Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2205.15339 · Physical review. B./Physical review. B

Incommensurate many-body localization in the presence of long-range hopping and single-particle mobility edge

Ke Huang, DinhDuy Vu, Xiao Li, S. Das Sarma

Published Jan 17, 2023• 16 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

We study many-body localization (MBL) in the quasiperiodic ${t}_{1}\text{\ensuremath{-}}{t}_{2}$ model, focusing on the role of next-nearest-neighbor (NNN) hopping ${t}_{2}$, which introduces a single-particle mobility edge. The calculated phase diagram can be divided into three distinct regimes, depending on the strength of the short-range interaction $U$. For weak interactions ($U\ensuremath{\ll}{t}_{1}$), this model is always nonthermal. For intermediate interactions ($U\ensuremath{\sim}{t}_{1}$), the thermal-MBL phase transition in this model is qualitatively the same as that of the Aubry-Andre (AA) model, which is consistent with existing experimental observations. For strong interactions $(U\ensuremath{\gg}{t}_{1})$, the NNN hopping produces qualitatively new physics because it breaks down the Hilbert space fragmentation present in the AA model. The NNN hopping is thus irrelevant when the interaction is intermediate but relevant for strong interactions.

DOI
10.1103/physrevb.107.035129

Related papers

Fermionic Many-Body Localization for Random and Quasiperiodic Systems in the Presence of Short- and Long-Range Interactions

DinhDuy Vu, Ke Huang, Xiao Li +1 more

We study many-body localization (MBL) for interacting one-dimensional lattice fermions in random (Anderson) and quasiperiodic (Aubry-Andre) models, focusing on the role of interaction range. We obtain the MBL quantum phase diagrams by calculating the experimentally relevant inverse participation ratio (IPR) at half-filling using exact diagonalization methods and extrapolating to the infinite system size. For short-range interactions, our results produce in the phase diagram a qualitative symmetry between weak and strong interaction limits. For long-range interactions, no such symmetry exists as the strongly interacting system is always many-body localized, independent of the effective disorder strength, and the system is analogous to a pinned Wigner crystal. We obtain various scaling exponents for the IPR, suggesting conditions for different MBL regimes arising from interaction effects.

arXiv:2109.04489•Physical Review Letters•Apr 6, 2022•48 citations

Observation of Many-Body Localization in a One-Dimensional System with a Single-Particle Mobility Edge

Thomas Kohlert, Sebastian Scherg, Xiao Li +4 more

We experimentally study many-body localization (MBL) with ultracold atoms in a weak one-dimensional quasiperiodic potential, which in the noninteracting limit exhibits an intermediate phase that is characterized by a mobility edge. We measure the time evolution of an initial charge density wave after a quench and analyze the corresponding relaxation exponents. We find clear signatures of MBL when the corresponding noninteracting model is deep in the localized phase. We also critically compare and contrast our results with those from a tight-binding Aubry-André model, which does not exhibit a single-particle intermediate phase, in order to identify signatures of a potential many-body intermediate phase.

arXiv:1809.04055•Physical Review Letters•May 3, 2019•239 citations

Criterion for the occurrence of many-body localization in the presence of a single-particle mobility edge

Ranjan Modak, Soumi Ghosh, Subroto Mukerjee

Noninteracting fermions in one dimension can undergo a localization-delocalization transition in the presence of a quasiperiodic potential as a function of that potential. In the presence of interactions, this transition transforms into a many-body localization (MBL) transition. Recent studies have suggested that this type of transition can also occur in models with quasiperiodic potentials that possess single-particle mobility edges. Two such models were studied by Modak and Mukerjee [Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 230401 (2015)] but only one was found to exhibit an MBL transition in the presence of interactions while the other one did not. In this work we investigate the occurrence of MBL in the presence of weak interactions in five different models with single-particle mobility edges in one dimension with a view to obtaining a criterion for the same. We find that not all such models undergo a thermal-MBL phase transition in the presence of weak interactions. We propose a criterion to determine whether MBL is likely to occur in the presence of interaction based only on the properties of the noninteracting models. The relevant quantity $\ensuremath{\epsilon}$ is a measure of how localized the localized states are relative to how delocalized the delocalized states are in the noninteracting model. We also study various other features of the noninteracting models such as the divergence of the localization length at the mobility edge and the presence or absence of ``ergodicity'' and localization in their many-body eigenstates. However, we find that these features cannot be used to predict the occurrence of MBL upon the introduction of weak interactions.

arXiv:1602.02067•Physical review. B./Physical review. B•Mar 19, 2018•26 citations

