Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2203.00703 · IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems

Simulation Paths for Quantum Circuit Simulation With Decision Diagrams What to Learn From Tensor Networks, and What Not

Lukas Burgholzer, Alexander Ploier, Robert Wille

Published Aug 10, 2022• 17 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

Simulating quantum circuits on classical computers is a notoriously hard, yet increasingly important task for the development and testing of quantum algorithms. In order to alleviate this inherent complexity, efficient data structures and methods, such as tensor networks and decision diagrams, have been proposed. However, their efficiency heavily depends on the order in which the individual computations are performed. For tensor networks, the order is defined by so-called contraction plans and a plethora of methods has been developed to determine suitable plans. On the other hand, simulation based on decision diagrams is mostly conducted in a straight-forward, i.e., sequential, fashion thus far. In this work, we study the importance of the path that is chosen when simulating quantum circuits using decision diagrams and show, conceptually and experimentally, that choosing the right simulation path can make a vast difference in the efficiency of classical simulations using decision diagrams. We propose an open-source framework (available at github.com/cda-tum/ddsim) that not only allows to investigate of dedicated simulation paths but also to reuse of existing findings, e.g., obtained from determining contraction plans for tensor networks. Experimental evaluations show that translating strategies from the domain of tensor networks may yield speedups of several factors compared to the state of the art. Furthermore, we design a dedicated simulation path heuristic that allows to improve the performance even further—frequently yielding speedups of several orders of magnitude. Finally, we provide an extensive discussion on what can be learned from tensor networks and what cannot.

DOI
10.1109/tcad.2022.3197969

Related papers

Exploiting Arbitrary Paths for the Simulation of Quantum Circuits with Decision Diagrams

Lukas Burgholzer, Alexander Ploier, Robert Wille

The classical simulation of quantum circuits is essential in the development and testing of quantum algorithms. Methods based on tensor networks or decision diagrams have proven to alleviate the inevitable exponential growth of the underlying complexity in many cases. But the complexity of these methods is very sensitive to so-called contraction plans or simulation paths, respectively, which define the order in which respective operations are applied. While, for tensor networks, a plethora of strategies has been developed, simulation based on decision diagrams is mostly conducted in a straight-forward fashion thus far. In this work, we envision a flow that allows to translate strategies from the domain of tensor networks to decision diagrams. Preliminary results indicate that a substantial advantage may be gained by employing suitable simulation paths-motivating a thorough consideration.

Design, Automation, and Test in Europe•Mar 14, 2022•12 citations

Quantum Circuit Simulation with Fast Tensor Decision Diagram

Qirui Zhang, Mehdi Saligane, Hun-Seok Kim +3 more

Quantum circuit simulation is a challenging computational problem crucial for quantum computing research and development. The predominant approaches in this area center on tensor networks, prized for their better concurrency and less computation than methods using full quantum vectors and matrices. However, even with the advantages, array-based tensors can have significant redundancy. We present a novel open-source framework that harnesses tensor decision diagrams to eliminate overheads and achieve significant speedups over prior approaches. On average, it delivers a speedup of 37 × over Google’s TensorNetwork library on redundancy-rich circuits, and 25 × and 144 × over quantum multi-valued decision diagram and prior tensor decision diagram implementation, respectively, on Google random quantum circuits. To achieve this, we introduce a new linear-complexity rank simplification algorithm, Tetris, and edge-centric data structures for recursive tensor decision diagram operations. Additionally, we explore the efficacy of tensor network contraction ordering and optimizations from binary decision diagrams.

arXiv:2401.11362•International Symposium on Quality Electronic Design (ISQED)•Apr 3, 2024•4 citations

Efficient quantum circuit contraction using tensor decision diagrams

Vicente López-Oliva, José M. Badía, Maribel Castillo

Abstract Quantum computing holds the potential to solve complex problems currently beyond the capabilities of classical computers by exploiting the principles of quantum mechanics. However, due to the immaturity of such computers and the inability to know the state of the circuit during execution, efficient quantum simulators on classical computers are needed. This paper compares different methods for the contraction of quantum circuits represented as tensor networks. Tensor Decision Diagrams (TDD) are used to implement two contraction ordering methods that exploit the structure of the circuits to reduce temporal and spatial costs. Experimental results show that these methods improve other well established approaches and that they are faster that other well-known simulation tools based on other circuit representations. In addition, an analysis of different implementations of the same quantum algorithm highlights the impact of gate sets on contraction efficiency.

