Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2203.09429 · Quantum

Three numerical approaches to find mutually unbiased bases using Bell inequalities

Maria Prat Colomer, Luke Mortimer, Irénée Frérot, Máté Farkas, Antonio Acín

Published Aug 17, 2022• 10 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

Mutually unbiased bases correspond to highly useful pairs of measurements in quantum information theory. In the smallest composite dimension, six, it is known that between three and seven mutually unbiased bases exist, with a decades-old conjecture, known as Zauner's conjecture, stating that there exist at most three. Here we tackle Zauner's conjecture numerically through the construction of Bell inequalities for every pair of integers n,d≥2 that can be maximally violated in dimension d if and only if n MUBs exist in that dimension. Hence we turn Zauner's conjecture into an optimisation problem, which we address by means of three numerical methods: see-saw optimisation, non-linear semidefinite programming and Monte Carlo techniques. All three methods correctly identify the known cases in low dimensions and all suggest that there do not exist four mutually unbiased bases in dimension six, with all finding the same bases that numerically optimise the corresponding Bell inequality. Moreover, these numerical optimisers appear to coincide with the ``four most distant bases'' in dimension six, found through numerically optimising a distance measure in [P. Raynal, X. Lü, B.-G. Englert, {Phys. Rev. A}, { 83} 062303 (2011)]. Finally, the Monte Carlo results suggest that at most three MUBs exist in dimension ten.

DOI
10.22331/q-2022-08-17-778

Related papers

The maximum number of mutually unbiased bases in dimension six

OpenAI

We prove that the maximum number of mutually unbiased orthonormal bases in ℂ6 is three, resolving Zauner's dimension-six MUB conjecture. The upper bound is computer-assisted: under the stated binary64 arithmetic and compiler conditions, a complete execution of the documented verification pipeline excludes four arbitrary complex bases.

•Oct 6, 2026•0 citations

Mutually unbiased bases and semi-definite programming

Stephen Brierley, Stefan Weigert

A complex Hilbert space of dimension six supports at least three but not more than seven mutually unbiased bases. Two computer-aided analytical methods to tighten these bounds are reviewed, based on a discretization of parameter space and on Gröbner bases. A third algorithmic approach is presented: the non-existence of more than three mutually unbiased bases in composite dimensions can be decided by a global optimization method known as semidefinite programming. The method is used to confirm that the spectral matrix cannot be part of a complete set of seven mutually unbiased bases in dimension six.

arXiv:1006.0093•Journal of Physics Conference Series•Nov 1, 2010•37 citations

Mutually Unbiased Bases on Hilbert Spaces of Composite Dimension

Stalin Mafla

Two orthonormal bases A and B are said to be mutually unbiased when, for every pair of vectors |αi〉 ∈ A, |βj〉 ∈ B, |〈αi|βj〉|2 = 1/d, where d is the dimension of the system. We have tried different methods to construct MUB’s in six dimensions. These include numerical searches for orthonormal bases, extension of Wootters and Fields’ method using the concept of field, and trying to partition the tensor product of qubits and qutrits operators to generate MUB’s as their eigenbases as suggested by Lawrence et al. Our studies have yielded no more than three MUB’s, and we are led to the conclusion that either only these three bases exist or the method for constructing such bases is radically different from those used so far. We shall present the difficulties encountered in each of these methods while searching for MUB’s in composite dimensions.

AIP conference proceedings•Jan 1, 2004•0 citations

Evidence for and against Zauner's MUB conjecture in C^6

Gary McConnell, Harry Spencer, Afaq Tahir

The problem of finding provably maximal sets of mutually unbiased bases in $\CC^d$, for composite dimensions $d$ which are not prime powers, remains completely open. In the first interesting case,~$d=6$, Zauner predicted that there can exist no more than three MUBs. We explore possible algebraic solutions in~$d=6$ by looking at their~`shadows' in vector spaces over finite fields. The main result is that if a counter-example to Zauner's conjecture were to exist, then it would leave no such shadow upon reduction modulo several different primes, forcing its algebraic complexity level to be much higher than that of current well-known examples. In the case of prime powers~$q \equiv 5 \bmod 12$, however, we are able to show some curious evidence which --- at least formally --- points in the opposite direction. In $\CC^6$, not even a single vector has ever been found which is mutually unbiased to a set of three MUBs. Yet in these finite fields we find sets of three `generalised MUBs' together with an orthonormal set of four vectors of a putative fourth MUB, all of which lifts naturally to a number field.

