arXiv:2112.13005

Quantum Linear Algorithm for Edit Distance Using the Word QRAM Model

Massimo Equi, Arianne Meijer-van de Griend, Veli Mäkinen

Published Dec 24, 2021• 0 citations

Abstract

Many problems that can be solved in quadratic time have bit-parallel speed-ups with factor $w$, where $w$ is the computer word size. For example, edit distance of two strings of length $n$ can be solved in $O(n^2/w)$ time. In a reasonable classical model of computation, one can assume $w=Θ(\log n)$. There are conditional lower bounds for such problems stating that speed-ups with factor $n^ε$ for any $ε>0$ would lead to breakthroughs in complexity theory. However, these conditional lower bounds do not cover quantum models of computing. Indeed, Boroujeni et al. (J. ACM, 2021) showed that edit distance can be approximated within a factor $3$ in sub-quadratic time $O(n^{1.81})$ using quantum computing. They also showed that, in their chosen model of quantum computing, the approximation factor cannot be improved using sub-quadractic time. To break through the aforementioned classical conditional lower bounds and this latest quantum lower bound, we enrich the model of computation with a quantum random access memory (QRAM), obtaining what we call the word QRAM model. Under this model, we show how to convert the bit-parallelism of quadratic time solvable problems into quantum algorithms that attain speed-ups with factor $n$. The technique we use is simple and general enough to apply to many bit-parallel algorithms that use Boolean logics and bit-shifts. To apply it to edit distance, we first show that the famous $O(n^2/w)$ time bit-parallel algorithm of Myers (J. ACM, 1999) can be adjusted to work without arithmetic + operations. As a direct consequence of applying our technique to this variant, we obtain linear time edit distance algorithm under the word QRAM model for constant alphabet. We give further results on a restricted variant of the word QRAM model to give more insights to the limits of the model.

DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2112.13005

Related papers

From Bit-Parallelism to Quantum String Matching for Labelled Graphs

Massimo Equi, Arianne Meijer-van de Griend, Veli Mäkinen

arXiv:2302.02848Työväentutkimus VuosikirjaJan 1, 20230 citations

Approximating Edit Distance in Truly Subquadratic Time: Quantum and MapReduce

Mahdi Boroujeni, Soheil Ehsani, Mohammad Ghodsi +2 more

arXiv:1804.04178Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics eBooksJan 1, 201869 citations

Near-Optimal Quantum Algorithms for Bounded Edit Distance and Lempel-Ziv Factorization

Daniel Gibney, Ce Jin, Tomasz Kociumaka +1 more

arXiv:2311.01793Nov 3, 20230 citations

On the Quantum Time Complexity of Divide and Conquer

Allcock, Jonathan, Bao, Jinge, Aleksandrs Belovs +2 more

arXiv:2311.16401Leibniz international proceedings in informaticsNov 28, 20232 citations

Near-Optimal Quantum Algorithms for String Problems

Shyan Akmal, Ce Jin

AlgorithmicaJan 27, 202311 citations

Improved Classical and Quantum Algorithms for the Shortest Vector Problem via Bounded Distance Decoding

Divesh Aggarwal, Yanlin Chen, Rajendra Kumar +1 more

SIAM Journal on ComputingMar 3, 20252 citations

arXiv:2112.13005

Quantum Linear Algorithm for Edit Distance Using the Word QRAM Model

Massimo Equi, Arianne Meijer-van de Griend, Veli Mäkinen

Published Dec 24, 2021• 0 citations

arXiv HTML PDF

Abstract

Many problems that can be solved in quadratic time have bit-parallel speed-ups with factor

w

, where

w

is the computer word size. For example, edit distance of two strings of length

n

can be solved in

O(n^2/w)

time. In a reasonable classical model of computation, one can assume

w=Θ(\log n)

. There are conditional lower bounds for such problems stating that speed-ups with factor

n^ε

for any

ε>0

would lead to breakthroughs in complexity theory. However, these conditional lower bounds do not cover quantum models of computing. Indeed, Boroujeni et al. (J. ACM, 2021) showed that edit distance can be approximated within a factor

