Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2204.02270

The Problem of Irreversible Change in Quantum Mechanics

Ovidiu Cristinel Stoica

Published Apr 5, 2022• 2 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

I prove that, if a change happens in a closed quantum system so that its state is perfectly distinguishable from all past or future states, the Hamiltonian is $\widehat{H}=-i\hbar\frac{\partial\ }{\partialτ}$. A time operator $\widehatτ$ can be defined as its canonical conjugate. This Hamiltonian is usually rejected because it has no ground state, but I show that even a weaker form of irreversibility is inconsistent with a ground state. What is the right choice, that the world's Hamiltonian is $-i\hbar\frac{\partial\ }{\partialτ}$, or that changes are reversible?

DOI
10.48550/arxiv.2204.02270

Related papers

The Quantum Mechanical Time Reversal Operator.

Andrew Holster

The analysis of the reversibility of quantum mechanics depends upon the choice of the time reversal operator for quantum mechanical states. The orthodox choice for the time reversal operator on QM states is known as the Wigner operator, T*, where * performs complex conjugation. The peculiarity is that this is not simply the unitary time reversal operation, but an anti-unitary operator, involving complex conjugation in addition to ordinary time reversal. The alternative choice is the Racah operator, which is simply ordinary time reversal, T. Orthodox treatments hold that it is either logically or empirically necessary to adopt the Wigner operator, and the Racah operator has received little attention. The basis for this choice is analysed in detail, and it is concluded that all the conventional arguments for rejecting the Racah operator and adopting the Wigner operator are mistaken. The additional problem of whether the deterministic part of quantum mechanics should be judged to be reversible or not is also considered. The adoption of the Racah operator for time reversal appears prima facie to entail that quantum mechanics is irreversible. However, it is concluded that the real answer to question depends upon the choice of interpretation of the theory. In any case, the conventional reasons for claiming that quantum mechanics is reversible are incorrect.

•Oct 1, 2003•0 citations

Exact quantum time compatible with positive energy

Ovidiu Cristinel Stoica

What would it be like to be in a superposition of yesterday, today, and tomorrow? This question may seem at best entertaining, but it is necessary, and exploring it allows us to understand how exact irreversible clocks and change are possible, despite the Unruh-Wald and Hegerfeldt-Ruijsenaars no-go theorems forbidding them. Unruh and Wald (1989) proved that if energy is bounded from below, no observable can increase monotonically with the Schrödinger time parameter t. Perfectly monotonic clocks and irreversible observable changes (Hegerfeldt-Ruijsenaars, 1980) seem impossible. From the perspective of the Schrödinger time, the world appears in a superposition of different intrinsic clock states indicating different times and opposite time directions. This seems to directly contradict our daily experiences of time and change. I show that there is no contradiction: from an intrinsic perspective of the world, sharp irreversible changes do happen, because the macroscopic pointer states resolve the superposition of different times. Large-scale time-reversing or discontinuous transitions are not internally observable in the records. From the intrinsic perspective, an unbounded intrinsic-time translation generator plays the role of the Hamiltonian, generating only forward time evolution with respect to the intrinsic time, but not to the Schrödinger parameter t, which is thus not justified to play the role of time. This allows sharp time observables even if the external Hamiltonian is bounded from below. In addition, this leads to a stationary wavefunction of the universe satisfying a Wheeler-DeWitt-type equation, without assuming gravity.

quant-pharXiv:2607.01296•Jul 2, 2026•0 citations

Time-reversal of an unknown quantum state

A. V. Lebedev, V. M. Vinokur

Abstract For decades, researchers have sought to understand how the irreversibility of the surrounding world emerges from the seemingly time-symmetric, fundamental laws of physics. Quantum mechanics conjectured a clue that final irreversibility is set by the measurement procedure and that the time-reversal requires complex conjugation of the wave function, which is overly complex to spontaneously appear in nature. Building on this Landau-Wigner conjecture, it became possible to demonstrate that time-reversal is exponentially improbable in a virgin nature and to design an algorithm artificially reversing a time arrow for a given quantum state on the IBM quantum computer. However, the implemented arrow-of-time reversal embraced only the known states initially disentangled from the thermodynamic reservoir. Here we develop a procedure for reversing the temporal evolution of an arbitrary unknown quantum state. This opens the route for general universal algorithms sending temporal evolution of an arbitrary system backward in time.

arXiv:1912.12036•Communications Physics•Jul 21, 2020•3 citations

Is Time ‘Handed’ in a Quantum World?

