Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2112.14028 · Physical Review A

Error-disturbance uncertainty relations in Faraday measurements

Le Bin Ho, Keiichi Edamatsu

Published May 31, 2022• 2 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

We examine error-disturbance relations in the quantum measurement of spin systems using an atom-light interface scheme. We model a single spin-1/2 system that interacts with a polarized light meter via a Faraday interaction. We formulate the error and disturbance of the model and examine the uncertainty relations. We find that, for the coherent light meter in pure polarization, both the error and disturbance behave like the cyclic oscillations due to the Faraday rotation in both the light and spin polarizations. We also examine a class of polarization-squeezed light meter, where we apply the phase-space approximation and characterize the role of squeezing. We derive the error-disturbance relations for these cases and find that the Heisenberg-Arthurs-Kelly uncertainty is violated while the tight Branciard-Ozawa uncertainty always holds. We note that, in the limit of weak interaction strength, the error and disturbance come to obey the unbiasedness condition and hence the Heisenberg-Arthurs-Kelly relation holds. The work contributes to our understanding of the quantum measurement of spin systems under the atom-light interface framework and may hold potential applications in quantum metrology, quantum state estimation, and control.

DOI
10.1103/physreva.105.052228

Related papers

Error-Disturbance Relations in Spin Measurement Using Faraday Interaction

Le Bin Ho, Keiichi Edamatsu

We model the quantum measurement of spin systems under the Faraday interaction with a polarized light meter and examine the error-disturbance relations comparing the Heisenberg-Arthurs-Kelly and the Branciard-Ozawa relations. © 2022 The Author(s)

Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics Pacific Rim (CLEO-PR)•Jul 31, 2022•0 citations

Error-Disturbance relations in spin measurement using Faraday interaction

Le Bin Ho, Keiichi Edamatsu

We model the quantum measurement of spin systems under the Faraday interaction with a polarized light meter and examine the error-disturbance relations comparing the Heisenberg-Arthurs-Kelly and the Branciard-Ozawa relations.

Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics Pacific Rim (CLEO-PR)•Jan 1, 2022•0 citations

Measurement of spin systems under the Faraday interaction

Le Bin Ho, Keiichi Edamatsu

We model the quantum measurement of spin systems under the Faraday inter-action with a polarized light meter and examine the error-disturbance relations comparing the Heisenberg-Arthurs-Kelly and the Branciard-Ozawa relations.

Quantum 2.0 Conference and Exhibition•Jan 1, 2022•0 citations

Error-disturbance uncertainty relations in neutron spin measurements

Stephan Sponar

Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle in a formulation of uncertainties, intrinsic to any quantum system, is rigorously proven and demonstrated in various quantum systems. Nevertheless, Heisenberg’s original formulation of the uncertainty principle was given in terms of a reciprocal relation between the error of a position measurement and the thereby induced disturbance on a subsequent momentum measurement. However, a naive generalization of a Heisenberg-type error-disturbance relation for arbitrary observables is not valid. An alternative universally valid relation was derived by Ozawa in 2003. Though universally valid, Ozawa’s relation is not optimal. Recently, Branciard has derived a tight error-disturbance uncertainty relation (EDUR), describing the optimal trade-off between error and disturbance under certain conditions. Here, we report a neutron-optical experiment that records the error of a spin-component measurement, as well as the disturbance caused on another spin-component to test EDURs. We demonstrate that Heisenberg’s original EDUR is violated, and Ozawa’s and Branciard’s EDURs are valid in a wide range of experimental parameters, as well as the tightness of Branciard’s relation.

