Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2206.11805 · Mathematische Annalen

Monogamy of entanglement between cones

Guillaume Aubrun, Alexander Müller‐Hermes, Martin Plávala

Published Aug 7, 2024• 2 citations
arXivHTMLPDF
DOI
10.1007/s00208-024-02935-4

Related papers

A simple proof of monogamy of entanglement

Dong Yang

arXiv:quant-ph/0604168•Physics Letters A•Aug 18, 2006•56 citations

Monogamy of entanglement measures based on fidelity in multiqubit systems

Limin Gao, Fengli Yan, Ting Gao

arXiv:2103.11296•Quantum Information Processing•Oct 1, 2021•7 citations

Tighter entanglement monogamy relations of qubit systems

Zhi‐Xiang Jin, Shao-Ming Fei

arXiv:1702.03405•Quantum Information Processing•Feb 3, 2017•61 citations

Monogamy paradox: A toy model in flat space

Tuneer Chakraborty, Joydeep Chakravarty, Priyadarshi Paul

In this work, we investigate a toy model in empty flat space which captures essential features of the monogamy paradox for flat space black holes within a clean calculational framework. We formulate the paradox in terms of monogamy of CHSH correlations, which we use to quantify the monogamy of entanglement. Within effective field theory, we show that the entanglement of approximately local bulk modes just outside a light cone with modes just inside the light cone as well as with modes situated far away at the past of future null infinity gives rise to an O(1) violation in the monogamy of entanglement. An essential feature of this violation is that small corrections of O($\sqrt{G_N}$) do not resolve the same. We argue that the resolution of the paradox is that our spatially separated observables probe the same underlying degrees of freedom, i.e., such observables act on a non-factorized Hilbert space, thereby circumventing the conflict with monogamy of entanglement.

•Jul 16, 2021•3 citations

Entangleability of cones

Guillaume Aubrun, Ludovico Lami, Carlos Palazuelos +1 more

arXiv:1911.09663•Geometric and Functional Analysis•Apr 1, 2021•38 citations

Unified monogamy relation of entanglement measures

Xue Yang, Ming-Xing Luo

arXiv:2007.04520•Quantum Information Processing•Mar 1, 2021•7 citations
In this work, we investigate a toy model in empty flat space which captures essential features of the monogamy paradox for flat space black holes within a clean calculational framework. We formulate the paradox in terms of monogamy of CHSH correlations, which we use to quantify the monogamy of entanglement. Within effective field theory, we show that the entanglement of approximately local bulk modes just outside a light cone with modes just inside the light cone as well as with modes situated far away at the past of future null infinity gives rise to an O(1) violation in the monogamy of entanglement. An essential feature of this violation is that small corrections of O(GN\sqrt{G_N}GN​​) do not resolve the same. We argue that the resolution of the paradox is that our spatially separated observables probe the same underlying degrees of freedom, i.e., such observables act on a non-factorized Hilbert space, thereby circumventing the conflict with monogamy of entanglement.