Craig Callender

In a classical mechanical world, the fundamental laws of nature are reversible. The laws of nature treat the past and future as mirror images of each other. Temporally asymmetric phenomena are ultimately said to arise from initial conditions. But are the laws of nature also reversible in a quantum world? This paper argues that they are not, that time in a quantum world prefers a particular ‘hand’ or ordering. I argue, first, that the probabilistic algorithm used in the theory picks out a preferred direction of time for almost all interpretations of the theory, and second, that contrary to the received wisdom the Schrödinger evolution is also irreversible. The status of Wigner reversal invariance is then discussed. I conclude that the quantum world is fundamentally irreversible, but manages to appear (thanks to Wigner reversal invariance) reversible at the classical level.

Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society (Hardback)•Jun 1, 2000•42 citations

Information-Theoretic Equilibration: The Appearance of Irreversibility under Complex Quantum Dynamics

Cozmin Ududec, Nathan Wiebe, Joseph Emerson

The question of how irreversibility can emerge as a generic phenomenon when the underlying mechanical theory is reversible has been a long-standing fundamental problem for both classical and quantum mechanics. We describe a mechanism for the appearance of irreversibility that applies to coherent, isolated systems in a pure quantum state. This equilibration mechanism requires only an assumption of sufficiently complex internal dynamics and natural information-theoretic constraints arising from the infeasibility of collecting an astronomical amount of measurement data. Remarkably, we are able to prove that irreversibility can be understood as typical without assuming decoherence or restricting to coarse-grained observables, and hence occurs under distinct conditions and time scales from those implied by the usual decoherence point of view. We illustrate the effect numerically in several model systems and prove that the effect is typical under the standard random-matrix conjecture for complex quantum systems.

arXiv:1208.3419•Physical Review Letters•Aug 20, 2013•28 citations

Quantum origin of time's arrow

Davide Romano

The problem of time’s arrow is (roughly) to understand why macroscopic physical processes typically evolve in a specific direction (the one we call “the future”) even though the underlying laws of physics describing the individual microscopic systems are time-reversal invariant. The standard answer to this problem is given by Boltzmann’s explanation of the II law of thermodynamics: a classical system starting in a non-equilibrium state spontaneously (i.e. with a high level of probability) tends towards equilibrium, thus implementing an irreversible process. However, this explanation has two drawbacks: 1. it needs a further assumption on the entropy of the initial state of the universe (past hypothesis); 2. microscopic systems (e.g. molecules in a box) should be represented as quantum states and not classical states. In this talk, I want to propose a different hypothesis to explain the origin of time’s arrow, based on quantum mechanics, specifically on decoherence theory. Differently from isolated systems, open quantum systems described by decoherence theory showirreversible behavior, as they evolve towards decoherence and von Neumann entropy increase. Is this behavior a sign of genuine irreversibility? And, if so, can this be linked to thermodynamic irreversibility?

