples. Our methods are directly implementable and pave the pathway to better understanding correlated noise in quantum processors.
The rapid progress in the development of quantum devices is in large part due to the availability of a wide range of characterization techniques allowing to probe, test and adjust them. Nevertheless, these methods often make use of approximations that hold in rather simplistic circumstances. In particular, assuming that error mechanisms stay constant in time and have no dependence in the past, is something that will be impossible to do as quantum processors continue scaling up in depth and size. We establish a theoretical framework for the Randomized Benchmarking protocol encompassing temporally-correlated, so-called non-Markovian noise, at the gate level, for any gate set belonging to a wide class of finite groups. We obtain a general expression for the Average Sequence Fidelity (ASF) and propose a way to obtain average gate fidelities of full non-Markovian noise processes. Moreover, we obtain conditions that are fulfilled when an ASF displays authentic non-Markovian deviations. Finally, we show that even though gate-dependence does not translate into a perturbative term within the ASF, as in the Markovian case, the non-Markovian sequence fidelity nevertheless remains stable under small gate-dependent perturbations.
In non-Markovian systems, the current state of the system depends on the full or partial history of its past evolution. Owing to these time correlations, non-Markovian noise violates common assumptions in gate characterization protocols such as randomized benchmarking and gate-set tomography. Here, we perform a case study of the effects of a quantum non-Markovian bath on qubit randomized benchmarking experiments. We consider a model consisting of qubits coupled to a multimode bosonic bath. We apply unitary operations on the qubits, interspersed with brief interactions with the environment governed by a Hamiltonian. Allowing for non-Markovianity in the interactions leads to clear differences in the randomized benchmarking decay curves in this model, which we analyze in detail. The Markovian model’s decay is exponential as expected, whereas the model with non-Markovian interactions displays a much slower, almost polynomial, decay. We develop efficient numerical methods for this problem that we use to support our theoretical results. These results inform efforts on incorporating quantum non-Markovian noise in the characterization and benchmarking of quantum devices.