The Journal of Supercomputing•Dec 30, 2024•0 citations

Mixed-Dimensional Quantum Circuit Simulation with Decision Diagrams

Kevin Mato, Stefan Hillmich, Robert Wille

Quantum computers promise to solve several categories of problems faster than classical computers ever could. Current research mostly focuses on qubits, i.e., systems where the unit of information can assume only two levels. However, the underlying physics of most (if not all) of the technological platforms supports more than two levels, commonly referred to as qudits. Performing computations with qudits increases the overall complexity while, at the same time, reducing the number of operations and providing a lower error rate. Furthermore, qudits with different number of levels can be mixed in one system to ease the experimental control and keep representations as compact as possible. Exploiting these capabilities requires dedicated software support to tackle the increased complexity in an automated and efficient fashion. In this paper, we present a qudit simulator that handles mixed-dimensional systems based on Decision Diagrams (DDs). More precisely, we discuss the type of decision diagram introduced as underlying data structure as well as the resulting implementation. Experimental evaluations demonstrate that the proposed solution is capable of efficiently simulating mixed-dimensional quantum circuits, with specific use cases including more than 100 qudits in one circuit. The source code of the simulator is available via github.com/cda-tdum/MiSiM under the MIT license.

arXiv:2308.12332•IEEE International Conference on Quantum Computing and Engineering (QCE)•Sep 17, 2023•2 citations

Tools for Quantum Computing Based on Decision Diagrams

Robert Wille, Stefan Hillmich, Lukas Burgholzer

With quantum computers promising advantages even in the near-term NISQ era, there is a lively community that develops software and toolkits for the design of corresponding quantum circuits. Although the underlying problems are different, expertise from the design automation community, which developed sophisticated design solutions for the conventional realm in the past decades, can help here. In this respect, decision diagrams provide a promising foundation for tackling many design tasks such as simulation, synthesis, and verification of quantum circuits. However, users of the corresponding tools often do not have a proper background or an intuition about how these methods based on decision diagrams work and what their strengths and limits are. In this work, we first review the concepts of how decision diagrams can be employed, e.g., for the simulation and verification of quantum circuits. Afterwards, in an effort to make decision diagrams for quantum computing more accessible, we then present a visualization tool for quantum decision diagrams, which allows users to explore the behavior of decision diagrams in the design tasks mentioned above. Finally, we present decision diagram-based tools for simulation and verification of quantum circuits using the methods discussed above as part of the open-source Munich Quantum Toolkit (MQT)—a set of tools for quantum computing developed at the Technical University of Munich and the Johannes Kepler University Linz and released under the MIT license. More information about the corresponding tools is available at https://github.com/cda-tum/ddsim . By this, we provide an introduction of the concepts and tools for potential users who would like to work with them as well as potential developers aiming to extend them.

arXiv:2108.07027•ACM Transactions on Quantum Computing•Feb 23, 2022•32 citations

A Tensor Network based Decision Diagram for Representation of Quantum Circuits

Xin Hong, Xiangzhen Zhou, Sanjiang Li +2 more

Tensor networks have been successfully applied in simulation of quantum physical systems for decades. Recently, they have also been employed in classical simulation of quantum computing, in particular, random quantum circuits. This article proposes a decision diagram style data structure, called Tensor Decision Diagram (TDD), for more principled and convenient applications of tensor networks. This new data structure provides a compact and canonical representation for quantum circuits. By exploiting circuit partition, the TDD of a quantum circuit can be computed efficiently. Furthermore, we show that the operations of tensor networks essential in their applications (e.g., addition and contraction) can also be implemented efficiently in TDDs. A proof-of-concept implementation of TDDs is presented and its efficiency is evaluated on a set of benchmark quantum circuits. It is expected that TDDs will play an important role in various design automation tasks related to quantum circuits, including but not limited to equivalence checking, error detection, synthesis, simulation, and verification.