•Jun 21, 2024•0 citations
I prove that, if a change happens in a closed quantum system so that its state is perfectly distinguishable from all past or future states, the Hamiltonian is H^=−iℏ∂ ∂τ\widehat{H}=-i\hbar\frac{\partial\ }{\partialτ}H=−iℏ∂τ∂ ​. A time operator τ^\widehatττ can be defined as its canonical conjugate. This Hamiltonian is usually rejected because it has no ground state, but I show that even a weaker form of irreversibility is inconsistent with a ground state. What is the right choice, that the world's Hamiltonian is −iℏ∂ ∂τ-i\hbar\frac{\partial\ }{\partialτ}−iℏ∂τ∂ ​, or that changes are reversible?
The analysis of the reversibility of quantum mechanics depends upon the choice of the time reversal operator for quantum mechanical states. The orthodox choice for the time reversal operator on QM states is known as the Wigner operator, T*, where * performs complex conjugation. The peculiarity is that this is not simply the unitary time reversal operation, but an anti-unitary operator, involving complex conjugation in addition to ordinary time reversal. The alternative choice is the Racah operator, which is simply ordinary time reversal, T. Orthodox treatments hold that it is either logically or empirically necessary to adopt the Wigner operator, and the Racah operator has received little attention. The basis for this choice is analysed in detail, and it is concluded that all the conventional arguments for rejecting the Racah operator and adopting the Wigner operator are mistaken. The additional problem of whether the deterministic part of quantum mechanics should be judged to be reversible or not is also considered. The adoption of the Racah operator for time reversal appears prima facie to entail that quantum mechanics is irreversible. However, it is concluded that the real answer to question depends upon the choice of interpretation of the theory. In any case, the conventional reasons for claiming that quantum mechanics is reversible are incorrect.
What would it be like to be in a superposition of yesterday, today, and tomorrow? This question may seem at best entertaining, but it is necessary, and exploring it allows us to understand how exact irreversible clocks and change are possible, despite the Unruh-Wald and Hegerfeldt-Ruijsenaars no-go theorems forbidding them. Unruh and Wald (1989) proved that if energy is bounded from below, no observable can increase monotonically with the Schrödinger time parameter t. Perfectly monotonic clocks and irreversible observable changes (Hegerfeldt-Ruijsenaars, 1980) seem impossible. From the perspective of the Schrödinger time, the world appears in a superposition of different intrinsic clock states indicating different times and opposite time directions. This seems to directly contradict our daily experiences of time and change. I show that there is no contradiction: from an intrinsic perspective of the world, sharp irreversible changes do happen, because the macroscopic pointer states resolve the superposition of different times. Large-scale time-reversing or discontinuous transitions are not internally observable in the records. From the intrinsic perspective, an unbounded intrinsic-time translation generator plays the role of the Hamiltonian, generating only forward time evolution with respect to the intrinsic time, but not to the Schrödinger parameter t, which is thus not justified to play the role of time. This allows sharp time observables even if the external Hamiltonian is bounded from below. In addition, this leads to a stationary wavefunction of the universe satisfying a Wheeler-DeWitt-type equation, without assuming gravity.
Abstract For decades, researchers have sought to understand how the irreversibility of the surrounding world emerges from the seemingly time-symmetric, fundamental laws of physics. Quantum mechanics conjectured a clue that final irreversibility is set by the measurement procedure and that the time-reversal requires complex conjugation of the wave function, which is overly complex to spontaneously appear in nature. Building on this Landau-Wigner conjecture, it became possible to demonstrate that time-reversal is exponentially improbable in a virgin nature and to design an algorithm artificially reversing a time arrow for a given quantum state on the IBM quantum computer. However, the implemented arrow-of-time reversal embraced only the known states initially disentangled from the thermodynamic reservoir. Here we develop a procedure for reversing the temporal evolution of an arbitrary unknown quantum state. This opens the route for general universal algorithms sending temporal evolution of an arbitrary system backward in time.
In a classical mechanical world, the fundamental laws of nature are reversible. The laws of nature treat the past and future as mirror images of each other. Temporally asymmetric phenomena are ultimately said to arise from initial conditions. But are the laws of nature also reversible in a quantum world? This paper argues that they are not, that time in a quantum world prefers a particular ‘hand’ or ordering. I argue, first, that the probabilistic algorithm used in the theory picks out a preferred direction of time for almost all interpretations of the theory, and second, that contrary to the received wisdom the Schrödinger evolution is also irreversible. The status of Wigner reversal invariance is then discussed. I conclude that the quantum world is fundamentally irreversible, but manages to appear (thanks to Wigner reversal invariance) reversible at the classical level.
The question of how irreversibility can emerge as a generic phenomenon when the underlying mechanical theory is reversible has been a long-standing fundamental problem for both classical and quantum mechanics. We describe a mechanism for the appearance of irreversibility that applies to coherent, isolated systems in a pure quantum state. This equilibration mechanism requires only an assumption of sufficiently complex internal dynamics and natural information-theoretic constraints arising from the infeasibility of collecting an astronomical amount of measurement data. Remarkably, we are able to prove that irreversibility can be understood as typical without assuming decoherence or restricting to coarse-grained observables, and hence occurs under distinct conditions and time scales from those implied by the usual decoherence point of view. We illustrate the effect numerically in several model systems and prove that the effect is typical under the standard random-matrix conjecture for complex quantum systems.
The problem of time’s arrow is (roughly) to understand why macroscopic physical processes typically evolve in a specific direction (the one we call “the future”) even though the underlying laws of physics describing the individual microscopic systems are time-reversal invariant. The standard answer to this problem is given by Boltzmann’s explanation of the II law of thermodynamics: a classical system starting in a non-equilibrium state spontaneously (i.e. with a high level of probability) tends towards equilibrium, thus implementing an irreversible process. However, this explanation has two drawbacks: 1. it needs a further assumption on the entropy of the initial state of the universe (past hypothesis); 2. microscopic systems (e.g. molecules in a box) should be represented as quantum states and not classical states. In this talk, I want to propose a different hypothesis to explain the origin of time’s arrow, based on quantum mechanics, specifically on decoherence theory. Differently from isolated systems, open quantum systems described by decoherence theory showirreversible behavior, as they evolve towards decoherence and von Neumann entropy increase. Is this behavior a sign of genuine irreversibility? And, if so, can this be linked to thermodynamic irreversibility?