Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2205.00118 · IEEE International Conference on Quantum Computing and Engineering (QCE)

Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm with Sparsified Phase Operator

Xiaoyuan Liu, Ruslan Shaydulin, Ilya Safro

Published Sep 1, 2022• 6 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

The Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) is a promising candidate algorithm for demonstrating quantum advantage in optimization using near-term quantum computers. However, QAOA has high requirements on gate fidelity due to the need to encode the objective function in the phase separating operator, requiring a large number of gates that potentially do not match the hardware connectivity. Using the MaxCut problem as the target, we demonstrate numerically that an easier way to implement an alternative phase operator can be used in lieu of the phase operator encoding the objective function, as long as the ground state is the same. We observe that if the ground state energy is not preserved, the approximation ratio obtained by QAOA with such phase separating operator is likely to decrease. Moreover, we show that a better alignment of the low energy subspace of the alternative operator leads to better performance. Leveraging these observations, we propose a sparsification strategy that reduces the resource requirements of QAOA. We also compare our sparsification strategy with some other classical graph sparsification methods, and demonstrate the efficacy of our approach.

DOI
10.1109/qce53715.2022.00032

Related papers

Evaluation of Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm based on the approximation ratio of single samples.

Jason M. Larkin, Matías Jonsson, Daniel Justice +1 more

The Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) is a hybrid quantum-classical algorithm to solve binary-variable optimization problems. Due to its expected robustness to systematic errors and the short circuit depth, it is one of the promising candidates likely to run on near-term quantum devices. We project the performance of QAOA applied to the Max-Cut problem and compare it with some of the best classical alternatives, both for exact or approximate solution. When comparing approximate solvers, their performance is characterized by the computational time taken to achieve a given quality of solution. Since QAOA is based on sampling, we introduce performance metrics based on the probability of observing a sample above a certain quality. In addition, we show that the QAOA performance varies significantly with the graph type. By selecting a suitable optimizer for the variational parameters and reducing the number of function evaluations, QAOA performance improves by up to 2 orders of magnitude compared to previous estimates. Especially for 3-regular random graphs, this setting decreases the performance gap with classical alternatives.

•Jun 8, 2020•6 citations

Quantum approximate optimization algorithm with adaptive bias fields

Yunlong Yu, Chenfeng Cao, Carter Dewey +3 more

The quantum approximate optimization algorithm (QAOA) transforms a simple many-qubit wave function into one that encodes a solution to a difficult classical optimization problem. It does this by optimizing the schedule according to which two unitary operators are alternately applied to the qubits. In this paper, the QAOA is modified by updating the operators themselves to include local fields, using information from the measured wave function at the end of one iteration step to improve the operators at later steps. It is shown by numerical simulation on MaxCut problems that, for a fixed accuracy, this procedure decreases the runtime of QAOA very substantially. This improvement appears to increase with the problem size. Our method requires essentially the same number of quantum gates per optimization step as the standard QAOA, and no additional measurements. This modified algorithm enhances the prospects for quantum advantage for certain optimization problems.

arXiv:2105.11946•Physical Review Research•Jun 27, 2022•33 citations

Quantum approximate optimization algorithm with random and subgraph phase operators

Anthony Wilkie, Igor Gaidai, James Ostrowski +1 more

The quantum approximate optimization algorithm (QAOA) is a promising quantum algorithm that can be used to approximately solve combinatorial optimization problems. The usual QAOA ansatz consists of an alternating application of the cost and mixer Hamiltonians. In this work, we study how using Hamiltonians other than the usual cost Hamiltonian, dubbed custom phase operators, can affect the performance of the QAOA. We derive an expected value formula for the QAOA with custom phase operators at $p=1$ and show numerically that some of these custom phase operators can achieve higher approximation ratios than the original algorithm implementation. Out of all the graphs tested at $p=1$, 0.036% of the random custom phase operators, 75.9% of the subgraph custom phase operators, 95.1% of the triangle-removed custom phase operators, and 93.9% of the maximal degree edge-removed custom phase operators have a higher approximation ratio than the original QAOA implementation. Furthermore, we numerically simulate these phase operators for $p=2$ and $p=3$ levels of QAOA and find that there exist a large number of subgraph, triangle-removed, and maximal degree edge-removed custom phase operators that have a higher approximation ratio than the QAOA at the same depth. These findings open up the question of whether better phase operators can be designed to further improve the performance of the QAOA.

