In the quantum computation verification problem, a quantum server wants to convince a client that the output of evaluating a quantum circuit C is some result that it claims. This problem is considered very important both theoretically and practically in quantum computation [1], [2], [3]. The client is considered to be limited in computational power, and one desirable property is that the client can be completely classical, which leads to the classical verification of quantum computation (CVQC) problem. In terms of the time complexity of server-side quantum computations (which typically dominate the total time complexity of both the client and the server), the fastest single-server CVQC protocol so far has complexity $O(\mathrm{p}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{l}\mathrm{y}(\kappa)|C|^{3})$ where $|C|$ is the size of the circuit to be verified and $\kappa$ is the security parameter, given by Mahadev [4]. This leads to a similar cubic time blowup in many existing protocols including multiparty quantum computation, zero knowledge and obfuscation [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10]. Considering the preciousness of quantum computation resources, this cubic complexity barrier could be a big obstacle for theoretical and practical development of protocols for these problems.In this work, by developing new techniques, we give a new CVQC protocol with complexity $O(\mathrm{p}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{l}\mathrm{y}(\kappa)|C|)$ (in terms of the total time complexity of both the client and the server), which is significantly faster than existing protocols. Our protocol is secure in the quantum random oracle model [11] assuming the existence of noisy trapdoor claw-free functions [12], which are both extensively used assumptions in quantum cryptography. Along the way, we also give a new classical channel remote state preparation protocol for states in $\displaystyle \left\{|+\theta\rangle=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(|0\rangle+e^{\mathrm{i}\theta\pi/4}|1\rangle)\ :\ \theta\in\left\{0,1\cdots 7\right\}\right\}$, another basic primitive in quantum cryptography. Our protocol allows for parallel verifiable preparation of L independently random states in this form (up to a constant overall error and a possibly unbounded server-side simulator), and runs in only O(poly($\kappa$)L) time and constant rounds; for comparison, existing works (even for possibly simpler state families) all require very large or unestimated time and round complexities [13], [14], [15], [16].
In the quantum computation verification problem, a quantum server wants to convince a client that the output of evaluating a quantum circuit C is some result that it claims. This problem is considered very important both theoretically and practically in quantum computation [1], [2], [3]. The client is considered to be limited in computational power, and one desirable property is that the client can be completely classical, which leads to the classical verification of quantum computation (CVQC) problem. In terms of the time complexity of server-side quantum computations (which typically dominate the total time complexity of both the client and the server), the fastest single-server CVQC protocol so far has complexity O(poly(κ)∣C∣3) where ∣C∣ is the size of the circuit to be verified and κ is the security parameter, given by Mahadev [4]. This leads to a similar cubic time blowup in many existing protocols including multiparty quantum computation, zero knowledge and obfuscation [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10]. Considering the preciousness of quantum computation resources, this cubic complexity barrier could be a big obstacle for theoretical and practical development of protocols for these problems.In this work, by developing new techniques, we give a new CVQC protocol with complexity O(poly(κ)∣C∣) (in terms of the total time complexity of both the client and the server), which is significantly faster than existing protocols. Our protocol is secure in the quantum random oracle model [11] assuming the existence of noisy trapdoor claw-free functions [12], which are both extensively used assumptions in quantum cryptography. Along the way, we also give a new classical channel remote state preparation protocol for states in {∣+θ⟩=21(∣0⟩+eiθπ/4∣1⟩):θ∈{0,1⋯7}}, another basic primitive in quantum cryptography. Our protocol allows for parallel verifiable preparation of L independently random states in this form (up to a constant overall error and a possibly unbounded server-side simulator), and runs in only O(poly(κ)L) time and constant rounds; for comparison, existing works (even for possibly simpler state families) all require very large or unestimated time and round complexities [13], [14], [15], [16].
