The intrinsic probabilistic nature of quantum mechanics invokes endeavors of designing quantum generative learning models (QGLMs). Despite the empirical achievements, the foundations and the potential advantages of QGLMs remain largely obscure. To narrow this knowledge gap, here we explore the generalization property of QGLMs, the capability to extend the model from learned to unknown data. We consider two prototypical QGLMs, quantum circuit Born machines and quantum generative adversarial networks, and explicitly give their generalization bounds. The result identifies superiorities of QGLMs over classical methods when quantum devices can directly access the target distribution and quantum kernels are employed. We further employ these generalization bounds to exhibit potential advantages in quantum state preparation and Hamiltonian learning. Numerical results of QGLMs in loading Gaussian distribution and estimating ground states of parameterized Hamiltonians accord with the theoretical analysis. Our work opens the avenue for quantitatively understanding the power of quantum generative learning models.
The intrinsic probabilistic nature of quantum mechanics invokes endeavors of designing quantum generative learning models (QGLMs). Despite the empirical achievements, the foundations and the potential advantages of QGLMs remain largely obscure. To narrow this knowledge gap, here we explore the generalization property of QGLMs, the capability to extend the model from learned to unknown data. We consider two prototypical QGLMs, quantum circuit Born machines and quantum generative adversarial networks, and explicitly give their generalization bounds. The result identifies superiorities of QGLMs over classical methods when quantum devices can directly access the target distribution and quantum kernels are employed. We further employ these generalization bounds to exhibit potential advantages in quantum state preparation and Hamiltonian learning. Numerical results of QGLMs in loading Gaussian distribution and estimating ground states of parameterized Hamiltonians accord with the theoretical analysis. Our work opens the avenue for quantitatively understanding the power of quantum generative learning models.
Quantum computers are next-generation devices that hold promise to perform calculations beyond the reach of classical computers. A leading method towards achieving this goal is through quantum machine learning, especially quantum generative learning. Due to the intrinsic probabilistic nature of quantum mechanics, it is reasonable to postulate that quantum generative learning models (QGLMs) may surpass their classical counterparts. As such, QGLMs are receiving growing attention from the quantum physics and computer science communities, where various QGLMs that can be efficiently implemented on near-term quantum machines with potential computational advantages are proposed. In this paper, we review the current progress of QGLMs from the perspective of machine learning. Particularly, we interpret these QGLMs, covering quantum circuit Born machines, quantum generative adversarial networks, quantum Boltzmann machines, and quantum variational autoencoders, as the quantum extension of classical generative learning models. In this context, we explore their intrinsic relations and their fundamental differences. We further summarize the potential applications of QGLMs in both conventional machine learning tasks and quantum physics. Last, we discuss the challenges and further research directions for QGLMs.
Abstract In recent proposals of quantum circuit models for generative tasks, the discussion about their performance has been limited to their ability to reproduce a known target distribution. For example, expressive model families such as quantum circuit Born machines (QCBMs) have been almost entirely evaluated on their capability to learn a given target distribution with high accuracy. While this aspect may be ideal for some tasks, it limits the scope of a generative model’s assessment to its ability to memorize data rather than generalize . As a result, there has been little understanding of a model’s generalization performance and the relation between such capability and the resource requirements, e.g. the circuit depth and the amount of training data. In this work, we leverage upon a recently proposed generalization evaluation framework to begin addressing this knowledge gap. We first investigate the QCBM’s learning process of a cardinality-constrained distribution and see an increase in generalization performance while increasing the circuit depth. In the 12-qubit example presented here, we observe that with as few as 30 % of the valid data in the training set, the QCBM exhibits the best generalization performance toward generating unseen and valid data. Lastly, we assess the QCBM’s ability to generalize not only to valid samples, but to high-quality bitstrings distributed according to an adequately re-weighted distribution. We see that the QCBM is able to effectively learn the reweighted dataset and generate unseen samples with higher quality than those in the training set. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first work in the literature that presents the QCBM’s generalization performance as an integral evaluation metric for quantum generative models, and demonstrates the QCBM’s ability to generalize to high-quality, desired novel samples.
The goal of generative machine learning is to model the probability distribution underlying a given data set. This probability distribution helps to characterize the generation process of the data samples. While classical generative machine learning is solely based on classical resources, generative quantum machine learning can also employ quantum resources - such as parameterized quantum channels and quantum operators - to learn and sample from the probability model of interest. Applications of generative (quantum) models are multifaceted. The trained model can generate new samples that are compatible with the given data and extend the data set. Additionally, learning a model for the generation process of a data set may provide interesting information about the corresponding properties. With the help of quantum resources, the respective generative models have access to functions that are difficult to evaluate with a classical computer and may improve the performance or lead to new insights. Furthermore, generative quantum machine learning can be applied to efficient, approximate loading of classical data into a quantum state which may help to avoid - potentially exponentially - expensive, exact quantum data loading. The aim of this doctoral thesis is to develop new generative quantum machine learning algorithms, demonstrate their feasibility, and analyze their performance. Additionally, we outline their potential application to efficient, approximate quantum data loading. More specifically, we introduce a quantum generative adversarial network and a quantum Boltzmann machine implementation, both of which can be realized with parameterized quantum circuits. These algorithms are compatible with first-generation quantum hardware and, thus, enable us to study proof of concept implementations not only with numerical quantum simulations but also real quantum hardware available today.