Quantum Information and Computation•Jul 14, 2021•1 citation

Mutually Unbiased Bases in Composite Dimensions – A Review

Daniel McNulty, Stefan Weigert

Maximal sets of mutually unbiased bases are useful throughout quantum physics, both in a foundational context and for applications. To date, it remains unknown if complete sets of mutually unbiased bases exist in Hilbert spaces of dimensions different from a prime power, i.e. in composite dimensions such as six or ten. Fourteen mathematically equivalent formulations of the existence problem are presented. We comprehensively summarise analytic, computer-aided and numerical results relevant to the case of composite dimensions. Known modifications of the existence problem are reviewed and potential solution strategies are outlined.

arXiv:2410.23997•Quantum•Apr 1, 2026•8 citations

ON MUTUALLY UNBIASED BASES

Thomas Durt, Berthold‐Georg Englert, Ingemar Bengtsson +1 more

Mutually unbiased bases for quantum degrees of freedom are central to all theoretical investigations and practical exploitations of complementary properties. Much is known about mutually unbiased bases, but there are also a fair number of important questions that have not been answered in full as yet. In particular, one can find maximal sets of N + 1 mutually unbiased bases in Hilbert spaces of prime-power dimension N = p M , with p prime and M a positive integer, and there is a continuum of mutually unbiased bases for a continuous degree of freedom, such as motion along a line. But not a single example of a maximal set is known if the dimension is another composite number (N = 6, 10, 12,…). In this review, we present a unified approach in which the basis states are labeled by numbers 0, 1, 2, …, N - 1 that are both elements of a Galois field and ordinary integers. This dual nature permits a compact systematic construction of maximal sets of mutually unbiased bases when they are known to exist but throws no light on the open existence problem in other cases. We show how to use the thus constructed mutually unbiased bases in quantum-informatics applications, including dense coding, teleportation, entanglement swapping, covariant cloning, and state tomography, all of which rely on an explicit set of maximally entangled states (generalizations of the familiar two–q-bit Bell states) that are related to the mutually unbiased bases. There is a link to the mathematics of finite affine planes. We also exploit the one-to-one correspondence between unbiased bases and the complex Hadamard matrices that turn the bases into each other. The ultimate hope, not yet fulfilled, is that open questions about mutually unbiased bases can be related to open questions about Hadamard matrices or affine planes, in particular the notorious existence problem for dimensions that are not a power of a prime. The Hadamard-matrix approach is instrumental in the very recent advance, surveyed here, of our understanding of the N = 6 situation. All evidence indicates that a maximal set of seven mutually unbiased bases does not exist — one can find no more than three pairwise unbiased bases — although there is currently no clear-cut demonstration of the case.

