Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2205.02219 · Quantum

When does a particle arrive?

Simone Roncallo, Krzysztof Sacha, Lorenzo Maccone

Published Mar 30, 2023• 8 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

We compare the proposals that have appeared in the literature to describe a measurement of the time of arrival of a quantum particle at a detector. We show that there are multiple regimes where different proposals give inequivalent, experimentally discriminable, predictions. This analysis paves the way for future experimental tests.
DOI
10.22331/q-2023-03-30-968

Related papers

What Does One Measure When One Measures the Arrival Time of a Quantum Particle?

Nicola Vona, Günter Hinrichs, Detlef Dürr

What is the right statistics for the measurements of arrival times of a quantum particle? Although this question is very old, it is still open. The usual experiments are performed in the far-field regime and this question becomes unimportant, as a semiclassical analysis suffices. Nevertheless, the development in the detector technology will soon allow for near-field investigations; thus, a better understanding of arrival time measurements is needed. Since outcomes of quantum measurements are always described by positive-operator-valued measures (POVMs), various arrival time POVMs have been proposed. On the other hand, many physicists would agree that the arrival time statistics is given by the quantum flux. This urges the question whether a POVM exists, which agrees approximately with the quantum flux values on a reasonable set of wave functions. We answer this question negatively for a very natural set of wave functions, but we remark that the answer is very sensitive to the choice of the set and provide evidence for the existence of a POVM that agrees with the quantum flux on a more restrictive set.

arXiv:1307.4366•Physical Review Letters•Nov 26, 2013•35 citations

Proposal of quantum arrival-time measurement with a Bose-Einstein condensate

Pascal Naidon, Lucas Happ, Denis Boiron

This work shows how a Bose-Einstein condensate of ultracold atoms could be used to address a long-standing question in quantum theory: how much time does it take for a particle to reach a detector? To this end, we propose a realistic experimental setup, whose key idea is not to measure arrival times directly, but the arrival flux on the detector as a function of its position. This novel approach not only solves practical issues with having a detector close to the system, but also results in signals that allow to unambiguously distinguish different theoretical predictions. This proposal raises prospects for resolving the decades-old debate on this fundamental issue.

quant-pharXiv:2606.20278•Jun 19, 2026•0 citations

Quantum Measurements of time

Lorenzo Maccone

We propose a time-of-arrival operator in quantum mechanics by conditioning on a quantum clock. This allows us to bypass the problems that afflict previous proposals, and to obtain a Hermitian time of arrival operator whose probability distribution arises from the Born rule and which has a clear physical interpretation. The same procedure can be employed to measure the “time at which some event happens” for arbitrary events (and not just specifically for the arrival time of a particle).

Quantum Information and Measurement (QIM)•Jan 1, 2019•5 citations

Quantum Measurements of Time

Lorenzo Maccone, Krzysztof Sacha

We propose a time-of-arrival operator in quantum mechanics by conditioning on a quantum clock. This allows us to bypass some of the problems of previous proposals, and to obtain a Hermitian time of arrival operator whose probability distribution arises from the Born rule and which has a clear physical interpretation. The same procedure can be employed to measure the "time at which some event happens" for arbitrary events (and not just specifically for the arrival time of a particle).

arXiv:1810.12869•Physical Review Letters•Mar 16, 2020•57 citations

Detection Time Distribution Predicted Using Absorbing Boundary Conditions and Imaginary Potentials

Alireza Jozani, Roderich Tumulka

There are several inequivalent proposals in the literature for how to compute the probability distribution of the time that a detector registers for the arrival of a quantum particle. For three of these proposals, based on two kinds of absorbing boundary conditions and imaginary potentials, we compute the predicted distribution for an experimental setup involving a single non-relativistic quantum particle with spin 0 or 1/2 in a wave guide along the $z$ axis with the detector waiting downstream. We find that the distribution shows signs of partial reflection of the wave function off of the detector; for a spin-1/2 wave function, it is independent of the initial spin orientation for the parameters tested but does depend, for boundary conditions coupling to the spin, on the width of the wave guide. We also compare our predictions with the competing ones of Das and Dürr [arXiv:1802.07141].

quant-pharXiv:2603.22044•Physical Review Research•Mar 24, 2026•0 citations

The time of arrival in quantum mechanics. 1. Formal considerations

Theoretical Physics

Annals of Physics•Mar 1, 1969•0 citations
What is the right statistics for the measurements of arrival times of a quantum particle? Although this question is very old, it is still open. The usual experiments are performed in the far-field regime and this question becomes unimportant, as a semiclassical analysis suffices. Nevertheless, the development in the detector technology will soon allow for near-field investigations; thus, a better understanding of arrival time measurements is needed. Since outcomes of quantum measurements are always described by positive-operator-valued measures (POVMs), various arrival time POVMs have been proposed. On the other hand, many physicists would agree that the arrival time statistics is given by the quantum flux. This urges the question whether a POVM exists, which agrees approximately with the quantum flux values on a reasonable set of wave functions. We answer this question negatively for a very natural set of wave functions, but we remark that the answer is very sensitive to the choice of the set and provide evidence for the existence of a POVM that agrees with the quantum flux on a more restrictive set.
This work shows how a Bose-Einstein condensate of ultracold atoms could be used to address a long-standing question in quantum theory: how much time does it take for a particle to reach a detector? To this end, we propose a realistic experimental setup, whose key idea is not to measure arrival times directly, but the arrival flux on the detector as a function of its position. This novel approach not only solves practical issues with having a detector close to the system, but also results in signals that allow to unambiguously distinguish different theoretical predictions. This proposal raises prospects for resolving the decades-old debate on this fundamental issue.
There are several inequivalent proposals in the literature for how to compute the probability distribution of the time that a detector registers for the arrival of a quantum particle. For three of these proposals, based on two kinds of absorbing boundary conditions and imaginary potentials, we compute the predicted distribution for an experimental setup involving a single non-relativistic quantum particle with spin 0 or 1/2 in a wave guide along the zzz axis with the detector waiting downstream. We find that the distribution shows signs of partial reflection of the wave function off of the detector; for a spin-1/2 wave function, it is independent of the initial spin orientation for the parameters tested but does depend, for boundary conditions coupling to the spin, on the width of the wave guide. We also compare our predictions with the competing ones of Das and Dürr [arXiv:1802.07141].