Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2206.07905 · Quantum Information Processing

Estimating parameterized entanglement measure

Zhi-Wei Wei, Ming-Xing Luo, Shao-Ming Fei

Published Jun 14, 2022• 7 citations
arXivHTMLPDF
DOI
10.1007/s11128-022-03551-4

Related papers

Parameterized entanglement measures with computable lower bounds

Gui Bao, Xue‐Na Zhu

Quantum Information Processing•Mar 3, 2025•1 citation

Computable lower bound of the parameterized entanglement monotone

Ning Yang, Yu Guo, Shuanping Du

Although numerous measures of entanglement have been proposed so far, the calculation of a given faithful entanglement measure is a hard work since it is always involved in some optimization process. It is, therefore, important to estimate the lower bound of a given entanglement measure for an arbitrary quantum state. This results in a subject of intensive mathematical research. In particular, along this line, the lower bounds of concurrence or other measures that are induced from concurrence have been explored a lot. Here, we investigate the lower bounds of two kinds of entanglement monotones, i.e., $q$-concurrence ($q>1$) and $α$-concurrence ($0<α<1$), or termed the parameterized entanglement monotone together. We obtain, in the light of the informationally complete ($N$, $M$)-positive operator-valued measure [($N$, $M$)-POVM], the lower bounds for the case of $\frac12<α<1$, $1<q<2$ for two-qudit states, and the case of $2\leqslant q<3$ for two-qubit states. We list several examples which show that the lower bounds based on ($N$, $M$)-POVM outperform that of GSIC-POVM and SIC-POVM, and all these measurement based bounds are better then the ones induced by positive partial transpose (PPT) and realignment criteria in literature. In addition, we obtain an analytical formula of the parameterized entanglement monotone with $\frac12<α<1$ and $1<q<2$ for the isotropic state.

quant-pharXiv:2605.22165•May 22, 2026•0 citations

Getting the measure of entanglement

S. L. Rolston

Nature•Dec 1, 2015•4 citations

Ultra-precise phase estimation without mode entanglement

Mikhail S. Podoshvedov, Sergey A. Podoshvedov

We explore optical quantum engineering of phase-parameterized continuous-variable (CV) probe states to exploit nonclassical light to solve the problem of precise phase estimation. The optical interferometer consists of a single beam splitter (BS) with tunable transmittance and reflectance, and two single-mode squeezed vacuum states (SMSVs). The reference SMSV state is mixed with a weakly squeezed state carrying an unknown phase at the beam splitter to form an output hybrid entangled state. Then, in the measurement mode, the number of photons is measured to generate the target CV state parameterized by the unknown phase. Using the CV states, we propose a sub-Heisenberg metrology protocol in which the quantum Cramer-Rao (QCR) boundary is saturated by intensity measurement. The advantage of quantum engineering of CV probe states for ultra-precise phase estimation of unknown phase is due solely to the nonclassical photonic properties of the measurement induced CV states of definite parity and is independent of the mode entanglement.

quant-pharXiv:2603.09182•Mar 11, 2026•0 citations

Superior monogamy and polygamy relations and estimates of concurrence

Yue Cao, Naihuan Jing, Kailash C. Misra +1 more

Abstract It is well known that any well-defined bipartite entanglement measure $$\mathcal {E}$$ E obeys $$\gamma $$ γ th-monogamy relations Eq. (1.1) and assisted measure $$\mathcal {E}_{a}$$ E a obeys $$\delta $$ δ th-polygamy relations Eq. (1.2). Recently, we presented a class of tighter parameterized monogamy relation for the $$\alpha $$ α th $$(\alpha \ge \gamma )$$ ( α ≥ γ ) power based on Eq. 1.1. This study provides a family of tighter lower (resp. upper) bounds of the monogamy (resp. polygamy) relations in a unified manner. In the first part of the paper, the following three basic problems are focused: tighter monogamy relation for the $$\alpha $$ α th ( $$0\le \alpha \le \gamma $$ 0 ≤ α ≤ γ ) power of any bipartite entanglement measure $$\mathcal {E}$$ E based on Eq. (1.1); tighter polygamy relation for the $$\beta $$ β th ( $$ \beta \ge \delta $$ β ≥ δ ) power of any bipartite assisted entanglement measure $$\mathcal {E}_{a}$$ E a based on Eq. (1.2); tighter polygamy relation for the $$\omega $$ ω th ( $$0\le \omega \le \delta $$ 0 ≤ ω ≤ δ ) power of any bipartite assisted entanglement measure $$\mathcal {E}_{a}$$ E a based on Eq. (1.2). In the second part, using the tighter polygamy relation for the $$\omega $$ ω th ( $$0\le \omega \le 2$$ 0 ≤ ω ≤ 2 ) power of CoA, we obtain good estimates or bounds for the $$\omega $$ ω th ( $$0\le \omega \le 2$$ 0 ≤ ω ≤ 2 ) power of concurrence for any N-qubit pure states $$|\psi \rangle _{AB_{1}\cdots B_{N-1}}$$

