The explorations of non-Hermiticity have been devoted to investigate the disorder-induced many-body localization (MBL). However, the sensitivity of the spatial boundary conditions and the interplay of the non-Hermitian skin effect with many-body phenomena are not yet clear. For a MBL system in the presence of nonreciprocal tunnelings and random disorder potential, we identify two different complex-real spectral transitions, one is present for both open and periodic boundaries while the other is present only for open boundaries of coupled non-Hermitian chains. The later is driven due to the interchain coupling at weak disorder where the level statistics of the real eigenenergy phase follows a Gaussian orthogonal ensemble. We further characterize wave functions through the (biorthogonal) inverse participation ratio and fractal dimension, which reveal the suppression of skin effect in the non-Hermitian MBL phase. Finally, we demonstrate that the quench dynamics of the local particle density, spin imbalance, and entanglement entropy also signify the hallmark of the boundary effects and nonergodic character of many-body localization.
The explorations of non-Hermiticity have been devoted to investigate the disorder-induced many-body localization (MBL). However, the sensitivity of the spatial boundary conditions and the interplay of the non-Hermitian skin effect with many-body phenomena are not yet clear. For a MBL system in the presence of nonreciprocal tunnelings and random disorder potential, we identify two different complex-real spectral transitions, one is present for both open and periodic boundaries while the other is present only for open boundaries of coupled non-Hermitian chains. The later is driven due to the interchain coupling at weak disorder where the level statistics of the real eigenenergy phase follows a Gaussian orthogonal ensemble. We further characterize wave functions through the (biorthogonal) inverse participation ratio and fractal dimension, which reveal the suppression of skin effect in the non-Hermitian MBL phase. Finally, we demonstrate that the quench dynamics of the local particle density, spin imbalance, and entanglement entropy also signify the hallmark of the boundary effects and nonergodic character of many-body localization.
The non-Hermitian systems exhibit extreme sensitivity to the boundary conditions. The change in the eigenspectrum with tuning boundary parameter is intimately connected to the non-Hermitian skin effect. The single-particle systems are affected by the boundary perturbations; however, the interplay of a random disorder potential and nonreciprocal hopping under boundary perturbations of an interacting many-body system is not yet clear. In this work, we examine the boundary sensitivity of a non-Hermitian interacting fermionic system in the presence of a random disorder potential. A nonzero boundary parameter results in real-complex spectral transitions with nonreciprocal (or unidirectional) hopping at weak disorder, while the many-body localization at strong disorder washes away real-complex transitions leading to dynamical stability and real eigenvalue spectrum. We show that the boundary-driven real-complex spectral transitions of the non-Hermitian chain are accompanied by the corresponding changes in the level statistics and nearest level-spacing distributions. The intriguing features of nonreciprocity and boundary sensitivity are further revealed using the averaged inverse participation ratios. Finally, we find distinct behavior in the quench dynamics of local particle density, population imbalance, and entanglement entropy of charge-density-wave ordered state that corroborate the real-complex and localization transitions. Our results provide a route to understanding disordered many-body systems under a generalized boundary.
Localization in one-dimensional interacting systems can be caused by disorder potentials or non-Hermiticity. The former phenomenon is the many-body localization (MBL), and the latter is the many-body non-Hermitian skin effect (NHSE). In this work, we numerically investigate the interplay between these two kinds of localization, where the energy-resolved MBL arises from a deterministic quasiperiodic potential in a fermionic chain. We propose a set of eigenstate properties and long-time dynamics that collectively distinguish the two localization mechanisms in the presence of non-Hermiticity. By computing the proposed diagnostics, we show that the thermal states are vulnerable to the many-body NHSE while the MBL states remain resilient up to a strong non-Hermiticity. Finally, we discuss experimental observables that probe the difference between the two localizations in a non-Hermitian quasiperiodic fermionic chain. Our results pave the way toward experimental observations on the interplay of interaction, quasiperiodic potential, and non-Hermiticity.