arXiv:2009.02618•ACM Transactions on Design Automation of Electronic Systems•Feb 18, 2022•44 citations
Simulating quantum circuits on classical computers is a notoriously hard, yet increasingly important task for the development and testing of quantum algorithms. In order to alleviate this inherent complexity, efficient data structures and methods, such as tensor networks and decision diagrams, have been proposed. However, their efficiency heavily depends on the order in which the individual computations are performed. For tensor networks, the order is defined by so-called contraction plans and a plethora of methods has been developed to determine suitable plans. On the other hand, simulation based on decision diagrams is mostly conducted in a straight-forward, i.e., sequential, fashion thus far. In this work, we study the importance of the path that is chosen when simulating quantum circuits using decision diagrams and show, conceptually and experimentally, that choosing the right simulation path can make a vast difference in the efficiency of classical simulations using decision diagrams. We propose an open-source framework (available at github.com/cda-tum/ddsim) that not only allows to investigate of dedicated simulation paths but also to reuse of existing findings, e.g., obtained from determining contraction plans for tensor networks. Experimental evaluations show that translating strategies from the domain of tensor networks may yield speedups of several factors compared to the state of the art. Furthermore, we design a dedicated simulation path heuristic that allows to improve the performance even further—frequently yielding speedups of several orders of magnitude. Finally, we provide an extensive discussion on what can be learned from tensor networks and what cannot.
The classical simulation of quantum circuits is essential in the development and testing of quantum algorithms. Methods based on tensor networks or decision diagrams have proven to alleviate the inevitable exponential growth of the underlying complexity in many cases. But the complexity of these methods is very sensitive to so-called contraction plans or simulation paths, respectively, which define the order in which respective operations are applied. While, for tensor networks, a plethora of strategies has been developed, simulation based on decision diagrams is mostly conducted in a straight-forward fashion thus far. In this work, we envision a flow that allows to translate strategies from the domain of tensor networks to decision diagrams. Preliminary results indicate that a substantial advantage may be gained by employing suitable simulation paths-motivating a thorough consideration.
Quantum circuit simulation is a challenging computational problem crucial for quantum computing research and development. The predominant approaches in this area center on tensor networks, prized for their better concurrency and less computation than methods using full quantum vectors and matrices. However, even with the advantages, array-based tensors can have significant redundancy. We present a novel open-source framework that harnesses tensor decision diagrams to eliminate overheads and achieve significant speedups over prior approaches. On average, it delivers a speedup of 37 × over Google’s TensorNetwork library on redundancy-rich circuits, and 25 × and 144 × over quantum multi-valued decision diagram and prior tensor decision diagram implementation, respectively, on Google random quantum circuits. To achieve this, we introduce a new linear-complexity rank simplification algorithm, Tetris, and edge-centric data structures for recursive tensor decision diagram operations. Additionally, we explore the efficacy of tensor network contraction ordering and optimizations from binary decision diagrams.
Abstract Quantum computing holds the potential to solve complex problems currently beyond the capabilities of classical computers by exploiting the principles of quantum mechanics. However, due to the immaturity of such computers and the inability to know the state of the circuit during execution, efficient quantum simulators on classical computers are needed. This paper compares different methods for the contraction of quantum circuits represented as tensor networks. Tensor Decision Diagrams (TDD) are used to implement two contraction ordering methods that exploit the structure of the circuits to reduce temporal and spatial costs. Experimental results show that these methods improve other well established approaches and that they are faster that other well-known simulation tools based on other circuit representations. In addition, an analysis of different implementations of the same quantum algorithm highlights the impact of gate sets on contraction efficiency.
Quantum computers promise to solve several categories of problems faster than classical computers ever could. Current research mostly focuses on qubits, i.e., systems where the unit of information can assume only two levels. However, the underlying physics of most (if not all) of the technological platforms supports more than two levels, commonly referred to as qudits. Performing computations with qudits increases the overall complexity while, at the same time, reducing the number of operations and providing a lower error rate. Furthermore, qudits with different number of levels can be mixed in one system to ease the experimental control and keep representations as compact as possible. Exploiting these capabilities requires dedicated software support to tackle the increased complexity in an automated and efficient fashion. In this paper, we present a qudit simulator that handles mixed-dimensional systems based on Decision Diagrams (DDs). More precisely, we discuss the type of decision diagram introduced as underlying data structure as well as the resulting implementation. Experimental evaluations demonstrate that the proposed solution is capable of efficiently simulating mixed-dimensional quantum circuits, with specific use cases including more than 100 qudits in one circuit. The source code of the simulator is available via github.com/cda-tdum/MiSiM under the MIT license.
With quantum computers promising advantages even in the near-term NISQ era, there is a lively community that develops software and toolkits for the design of corresponding quantum circuits. Although the underlying problems are different, expertise from the design automation community, which developed sophisticated design solutions for the conventional realm in the past decades, can help here. In this respect, decision diagrams provide a promising foundation for tackling many design tasks such as simulation, synthesis, and verification of quantum circuits. However, users of the corresponding tools often do not have a proper background or an intuition about how these methods based on decision diagrams work and what their strengths and limits are. In this work, we first review the concepts of how decision diagrams can be employed, e.g., for the simulation and verification of quantum circuits. Afterwards, in an effort to make decision diagrams for quantum computing more accessible, we then present a visualization tool for quantum decision diagrams, which allows users to explore the behavior of decision diagrams in the design tasks mentioned above. Finally, we present decision diagram-based tools for simulation and verification of quantum circuits using the methods discussed above as part of the open-source Munich Quantum Toolkit (MQT)—a set of tools for quantum computing developed at the Technical University of Munich and the Johannes Kepler University Linz and released under the MIT license. More information about the corresponding tools is available at https://github.com/cda-tum/ddsim . By this, we provide an introduction of the concepts and tools for potential users who would like to work with them as well as potential developers aiming to extend them.
Tensor networks have been successfully applied in simulation of quantum physical systems for decades. Recently, they have also been employed in classical simulation of quantum computing, in particular, random quantum circuits. This article proposes a decision diagram style data structure, called Tensor Decision Diagram (TDD), for more principled and convenient applications of tensor networks. This new data structure provides a compact and canonical representation for quantum circuits. By exploiting circuit partition, the TDD of a quantum circuit can be computed efficiently. Furthermore, we show that the operations of tensor networks essential in their applications (e.g., addition and contraction) can also be implemented efficiently in TDDs. A proof-of-concept implementation of TDDs is presented and its efficiency is evaluated on a set of benchmark quantum circuits. It is expected that TDDs will play an important role in various design automation tasks related to quantum circuits, including but not limited to equivalence checking, error detection, synthesis, simulation, and verification.