arXiv:2204.07881

A Family of Neyman-Pearson-Based Detectors for Noise-Type Radars

David Luong, Bhashyam Balaji, Sreeraman Rajan

Published Apr 16, 2022• 2 citations

Abstract

We derive a detector that optimizes the target detection performance of any single-input single-output noise radar satisfying the following properties: it transmits Gaussian noise, it retains an internal reference signal for matched filtering, all external noise is additive white Gaussian noise, and all signals are measured using heterodyne receivers. This class of radars, which we call noise-type radars, includes not only many types of standard noise radars, but also a type of quantum radar known as quantum two-mode squeezing radar. The detector, which we derive using the Neyman-Pearson lemma, is not practical because it requires foreknowledge of a target-dependent correlation coefficient that cannot be known beforehand. (It is, however, a natural standard of comparison for other detectors.) This motivates us to study the family of Neyman-Pearson-based detectors that result when the correlation coefficient is treated as a parameter. We derive the probability distribution of the Neyman-Pearson-based detectors when there is a mismatch between the pre-chosen parameter value and the true correlation coefficient. We then use this result to generate receiver operating characteristic curves. Finally, we apply our results to the case where the correlation coefficient is small. It turns out that the resulting detector is not only a good one, but that it has appeared previously in the quantum radar literature.

DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2204.07881

Related papers

Quantum Two-Mode Squeezing Radar and Noise Radar: Correlation Coefficients for Target Detection

David Luong, Sreeraman Rajan, Bhashyam Balaji

Quantum two-mode squeezing (QTMS) radars and noise radars detect targets by correlating the received signal with an internally stored recording. A covariance matrix can be calculated between the two which, in theory, is a function of a single correlation coefficient. This coefficient can be used to decide whether a target is present or absent. We can estimate the correlation coefficient by minimizing the Frobenius norm between the sample covariance matrix and the theoretically expected form of the matrix. Using simulated data, we show that the estimates follow a Rice distribution whose parameters are simple functions of the underlying, “true” correlation coefficient as well as the number of integrated samples. We obtain an explicit expression for the receiver operating characteristic curve that results when the correlation coefficient is used for target detection. This is an important first step toward performance prediction for QTMS radars.

arXiv:1911.09062IEEE Sensors JournalFeb 5, 202036 citations

Noise-Type Radars: Probability of Detection vs. Correlation Coefficient and Integration Time

David Luong, Bhashyam Balaji, Sreeraman Rajan

Noise radars have the same mathematical description as a type of quantum radar known as quantum two-mode squeezing radar. Although their physical implementations are very different, this mathematical similarity allows us to analyze them collectively. We may consider the two types of radars as forming a single class of radars, called noise-type radars. The target detection performance of noise-type radars depends on two parameters: the number of integrated samples and a correlation coefficient. In this paper, we show that when the number of integrated samples is large and the correlation coefficient is low, the detection performance becomes a function of a single parameter: the number of integrated samples multiplied by the square of the correlation coefficient. We then explore the detection performance of noise-type radars in terms of this emergent parameter; in particular, we determine the probability of detection as a function of this parameter.

arXiv:2208.03417Aug 6, 20223 citations

When Should We Use Likelihood Ratio Target Detection with QTMS Radar and Noise Radar?

David Luong, Bhashyam Balaji, Sreeraman Rajan

We analyze the potential application of a generalized likelihood ratio (GLR)-based detector function to quantum two-mode squeezing (QTMS) radars and standard noise radars. We give an expression for the likelihood ratio (LR) in terms of the maximum-likelihood estimate of the correlation coefficient between the received and reference signals of the radar. Interestingly, we found that a previously-studied detector function outperforms the GLR detector, though not in all parameter regimes. This runs counter to the intuition, based on the Neyman-Pearson lemma, that the LR test is optimal. We discuss why the lemma does not hold in this particular case and why the search for detector functions for QTMS radars and noise radars remains open. However, the GLR detector is a good choice when the correlation coefficient is high, the number of integrated samples is low, and appropriate computational resources are available.

IEEE Radar Conference (RadarConf)May 7, 20215 citations

Noise-Type Radars With Gaussian Statistics: SNR and the Correlation Coefficient

David Luong, Ian W. K. Lam, Sreeraman Rajan

Noise radars have the same mathematical description as a type of quantum radar known asquantum two-mode squeezing radar. Although their physical implementations are very different, this mathematical similarity allows us to analyze them collectively, for which reason we call themnoise-type radars. The target detection performance of noise-type radars depend crucially on a parameter called the “correlation coefficient”. In this paper, we show that the correlation coefficient reduces to the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) in certain limiting cases when the SNR is appropriately defined. This allows us to translate between the correlation coefficient, which is the more fundamental parameter in the theory of noise-type radars, and the SNR, which is more familiar to engineers. To illustrate the ideas in this paper, we present experimental results from a laboratory-based noise radar.

IEEE Transactions on Radar SystemsJan 1, 20250 citations

Estimating Correlation Coefficients for Quantum Radar and Noise Radar: A Simulation Study

David Luong, Sreeraman Rajan, Bhashyam Balaji

For target detection, quantum two-mode squeezing (QTMS) radars and noise radars require estimation of a covariance matrix. A scalar function of the covariance matrix is then used for deciding the presence or absence of a target. In this paper, estimation of the covariance matrix is carried out by minimizing the Frobenius norm between the sample covariance matrix and the theoretically expected form of the matrix. Two scalars, a normalized correlation coefficient and an unnormalized cross-correlation, are used for detecting the target. Their performances are compared and found to be the same. Probability distributions are then fit to the histograms of these estimated correlations. Using these fitted distributions, expressions are obtained for receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves that predict the performance of these functions in the task of deciding whether a target is present or not. This work is a first step toward understanding and modeling target detection performance of a QTMS radar or noise radar when using correlation-related measures as detector functions.