Quantum computers promise to offer a considerable speed-up in solving certain problems, compared to the best classical algorithms. In many instances, the gap between quantum and classical running times is conjectured to be exponential. While this is great news for those applications where quantum computers would provide such an advantage, it also raises a significant challenge: how can classical computers verify the correctness of quantum computations? In attempting to answer this question, a number of protocols have been developed in which a classical client (referred to as verifier) can interact with one or more quantum servers (referred to as provers) in order to certify the correctness of a quantum computation performed by the server(s). These protocols are of one of two types: either there are multiple non-communicating provers, sharing entanglement, and the verifier is completely classical; or, there is a single prover and the classical verifier has a device for preparing or measuring quantum states. The latter type of protocols are, arguably, more relevant to near term quantum computers, since having multiple quantum computers that share a large amount of entanglement is, from a technological standpoint, extremely challenging. Before the realisation of practical single-prover protocols, a number of challenges need to be addressed: how robust are these protocols to noise on the verifier's device? Can the protocols be made fault-tolerant without significantly increasing the requirements of the verifier? How do we know that the verifier's device is operating correctly? Could this device be eliminated completely, thus having a protocol with a fully classical verifier and a single quantum prover? Our work attempts to provide answers to these questions. First, we consider a single-prover verification protocol developed by Fitzsimons and Kashefi and show that this protocol is indeed robust with respect to deviations on the quantum state prepared by the verifier. We show that this is true even if those deviations are the result of a correlation with the prover's system. We then use this result to give a verification protocol which is device- independent. The protocol consists of a verifier with a measurement device and a single prover. Device-independence means that the verifier need not trust the measurement device (nor the prover) which can be assumed to be fully malicious (though not communicating with the prover). A key element in realising this protocol is a robust technique of Reichardt, Unger and Vazirani for testing, using non-local correlations, that two untrusted devices share a large number of entangled states. This technique is referred to as rigidity of non-local correlations. Our second result is to prove a rigidity result for a type of quantum correlations known as steering correlations. To do this, we first show that steering correlations can be used in order to certify maximally entangled states, in a setting in which each test is independent of the previous one. We also show that the fidelity with which we characterise the state, in this specific test, is optimal. We then improve the previous result by removing the independence assumption. This then leads to our desired rigidity result. We make use of it, in a similar fashion to the device-independent case, in order to give a verification protocol that is one-sided device-independent. The importance of this application is to show how different trust assumptions affect the efficiency of the protocol. Next, we describe a protocol for fault-tolerantly verifying quantum computations, with minimal "quantum requirements" for the verifier. Specifically, the verifier only requires a device for measuring single-qubit states. Both this device, and the prover's operations are assumed to be prone to errors. We show that under standard assumptions about the error model, it is possible to achieve verification of quantum computation using fault-tolerant principles. As a proof of principle, and to better illustrate the inner workings of the protocol, we describe a toy implementation of the protocol in a quantum simulator, and present the results we obtained, when running it for a small computation. Finally, we explore the possibility of having a verification protocol, with a classical verifier and a single prover, such that the prover is blind with respect to the verifier's computation. We give evidence that this is not possible. In fact, our result is only concerned with blind quantum computation with a classical client, and uses complexity theoretic results to argue why it is improbable for such a protocol to exist. We then use these complexity theoretic techniques to show that a client, with the ability to prepare and send quantum states to a quantum server, would not be able to delegate arbitrary NP problems to that server. In other words, even a client with quantum capabilities cannot exploit those capabilities to delegate the computation of NP problems, while keeping the input, to that computation, private. This is again true, provided certain complexity theoretic conjectures are true.
