Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2203.13200

Modified Hamiltonian for a particle in an infinite box that includes wall effects

Leon W. Cohen, R. Sala Mayato, Laughlin, Patrick

Published Mar 23, 2022• 0 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

We give a modified Hamiltonian for a particle in a box with infinite potential walls that takes into account wall effects. The Hamiltonian is expressed in both the position and momentum representation. In the momentum representation the eigenvalue problem for energy is an integral equation.
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.2203.13200

Related papers

Momentum Wavefunction of a Particle in a Box

Francesco R. Ruggeri

The momentum wavefunction fp of a particle in a box (with infinite potential walls) has been described (1) (2) in terms of many plane waves (i.e. many fp’s) even though the energy E=(hbar k)/2/2m expresses only one k. Thus, the energy E appears to be an average. It seems one may have a plane wave exp(ipx) which collides inelastically with the wall and changes to exp(-ip1x) etc.; on average energy is conserved. In (1) and (2), the spatial wavefunction W(x)= Sum over p fp exp(ipx) is obtained by solving the time-independent Schrodinger equation, and fp from taking the Fourier transform of W(x). These are strictly math procedures it seems. In a previous note (3), the time independent Schrodinger equation is written with V(x) and W(x) both expressed in terms of Fourier transforms. This lead to an equation for each p of the form: Sum j+k=p Vk fk = (E-p*p/2m) fp ((1)). In such a case, V(x) exists throughout x. For the case of an infinite wall, there is still a potential, but only at the end walls. In this note, we suggest ((1)) may be used to obtain fp without taking the Fourier transform of W(x) or solving for Vk. This approach also shows cycling is involved, even for a particle in a box. The cycling occurs at the walls.

•May 2, 2019•0 citations

The particle in a box is not simple

Frank E. Cummings

Naive use of the position representation wave functions for a particle in either a finite or infinite square well predicts properties of the momentum distribution in disagreement with those calculated in the momentum representation. The discrepancy is removed by explicit consideration of the effects of the discontinuity in the potential at the walls on position space calculations.

American Journal of Physics•Feb 1, 1977•32 citations

When the classical & quantum mechanical considerations hint to a single point; a microscopic particle in a one dimensional box with two infinite walls and a linear potential inside it

Majid Monajjemi, K. Zare, A.R. Zieglari

In this paper we have solved analytically the Schrodinger equation for a microscopic particle in a one-dimensional box with two infinite walls, which the potential function inside it, has a linear form. Based on the solutions of this special quantum mechanical system, we have shown that as the quantum number approaches infinity the expectation values of microscopic particle position and square of the linear momentum are equal to the classical time average of particle position and its square of the linear momentum, respectively.

Journal of Physical & Theoretical Chemistry•Feb 1, 2006•0 citations

Particle in a quantum well with a moving wall

Reza Torabi, Zahra Rezaei

We study the problem of a quantum particle in an infinite one dimensional potential well with a moving wall. Based on the effective Hamiltonian approach and using the gauge transformation concepts, we show that the effect of the moving wall appears as an extra phase factor in the wave function which depends on the velocity of the wall.

Iranian Journal of Physics Research•May 1, 2017•0 citations

The effect of a $δ$ distribution potential on a quantum mechanical particle in a box

Pedro M. Girão, João P. Nunes

We study the effect of a $δ$ distribution potential placed at $x_0\geq 0$ and multiplied by a parameter $α$ on a quantum mechanical particle in an infinite square well over the segment $\left[-\,\frac{L}{2},\frac{L}{2}\right]$. We obtain the limit of the eigenfunctions of the time independent Schrödinger equation as $α\nearrow+\infty$ and as $α\searrow-\infty$. We see how each solution of the Schrödinger equation corresponding to $α=0$ changes as $α$ runs through the real line. When $x_0$ is a rational multiple of $L$, there exist solutions of the Schrödinger equation which vanish at $x_0$ and are unaffected by the value of $α$. We show that each one of these has an energy that coincides with the energy of a certain limiting eigenfunction obtained by taking $|α|\to\infty$. The expectation value of the position of a particle with wave function equal to the limiting eigenfunction is $x_0$.

