We consider the following problem: Given a set S of at most n elements from a universe of size m, represent it in memory as a bit string so that membership queries of the form "Is x in S?" can be answered by making at most t probes into the bit string. Let s(m,n,t) be the minimum number of bits needed by any such scheme. We obtain new upper bounds for s(m,n,t=2), which match or improve all the previously known bounds. We also consider the quantum version of this problem and obtain improved upper bounds.
We consider the following problem: Given a set S of at most n elements from a universe of size m, represent it in memory as a bit string so that membership queries of the form "Is x in S?" can be answered by making at most t probes into the bit string. Let s(m,n,t) be the minimum number of bits needed by any such scheme. We obtain new upper bounds for s(m,n,t=2), which match or improve all the previously known bounds. We also consider the quantum version of this problem and obtain improved upper bounds.
Studies the quantum complexity of the static set membership problem: given a subset S (|S|/spl les/n) of a universe of size m(/spl Gt/n), store it as a table, T:(0,1)/sup r//spl rarr/(0,1), of bits so that queries of the form 'is x in S?' can be answered. The goal is to use a small table and yet answer queries using a few bit probes. This problem was considered by H. Buhrman et al. (2000), who showed lower and upper bounds for this problem in the classical deterministic and randomised models. In this paper, we formulate this problem in the "quantum bit-probe model". We assume that access to the table T is provided by means of a black-box (oracle) unitary transform O/sub T/ that takes the basis state (y,b) to the basis state |y,b/spl oplus/T(y)>. The query algorithm is allowed to apply O/sub T/ on any superposition of basis states. We show tradeoff results between the space (defined as 2/sup r/) and the number of probes (oracle calls) in this model. Our results show that the lower bounds shown by Buhrman et al. for the classical model also hold (with minor differences) in the quantum bit-probe model. These bounds almost match the classical upper bounds. Our lower bounds are proved using linear algebraic arguments.
We study the quantum complexity of the static set membership problem: given a subset S (|S| \leq n) of a universe of size m (m \gg n), store it as a table of bits so that queries of the form `Is x \in S?' can be answered. The goal is to use a small table and yet answer queries using few bitprobes. This problem was considered recently by Buhrman, Miltersen, Radhakrishnan and Venkatesh, where lower and upper bounds were shown for this problem in the classical deterministic and randomized models. In this paper, we formulate this problem in the "quantum bitprobe model" and show tradeoff results between space and time.In this model, the storage scheme is classical but the query scheme is quantum.We show, roughly speaking, that similar lower bounds hold in the quantum model as in the classical model, which imply that the classical upper bounds are more or less tight even in the quantum case. Our lower bounds are proved using linear algebraic techniques.
In the search with wildcards problem [Ambainis, Montanaro, Quantum Inf.~Comput.'14], one's goal is to learn an unknown bit-string x∈{−1,1}n. An algorithm may, at unit cost, test equality of any subset of the hidden string with a string of its choice. Ambainis and Montanaro showed a quantum algorithm of cost O(nlogn) and a near-matching lower bound of Ω(n). Belovs [Comput.~Comp.'15] subsequently showed a tight O(n) upper bound.
We consider a natural generalization of this problem, parametrized by a subset Q⊆2[n], where an algorithm may test whether xS=b for an arbitrary S∈Q and b∈{−1,1}S of its choice, at unit cost. We show near-tight bounds when Q is any of the following collections: bounded-size sets, contiguous blocks, prefixes, and only the full set.
All of these results are derived using a framework that we develop. Using symmetries of the task at hand we show that the quantum query complexity of learning x is characterized, up to a constant factor, by an optimization program, which is succinctly described as follows: `maximize over all odd functions f:{−1,1}n→R the ratio of the maximum value of f to the maximum (over T∈Q) standard deviation of f on a subcube whose free variables are exactly T.'
To the best of our knowledge, ours is the first work to use the primal version of the negative-weight adversary bound (which is a maximization program typically used to show lower bounds) to show new quantum query upper bounds without explicitly resorting to SDP duality.
This survey summarizes several results about quantum computing related to (mostly static) data structures. First, we describe classical data structures for the set membership and the predecessor search problems: Perfect Hash tables for set membership by Fredman, Komlós and Szemerédi and a data structure by Beame and Fich for predecessor search. We also prove results about their space complexity (how many bits are required) and time complexity (how many bits have to be read to answer a query). After that, we turn our attention to classical data structures with quantum access. In the quantum access model, data is stored in classical bits, but they can be accessed in a quantum way: We may read several bits in superposition for unit cost. We give proofs for lower bounds in this setting that show that the classical data structures from the first section are, in some sense, asymptotically optimal - even in the quantum model. In fact, these proofs are simpler and give stronger results than previous proofs for the classical model of computation. The lower bound for set membership was proved by Radhakrishnan, Sen and Venkatesh and the result for the predecessor problem by Sen and Venkatesh. Finally, we examine fully quantum data structures. Instead of encoding the data in classical bits, we now encode it in qubits. We allow any unitary operation or measurement in order to answer queries. We describe one data structure by de Wolf for the set membership problem and also a general framework using fully quantum data structures in quantum walks by Jeffery, Kothari and Magniez.
In the oracle identification problem, we are given oracle access to an unknown N-bit string x promised to belong to a known set C of size M and our task is to identify x. We present a quantum algorithm for the problem that is optimal in its dependence on N and M. Our algorithm considerably simplifies and improves the previous best algorithm due to Ambainis et al. Our algorithm also has applications in quantum learning theory, where it improves the complexity of exact learning with membership queries, resolving a conjecture of Hunziker et al. The algorithm is based on ideas from classical learning theory and a new composition theorem for solutions of the filtered γ2-norm semidefinite program, which characterizes quantum query complexity. Our composition theorem is quite general and allows us to compose quantum algorithms with input-dependent query complexities without incurring a logarithmic overhead for error reduction. As an application of the composition theorem, we remove all log factors from the best known quantum algorithm for Boolean matrix multiplication.
We consider two combinatorial problems. The first we call ``search with wildcards'': given an unknown n-bit string x, and the ability to check whether any subset of the bits of x is equal to a provided query string, the goal is to output x. We give a nearly optimal O(nlogn) quantum query algorithm for search with wildcards, beating the classical lower bound of Ω(n) queries. Rather than using amplitude amplification or a quantum walk, our algorithm is ultimately based on the solution to a state discrimination problem. The second problem we consider is combinatorial group testing, which is the task of identifying a subset of at most k special items out of a set of n items, given the ability to make queries of the form ``does the set S contain any special items?''\ for any subset S of the n items. We give a simple quantum algorithm which uses O(k) queries to solve this problem, as compared with the classical lower bound of Ω(klog(n/k)) queries.