3

in sub-quadratic time

O(n^{1.81})

using quantum computing. They also showed that, in their chosen model of quantum computing, the approximation factor cannot be improved using sub-quadractic time. To break through the aforementioned classical conditional lower bounds and this latest quantum lower bound, we enrich the model of computation with a quantum random access memory (QRAM), obtaining what we call the word QRAM model. Under this model, we show how to convert the bit-parallelism of quadratic time solvable problems into quantum algorithms that attain speed-ups with factor

n

. The technique we use is simple and general enough to apply to many bit-parallel algorithms that use Boolean logics and bit-shifts. To apply it to edit distance, we first show that the famous

O(n^2/w)

time bit-parallel algorithm of Myers (J. ACM, 1999) can be adjusted to work without arithmetic + operations. As a direct consequence of applying our technique to this variant, we obtain linear time edit distance algorithm under the word QRAM model for constant alphabet. We give further results on a restricted variant of the word QRAM model to give more insights to the limits of the model.

DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2112.13005

Related papers

From Bit-Parallelism to Quantum String Matching for Labelled Graphs

Massimo Equi, Arianne Meijer-van de Griend, Veli Mäkinen

Many problems that can be solved in quadratic time have bit-parallel speed-ups with factor $w$ , where $w$ is the computer word size. A classic example is computing the edit distance of two strings of length $n$ , which can be solved in $O(n^2/w)$ time. In a reasonable classical model of computation, one can assume $w=Θ(\log n)$ , and obtaining significantly better speed-ups is unlikely in the light of conditional lower bounds obtained for such problems. In this paper, we study the connection of bit-parallelism to quantum computation, aiming to see if a bit-parallel algorithm could be converted to a quantum algorithm with better than logarithmic speed-up. We focus on string matching in labeled graphs, the problem of finding an exact occurrence of a string as the label of a path in a graph. This problem admits a quadratic conditional lower bound under a very restricted class of graphs (Equi et al. ICALP 2019), stating that no algorithm in the classical model of computation can solve the problem in time $O(|P||E|^{1-ε})$ or $O(|P|^{1-ε}|E|)$ . We show that a simple bit-parallel algorithm on such restricted family of graphs (level DAGs) can indeed be converted into a realistic quantum algorithm that attains subquadratic time complexity $O(|E|\sqrt{|P|})$ .Many problems that can be solved in quadratic time have bit-parallel speed-ups with factor $w$, where $w$ is the computer word size. A classic example is computing the edit distance of two strings of length $n$, which can be solved in $O(n^2/w)$ time. In a reasonable classical model of computation, one can assume $w=Θ(\log n)$, and obtaining significantly better speed-ups is unlikely in the light of conditional lower bounds obtained for such problems. In this paper, we study the connection of bit-parallelism to quantum computation, aiming to see if a bit-parallel algorithm could be converted to a quantum algorithm with better than logarithmic speed-up. We focus on string matching in labeled graphs, the problem of finding an exact occurrence of a string as the label of a path in a graph. This problem admits a quadratic conditional lower bound under a very restricted class of graphs (Equi et al. ICALP 2019), stating that no algorithm in the classical model of computation can solve the problem in time $O(|P||E|^{1-ε})$ or $O(|P|^{1-ε}|E|)$. We show that a simple bit-parallel algorithm on such restricted family of graphs (level DAGs) can indeed be converted into a realistic quantum algorithm that attains subquadratic time complexity $O(|E|\sqrt{|P|})$.

