Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2203.08002

Quantum Parameterized Complexity

Michael J. Bremner, Zhengfeng Ji, Ryan L. Mann, Luke Mathieson, Mauro E. S. Morales, Alexis Shaw

Published Mar 15, 2022• 1 citation
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

Parameterized complexity theory was developed in the 1990s to enrich the complexity-theoretic analysis of problems that depend on a range of parameters. In this paper we establish a quantum equivalent of classical parameterized complexity theory, motivated by the need for new tools for the classifications of the complexity of real-world problems. We introduce the quantum analogues of a range of parameterized complexity classes and examine the relationship between these classes, their classical counterparts, and well-studied problems. This framework exposes a rich classification of the complexity of parameterized versions of QMA-hard problems, demonstrating, for example, a clear separation between the Quantum Circuit Satisfiability problem and the Local Hamiltonian problem.

DOI
10.48550/arxiv.2203.08002

Related papers

Parameterized quantum algorithms for closest string problems

Josh Cudby, Sergii Strelchuk

Parameterized complexity enables the practical solution of generally intractable NP-hard problems when certain parameters are small, making it particularly useful in real-world applications. The study of string problems in this framework has been particularly fruitful, yielding many state-of-the-art classical algorithms that run efficiently in certain parameter regimes contrary to their worst- or average-case performance. Motivated by the dramatic increase in genomic data and its growing computational demands, we initiate the study of the quantum parameterized complexity of the Closest String Problem (CSP) and the related Closest Substring Problem (CSSP). We present three quantum algorithms for the CSP and one for the CSSP. Each algorithm demonstrates improved performance over classical counterparts in specific parameter regimes, highlighting the promise of quantum approaches in structured combinatorial settings. We also derive a conditional lower bound for the CSP with binary alphabets, showing that our first algorithm is tight in its dominant scaling factor.

arXiv:2510.15529•Oct 17, 2025•0 citations

On Physical Problems that are Slightly More Difficult than QMA

Andris Ambainis

We study the complexity of computational problems from quantum physics. Typically, they are studied using the complexity class QMA (quantum counterpart of NP) but some natural computational problems appear to be slightly harder than QMA. We introduce new complexity classes consisting of problems that are solvable with a small number of queries to a QMA oracle and use these complexity classes to quantify the complexity of several natural computational problems (for example, the complexity of estimating the spectral gap of a Hamiltonian).

IEEE Conference on Computational Complexity (CCC)•Jun 1, 2014•29 citations

On physical problems that are slightly more difficult than QMA

Andris Ambainis

We study the complexity of computational problems from quantum physics. Typically, they are studied using the complexity class QMA (quantum counterpart of NP) but some natural computational problems appear to be slightly harder than QMA. We introduce new complexity classes consisting of problems that are solvable with a small number of queries to a QMA oracle and use these complexity classes to quantify the complexity of several natural computational problems (for example, the complexity of estimating the spectral gap of a Hamiltonian).

arXiv:1312.4758•Dec 17, 2013•1 citation

The Parameterized Complexity of Quantum Verification

Srinivasan Arunachalam, Sergey B. Bravyi, Chinmay Nirkhe +1 more

We initiate the study of parameterized complexity of $\textsf{QMA}$ problems in terms of the number of non-Clifford gates in the problem description. We show that for the problem of parameterized quantum circuit satisfiability, there exists a classical algorithm solving the problem with a runtime scaling exponentially in the number of non-Clifford gates but only polynomially with the system size. This result follows from our main result, that for any Clifford + $t$ $T$-gate quantum circuit satisfiability problem, the search space of optimal witnesses can be reduced to a stabilizer subspace isomorphic to at most $t$ qubits (independent of the system size). Furthermore, we derive new lower bounds on the $T$-count of circuit satisfiability instances and the $T$-count of the $W$-state assuming the classical exponential time hypothesis ($\textsf{ETH}$). Lastly, we explore the parameterized complexity of the quantum non-identity check problem.