arXiv:2311.02611•Nov 5, 2023•0 citations

On the virial theorem for a particle in a box: Accounting for Cauchy's boundary condition

R. Cabrera‐Trujillo, Oriol Vendrell

Most introductory books on quantum mechanics discuss the particle-in-a-box problem through solutions of the Schrödinger equation, at least, in the one-dimensional case. When introducing the virial theorem, however, its discussion in the context of this simple model is not considered and students ponder the question of the validity of the virial theorem for a system with, apparently, no forces. In this work, we address this issue by solving the particle in a finite box and show that the virial theorem is fulfilled when the appropriate Cauchy boundary conditions are taken into account. We also illustrate how, in the limit of the infinite potential box, the virial theorem holds as well. As a consequence, it is possible to determine the averaged force exerted by the walls on the particle. Finally, a discussion of these results in the classical limit is provided.

American Journal of Physics•Nov 19, 2020•4 citations
The momentum wavefunction fp of a particle in a box (with infinite potential walls) has been described (1) (2) in terms of many plane waves (i.e. many fp’s) even though the energy E=(hbar k)/2/2m expresses only one k. Thus, the energy E appears to be an average. It seems one may have a plane wave exp(ipx) which collides inelastically with the wall and changes to exp(-ip1x) etc.; on average energy is conserved. In (1) and (2), the spatial wavefunction W(x)= Sum over p fp exp(ipx) is obtained by solving the time-independent Schrodinger equation, and fp from taking the Fourier transform of W(x). These are strictly math procedures it seems. In a previous note (3), the time independent Schrodinger equation is written with V(x) and W(x) both expressed in terms of Fourier transforms. This lead to an equation for each p of the form: Sum j+k=p Vk fk = (E-p*p/2m) fp ((1)). In such a case, V(x) exists throughout x. For the case of an infinite wall, there is still a potential, but only at the end walls. In this note, we suggest ((1)) may be used to obtain fp without taking the Fourier transform of W(x) or solving for Vk. This approach also shows cycling is involved, even for a particle in a box. The cycling occurs at the walls.
In this paper we have solved analytically the Schrodinger equation for a microscopic particle in a one-dimensional box with two infinite walls, which the potential function inside it, has a linear form. Based on the solutions of this special quantum mechanical system, we have shown that as the quantum number approaches infinity the expectation values of microscopic particle position and square of the linear momentum are equal to the classical time average of particle position and its square of the linear momentum, respectively.
The effect of a δδδ distribution potential on a quantum mechanical particle in a box
We study the effect of a δδδ distribution potential placed at x0≥0x_0\geq 0x0​≥0 and multiplied by a parameter ααα on a quantum mechanical particle in an infinite square well over the segment [− L2,L2]\left[-\,\frac{L}{2},\frac{L}{2}\right][−2L​,2L​]. We obtain the limit of the eigenfunctions of the time independent Schrödinger equation as α↗+∞α\nearrow+\inftyα↗+∞ and as α↘−∞α\searrow-\inftyα↘−∞. We see how each solution of the Schrödinger equation corresponding to α=0α=0α=0 changes as ααα runs through the real line. When x0x_0x0​ is a rational multiple of LLL, there exist solutions of the Schrödinger equation which vanish at x0x_0x0​ and are unaffected by the value of ααα. We show that each one of these has an energy that coincides with the energy of a certain limiting eigenfunction obtained by taking ∣α∣→∞|α|\to\infty∣α∣→∞. The expectation value of the position of a particle with wave function equal to the limiting eigenfunction is x0x_0x0​.
Most introductory books on quantum mechanics discuss the particle-in-a-box problem through solutions of the Schrödinger equation, at least, in the one-dimensional case. When introducing the virial theorem, however, its discussion in the context of this simple model is not considered and students ponder the question of the validity of the virial theorem for a system with, apparently, no forces. In this work, we address this issue by solving the particle in a finite box and show that the virial theorem is fulfilled when the appropriate Cauchy boundary conditions are taken into account. We also illustrate how, in the limit of the infinite potential box, the virial theorem holds as well. As a consequence, it is possible to determine the averaged force exerted by the walls on the particle. Finally, a discussion of these results in the classical limit is provided.