arXiv:2302.02848Työväentutkimus VuosikirjaJan 1, 20230 citations

Approximating Edit Distance in Truly Subquadratic Time: Quantum and MapReduce

Mahdi Boroujeni, Soheil Ehsani, Mohammad Ghodsi +2 more

The edit distance between two strings is defined as the smallest number of insertions, deletions, and substitutions that need to be made to transform one of the strings to another one. Approximating edit distance in subquadratic time is “one of the biggest unsolved problems in the field of combinatorial pattern matching” [21]. Our main result is a quantum constant approximation algorithm for computing the edit distance in truly subquadratic time. More precisely, we give an O(n1.858) quantum algorithm that approximates the edit distance within a factor of 7. We further extend this result to an O(n1.781) quantum algorithm that approximates the edit distance within a larger constant factor. Our solutions are based on a framework for approximating edit distance in parallel settings. This framework requires as black box an algorithm that computes the distances of several smaller strings all at once. For a quantum algorithm, we reduce the black box to metric estimation and provide efficient algorithms for approximating it. We further show that this framework enables us to approximate edit distance in distributed settings. To this end, we provide a MapReduce algorithm to approximate edit distance within a factor of 3, with sublinearly many machines and sublinear memory. Also, our algorithm runs in a logarithmic number of rounds.The edit distance between two strings is defined as the smallest number of insertions, deletions, and substitutions that need to be made to transform one of the strings to another one. Approximating edit distance in subquadratic time is “one of the biggest unsolved problems in the field of combinatorial pattern matching” [21]. Our main result is a quantum constant approximation algorithm for computing the edit distance in truly subquadratic time. More precisely, we give an O(n1.858) quantum algorithm that approximates the edit distance within a factor of 7. We further extend this result to an O(n1.781) quantum algorithm that approximates the edit distance within a larger constant factor. Our solutions are based on a framework for approximating edit distance in parallel settings. This framework requires as black box an algorithm that computes the distances of several smaller strings all at once. For a quantum algorithm, we reduce the black box to metric estimation and provide efficient algorithms for approximating it. We further show that this framework enables us to approximate edit distance in distributed settings. To this end, we provide a MapReduce algorithm to approximate edit distance within a factor of 3, with sublinearly many machines and sublinear memory. Also, our algorithm runs in a logarithmic number of rounds.

arXiv:1804.04178Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics eBooksJan 1, 201869 citations

Near-Optimal Quantum Algorithms for Bounded Edit Distance and Lempel-Ziv Factorization

Daniel Gibney, Ce Jin, Tomasz Kociumaka +1 more

Classically, the edit distance of two length- $n$ strings can be computed in $O(n^2)$ time, whereas an $O(n^{2-ε})$ -time procedure would falsify the Orthogonal Vectors Hypothesis. If the edit distance does not exceed $k$ , the running time can be improved to $O(n+k^2)$ , which is near-optimal (conditioned on OVH) as a function of $n$ and $k$ . Our first main contribution is a quantum $\tilde{O}(\sqrt{nk}+k^2)$ -time algorithm that uses $\tilde{O}(\sqrt{nk})$ queries, where $\tilde{O}(\cdot)$ hides polylogarithmic factors. This query complexity is unconditionally optimal, and any significant improvement in the time complexity would resolve a long-standing open question of whether edit distance admits an $O(n^{2-ε})$ -time quantum algorithm. Our divide-and-conquer quantum algorithm reduces the edit distance problem to a case where the strings have small Lempel-Ziv factorizations. Then, it combines a quantum LZ compression algorithm with a classical edit-distance subroutine for compressed strings. The LZ factorization problem can be classically solved in $O(n)$ time, which is unconditionally optimal in the quantum setting. We can, however, hope for a quantum speedup if we parameterize the complexity in terms of the factorization size $z$ . Already a generic oracle identification algorithm yields the optimal query complexity of $\tilde{O}(\sqrt{nz})$ at the price of exponential running time. Our second main contribution is a quantum algorithm that achieves the optimal time complexity of $\tilde{O}(\sqrt{nz})$ . The key tool is a novel LZ-like factorization of size $O(z\log^2n)$ whose subsequent factors can be efficiently computed through a combination of classical and quantum techniques. We can then obtain the string's run-length encoded Burrows-Wheeler Transform (BWT), construct the $r$ -index, and solve many fundamental string processing problems in time $\tilde{O}(\sqrt{nz})$ .Classically, the edit distance of two length-$n$ strings can be computed in $O(n^2)$ time, whereas an $O(n^{2-ε})$-time procedure would falsify the Orthogonal Vectors Hypothesis. If the edit distance does not exceed $k$, the running time can be improved to $O(n+k^2)$, which is near-optimal (conditioned on OVH) as a function of $n$ and $k$. Our first main contribution is a quantum $\tilde{O}(\sqrt{nk}+k^2)$-time algorithm that uses $\tilde{O}(\sqrt{nk})$ queries, where $\tilde{O}(\cdot)$ hides polylogarithmic factors. This query complexity is unconditionally optimal, and any significant improvement in the time complexity would resolve a long-standing open question of whether edit distance admits an $O(n^{2-ε})$-time quantum algorithm. Our divide-and-conquer quantum algorithm reduces the edit distance problem to a case where the strings have small Lempel-Ziv factorizations. Then, it combines a quantum LZ compression algorithm with a classical edit-distance subroutine for compressed strings. The LZ factorization problem can be classically solved in $O(n)$ time, which is unconditionally optimal in the quantum setting. We can, however, hope for a quantum speedup if we parameterize the complexity in terms of the factorization size $z$. Already a generic oracle identification algorithm yields the optimal query complexity of $\tilde{O}(\sqrt{nz})$ at the price of exponential running time. Our second main contribution is a quantum algorithm that achieves the optimal time complexity of $\tilde{O}(\sqrt{nz})$. The key tool is a novel LZ-like factorization of size $O(z\log^2n)$ whose subsequent factors can be efficiently computed through a combination of classical and quantum techniques. We can then obtain the string's run-length encoded Burrows-Wheeler Transform (BWT), construct the $r$-index, and solve many fundamental string processing problems in time $\tilde{O}(\sqrt{nz})$.

