While Bell nonlocality can be explained through mechanisms such as retrocausality and superluminal influences, it is not clear why such mechanisms do not manifest at an everyday macroscopic level. In this paper, we show how measurement and nonlocality can be explained consistently with macroscopic realism and no-signaling, and causal relations for macroscopic quantities. Considering the measurement of a field amplitude x ̂ , we derive theorems that lead to an equivalence between a quantum phase-space probability distribution Q ( x , p , t ) and stochastic trajectories for real amplitudes x ( t ) and p ( t ) propagating backward and forward in time, respectively. We present forward-backward stochastic simulations that motivate a Q -based objective-field model of reality. Amplification plays a key role in the measurement. With amplification, similar to decoherence, contributions due to interference become unobservable, leading to “branches” in x that correspond to distinct eigenvalues λ . This elucidates how the system evolves from a superposition to an eigenstate, from which Born's rule follows. For superposition states, we find that the backward and forward trajectories are connected, leading to “hidden loops.” We deduce a hybrid causal structure involving causal deterministic relations for amplified variables, along with microscopic noise inputs and hidden loops for unobservable quantities. Causal consistency is confirmed, removing grandfather-type paradoxes. The simulations allow evaluation of a state inferred for the system, conditioned on a particular branch λ , from which we deduce a model for projection and the collapse of the wave function. The theory is extended to Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen correlations and Bell nonlocality. We demonstrate consistency with three weak local realistic premises: (1) the existence of real properties (defined for the system after operations that fix measurement settings); (2) a partial locality implying no-signaling; (3) “elements of reality” that apply to the predictions of a system by a meter, once meter settings are fixed. A Q -based hidden variable model and mechanism for Bell nonlocality is identified. Our work shows how forward-backward stochastic simulations lead to a hybrid causal structure, involving both deterministic causal relations and “hidden” stochastic loops, explaining measurement and entanglement, with paradoxes typically associated with retrocausality avoided.
We analyze quantum measurement and entanglement by solving the dynamics of stochastic amplitudes that propagate both forward and backward in time. The model allows simulation of Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen and Bell correlations, and reveals consistency with a weak form of local realism defined after the unitary interactions determining the measurement settings. Bell violations emerge due to a breakdown of a subset of Bell's local-realism conditions. Our results elucidate how hidden causal loops can explain Bell nonlocality, without requiring retrocausality at a macroscopic level.
In this paper, we examine measurement using the Q-based, objective-field model for quantum mechanics. Schrodinger considered a microscopic system prepared in a superposition of states which is then coupled to a macroscopic meter. We analyze the entangled meter and system, and measurements on it, by solving forward-backward stochastic differential equations for real amplitudes
x(t) and
p(t) that correspond to the phase-space variables of the Q function of the system at a time
t. We model the system and meter as single-mode fields, and measurement of
x^ by amplification of the amplitude
x(t). Our conclusion is that the outcome for the measurement is determined at (or by) the time
tm, when the coupling to the meter is complete, the meter states being macroscopically distinguishable. There is consistency with macroscopic realism. By evaluating the distribution of the amplitudes
x and
p postselected on a given outcome of the meter, we show how the
Q-based model represents a more complete description of quantum mechanics: The variances associated with amplitudes
x and
p are too narrow to comply with the uncertainty principle, ruling out that the distribution represents a quantum state. We conclude that the collapse of the wavefunction occurs as a two-stage process: First there is an amplification that creates branches of amplitudes
x(t) of the meter, associated with distinct eigenvalues. The outcome of measurement is determined by
x(t) once amplified, explaining Born's rule. Second, the distribution that determines the final collapse is the state inferred for the system conditioned on the outcome of the meter: information is lost about the meter, in particular, about the complementary variable
p.
The Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen (EPR) paradox gives an argument for the incompleteness of quantum mechanics based on a plausible criterion for reality, as well as the assumption of locality. A general view is that the argument is compromised, because EPR's premises are falsified by Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger (GHZ) and Bell experiments. In this paper, we present an EPR argument based on premises not falsified by these experiments. First, we consider macroscopic EPR-Bohm, Bell, and GHZ experiments using spins ${\stackrel{\ifmmode \hat{}\else \^{}\fi{}}{S}}_{\ensuremath{\theta}}$ defined by two macroscopically distinct states. The analyzers that realize the unitary operations ${U}_{\ensuremath{\theta}}$ determining the measurement settings $\ensuremath{\theta}$ are nonlinear devices creating macroscopic superposition states. We note two definitions of macroscopic realism (MR). For a system with two macroscopically distinct states available to it, MR posits a predetermined outcome for the measurement ${\stackrel{\ifmmode \hat{}\else \^{}\fi{}}{S}}_{\ensuremath{\theta}}$ distinguishing between the states. Deterministic macroscopic realism assumes MR for the system defined prior to the interaction ${U}_{\ensuremath{\theta}}$ being carried out but is falsifiable by the macroscopic Bell and GHZ proposals. Motivated by arguments to uphold MR (without resorting to decoherence), as well as no-signaling and the properties of a meter, we define a set of premises referred to as weak macroscopic realism (wMR). Weak macroscopic realism (wMR) posits MR for the system after ${U}_{\ensuremath{\theta}}$, at the time
tf---when the system is prepared with respect to the measurement basis, ready for a ``pointer'' measurement and readout. For this system, wMR posits that the outcome of ${\stackrel{\ifmmode \hat{}\else \^{}\fi{}}{S}}_{\ensuremath{\theta}}$ is determined and not changed by interactions that might subsequently occur at a remote system
B. The premise wMR also posits a weaker version of EPR's criterion for reality. Importantly, we show that the GHZ and Bell predictions are consistent with wMR. Yet, an EPR paradox arises for a macroscopic EPR-Bohm state, based on wMR. As considered by Schr\"odinger, it is possible to measure two complementary spins of system
A simultaneously, ``one by direct, the other by indirect measurement'': If we assume wMR, then once both settings are fixed, the outcomes of the two spins are both determined. We revisit the original EPR paradox and find a similar result: An EPR argument can be based on a set of premises, weak local realism, which we show are not falsifiable by GHZ or Bell experiments.
This thesis investigates a novel proposal for quantum reality and measurement, based on phase-space representations and forward-backward stochastic differential equations, that is consistent with macroscopic realism: a Q-based objective-field model for quantum mechanics. We study the model through macroscopic quantum paradoxes, quantum measurement, and continuous-variable Bell tests. We investigate techniques for enhancing the coherence of two-mode cat states and analyze macroscopic versions of Wigner’s friend and the three-box paradox. The measurement problem is examined through the dynamics of the Q function, providing an account of wave-function collapse. This work contributes to understanding quantum reality and measurement and provides a foundation for developing quantum technologies.
Eighty years ago Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen demonstrated that instantaneous reduction of wave function, believed to describe completely a pair of entangled physical systems, led to EPR paradox. The paradox disappears in statistical interpretation of quantum mechanics (QM) according to which a wave function describes only an ensemble of identically prepared physical systems. QM predicts strong correlations between outcomes of measurements performed on different members of EPR pairs in far-away locations. Searching for an intuitive explanation of these correlations John Bell analysed so called local realistic hidden variable models and proved that correlations consistent with these models satisfy Bell inequalities which are violated by some predictions of QM and by experimental data. Several different local models were constructed and inequalities proven. Some eminent physicists concluded that Nature is definitely nonlocal and that it is acting according to a law of nonlocal randomness. According to these law perfectly random, but strongly correlated events, can be produced at the same time in far away locations and a local and causal explanation of their occurrence cannot be given. We strongly disagree with this conclusion and we prove the contrary by analysing in detail some influential finite sample proofs of Bell and CHSH inequalities and so called Quantum Randi Challenges. We also show how one can win so called Bell's game without violating locality of Nature. Nonlocal randomness is inconsistent with local quantum field theory, with standard model in elementary particle physics and with causal laws and adaptive dynamics prevailing in the surrounding us world. The experimental violation of Bell-type inequalities does not prove the nonlocality of Nature but it only confirms a contextual character of quantum observables and gives a strong argument against counterfactual definiteness and against a point of view according to which experimental outcomes are produced in irreducible random way.