arXiv:2402.18412•Physical Review A•Aug 27, 2024•6 citations

Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm: Performance, Mechanism, and Implementation on Near-Term Devices

Leo Zhou, Sheng-Tao Wang, Soonwon Choi +2 more

The quantum approximate optimization algorithm (QAOA) is a hybrid quantum-classical variational algorithm designed to tackle combinatorial optimization problems.Despite its promise for near-term quantum applications, not much is currently understood about the QAOA's performance beyond its lowestdepth variant.An essential but missing ingredient for understanding and deploying the QAOA is a constructive approach to carry out the outer-loop classical optimization.We provide an in-depth study of the performance of the QAOA on MaxCut problems by developing an efficient parameter-optimization procedure and revealing its ability to exploit nonadiabatic operations.Building on observed patterns in optimal parameters, we propose heuristic strategies for initializing optimizations to find quasioptimal p-level QAOA parameters in O½polyðpÞ time, whereas the standard strategy of random initialization requires 2 OðpÞ optimization runs to achieve similar performance.We then benchmark the QAOA and compare it with quantum annealing, especially on difficult instances where adiabatic quantum annealing fails due to small spectral gaps.The comparison reveals that the QAOA can learn via optimization to utilize nonadiabatic mechanisms to circumvent the challenges associated with vanishing spectral gaps.Finally, we provide a realistic resource analysis on the experimental implementation of the QAOA.When quantum fluctuations in measurements are accounted for, we illustrate that optimization is important only for problem sizes beyond numerical simulations but accessible on near-term devices.We propose a feasible implementation of large MaxCut problems with a few hundred vertices in a system of 2D neutral atoms, reaching the regime to challenge the best classical algorithms.

arXiv:1812.01041•Physical Review X•Jun 24, 2020•932 citations

Scaling quantum approximate optimization on near-term hardware

Phillip C. Lotshaw, Thien Nguyen, Anthony Santana +5 more

The quantum approximate optimization algorithm (QAOA) is an approach for near-term quantum computers to potentially demonstrate computational advantage in solving combinatorial optimization problems. However, the viability of the QAOA depends on how its performance and resource requirements scale with problem size and complexity for realistic hardware implementations. Here, we quantify scaling of the expected resource requirements by synthesizing optimized circuits for hardware architectures with varying levels of connectivity. Assuming noisy gate operations, we estimate the number of measurements needed to sample the output of the idealized QAOA circuit with high probability. We show the number of measurements, and hence total time to solution, grows exponentially in problem size and problem graph degree as well as depth of the QAOA ansatz, gate infidelities, and inverse hardware graph degree. These problems may be alleviated by increasing hardware connectivity or by recently proposed modifications to the QAOA that achieve higher performance with fewer circuit layers.

