Machine Learning (ML) techniques are employed to analyze and process big Remote Sensing (RS) data, and one well-known ML technique is a Support Vector Machine (SVM). An SVM is a quadratic programming (QP) problem, and a D-Wave quantum annealer (D-Wave QA) promises to solve this QP problem more efficiently than a conventional computer. However, the D-Wave QA cannot solve directly the SVM due to its very few input qubits. Hence, we use a coreset ("core of a dataset") of given EO data for training an SVM on this small D-Wave QA. The coreset is a small, representative weighted subset of an original dataset, and any training models generate competitive classes by using the coreset in contrast to by using its original dataset. We measured the closeness between an original dataset and its coreset by employing a Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence measure. Moreover, we trained the SVM on the coreset data by using both a D-Wave QA and a conventional method. We conclude that the coreset characterizes the original dataset with very small KL divergence measure. In addition, we present our KL divergence results for demonstrating the closeness between our original data and its coreset. As practical RS data, we use Hyperspectral Image (HSI) of Indian Pine, USA.
Machine Learning (ML) techniques are employed to analyze and process big Remote Sensing (RS) data, and one well-known ML technique is a Support Vector Machine (SVM). An SVM is a quadratic programming (QP) problem, and a D-Wave quantum annealer (D-Wave QA) promises to solve this QP problem more efficiently than a conventional computer. However, the D-Wave QA cannot solve directly the SVM due to its very few input qubits. Hence, we use a coreset ("core of a dataset") of given EO data for training an SVM on this small D-Wave QA. The coreset is a small, representative weighted subset of an original dataset, and any training models generate competitive classes by using the coreset in contrast to by using its original dataset. We measured the closeness between an original dataset and its coreset by employing a Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence measure. Moreover, we trained the SVM on the coreset data by using both a D-Wave QA and a conventional method. We conclude that the coreset characterizes the original dataset with very small KL divergence measure. In addition, we present our KL divergence results for demonstrating the closeness between our original data and its coreset. As practical RS data, we use Hyperspectral Image (HSI) of Indian Pine, USA.
Machine Learning (ML) techniques are employed to analyze and process big Remote Sensing (RS) data, and one well-known ML technique is a Support Vector Machine (SVM). An SVM is a quadratic programming (QP) problem, and a D-Wave quantum annealer (D-Wave QA) promises to solve this QP problem more efficiently than a conventional computer. However, the D-Wave QA cannot solve directly the SVM due to its very few input qubits. Hence, we use a coreset ("core of a dataset") of given EO data for training an SVM on this small D-Wave QA. The coreset is a small, representative weighted subset of an original dataset, and any training models generate competitive classes by using the coreset in contrast to by using its original dataset. We measured the closeness between an original dataset and its coreset by employing a Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence measure. Moreover, we trained the SVM on the coreset data by using both a D-Wave QA and a conventional method. We conclude that the coreset characterizes the original dataset with very small KL divergence measure. In addition, we present our KL divergence results for demonstrating the closeness between our original data and its coreset. As practical RS data, we use Hyperspectral Image (HSI) of Indian Pine, USA
Satellite instruments monitor the Earth’s surface day and night, and, as a result, the size of Earth observation (EO) data is dramatically increasing. Machine Learning (ML) techniques are employed routinely to analyze and process these big EO data, and one well-known ML technique is a Support Vector Machine (SVM). An SVM poses a quadratic programming problem, and quantum computers including quantum annealers (QA) as well as gate-based quantum computers promise to solve an SVM more efficiently than a conventional computer; training the SVM by employing a quantum computer/conventional computer represents a quantum SVM (qSVM)/classical SVM (cSVM) application. However, quantum computers cannot tackle many practical EO problems by using a qSVM due to their very low number of input qubits. Hence, we assembled a coreset (“core of a dataset”) of given EO data for training a weighted SVM on a small quantum computer, a D-Wave quantum annealer with around 5000 input quantum bits. The coreset is a small, representative weighted subset of an original dataset, and its performance can be analyzed by using the proposed weighted SVM on a small quantum computer in contrast to the original dataset. As practical data, we use synthetic data, Iris data, a Hyperspectral Image (HSI) of Indian Pine, and a Polarimetric Synthetic Aperture Radar (PolSAR) image of San Francisco. We measured the closeness between an original dataset and its coreset by employing a Kullback–Leibler (KL) divergence test, and, in addition, we trained a weighted SVM on our coreset data by using both a D-Wave quantum annealer (D-Wave QA) and a conventional computer. Our findings show that the coreset approximates the original dataset with very small KL divergence (smaller is better), and the weighted qSVM even outperforms the weighted cSVM on the coresets for a few instances of our experiments. As a side result (or a by-product result), we also present our KL divergence findings for demonstrating the closeness between our original data (i.e., our synthetic data, Iris data, hyperspectral image, and PolSAR image) and the assembled coreset.