Many-body localization in incommensurate models with a mobility edge

Dong‐Ling Deng, Sriram Ganeshan, Xiaopeng Li +3 more

We review the physics of many-body localization in models with incommensurate potentials. In particular, we consider one-dimensional quasiperiodic models with single-particle mobility edges. A conventional perspective suggests that delocalized states act as a thermalizing bath for the localized states in the presence of of interactions. However, contrary to this intuition there is evidence that such systems can display non-ergodicity. This is in part due to the fact that the delocalized states do not have any kind of protection due to symmetry or topology and are thus susceptible to localization. A study of such incommensurate models, in the non-interacting limit, shows that they admit extended, partially extended, and fully localized many-body states. Non-interacting incommensurate models cannot thermalize dynamically and remain localized upon the introduction of interactions. In particular, for a certain range of energy, the system can host a non-ergodic extended (i.e. metallic) phase in which the energy eigenstates violate the eigenstate thermalization hypothesis (ETH) but the entanglement entropy obeys volume-law scaling. The level statistics and entanglement growth also indicate the lack of ergodicity in these models. The phenomenon of localization and non-ergodicity in a system with interactions despite the presence of single-particle delocalized states is closely related to the so-called many-body proximity effect and can also be observed in models with disorder coupled to systems with delocalized degrees of freedom. Many-body localization in systems with incommensurate potentials (without single-particle mobility edges) have been realized experimentally, and we show how this can be modified to study the the effects of such mobility edges. Demonstrating the failure of thermalization in the presence of a single-particle mobility edge in the thermodynamic limit would indicate a more robust violation of the ETH.

•Jan 1, 2017•21 citations

Many-Body Localization in the Presence of a Single-Particle Mobility Edge

Ranjan Modak, Subroto Mukerjee

In one dimension, noninteracting particles can undergo a localization-delocalization transition in a quasiperiodic potential. Recent studies have suggested that this transition transforms into a many-body localization (MBL) transition upon the introduction of interactions. It has also been shown that mobility edges can appear in the single particle spectrum for certain types of quasiperiodic potentials. Here, we investigate the effect of interactions in two models with such mobility edges. Employing the technique of exact diagonalization for finite-sized systems, we calculate the level spacing distribution, time evolution of entanglement entropy, optical conductivity, and return probability to detect MBL. We find that MBL does indeed occur in one of the two models we study, but the entanglement appears to grow faster than logarithmically with time unlike in other MBL systems.

arXiv:1503.07620•Physical Review Letters•Dec 2, 2015•127 citations

Many-Body Localization and Quantum Nonergodicity in a Model with a Single-Particle Mobility Edge

Xiaopeng Li, Sriram Ganeshan, J. H. Pixley +1 more

We investigate many-body localization in the presence of a single-particle mobility edge. By considering an interacting deterministic model with an incommensurate potential in one dimension we find that the single-particle mobility edge in the noninteracting system leads to a many-body mobility edge in the corresponding interacting system for certain parameter regimes. Using exact diagonalization, we probe the mobility edge via energy resolved entanglement entropy (EE) and study the energy resolved applicability (or failure) of the eigenstate thermalization hypothesis (ETH). Our numerical results indicate that the transition separating area and volume law scaling of the EE does not coincide with the nonthermal to thermal transition. Consequently, there exists an extended nonergodic phase for an intermediate energy window where the many-body eigenstates violate the ETH while manifesting volume law EE scaling. We also establish that the model possesses an infinite temperature many-body localization transition despite the existence of a single-particle mobility edge. We propose a practical scheme to test our predictions in atomic optical lattice experiments which can directly probe the effects of the mobility edge.