Quantum computers can make use of quantum mechanics to achieve surprising speed-ups relative to classical computers, for important computational problems. Quantum computers are gradually coming into reality, but the current implementations are big, require advanced facilities and could only be used as a cloud service in the foreseeable future. If we want to run quantum computations on secret data, we require protocols for performing computations on a remote quantum server without leaking information to the server about the data being processed. In the quantum computation delegation problem, a client with limited quantum computing resources wishes to evaluate a secret quantum circuit C with the help of a more powerful remote server. The protocol is deemed secure if the server learns nothing about either the circuit or the input state even if the server acts maliciously. This problem, first raised in (Childs05), has become fundamental to the study of quantum cryptography, because of its practical importance, and because it provides a testbed for new techniques that can be later applied to related problems (for example, quantum computation verification [FK12]). Prior to our work, known protocols for this problem were either proven secure against all possible attackers, without any complexity-theoretic assumptions, but highly inefficient for the client; or efficient but proven secure only based on strong cryptographic assumptions. This second category of protocols is only secure if there exist public-key encryption schemes that are secure against quantum attacks and that have special additional properties. Very few candidates for such schemes are known, and their security remains poorly understood. We seek to understand how efficient quantum delegation schemes can be designed based on weaker or different complexity assumptions. We study how the availability of symmetric-key primitives, modeled by a random oracle, changes the complexity of quantum computation delegation. In contrast with public-key primitives, there are many candidates for symmetric-key schemes secure against quantum attacks. We aim for protocols that require as little quantum computing as possible for the client. Specifically, we ask that the client only needs to run a quantum circuit of size independent of the circuit being evaluated. Known unconditionally-secure protocols all require the client to evaluate quantum circuits of size at least linear in the original circuit size. In this thesis, we construct two new quantum computation delegation protocols. The first protocol is for the delegation of a large special circuit family, which we call "C+P circuits". This scheme is non-interactive, and can be used to delegate a very important quantum algorithm---Shor's algorithm (Shor,97) for integer factorization and discrete logarithms. Our second protocol requires interaction---one quantum message from the client to the server, and many rounds of classical computation---but supports arbitrary quantum computation (instead of a specific circuit family), and is thus much more general than the first protocol in both theory and practice. Both protocols are proved secure in the quantum random oracle model. The protocols can be instantiated in practice with a symmetric-key cipher such as AES.
A quantum verifier decides membership in QMA using a (single) quantum witness state. This witness may be arbitrary, and no requirement is placed on it beyond its acceptance probability. A protocol claiming to classically verify QMA should offer the same guarantee: any witness that would convince a quantum verifier should also suffice to convince a classical verifier. Unfortunately, existing classical verification of quantum computation (CVQC) protocols behave quite differently from the original QMA verifier: they require many copies of the witness and destroy every one, effectively demanding that the prover solve the hard problem of witness duplication before verification can begin.
We build a protocol to classically verify QMA languages that uses a single copy of the prover's QMA witness. Whenever the original QMA verifier accepts that witness with overwhelming probability, our protocol has negligible completeness and soundness errors and returns the witness negligibly disturbed after interaction with an honest verifier. The soundness of our CVQC is based on the post-quantum Learning With Errors (LWE) assumption.
As an intermediate step of independent interest, we introduce witness-preserving classical arguments for NP which enable provers that start out with a superposition over NP witnesses to convince a verifier without disturbing their superposition.
Properties of quantum mechanics such as entanglement and the no-cloning theorem enable new forms of cryptography that are unattainable in classical models of computation. Quantum information, however, is harder to process, store, and transmit than classical information. As such, it is desirable to construct semi-quantum cryptographic protocols where only a subset of the parties have quantum capabilities while the rest operate classically. In this dissertation, we analyze the security of semi-quantum protocols based on two approaches: (i) nonlocality-based techniques and (ii) the hardness of the Learning with Errors (LWE) problem. In the first part of the dissertation, we leverage a form of Bell test to construct a quantum position verification (QPV) protocol. Initial QPV protocols required verifiers to prepare and send quantum states to an honest prover to achieve security against adversaries with bounded memory or entanglement. Later work constructed QPV protocols with classical verifiers but required additional assumptions such as the hardness of LWE or of random circuit sampling. We construct a variant of QPV where classical verifiers verify the spatial locations of two provers. We use the nonlocal correlations produced by the two provers to show security against adversaries with bounded quantum memory without making any computational intractability assumptions. In the second part of the dissertation, we use trapdoor claw-free functions (TCFs) to construct semi-quantum cryptographic protocols. TCFs, which are constructible from the hardness of LWE, have been shown to be immensely valuable in the construction of classically verifiable quantum cryptographic protocols. As opposed to previous work where the server is asked to prepare a claw state and perform Pauli-X and Z measurements, we use a technique that leverages the entire range of qubit measurements on the XY-plane. We use this technique to construct three protocols: (i) a one-round blind remote state preparation protocol that delegates the preparation of an arbitrary state on the XY-plane up to a Pauli-X correction; (ii) a two-round proof of quantumness whose security is directly in terms of the hardness of LWE and only requires the prover to prepare and measure a single claw state; and (iii) a 1-of-2 Puzzle with a single qubit auxiliary state.