Support Vector Machine (SVM) is a popular supervised Machine Learning (ML) method that is widely used for classification and regression problems. Recently, a method to train SVMs on a D-Wave 2000Q Quantum Annealer (QA) was proposed for binary classification of some biological data. First, ensembles of weak quantum SVMs are generated by training each classifier on a disjoint training subset that can be fit into the QA. Then, the computed weak solutions are fused for making predictions on unseen data. In this work, the classification of Remote Sensing (RS) multispectral images with SVMs trained on a QA is discussed. Furthermore, an open code repository is released to facilitate an early entry into the practical application of QA, a new disruptive compute technology.
The increasing complexity and volume of remote sensing data necessitate advanced computational techniques for efficient and accurate image classification. This study explores the efficacy of Quantum Annealing based Support Vector Machines (QASVM) in comparison to classical Support Vector Machines (SVM) for classifying cloud features in remote sensing images. Quantum annealing, leveraging principles of quantum mechanics, promises to solve optimization problems more efficiently and accurately than classical methods, particularly in high-dimensional data spaces typical of remote sensing applications. Our experimental framework involved the classification of cloud features using a comprehensive dataset of Indian Nano Satellite (INS-2B) Nano-MX satellite imagery. The QA-SVM is implemented on a D-Wave quantum annealer based on the Adiabatic Quantum Computation (AQC) model, while the classical SVM utilizes a traditional computing setup. Performance metrics, including overall accuracy and F1 score, are evaluated. The results demonstrated that QA-SVM achieved higher overall accuracy and F1 score compared to its classical counterpart on the Nano-MX test image. It is found that the overall accuracy of QA-SVM is increased by 6.7% while the F1 score is increased by 4.5% with respect to classical SVM. This performance gain is attributed to the quantum annealer’s ability to explore a vast solution space more effectively, avoiding local minima that often hinder classical SVMs.
Support vector machines (SVMs) are widely used machine learning models, with formulations for both classification and regression tasks. In the last years, with the advent of working quantum annealers, hybrid SVM models characterized by quantum training and classical execution have been introduced. These models have demonstrated comparable performance to their classical counterparts. However, they are limited in the training set size due to the restricted connectivity of the current quantum annealers. Hence, to take advantage of large datasets, a strategy is required. In the classical domain, local SVMs, namely, SVMs trained on the data samples selected by ak-nearest neighbors model, have already proven successful. Here, the local application of quantum-trained SVM models is proposed and empirically assessed. In particular, this approach allows overcoming the constraints on the training set size of the quantum-trained models while enhancing their performance. In practice, the fast local kernel support vector machine (FaLK-SVM) method, designed for efficient local SVMs, has been combined with quantum-trained SVM models for binary and multiclass classification. In addition, for comparison, FaLK-SVM has been interfaced for the first time with a classical single-step multiclass SVM model. Concerning the empirical evaluation, D-Wave's quantum annealers and real-world datasets taken from the remote sensing domain have been employed. The results have shown the effectiveness and scalability of the proposed approach, but also its practical applicability in a real-world large-scale scenario.
Kernel-based support vector machines (SVMs) are supervised machine learning algorithms for classification and regression problems. We introduce a method to train SVMs on a D-Wave 2000Q quantum annealer and study its performance in comparison to SVMs trained on conventional computers. The method is applied to both synthetic data and real data obtained from biology experiments. We find that the quantum annealer produces an ensemble of different solutions that often generalizes better to unseen data than the single global minimum of an SVM trained on a conventional computer, especially in cases where only limited training data is available. For cases with more training data than currently fits on the quantum annealer, we show that a combination of classifiers for subsets of the data almost always produces stronger joint classifiers than the conventional SVM for the same parameters.