Non-Hermitian many-body physics reveals a rich interplay between topology, localization, and boundary effects, yet their collective behavior in interacting disordered systems remains largely unexplored. In this work, we study an interacting non-Hermitian spin chain subject to a quasi-periodic longitudinal field, providing a unified and controlled setting, where non-Hermitian dynamics, interactions, and localization mechanisms intertwine. Remarkably, we discover a "D-shaped" many-body mobility edge that separates extended and localized eigenstates, while simultaneously delineating regimes of many-body localization and the many-body skin effect (where many-body eigenstates acquire an anomalous drift towards a boundary under open boundaries) emerging from the combined action of interactions, non-Hermiticity, and driving amplitude. We demonstrate that the skin effect induces multifractal scaling in the non-Hermitian eigenstates, providing a clear signature of the many-body skin effect. Employing diagnostics such as the fractal dimension, complex eigenvalue fractions, and many-body inverse participation ratios, we map out a unified phase diagram in which all measures consistently identify the "D-shaped" mobility edge. Finally, we probe this interplay using both complex level-spacing statistics and dynamical observables such as density imbalance, entanglement growth, and wave-packet evolution, culminating in a rich many-body mobility phase diagram that captures both the many-body skin effect and localization transitions. Our results identify a clear, defining signature of the "D-shaped" many-body mobility edge, and underscore its pivotal role in shaping the physics of open quantum many-body systems.
Recent studies on disorder-induced many-body localization (MBL) in non-Hermitian quantum systems have attracted great interest. However, the non-Hermitian disorder-free MBL still needs to be clarified. We consider a one-dimensional interacting Stark model with nonreciprocal hoppings having time-reversal symmetry, the properties of which are boundary dependent. Under periodic boundary conditions (PBCs), such a model exhibits three types of phase transitions: the real-complex transition of eigenenergies, the topological phase transition, and the non-Hermitian Stark MBL transition. The real-complex and topological phase transitions occur at the same point in the thermodynamic limit but do not coincide with the non-Hermitian Stark MBL transition, which is quite different from the non-Hermitian disordered cases. By the level statistics, the system transitions from the Ginibre ensemble (GE) to the Gaussian orthogonal ensemble (GOE) to the Possion ensemble with the increase of the linear tilt potential's strength. The real-complex transition of the eigenvalues is accompanied by the GE-to-GOE transition in the ergodic regime. Moreover, the second transition of the level statistics corresponds to the occurrence of non-Hermitian Stark MBL. We demonstrate that the non-Hermitian Stark MBL is robust and shares many similarities with disorder-induced MBL, which several existing characteristic quantities of the spectral statistics and eigenstate properties can confirm. The dynamical evolutions of the entanglement entropy and the density imbalance can distinguish the real-complex and Stark MBL transitions. Finally, we find that our system under open boundary conditions lacks a real-complex transition, and the transition of non-Hermitian Stark MBL is the same as that under PBCs.
We present the non-Hermitian many-body localization (MBL) induced by imaginary disorder. By numerically calculating the entanglement entropy and complex level spacing, we identify a clear thermal-MBL transition: the entanglement entropy from the volume law to area law and the level spacing from the repulsive distribution to the uncorrelated Poisson distribution. In the complex energy plane, there exists a mobility loop separating different phases, which is similar to the mobility edge for the Hermitian MBL. Surprisingly, we find that the confluence of imaginary disorder and the localization length provides tunneling channels for dynamically jumping of the particles from the initial to the final state in both the real and Hilbert spaces. Our work provides an example of non-Hermitian many-body phases induced by imaginary disorder, which offers new possibilities for studying strongly correlated non-Hermitian physics.
Utilizing exact diagonalization techniques, we investigate a one-dimensional, nonreciprocal, interacting hard-core boson model under a Stark potential with tail curvature. By employing the nonzero imaginary eigenenergies ratio, half-chain entanglement entropy, and eigenstate instability, we numerically confirm that the critical points of spectral real-complex (RC) transition and many-body localization (MBL) phase transition are not identical, and an examination of the phase diagrams reveals that the spectral RC transition arises before the MBL phase transition, which suggests the existence of a non-MBL-driven spectral RC transition. These findings are quite unexpected, and they are entirely different from observations in disorder-driven interacting non-Hermitian systems. This work provides a useful reference for further research on phase transitions in disorder-free interacting non-Hermitian systems.