The rapid evolution of quantum technologies is likely to cause major shifts in the mainstream computing landscape. In order to fully reach their potential in a wide base accessible to any user, remote access of quantum computers and manipulation of data with strong privacy and integrity guarantees are essential. Consider a setting where a client having a fully classical computer wants to determine the result of some quantum computation, but lacks the necessary resources to perform the computation herself. She has access to a more powerful server which has quantum resources and can solve the problem and send the outcome back to the client. However, the client does not trust the powerful server, so she needs to find a way to hide her data. Therefore, the main question that arises is how can we guarantee the client’s privacy of the input and even the computation itself against the server possessing quantum computational capabilities. In the present thesis, we study this problem, denoted here as classical secure delegation of quantum computations (CSDQC) between a fully classical honest client and a quantum untrusted server. We focus on different models of security, analyzing the limitations and potential of each of the settings. Concretely, we first study the CSDQC problem under information-theoretic security. We analyse two categories of quantum computations, decision and sampling problems and in both cases we provide evidence indicating the impossibility of achieving information-theoretic security. Subsequently, we consider relaxing the security framework and specifically, we will analyze this task in the computational security setting (against quantum polynomial-time adversaries). As a result, in the second part of the thesis we put forward the remote state preparation as a key component that would allow us to achieve classical secure delegation of universal quantum computations. We present two protocols realizing the remote state preparation primitive assuming only a classical channel between client and server. The first candidate is shown to be secure in the honest-but-curious model, while the second candidate is proven secure against the server in the malicious setting. The security of both constructions relies on the hardness of the learning with errors problem. Finally, given the important role the remote state preparation plays not only in CSDQC, but also in other quantum communication protocols, we analyze its composable security to determine the privacy loss as a result of using remote state preparation as a sub-module in different protocols.
How could quantum cryptography help us achieve what are not achievable in classical cryptography? In this work we study the classical cryptographic problem that two parties would like to perform secure computations with long outputs. As a basic primitive and example, we first consider the following problem which we call secure function sampling with long outputs: suppose f:{0,1}n→{0,1}m is a public, efficient classical function, where m is big; Alice would like to sample x from its domain and sends f(x) to Bob; what Bob knows should be no more than f(x) even if it behaves maliciously. Classical cryptography, like FHE and succinct arguments [Gen09,Kil92,HW15], allows us to achieve this task within communication complexity O(n+m); could we achieve this task with communication complexity independent of m? In this work, we first design a quantum cryptographic protocol that achieves secure function sampling with approximate security, within O(n) communication (omitting the dependency on the security parameter and error tolerance). We also prove the classical impossibility using techniques in [HW15], which means that our protocol indeed achieves a type of quantum advantage. Building on the secure function sampling protocol, we further construct protocols for general secure two-party computations [Yao86,GB01] with approximate security, with communication complexity only depending on the input length and the targeted security. In terms of the assumptions, we construct protocols for these problems assuming only the existence of collapsing hash functions [Unr16]; what's more, we also construct a classical-channel protocol for these problems additionally assuming the existence of noisy trapdoor claw-free functions [BCMVV,BKVV].