arXiv:2311.01793Nov 3, 20230 citations

On the Quantum Time Complexity of Divide and Conquer

Allcock, Jonathan, Bao, Jinge, Aleksandrs Belovs +2 more

In this work, we initiate a systematic study of the time complexity of quantum divide and conquer (QD&C) algorithms for classical problems, and propose a general framework for their analysis. We establish generic conditions under which search and minimization problems with classical divide and conquer algorithms are amenable to quantum speedup, and apply these theorems to various problems involving strings, integers, and geometric objects. These include Longest Distinct Substring, Klee's Coverage, several optimization problems on stock transactions, and k-Increasing Subsequence. For most of these problems our quantum time upper bounds match the quantum query lower bounds, up to polylogarithmic factors. We give a structured framework for describing and classifying a wide variety of QD&C algorithms so that quantum speedups can be more easily identified and applied, and prove general statements on QD&C time complexity covering a range of cases, accounting for the time required for all operations. In particular, we explicitly account for memory access operations in the commonly used QRAM (read-only) and QRAG (read-write) models, which are assumed to take unit time in the query model, and which require careful analysis when involved in recursion. Our generic QD&C theorems have several nice features. 1) To apply them, it suffices to come up with a classical divide and conquer algorithm satisfying the conditions of the theorem. The quantization of the algorithm is then completely handled by the theorem. This can make it easier to find applications which admit a quantum speedup, and contrast with dynamic programming algorithms which can be difficult to quantize due to their highly sequential nature. 2) As these theorems give bounds on time complexity, they can be applied to a greater range of problems than those based on query complexity, e.g., where the best-known quantum algorithms require super-linear time. 3) It can handle minimization problems as well as boolean functions, which allows us to improve on the query complexity result of Childs et al. [Childs et al., 2025] for k-Increasing Subsequence by a logarithmic factor.In this work, we initiate a systematic study of the time complexity of quantum divide and conquer (QD&C) algorithms for classical problems, and propose a general framework for their analysis. We establish generic conditions under which search and minimization problems with classical divide and conquer algorithms are amenable to quantum speedup, and apply these theorems to various problems involving strings, integers, and geometric objects. These include Longest Distinct Substring, Klee's Coverage, several optimization problems on stock transactions, and k-Increasing Subsequence. For most of these problems our quantum time upper bounds match the quantum query lower bounds, up to polylogarithmic factors. We give a structured framework for describing and classifying a wide variety of QD&C algorithms so that quantum speedups can be more easily identified and applied, and prove general statements on QD&C time complexity covering a range of cases, accounting for the time required for all operations. In particular, we explicitly account for memory access operations in the commonly used QRAM (read-only) and QRAG (read-write) models, which are assumed to take unit time in the query model, and which require careful analysis when involved in recursion. Our generic QD&C theorems have several nice features. 1) To apply them, it suffices to come up with a classical divide and conquer algorithm satisfying the conditions of the theorem. The quantization of the algorithm is then completely handled by the theorem. This can make it easier to find applications which admit a quantum speedup, and contrast with dynamic programming algorithms which can be difficult to quantize due to their highly sequential nature. 2) As these theorems give bounds on time complexity, they can be applied to a greater range of problems than those based on query complexity, e.g., where the best-known quantum algorithms require super-linear time. 3) It can handle minimization problems as well as boolean functions, which allows us to improve on the query complexity result of Childs et al. [Childs et al., 2025] for k-Increasing Subsequence by a logarithmic factor.

arXiv:2311.16401Leibniz international proceedings in informaticsNov 28, 20232 citations