arXiv:1004.3348•International Journal of Quantum Information•Jun 1, 2010•727 citations
Mutually unbiased bases correspond to highly useful pairs of measurements in quantum information theory. In the smallest composite dimension, six, it is known that between three and seven mutually unbiased bases exist, with a decades-old conjecture, known as Zauner's conjecture, stating that there exist at most three. Here we tackle Zauner's conjecture numerically through the construction of Bell inequalities for every pair of integers n,d≥2 that can be maximally violated in dimension d if and only if n MUBs exist in that dimension. Hence we turn Zauner's conjecture into an optimisation problem, which we address by means of three numerical methods: see-saw optimisation, non-linear semidefinite programming and Monte Carlo techniques. All three methods correctly identify the known cases in low dimensions and all suggest that there do not exist four mutually unbiased bases in dimension six, with all finding the same bases that numerically optimise the corresponding Bell inequality. Moreover, these numerical optimisers appear to coincide with the ``four most distant bases'' in dimension six, found through numerically optimising a distance measure in [P. Raynal, X. Lü, B.-G. Englert, {Phys. Rev. A}, { 83} 062303 (2011)]. Finally, the Monte Carlo results suggest that at most three MUBs exist in dimension ten.
A complex Hilbert space of dimension six supports at least three but not more than seven mutually unbiased bases. Two computer-aided analytical methods to tighten these bounds are reviewed, based on a discretization of parameter space and on Gröbner bases. A third algorithmic approach is presented: the non-existence of more than three mutually unbiased bases in composite dimensions can be decided by a global optimization method known as semidefinite programming. The method is used to confirm that the spectral matrix cannot be part of a complete set of seven mutually unbiased bases in dimension six.
Two orthonormal bases A and B are said to be mutually unbiased when, for every pair of vectors |αi〉 ∈ A, |βj〉 ∈ B, |〈αi|βj〉|2 = 1/d, where d is the dimension of the system. We have tried different methods to construct MUB’s in six dimensions. These include numerical searches for orthonormal bases, extension of Wootters and Fields’ method using the concept of field, and trying to partition the tensor product of qubits and qutrits operators to generate MUB’s as their eigenbases as suggested by Lawrence et al. Our studies have yielded no more than three MUB’s, and we are led to the conclusion that either only these three bases exist or the method for constructing such bases is radically different from those used so far. We shall present the difficulties encountered in each of these methods while searching for MUB’s in composite dimensions.
The problem of finding provably maximal sets of mutually unbiased bases in $\CC^d$, for composite dimensions ddd which are not prime powers, remains completely open. In the first interesting case,~d=6d=6d=6, Zauner predicted that there can exist no more than three MUBs. We explore possible algebraic solutions in~d=6d=6d=6 by looking at their~`shadows' in vector spaces over finite fields. The main result is that if a counter-example to Zauner's conjecture were to exist, then it would leave no such shadow upon reduction modulo several different primes, forcing its algebraic complexity level to be much higher than that of current well-known examples. In the case of prime powers~q≡5 mod 12q \equiv 5 \bmod 12q≡5mod12, however, we are able to show some curious evidence which --- at least formally --- points in the opposite direction. In $\CC^6$, not even a single vector has ever been found which is mutually unbiased to a set of three MUBs. Yet in these finite fields we find sets of three `generalised MUBs' together with an orthonormal set of four vectors of a putative fourth MUB, all of which lifts naturally to a number field.
Maximal sets of mutually unbiased bases are useful throughout quantum physics, both in a foundational context and for applications. To date, it remains unknown if complete sets of mutually unbiased bases exist in Hilbert spaces of dimensions different from a prime power, i.e. in composite dimensions such as six or ten. Fourteen mathematically equivalent formulations of the existence problem are presented. We comprehensively summarise analytic, computer-aided and numerical results relevant to the case of composite dimensions. Known modifications of the existence problem are reviewed and potential solution strategies are outlined.
Mutually unbiased bases for quantum degrees of freedom are central to all theoretical investigations and practical exploitations of complementary properties. Much is known about mutually unbiased bases, but there are also a fair number of important questions that have not been answered in full as yet. In particular, one can find maximal sets of N + 1 mutually unbiased bases in Hilbert spaces of prime-power dimension N = p M , with p prime and M a positive integer, and there is a continuum of mutually unbiased bases for a continuous degree of freedom, such as motion along a line. But not a single example of a maximal set is known if the dimension is another composite number (N = 6, 10, 12,…). In this review, we present a unified approach in which the basis states are labeled by numbers 0, 1, 2, …, N - 1 that are both elements of a Galois field and ordinary integers. This dual nature permits a compact systematic construction of maximal sets of mutually unbiased bases when they are known to exist but throws no light on the open existence problem in other cases. We show how to use the thus constructed mutually unbiased bases in quantum-informatics applications, including dense coding, teleportation, entanglement swapping, covariant cloning, and state tomography, all of which rely on an explicit set of maximally entangled states (generalizations of the familiar two–q-bit Bell states) that are related to the mutually unbiased bases. There is a link to the mathematics of finite affine planes. We also exploit the one-to-one correspondence between unbiased bases and the complex Hadamard matrices that turn the bases into each other. The ultimate hope, not yet fulfilled, is that open questions about mutually unbiased bases can be related to open questions about Hadamard matrices or affine planes, in particular the notorious existence problem for dimensions that are not a power of a prime. The Hadamard-matrix approach is instrumental in the very recent advance, surveyed here, of our understanding of the N = 6 situation. All evidence indicates that a maximal set of seven mutually unbiased bases does not exist — one can find no more than three pairwise unbiased bases — although there is currently no clear-cut demonstration of the case.