arXiv:2201.02247•Scientific Reports•Jul 20, 2022•37 citations

Evaluation of QAOA based on the approximation ratio of individual samples

Jason M. Larkin, Matías Jonsson, Daniel Justice +1 more

Abstract The quantum approximate optimization algorithm (QAOA) is a hybrid quantum–classical algorithm to solve binary-variable optimization problems. Due to the short circuit depth and its expected robustness to systematic errors it is a promising candidate likely to run on near-term quantum devices. We simulate the performance of QAOA applied to the Max-Cut problem and compare it with some of the best classical alternatives. When comparing solvers, their performance is characterized by the computational time taken to achieve a given quality of solution. Since QAOA is based on sampling, we utilize performance metrics based on the probability of observing a sample above a certain quality. In addition, we show that the QAOA performance varies significantly with the graph type. In particular for three-regular random graphs, QAOA performance shows improvement by up to two orders of magnitude compared to previous estimates, strongly reducing the performance gap with classical alternatives. This was possible by reducing the number of function evaluations per iteration and optimizing the variational parameters on small graph instances and transferring to large via training. Because QAOA’s performance guarantees are only known for limited applications and contexts, we utilize a framework for the search for quantum advantage which incorporates a large number of problem instances and all three classical solver modalities: exact, approximate, and heuristic.