arXiv:2202.08119•Leibniz international proceedings in informatics•Jan 1, 2022•3 citations

Title: Algorithmic Quantum Complexity Theory with Adaptive Parameterization

Jincheng Zhang

This paper presents a novel algorithmic approach to quantum complexity theory, focusing on automated parameterization and iterative refinement to achieve a target complexity. The core mechanism centers around leveraging quantum annealing to efficiently explore a vast parameter space, allowing the algorithm to pinpoint solutions with optimal complexity. We propose a framework where the initial parameters are coupled with a quantum annealing process, dynamically adjusting the parameters based on the calculated complexity. This fundamentally shifts the focus from approximation to precise quantification, offering a potentially transformative tool for tackling complex problems within the context of quantum computation. The paper details the algorithm's design, its theoretical justification, and preliminary experimental results demonstrating its efficacy in a simplified, yet representative, example. We aim to establish a new paradigm in complexity theory, moving beyond traditional approximations and embracing a direct, quantum-driven approach to complexity assessment.

•Sep 4, 2026•0 citations

Bosonic Quantum Computational Complexity

Ulysse Chabaud, Michael Joseph, Saeed Adel Mehraban +1 more

Quantum computing involving physical systems with continuous degrees of freedom, such as the quantum states of light, has recently attracted significant interest. However, a well-defined quantum complexity theory for these bosonic computations over infinite-dimensional Hilbert spaces is missing. In this work, we lay foundations for such a research program. We introduce natural complexity classes and problems based on bosonic generalizations of BQP, the local Hamiltonian problem, and QMA. We uncover several relationships and subtle differences between standard Boolean classical and discrete variable quantum complexity classes and identify outstanding open problems. In particular: 1. We show that the power of quadratic (Gaussian) quantum dynamics is equivalent to the class BQL. More generally, we define classes of continuous-variable quantum polynomial time computations with a bounded probability of error based on higher-degree gates. Due to the infinite dimensional Hilbert space, it is not a priori clear whether a decidable upper bound can be obtained for these classes. We identify complete problems for these classes and demonstrate a BQP lower and EXPSPACE upper bound. We further show that the problem of computing expectation values of polynomial bosonic observables is in PSPACE. 2. We prove that the problem of deciding the boundedness of the spectrum of a bosonic Hamiltonian is co-NP-hard. Furthermore, we show that the problem of finding the minimum energy of a bosonic Hamiltonian critically depends on the non-Gaussian stellar rank of the family of energy-constrained states one optimizes over: for constant stellar rank, it is NP-complete; for polynomially-bounded rank, it is in QMA; for unbounded rank, it is undecidable.

