Given a dataset of input states, measurements, and probabilities, is it possible to efficiently predict the measurement probabilities associated with a quantum circuit? Recent work of Caro and Datta \cite{2020Caro} studied the problem of PAC learning quantum circuits in an information theoretic sense, leaving open questions of computational efficiency. In particular, one candidate class of circuits for which an efficient learner might have been possible was that of Clifford circuits, since the corresponding set of states generated by such circuits, called stabilizer states, are known to be efficiently PAC learnable \cite{rocchetto2018stabiliser}. Here we provide a negative result, showing that proper learning of CNOT circuits with 1/ poly( n ) error is hard for classical learners unless RP = NP , ruling out the possibility of strong learners under standard complexity theoretic assumptions. As the classical analogue and subset of Clifford circuits, this naturally leads to a hardness result for Clifford circuits as well. Additionally, we show that if RP = NP then there would exist efficient proper learning algorithms for CNOT and Clifford circuits. By similar arguments, we also find that an efficient proper quantum learner for such circuits exists if and only if NP ⊆ RQP . We leave open the problem of hardness for improper learning or O(1) error to future work.
There is currently a large interest in understanding the potential advantages quantum devices can offer for probabilistic modelling. In this work we investigate, within two different oracle models, the probably approximately correct (PAC) learnability of quantum circuit Born machines, i.e., the output distributions of local quantum circuits. We first show a negative result, namely, that the output distributions of super-logarithmic depth Clifford circuits are not sample-efficiently learnable in the statistical query model, i.e., when given query access to empirical expectation values of bounded functions over the sample space. This immediately implies the hardness, for both quantum and classical algorithms, of learning from statistical queries the output distributions of local quantum circuits using any gate set which includes the Clifford group. As many practical generative modelling algorithms use statistical queries -- including those for training quantum circuit Born machines -- our result is broadly applicable and strongly limits the possibility of a meaningful quantum advantage for learning the output distributions of local quantum circuits. As a positive result, we show that in a more powerful oracle model, namely when directly given access to samples, the output distributions of local Clifford circuits are computationally efficiently PAC learnable by a classical learner. Our results are equally applicable to the problems of learning an algorithm for generating samples from the target distribution (generative modelling) and learning an algorithm for evaluating its probabilities (density modelling). They provide the first rigorous insights into the learnability of output distributions of local quantum circuits from the probabilistic modelling perspective.
In this paper, we study the quantum learnability of constant-depth classical circuits under the uniform distribution and in the distribution-independent framework of probably approximately correct (PAC) learning. In order to attain our results, we establish connections between quantum learning and quantum-secure cryptosystems. We then achieve the following results. 1. Hardness of PAC learning
AC0 and
TC0 under the uniform distribution. Our first result concerns the concept class
TC0 (resp.,
AC0), the class of constant-depth, polynomial-sized circuits with unbounded fan-in majority gates (resp.,
AND,OR,NOT gates). We show the following: if there exists no quantum (quasi-)polynomial-time algorithm to solve the ring-learning with errors (
RLWE) problem, then there exists no (quasi-)polynomial-time quantum learning algorithm for
TC0; and if there exists no
2O(d1/η)-time quantum algorithm to solve
RLWE with dimension
d=O(polylogn) (for every constant
η>2), then there exists no
O(nlogνn)-time quantum learning algorithm for
poly(n)-sized
AC0 circuits (for a constant
ν>0), matching the classical upper bound of Linial, Mansour and Nisan [J. ACM, 40 (1993), pp. 607--620], where the learning algorithms are under the uniform distribution (even with access to quantum membership queries). The main technique in these results uses an explicit family of pseudorandom functions that are believed to be quantum-secure to construct concept classes that are hard to learn quantumly under the uniform distribution. 2. Hardness of learning
TC20 in the PAC setting. Our second result shows that if there exists no quantum polynomial-time algorithm for the
LWE problem, then there exists no polynomial-time quantum-PAC learning algorithm for the class
TC20, i.e., depth-2
TC0 circuits. The main technique in this result is to establish a connection between the quantum security of public-key encryption schemes and the learnability of a concept class that consists of decryption functions of the cryptosystem. Our results show that quantum resources do not give an exponential improvement to learning constant-depth polynomial-sized neural networks. This also gives a strong (conditional) negative answer to one of the “Ten Semi-Grand Challenges for Quantum Computing Theory" raised by Aaronson https://www.scottaaronson.com/writings/qchallenge.html, 2005.