arXiv:2006.04831•Quantum Science and Technology•Apr 22, 2022•33 citations
The Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) is a promising candidate algorithm for demonstrating quantum advantage in optimization using near-term quantum computers. However, QAOA has high requirements on gate fidelity due to the need to encode the objective function in the phase separating operator, requiring a large number of gates that potentially do not match the hardware connectivity. Using the MaxCut problem as the target, we demonstrate numerically that an easier way to implement an alternative phase operator can be used in lieu of the phase operator encoding the objective function, as long as the ground state is the same. We observe that if the ground state energy is not preserved, the approximation ratio obtained by QAOA with such phase separating operator is likely to decrease. Moreover, we show that a better alignment of the low energy subspace of the alternative operator leads to better performance. Leveraging these observations, we propose a sparsification strategy that reduces the resource requirements of QAOA. We also compare our sparsification strategy with some other classical graph sparsification methods, and demonstrate the efficacy of our approach.
The Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) is a hybrid quantum-classical algorithm to solve binary-variable optimization problems. Due to its expected robustness to systematic errors and the short circuit depth, it is one of the promising candidates likely to run on near-term quantum devices. We project the performance of QAOA applied to the Max-Cut problem and compare it with some of the best classical alternatives, both for exact or approximate solution. When comparing approximate solvers, their performance is characterized by the computational time taken to achieve a given quality of solution. Since QAOA is based on sampling, we introduce performance metrics based on the probability of observing a sample above a certain quality. In addition, we show that the QAOA performance varies significantly with the graph type. By selecting a suitable optimizer for the variational parameters and reducing the number of function evaluations, QAOA performance improves by up to 2 orders of magnitude compared to previous estimates. Especially for 3-regular random graphs, this setting decreases the performance gap with classical alternatives.
The quantum approximate optimization algorithm (QAOA) transforms a simple many-qubit wave function into one that encodes a solution to a difficult classical optimization problem. It does this by optimizing the schedule according to which two unitary operators are alternately applied to the qubits. In this paper, the QAOA is modified by updating the operators themselves to include local fields, using information from the measured wave function at the end of one iteration step to improve the operators at later steps. It is shown by numerical simulation on MaxCut problems that, for a fixed accuracy, this procedure decreases the runtime of QAOA very substantially. This improvement appears to increase with the problem size. Our method requires essentially the same number of quantum gates per optimization step as the standard QAOA, and no additional measurements. This modified algorithm enhances the prospects for quantum advantage for certain optimization problems.
The quantum approximate optimization algorithm (QAOA) is a promising quantum algorithm that can be used to approximately solve combinatorial optimization problems. The usual QAOA ansatz consists of an alternating application of the cost and mixer Hamiltonians. In this work, we study how using Hamiltonians other than the usual cost Hamiltonian, dubbed custom phase operators, can affect the performance of the QAOA. We derive an expected value formula for the QAOA with custom phase operators at p=1p=1p=1 and show numerically that some of these custom phase operators can achieve higher approximation ratios than the original algorithm implementation. Out of all the graphs tested at p=1p=1p=1, 0.036% of the random custom phase operators, 75.9% of the subgraph custom phase operators, 95.1% of the triangle-removed custom phase operators, and 93.9% of the maximal degree edge-removed custom phase operators have a higher approximation ratio than the original QAOA implementation. Furthermore, we numerically simulate these phase operators for p=2p=2p=2 and p=3p=3p=3 levels of QAOA and find that there exist a large number of subgraph, triangle-removed, and maximal degree edge-removed custom phase operators that have a higher approximation ratio than the QAOA at the same depth. These findings open up the question of whether better phase operators can be designed to further improve the performance of the QAOA.
The quantum approximate optimization algorithm (QAOA) is a hybrid quantum-classical variational algorithm designed to tackle combinatorial optimization problems.Despite its promise for near-term quantum applications, not much is currently understood about the QAOA's performance beyond its lowestdepth variant.An essential but missing ingredient for understanding and deploying the QAOA is a constructive approach to carry out the outer-loop classical optimization.We provide an in-depth study of the performance of the QAOA on MaxCut problems by developing an efficient parameter-optimization procedure and revealing its ability to exploit nonadiabatic operations.Building on observed patterns in optimal parameters, we propose heuristic strategies for initializing optimizations to find quasioptimal p-level QAOA parameters in O½polyðpÞ time, whereas the standard strategy of random initialization requires 2 OðpÞ optimization runs to achieve similar performance.We then benchmark the QAOA and compare it with quantum annealing, especially on difficult instances where adiabatic quantum annealing fails due to small spectral gaps.The comparison reveals that the QAOA can learn via optimization to utilize nonadiabatic mechanisms to circumvent the challenges associated with vanishing spectral gaps.Finally, we provide a realistic resource analysis on the experimental implementation of the QAOA.When quantum fluctuations in measurements are accounted for, we illustrate that optimization is important only for problem sizes beyond numerical simulations but accessible on near-term devices.We propose a feasible implementation of large MaxCut problems with a few hundred vertices in a system of 2D neutral atoms, reaching the regime to challenge the best classical algorithms.
The quantum approximate optimization algorithm (QAOA) is an approach for near-term quantum computers to potentially demonstrate computational advantage in solving combinatorial optimization problems. However, the viability of the QAOA depends on how its performance and resource requirements scale with problem size and complexity for realistic hardware implementations. Here, we quantify scaling of the expected resource requirements by synthesizing optimized circuits for hardware architectures with varying levels of connectivity. Assuming noisy gate operations, we estimate the number of measurements needed to sample the output of the idealized QAOA circuit with high probability. We show the number of measurements, and hence total time to solution, grows exponentially in problem size and problem graph degree as well as depth of the QAOA ansatz, gate infidelities, and inverse hardware graph degree. These problems may be alleviated by increasing hardware connectivity or by recently proposed modifications to the QAOA that achieve higher performance with fewer circuit layers.
Abstract The quantum approximate optimization algorithm (QAOA) is a hybrid quantum–classical algorithm to solve binary-variable optimization problems. Due to the short circuit depth and its expected robustness to systematic errors it is a promising candidate likely to run on near-term quantum devices. We simulate the performance of QAOA applied to the Max-Cut problem and compare it with some of the best classical alternatives. When comparing solvers, their performance is characterized by the computational time taken to achieve a given quality of solution. Since QAOA is based on sampling, we utilize performance metrics based on the probability of observing a sample above a certain quality. In addition, we show that the QAOA performance varies significantly with the graph type. In particular for three-regular random graphs, QAOA performance shows improvement by up to two orders of magnitude compared to previous estimates, strongly reducing the performance gap with classical alternatives. This was possible by reducing the number of function evaluations per iteration and optimizing the variational parameters on small graph instances and transferring to large via training. Because QAOA’s performance guarantees are only known for limited applications and contexts, we utilize a framework for the search for quantum advantage which incorporates a large number of problem instances and all three classical solver modalities: exact, approximate, and heuristic.