arXiv:2503.00694•The European Physical Journal Plus•Feb 5, 2025•1 citation

Entropic methodology for entanglement measures

Wei Deng, Yong Deng

Physica A Statistical Mechanics and its Applications•Aug 13, 2018•41 citations
Although numerous measures of entanglement have been proposed so far, the calculation of a given faithful entanglement measure is a hard work since it is always involved in some optimization process. It is, therefore, important to estimate the lower bound of a given entanglement measure for an arbitrary quantum state. This results in a subject of intensive mathematical research. In particular, along this line, the lower bounds of concurrence or other measures that are induced from concurrence have been explored a lot. Here, we investigate the lower bounds of two kinds of entanglement monotones, i.e., qqq-concurrence (q>1q>1q>1) and ααα-concurrence (0<α<10<α<10<α<1), or termed the parameterized entanglement monotone together. We obtain, in the light of the informationally complete (NNN, MMM)-positive operator-valued measure [(NNN, MMM)-POVM], the lower bounds for the case of 12<α<1\frac12<α<121​<α<1, 1<q<21<q<21<q<2 for two-qudit states, and the case of 2⩽q<32\leqslant q<32⩽q<3 for two-qubit states. We list several examples which show that the lower bounds based on (NNN, MMM)-POVM outperform that of GSIC-POVM and SIC-POVM, and all these measurement based bounds are better then the ones induced by positive partial transpose (PPT) and realignment criteria in literature. In addition, we obtain an analytical formula of the parameterized entanglement monotone with 12<α<1\frac12<α<121​<α<1 and 1<q<21<q<21<q<2 for the isotropic state.
We explore optical quantum engineering of phase-parameterized continuous-variable (CV) probe states to exploit nonclassical light to solve the problem of precise phase estimation. The optical interferometer consists of a single beam splitter (BS) with tunable transmittance and reflectance, and two single-mode squeezed vacuum states (SMSVs). The reference SMSV state is mixed with a weakly squeezed state carrying an unknown phase at the beam splitter to form an output hybrid entangled state. Then, in the measurement mode, the number of photons is measured to generate the target CV state parameterized by the unknown phase. Using the CV states, we propose a sub-Heisenberg metrology protocol in which the quantum Cramer-Rao (QCR) boundary is saturated by intensity measurement. The advantage of quantum engineering of CV probe states for ultra-precise phase estimation of unknown phase is due solely to the nonclassical photonic properties of the measurement induced CV states of definite parity and is independent of the mode entanglement.
Abstract It is well known that any well-defined bipartite entanglement measure E\mathcal {E}E E obeys γ\gamma γ γ th-monogamy relations Eq. (1.1) and assisted measure Ea\mathcal {E}_{a}Ea​ E a obeys δ\delta δ δ th-polygamy relations Eq. (1.2). Recently, we presented a class of tighter parameterized monogamy relation for the α\alpha α α th (α≥γ)(\alpha \ge \gamma )(α≥γ) ( α ≥ γ ) power based on Eq. 1.1. This study provides a family of tighter lower (resp. upper) bounds of the monogamy (resp. polygamy) relations in a unified manner. In the first part of the paper, the following three basic problems are focused: tighter monogamy relation for the α\alpha α α th ( 0≤α≤γ0\le \alpha \le \gamma 0≤α≤γ 0 ≤ α ≤ γ ) power of any bipartite entanglement measure E\mathcal {E}E E based on Eq. (1.1); tighter polygamy relation for the β\beta β β th ( β≥δ \beta \ge \delta β≥δ β ≥ δ ) power of any bipartite assisted entanglement measure Ea\mathcal {E}_{a}Ea​ E a based on Eq. (1.2); tighter polygamy relation for the ω\omega ω ω th ( 0≤ω≤δ0\le \omega \le \delta 0≤ω≤δ 0 ≤ ω ≤ δ ) power of any bipartite assisted entanglement measure Ea\mathcal {E}_{a}Ea​ E a based on Eq. (1.2). In the second part, using the tighter polygamy relation for the ω\omega ω ω th ( 0≤ω≤20\le \omega \le 20≤ω≤2 0 ≤ ω ≤ 2 ) power of CoA, we obtain good estimates or bounds for the ω\omega ω ω th ( 0≤ω≤20\le \omega \le 20≤ω≤2 0 ≤ ω ≤ 2 ) power of concurrence for any N-qubit pure states ∣ψ⟩AB1⋯BN−1|\psi \rangle _{AB_{1}\cdots B_{N-1}}∣ψ⟩AB1​⋯BN−1​​