International Journal of Quantum Information•May 21, 2016•0 citations

Experimental Test of Error-Disturbance Uncertainty Relations by Weak Measurement

Fumihiro Kaneda, So-Young Baek, Masanao Ozawa +1 more

We experimentally test the error-disturbance uncertainty relation (EDR) in generalized, strength-variable measurement of a single photon polarization qubit, making use of weak measurement that keeps the initial signal state practically unchanged. We demonstrate that the Heisenberg EDR is violated, yet the Ozawa and Branciard EDRs are valid throughout the range of our measurement strength.

arXiv:1308.5868•Physical Review Letters•Jan 15, 2014•121 citations

Error-disturbance uncertainty relations studied in neutron optics

Stephan Sponar, Georg Sulyok, Bülent Demirel +1 more

Heisenberg's uncertainty principle is probably the most famous statement of quantum physics and its essential aspects are well described by a formulations in terms of standard deviations. However, a naive Heisenberg-type error-disturbance relation is not valid. An alternative universally valid relation was derived by Ozawa in 2003. Though universally valid Ozawa's relation is not optimal. Recently, Branciard has derived a tight error-disturbance uncertainty relation (EDUR), describing the optimal trade-off between error and disturbance. Here, we report a neutron-optical experiment that records the error of a spin-component measurement, as well as the disturbance caused on another spin-component to test EDURs. We demonstrate that Heisenberg's original EDUR is violated, and the Ozawa's and Branciard's EDURs are valid in a wide range of experimental parameters, applying a new measurement procedure referred to as two-state method.

Journal of Physics Conference Series•Sep 1, 2016•0 citations
We examine error-disturbance relations in the quantum measurement of spin systems using an atom-light interface scheme. We model a single spin-1/2 system that interacts with a polarized light meter via a Faraday interaction. We formulate the error and disturbance of the model and examine the uncertainty relations. We find that, for the coherent light meter in pure polarization, both the error and disturbance behave like the cyclic oscillations due to the Faraday rotation in both the light and spin polarizations. We also examine a class of polarization-squeezed light meter, where we apply the phase-space approximation and characterize the role of squeezing. We derive the error-disturbance relations for these cases and find that the Heisenberg-Arthurs-Kelly uncertainty is violated while the tight Branciard-Ozawa uncertainty always holds. We note that, in the limit of weak interaction strength, the error and disturbance come to obey the unbiasedness condition and hence the Heisenberg-Arthurs-Kelly relation holds. The work contributes to our understanding of the quantum measurement of spin systems under the atom-light interface framework and may hold potential applications in quantum metrology, quantum state estimation, and control.
Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle in a formulation of uncertainties, intrinsic to any quantum system, is rigorously proven and demonstrated in various quantum systems. Nevertheless, Heisenberg’s original formulation of the uncertainty principle was given in terms of a reciprocal relation between the error of a position measurement and the thereby induced disturbance on a subsequent momentum measurement. However, a naive generalization of a Heisenberg-type error-disturbance relation for arbitrary observables is not valid. An alternative universally valid relation was derived by Ozawa in 2003. Though universally valid, Ozawa’s relation is not optimal. Recently, Branciard has derived a tight error-disturbance uncertainty relation (EDUR), describing the optimal trade-off between error and disturbance under certain conditions. Here, we report a neutron-optical experiment that records the error of a spin-component measurement, as well as the disturbance caused on another spin-component to test EDURs. We demonstrate that Heisenberg’s original EDUR is violated, and Ozawa’s and Branciard’s EDURs are valid in a wide range of experimental parameters, as well as the tightness of Branciard’s relation.
Heisenberg's uncertainty principle is probably the most famous statement of quantum physics and its essential aspects are well described by a formulations in terms of standard deviations. However, a naive Heisenberg-type error-disturbance relation is not valid. An alternative universally valid relation was derived by Ozawa in 2003. Though universally valid Ozawa's relation is not optimal. Recently, Branciard has derived a tight error-disturbance uncertainty relation (EDUR), describing the optimal trade-off between error and disturbance. Here, we report a neutron-optical experiment that records the error of a spin-component measurement, as well as the disturbance caused on another spin-component to test EDURs. We demonstrate that Heisenberg's original EDUR is violated, and the Ozawa's and Branciard's EDURs are valid in a wide range of experimental parameters, applying a new measurement procedure referred to as two-state method.