IEEE Global Conference on Signal and Information ProcessingNov 1, 20198 citations

Quantum Radar Signal Processing

David Luong

Quantum radars use phenomena from quantum physics, such as quantum entanglement, to enhance detection performance compared with classical radars.This thesis presents an end-to-end analysis of an entanglement-based radar called quantum two-mode squeezing radar (QTMS radar).This type of radar is of particular interest because a QTMS radar experiment has actually been performed, and because QTMS radars are closely related to a type of classical radar known as noise radar (NR).As part of the analysis, we develop a mathematical theory of QTMS radars and show that QTMS radars and NRs can be united under a single probabilistic model.We then show how their signals are to be processed to determine the presence or absence of a target, and undertake an extensive analysis of the target detection performance of QTMS radars and NRs.These theoretical results are verified using data drawn from a QTMS radar experiment and a laboratory NR.One important conclusion, supported by both theory and experiment, is that the receiver operating characteristic curve for a QTMS radar is better than that of an NR with the same signal powers.Throughout the thesis, we emphasize the need to establish common ground between quantum physics and radar engineering, and it is hoped that the unified theory of QTMS radar and NR presented here will play a role in this. List of TablesCommon sense imagines that when it sees a table it sees a table.This is a gross delusion.Bertrand Russell The ABC of Relativity 2.1 A taxonomy of quantum sensors 11 5.1 System parameters for Wilson's QTMS radar experiment 104 6.1 QTMS radar variables and parameters 127 6.2 Rice distribution parameters fitted to simulated values of ρ ˆ145 6.3 Parameter estimates for Wilson et al.'s QTMS radar prototype 151 6.4 TVD between theoretical and experimental PDFs for the QTMS radar 152 6.5 Transmit powers and parameter values for the experimental NR 153 6.6 TVD between theoretical and experimental PDFs for the NR 156 7.1 Parameter values for the ROC curve plots 196 8.1 Correlation coefficient vs. transmit power: fit parameters 210 8.2 Correlation coefficient vs. range: fit parameters 218 8.3 Noise radar system parameters used in Example 8.10 232 8.4 QTMS radar system parameters used in Example 8.11 233 B.1 Relationships between probability distributions 281 xvi List of Figures As the Chinese say, 1001 words is worth more than a picture.John McCarthy 3.1 Time evolution of coherent states 64 3.2 Vacuum noise in a beam splitter 68 4.1 Target detection using a detector and a threshold 77 4.2 Probabilities of detection and false alarm for the envelope detector 78 4.3 ROC curves for the envelope detector 83 4.4 ROC curves for the NP detector (sinusoidal radar) compared with those for the envelope detector 92 5.1 Illustration of the basic QI protocol 95 5.2 Block diagram of Wilson's QTMS radar setup 102 5.3 Horn antennas used in the Wilson experiment 102 5.4 Interior and exterior of the dilution refrigerator 105 5.5 Interior of the can containing the JPA 106 5.6 Simplified diagram of a JPA 108 5.7 JPA mounted on a printed circuit board 109 5.8 Block diagram of the benchmark NR for the Wilson experiment 110 6.1 Correlation number line 135 6.2 Separable, entangled, and forbidden values of ρ as a function of σ 1 135 6.3 PDF of σ ˆ1 141 xvii LIST OF FIGURES xviii 6.4 Exact and approximate PDFs of ρ ˆ143 6.5 TVD between the exact and approximate PDFs of ρ ˆ146 6.6 Concentration parameter vs. Nρ 2 148 6.7 Exact and approximate PDFs of φ ˆ149 6.8 TVD between the exact and approximate PDFs of φ ˆ149 6.9 Theoretical and experimental PDFs for the QTMS radar 151 6.10 Theoretical and experimental PDFs for the experimental NR with transmit power -18.91 dBm 154 6.11 Theoretical and experimental PDFs for the experimental NR with transmit power -9.380 dBm 154 6.12 Theoretical and experimental PDFs for the experimental NR with transmit power 1.955 dBm 155 7.1 PDF of the NP detector (target present) 169 7.2 PDF of the NP detector (target absent) 170 7.3 LIST OF FIGURES xix 8.3 Correlation coefficient vs. range 8.4 ROC curves for the MF detector for various ranges 8.5 Correlation coefficient vs. range for an experimental NR 8.6 ROC curves for all detectors when ρ → 0 and N → ∞ 8.7 ROC curve for the MF detector when ρ → 0 and N → ∞: increasing ρ vs. increasing N 8.8 Probability of detection vs. Nρ 2 when ρ → 0 and N → ∞ 8.9 ROC curves for D MF and ρ ˆwhen ρ is large and N is small 8.10 ROC curves for the Wilson experiment, showing the increase in N required for the benchmark NR to match the QTMS radar 8.11 Maximum range vs. ρ 0 and N when p d = 0.9 and p fa = 10 -6 D.1 Simplified block diagram of the NR setup D.2 Photograph of the NR setup D.3 NR aimed at a wall D.4 Corner reflector used for the experiment in Section 8.2to x 0 in a given situation, without asserting that x = x 0 elsewhere.An index of symbols and abbreviations used in this thesis, together with the page at which each symbol or abbreviation is first defined, is included at page 262.The reader is encouraged to make liberal use of this index.

Jan 1, 20233 citations