Quantum mechanics is inherently probabilistic in light of Born's rule. Using quantum circuits as probabilistic generative models for classical data exploits their superior expressibility and efficient direct sampling ability. However, training of quantum circuits can be more challenging compared to classical neural networks due to the lack of an efficient differentiable learning algorithm. We devise an adversarial quantum-classical hybrid training scheme via coupling a quantum circuit generator and a classical neural network discriminator together. After training, the quantum circuit generative model can infer missing data with quadratic speed-up via amplitude amplification. We numerically simulate the learning and inference of generative adversarial quantum circuits using the prototypical bars-and-stripes dataset. Generative adversarial quantum circuits are a fresh approach to machine learning which may enjoy the practically useful quantum advantage of near-term quantum devices.
Quantum generative models harness the probabilistic nature of quantum mechanics to represent and learn complex distributions, offering a novel framework for both classical and quantum data modeling. This chapter introduces foundational architectures such as quantum circuit Born machines, quantum generative adversarial networks, and variational autoencoders, emphasizing their expressivity, training methods, and applications. We explore use cases ranging from anomaly detection to spectral function sampling and discuss key challenges including trainability, noise, and evaluation metrics. The chapter concludes by outlining opportunities for quantum advantage in generative tasks and highlighting emerging strategies for scalable, noise-resilient model training on near-term quantum devices.
Quantum machine learning is at the crossroads of two of the most exciting current areas of research: quantum computing and classical machine learning. Although the field is still in its infancy, the body of literature is already large enough to warrant several review articles [1–3]. This short survey focuses on a selection of significant recent results on the subtopic of quantum neural networks, an area that hopes to build on the enormous impact that classical neural networks have had. In particular, we concentrate on quantum generalizations of popular neural-network concepts such as Boltzmann machines, generative adversarial networks and autoencoders, as well as applications of classical neural networks to quantum information and vice versa. Examples of Boltzmann machines. In a fully connected Boltzmann machine, connections exist between all visible and hidden neurons. In a restricted Boltzmann machine (RBM), there are no connections between neurons of the same type. A deep Boltzmann machine (DBM) consists of adding one or more additional layers of hidden neurons to an RBM, with no connections between neurons in the same layer. The energy-based nature of BMs gives a natural framework for considering quantum generalizations of their behavior. The BM energy function is equivalent to the Hamiltonian of a simple Ising model and one might hope that more general Hamiltonians allowed by quantum mechanics could explain certain data sets better than classically. Amin et al. [4] adopt this approach, and take the so-called transverse field Ising Hamiltonian as the energy function. This increased generality brings certain difficulties, however, as the transverse field term makes training the quantum Boltzmann machine (QBM) non-trivial. Although the general scaling and performance of QBMs is not yet well understood, for certain small-size examples the authors observe that their QBMs can learn data distributions better than classical BMs. Kieferova and Wiebe [5] extend the formalism of Amin et al. and consider more general Hamiltonians that, unlike the transverse Ising model, are not in general believed to be classically efficiently simulatable. Furthermore, they propose new methods for training that allow for parameters corresponding to quantum terms to be learned. Finally, their QBM enables a form of quantum-state tomography that can learn non-classical data, and also generate copies of the reconstructed state. Again, small-scale numerical evidence suggests that their proposals may provide an advantage over classical BMs, although their tendency to overfit data must be investigated further. The practical value of BMs, either classical or quantum, relies in part on the ease with which they are trained. This in turn depends on sampling efficiently from the Boltzmann distribution. Classically this can be done approximately only for the special case of restricted Boltzmann machines (RBM), i.e. where connections are between visible and hidden units, and no connections exist between neurons of the same type. Wiebe et al. [6] propose two quantum algorithms for Boltzmann sampling, based on starting from a state corresponding to the product distribution that is closest to the target Boltzmann distribution. While small-scale numerical studies are encouraging, true bounds on the running time of their algorithms rely on a problem-dependent parameter κ, the scaling of which is hard to estimate. The hope remains though that empirically their algorithms work well in practice, even for multi-layer and fully connected BMs. The expressive power of BMs for compactly representing complicated probability distributions has led to another line of investigation, namely their use for representing quantum many-body wave functions. The authors apply this technique to two prototypical spin models and achieve high accuracy in both ground-state estimation and dynamical evolution, improving on existing state-of-the-art techniques. Their results indicate that RBM states can capture complex many-body correlations in an efficient manner—evidence reinforced by the work of Deng et al. [8], who show that certain topological quantum states in one, two and three dimensions can be represented by RBM states with a number of parameters only linear in the system size. In a subsequent