arXiv:2410.04274•Quantum•May 20, 2026•1 citation
Parameterized complexity theory was developed in the 1990s to enrich the complexity-theoretic analysis of problems that depend on a range of parameters. In this paper we establish a quantum equivalent of classical parameterized complexity theory, motivated by the need for new tools for the classifications of the complexity of real-world problems. We introduce the quantum analogues of a range of parameterized complexity classes and examine the relationship between these classes, their classical counterparts, and well-studied problems. This framework exposes a rich classification of the complexity of parameterized versions of QMA-hard problems, demonstrating, for example, a clear separation between the Quantum Circuit Satisfiability problem and the Local Hamiltonian problem.
Parameterized complexity enables the practical solution of generally intractable NP-hard problems when certain parameters are small, making it particularly useful in real-world applications. The study of string problems in this framework has been particularly fruitful, yielding many state-of-the-art classical algorithms that run efficiently in certain parameter regimes contrary to their worst- or average-case performance. Motivated by the dramatic increase in genomic data and its growing computational demands, we initiate the study of the quantum parameterized complexity of the Closest String Problem (CSP) and the related Closest Substring Problem (CSSP). We present three quantum algorithms for the CSP and one for the CSSP. Each algorithm demonstrates improved performance over classical counterparts in specific parameter regimes, highlighting the promise of quantum approaches in structured combinatorial settings. We also derive a conditional lower bound for the CSP with binary alphabets, showing that our first algorithm is tight in its dominant scaling factor.
We study the complexity of computational problems from quantum physics. Typically, they are studied using the complexity class QMA (quantum counterpart of NP) but some natural computational problems appear to be slightly harder than QMA. We introduce new complexity classes consisting of problems that are solvable with a small number of queries to a QMA oracle and use these complexity classes to quantify the complexity of several natural computational problems (for example, the complexity of estimating the spectral gap of a Hamiltonian).
We study the complexity of computational problems from quantum physics. Typically, they are studied using the complexity class QMA (quantum counterpart of NP) but some natural computational problems appear to be slightly harder than QMA. We introduce new complexity classes consisting of problems that are solvable with a small number of queries to a QMA oracle and use these complexity classes to quantify the complexity of several natural computational problems (for example, the complexity of estimating the spectral gap of a Hamiltonian).
We initiate the study of parameterized complexity of QMA\textsf{QMA}QMA problems in terms of the number of non-Clifford gates in the problem description. We show that for the problem of parameterized quantum circuit satisfiability, there exists a classical algorithm solving the problem with a runtime scaling exponentially in the number of non-Clifford gates but only polynomially with the system size. This result follows from our main result, that for any Clifford + ttt TTT-gate quantum circuit satisfiability problem, the search space of optimal witnesses can be reduced to a stabilizer subspace isomorphic to at most ttt qubits (independent of the system size). Furthermore, we derive new lower bounds on the TTT-count of circuit satisfiability instances and the TTT-count of the WWW-state assuming the classical exponential time hypothesis (ETH\textsf{ETH}ETH). Lastly, we explore the parameterized complexity of the quantum non-identity check problem.
This paper presents a novel algorithmic approach to quantum complexity theory, focusing on automated parameterization and iterative refinement to achieve a target complexity. The core mechanism centers around leveraging quantum annealing to efficiently explore a vast parameter space, allowing the algorithm to pinpoint solutions with optimal complexity. We propose a framework where the initial parameters are coupled with a quantum annealing process, dynamically adjusting the parameters based on the calculated complexity. This fundamentally shifts the focus from approximation to precise quantification, offering a potentially transformative tool for tackling complex problems within the context of quantum computation. The paper details the algorithm's design, its theoretical justification, and preliminary experimental results demonstrating its efficacy in a simplified, yet representative, example. We aim to establish a new paradigm in complexity theory, moving beyond traditional approximations and embracing a direct, quantum-driven approach to complexity assessment.
Quantum computing involving physical systems with continuous degrees of freedom, such as the quantum states of light, has recently attracted significant interest. However, a well-defined quantum complexity theory for these bosonic computations over infinite-dimensional Hilbert spaces is missing. In this work, we lay foundations for such a research program. We introduce natural complexity classes and problems based on bosonic generalizations of BQP, the local Hamiltonian problem, and QMA. We uncover several relationships and subtle differences between standard Boolean classical and discrete variable quantum complexity classes and identify outstanding open problems. In particular: 1. We show that the power of quadratic (Gaussian) quantum dynamics is equivalent to the class BQL. More generally, we define classes of continuous-variable quantum polynomial time computations with a bounded probability of error based on higher-degree gates. Due to the infinite dimensional Hilbert space, it is not a priori clear whether a decidable upper bound can be obtained for these classes. We identify complete problems for these classes and demonstrate a BQP lower and EXPSPACE upper bound. We further show that the problem of computing expectation values of polynomial bosonic observables is in PSPACE. 2. We prove that the problem of deciding the boundedness of the spectrum of a bosonic Hamiltonian is co-NP-hard. Furthermore, we show that the problem of finding the minimum energy of a bosonic Hamiltonian critically depends on the non-Gaussian stellar rank of the family of energy-constrained states one optimizes over: for constant stellar rank, it is NP-complete; for polynomially-bounded rank, it is in QMA; for unbounded rank, it is undecidable.