A basic question in the PAC model of learning is whether proper learning is harder than improper learning. In the classical case, there are examples of concept classes with VC dimension
d that have sample complexity
Ω(εdlogε1) for proper learning with error
ε, while the complexity for improper learning is O
(εd). One such example arises from the Coupon Collector problem. Motivated by the efficiency of proper versus improper learning with quantum samples, Arunachalam, Belovs, Childs, Kothari, Rosmanis, and de Wolf (TQC 2020) studied an analogue, the Quantum Coupon Collector problem. Curiously, they discovered that for learning size
k subsets of
[n] the problem has sample complexity
Θ(klogmin{k,n−k+1}), in contrast with the complexity of
Θ(klogk) for Coupon Collector. This effectively negates the possibility of a separation between the two modes of learning via the quantum problem, and Arunachalam et al.\ posed the possibility of such a separation as an open question. In this work, we first present an algorithm for the Quantum Coupon Collector problem with sample complexity that matches the sharper lower bound of
(1−ok(1))klnmin{k,n−k+1} shown recently by Bab Hadiashar, Nayak, and Sinha (IEEE TIT 2024), for the entire range of the parameter
k. Next, we devise a variant of the problem, the Quantum Padded Coupon Collector. We prove that its sample complexity matches that of the classical Coupon Collector problem for both modes of learning, thereby exhibiting the same asymptotic separation between proper and improper quantum learning as mentioned above. The techniques we develop in the process can be directly applied to any form of padded quantum data. We hope that padding can more generally lift other forms of classical learning behaviour to the quantum setting.
Clifford circuits - i.e. circuits composed of only CNOT, Hadamard, and pi/4 phase gates - play a central role in the study of quantum computation. However, their computational power is limited: a well-known result of Gottesman and Knill states that Clifford circuits are efficiently classically simulable. We show that in contrast, "conjugated Clifford circuits" (CCCs) - where one additionally conjugates every qubit by the same one-qubit gate U - can perform hard sampling tasks. In particular, we fully classify the computational power of CCCs by showing that essentially any non-Clifford conjugating unitary U can give rise to sampling tasks which cannot be efficiently classically simulated to constant multiplicative error, unless the polynomial hierarchy collapses. Furthermore, by standard techniques, this hardness result can be extended to allow for the more realistic model of constant additive error, under a plausible complexity-theoretic conjecture. This work can be seen as progress towards classifying the computational power of all restricted quantum gate sets.
Optimal circuit synthesis is the problem of finding the shortest-depth circuit representation of a given functionality with respect to a pre-specified elementary gate set. This is a central problem in both quantum and classical hardware design. While the classical version is very well understood -- both in terms of heuristics and rigorous hardness assertions -- much less is known about optimal quantum circuit synthesis.
We focus on optimal Clifford circuit synthesis, for which various heuristics are known, e.g. via reduction to 3-SAT. Our main result supplies a matching hardness result: a variant of optimal Clifford synthesis is NP-hard. The proof proceeds in two parts: (i) reduce 3-edge colorability on 3-regular graphs to a circuit synthesis problem that only involves CZ gates, (ii) prove that the availability of additional elementary Clifford gates -- most notably: Hadamard, phase and CNOT -- cannot lead to further improvements of the optimal circuit depth. Our work sharpens the complexity-theoretic understanding of Clifford circuits: simulation and equivalence checking are in P, whereas deciding whether a Clifford unitary admits an implementation within a prescribed depth is NP-complete.
We consider the problem of learning stabilizer states with noise in the Probably Approximately Correct (PAC) framework of Aaronson (2007) for learning quantum states. In the noiseless setting, an algorithm for this problem was recently given by Rocchetto (2018), but the noisy case was left open. Motivated by approaches to noise tolerance from classical learning theory, we introduce the Statistical Query (SQ) model for PAC-learning quantum states, and prove that algorithms in this model are indeed resilient to common forms of noise, including classification and depolarizing noise. We prove an exponential lower bound on learning stabilizer states in the SQ model. Even outside the SQ model, we prove that learning stabilizer states with noise is in general as hard as Learning Parity with Noise (LPN) using classical examples. Our results position the problem of learning stabilizer states as a natural quantum analogue of the classical problem of learning parities: easy in the noiseless setting, but seemingly intractable even with simple forms of noise.