study, however, Gao and Duan [9] prove that although RBM states can indeed represent many highly entangled states, their expressive power is limited in that they cannot represent arbitrary states generated by polynomial-sized quantum circuits, nor those that are the ground states of k-local Hamiltonians with polynomial-sized energy gaps, unless the polynomial hierarchy from computational complexity theory collapses. On the other hand, they show that these two important classes of states can be efficiently represented by a deep Boltzmann machine of three layers. Intriguingly though, another paper by Deng et al. [10] gives an analytic construction of a family of RBM states with a number of parameters linear in the system size that exhibits maximal volume-law entanglement, and that cannot be represented efficiently by either matrix product states (MPS) or tensor-network (TN) states. This shows that the expressive power of even efficiently parametrized RBM states is not limited by entanglement in the same way that other popular compact representations are. This gives the hope that RBM states may prove a valuable tool in understanding entangled quantum systems intractable by traditional methods. Levine et al. [11] establish another connection between the many-body wave function and neural networks, this time in the form of convolutional arithmetic circuits (ConvAC), a variant of the popular convolutional neural networks in widespread use today. By proving a one-to-one equivalence between a ConvAC circuit and TN quantum states, the authors are able to use tools from quantum information theory to analyze the entanglement present in the corresponding TN, and quantify the neural network's ability to model complex correlations between its inputs. This in turn can be used to obtain bounds on the expressivity of a given ConvAC architecture and be of practical use in choosing network parameters tailored to the data. While ConvAC are not widely used in practice, the authors empirically validate that the insights gained can be applied successfully to more common convolutional neural-network designs. Generative adversarial networks (GAN) are machine-learning algorithms in which two players—a generator and a discriminator—compete against each another. The generator's goal is to create and send fake data samples to the discriminator and maximize the probability that the discriminator erroneously believes that the sample comes from some true data distribution. The discriminator attempts to discern real from fake data as best as possible. Under reasonable assumptions the game converges to a point where the discriminator is unable to discriminate with probability greater than 1/2 (i.e. no better than random guessing), and the generator in fact has learned to generate data from the true distribution. Lloyd and Weedbrook [12] consider the natural extension in which one or both of the generator and discriminator are equipped with quantum information processors. When the data to be learned are a quantum state and both parties have quantum processors, the authors show that the unique end point of the adversarial game also coincides with the generator producing a quantum state corresponding to the true data statistics, and the discriminator unable to discern true from false data better than random guessing. They further argue that a different outcome may hold when the true samples are produced by the measurement of some quantum state, and the generator is purely classical. The concept of quantum supremacy is based on the assumption that there exist probability distributions accessible to a quantum computer that no classical computer can efficiently sample from. If the true data correspond to one of these distributions, then no classical generator can efficiently generate fake data reproducing the true statistics and, in principle, the discriminator can successfully discriminate true from fake data. However, whether the discriminator can efficiently find the measurements required to do so is unclear. Quantum-computing techniques have also found applications in autoencoders—neural networks where a larger number of input and output neurons are connected via a smaller number of intermediary latent neurons. The goal is to tune the weights of the network so that a training set of classical bit strings can be approximately recovered after being passed through the autoencoder. Romero et al. [13] consider instead a training set of quantum states, and ask whether a quantum circuit with a similar bottleneck structure can compress and approximately recover the data. The circuits that they consider consist of gates chosen from some set of parametrized unitary operations, and arranged in some fixed order. The parameters are then optimized classically so that the circuit best predicts the training-set labels. The authors demonstrate the validity of this approach by showing that ground states of the Hubbard model and certain molecules can indeed be compressed and recovered by such circuits. However, in general, the performance of such quantum autoencoders will be highly dependent on the kind of programmable circuit on which they are based, and at present there does not seem to be a structured way of determining this. Quantum neural networks are still in their infancy and, while the above works are important steps towards bridging our understanding between classical neural networks and quantum computing, many questions remain unanswered. If the expressivity of Boltzmann machine states is not restricted by entanglement in the same way that MPS and tensor-network states are, what is the best way of understanding their limitations? How can physicists use the correspondence between ConvAC and TN to their advantage in finding efficient, expressive representations of many-body wave functions? Can classical data distributions be learned more efficiently by quantum GAN than classical GAN? Whatever the outcome of these and many other related questions, this promises to be an exciting and active area of research in the years to come.