arXiv:1504.00016•Physical Review Letters•Oct 28, 2015•169 citations
We study many-body localization (MBL) in the quasiperiodic t1\ensuremath-t2{t}_{1}\text{\ensuremath{-}}{t}_{2}t1​\ensuremath-t2​ model, focusing on the role of next-nearest-neighbor (NNN) hopping t2{t}_{2}t2​, which introduces a single-particle mobility edge. The calculated phase diagram can be divided into three distinct regimes, depending on the strength of the short-range interaction UUU. For weak interactions (U\ensuremath≪t1U\ensuremath{\ll}{t}_{1}U\ensuremath≪t1​), this model is always nonthermal. For intermediate interactions (U\ensuremath∼t1U\ensuremath{\sim}{t}_{1}U\ensuremath∼t1​), the thermal-MBL phase transition in this model is qualitatively the same as that of the Aubry-Andre (AA) model, which is consistent with existing experimental observations. For strong interactions (U\ensuremath≫t1)(U\ensuremath{\gg}{t}_{1})(U\ensuremath≫t1​), the NNN hopping produces qualitatively new physics because it breaks down the Hilbert space fragmentation present in the AA model. The NNN hopping is thus irrelevant when the interaction is intermediate but relevant for strong interactions.
We study many-body localization (MBL) for interacting one-dimensional lattice fermions in random (Anderson) and quasiperiodic (Aubry-Andre) models, focusing on the role of interaction range. We obtain the MBL quantum phase diagrams by calculating the experimentally relevant inverse participation ratio (IPR) at half-filling using exact diagonalization methods and extrapolating to the infinite system size. For short-range interactions, our results produce in the phase diagram a qualitative symmetry between weak and strong interaction limits. For long-range interactions, no such symmetry exists as the strongly interacting system is always many-body localized, independent of the effective disorder strength, and the system is analogous to a pinned Wigner crystal. We obtain various scaling exponents for the IPR, suggesting conditions for different MBL regimes arising from interaction effects.
We experimentally study many-body localization (MBL) with ultracold atoms in a weak one-dimensional quasiperiodic potential, which in the noninteracting limit exhibits an intermediate phase that is characterized by a mobility edge. We measure the time evolution of an initial charge density wave after a quench and analyze the corresponding relaxation exponents. We find clear signatures of MBL when the corresponding noninteracting model is deep in the localized phase. We also critically compare and contrast our results with those from a tight-binding Aubry-André model, which does not exhibit a single-particle intermediate phase, in order to identify signatures of a potential many-body intermediate phase.
Noninteracting fermions in one dimension can undergo a localization-delocalization transition in the presence of a quasiperiodic potential as a function of that potential. In the presence of interactions, this transition transforms into a many-body localization (MBL) transition. Recent studies have suggested that this type of transition can also occur in models with quasiperiodic potentials that possess single-particle mobility edges. Two such models were studied by Modak and Mukerjee [Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 230401 (2015)] but only one was found to exhibit an MBL transition in the presence of interactions while the other one did not. In this work we investigate the occurrence of MBL in the presence of weak interactions in five different models with single-particle mobility edges in one dimension with a view to obtaining a criterion for the same. We find that not all such models undergo a thermal-MBL phase transition in the presence of weak interactions. We propose a criterion to determine whether MBL is likely to occur in the presence of interaction based only on the properties of the noninteracting models. The relevant quantity $\ensuremath{\epsilon}$ is a measure of how localized the localized states are relative to how delocalized the delocalized states are in the noninteracting model. We also study various other features of the noninteracting models such as the divergence of the localization length at the mobility edge and the presence or absence of ``ergodicity'' and localization in their many-body eigenstates. However, we find that these features cannot be used to predict the occurrence of MBL upon the introduction of weak interactions.
We review the physics of many-body localization in models with incommensurate potentials. In particular, we consider one-dimensional quasiperiodic models with single-particle mobility edges. A conventional perspective suggests that delocalized states act as a thermalizing bath for the localized states in the presence of of interactions. However, contrary to this intuition there is evidence that such systems can display non-ergodicity. This is in part due to the fact that the delocalized states do not have any kind of protection due to symmetry or topology and are thus susceptible to localization. A study of such incommensurate models, in the non-interacting limit, shows that they admit extended, partially extended, and fully localized many-body states. Non-interacting incommensurate models cannot thermalize dynamically and remain localized upon the introduction of interactions. In particular, for a certain range of energy, the system can host a non-ergodic extended (i.e. metallic) phase in which the energy eigenstates violate the eigenstate thermalization hypothesis (ETH) but the entanglement entropy obeys volume-law scaling. The level statistics and entanglement growth also indicate the lack of ergodicity in these models. The phenomenon of localization and non-ergodicity in a system with interactions despite the presence of single-particle delocalized states is closely related to the so-called many-body proximity effect and can also be observed in models with disorder coupled to systems with delocalized degrees of freedom. Many-body localization in systems with incommensurate potentials (without single-particle mobility edges) have been realized experimentally, and we show how this can be modified to study the the effects of such mobility edges. Demonstrating the failure of thermalization in the presence of a single-particle mobility edge in the thermodynamic limit would indicate a more robust violation of the ETH.
In one dimension, noninteracting particles can undergo a localization-delocalization transition in a quasiperiodic potential. Recent studies have suggested that this transition transforms into a many-body localization (MBL) transition upon the introduction of interactions. It has also been shown that mobility edges can appear in the single particle spectrum for certain types of quasiperiodic potentials. Here, we investigate the effect of interactions in two models with such mobility edges. Employing the technique of exact diagonalization for finite-sized systems, we calculate the level spacing distribution, time evolution of entanglement entropy, optical conductivity, and return probability to detect MBL. We find that MBL does indeed occur in one of the two models we study, but the entanglement appears to grow faster than logarithmically with time unlike in other MBL systems.
We investigate many-body localization in the presence of a single-particle mobility edge. By considering an interacting deterministic model with an incommensurate potential in one dimension we find that the single-particle mobility edge in the noninteracting system leads to a many-body mobility edge in the corresponding interacting system for certain parameter regimes. Using exact diagonalization, we probe the mobility edge via energy resolved entanglement entropy (EE) and study the energy resolved applicability (or failure) of the eigenstate thermalization hypothesis (ETH). Our numerical results indicate that the transition separating area and volume law scaling of the EE does not coincide with the nonthermal to thermal transition. Consequently, there exists an extended nonergodic phase for an intermediate energy window where the many-body eigenstates violate the ETH while manifesting volume law EE scaling. We also establish that the model possesses an infinite temperature many-body localization transition despite the existence of a single-particle mobility edge. We propose a practical scheme to test our predictions in atomic optical lattice experiments which can directly probe the effects of the mobility edge.