Near-Optimal Quantum Algorithms for String Problems

Shyan Akmal, Ce Jin

Abstract We study quantum algorithms for several fundamental string problems, including Longest Common Substring, Lexicographically Minimal String Rotation, and Longest Square Substring. These problems have been widely studied in the stringology literature since the 1970s, and are known to be solvable by near-linear time classical algorithms. In this work, we give quantum algorithms for these problems with near-optimal query complexities and time complexities. Specifically, we show that: Longest Common Substring can be solved by a quantum algorithm in $\tilde{O}(n^{2/3})$ O ~ ( n 2 / 3 ) time, improving upon the recent $\tilde{O}(n^{5/6})$ O ~ ( n 5 / 6 ) -time algorithm by Le Gall and Seddighin (in: Proceedings of the 13th innovations in theoretical computer science conference (ITCS 2022), pp 97:1–97:23, 2022. https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2022.97 ). Our algorithm uses the MNRS quantum walk framework, together with a careful combination of string synchronizing sets (Kempa and Kociumaka, in: Proceedings of the 51st annual ACM SIGACT symposium on theory of computing (STOC 2019), ACM, pp 756–767, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313276.3316368 ) and generalized difference covers. Lexicographically Minimal String Rotation can be solved by a quantum algorithm in $n^{1/2 + o(1)}$ n 1 / 2 + o ( 1 ) time, improving upon the recent $\tilde{O}(n^{3/4})$ O ~ ( n 3 / 4 ) -time algorithm by Wang and Ying (in: Quantum algorithm for lexicographically minimal string rotation. CoRR, 2020. arXiv:2012.09376 ). We design our algorithm by first giving a new classical divide-and-conquer algorithm in near-linear time based on exclusion rules, and then speeding it up quadratically using nested Grover search and quantum minimum finding. Longest Square Substring can be solved by a quantum algorithm in $\tilde{O}(\sqrt{n})$ O ~ ( n ) time. Our algorithm is an adaptation of the algorithm by Le Gall and Seddighin (2022) for the Longest Palindromic Substring problem, but uses additional techniques to overcome the difficulty that binary search no longer applies. Our techniques naturally extend to other related string problems, such as Longest Repeated Substring, Longest Lyndon Substring, and Minimal Suffix.Abstract We study quantum algorithms for several fundamental string problems, including Longest Common Substring, Lexicographically Minimal String Rotation, and Longest Square Substring. These problems have been widely studied in the stringology literature since the 1970s, and are known to be solvable by near-linear time classical algorithms. In this work, we give quantum algorithms for these problems with near-optimal query complexities and time complexities. Specifically, we show that: Longest Common Substring can be solved by a quantum algorithm in $$\tilde{O}(n^{2/3})$$ O ~ ( n 2 / 3 ) time, improving upon the recent $$\tilde{O}(n^{5/6})$$ O ~ ( n 5 / 6 ) -time algorithm by Le Gall and Seddighin (in: Proceedings of the 13th innovations in theoretical computer science conference (ITCS 2022), pp 97:1–97:23, 2022. https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2022.97 ). Our algorithm uses the MNRS quantum walk framework, together with a careful combination of string synchronizing sets (Kempa and Kociumaka, in: Proceedings of the 51st annual ACM SIGACT symposium on theory of computing (STOC 2019), ACM, pp 756–767, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313276.3316368 ) and generalized difference covers. Lexicographically Minimal String Rotation can be solved by a quantum algorithm in $$n^{1/2 + o(1)}$$ n 1 / 2 + o ( 1 ) time, improving upon the recent $$\tilde{O}(n^{3/4})$$ O ~ ( n 3 / 4 ) -time algorithm by Wang and Ying (in: Quantum algorithm for lexicographically minimal string rotation. CoRR, 2020. arXiv:2012.09376 ). We design our algorithm by first giving a new classical divide-and-conquer algorithm in near-linear time based on exclusion rules, and then speeding it up quadratically using nested Grover search and quantum minimum finding. Longest Square Substring can be solved by a quantum algorithm in $$\tilde{O}(\sqrt{n})$$ O ~ ( n ) time. Our algorithm is an adaptation of the algorithm by Le Gall and Seddighin (2022) for the Longest Palindromic Substring problem, but uses additional techniques to overcome the difficulty that binary search no longer applies. Our techniques naturally extend to other related string problems, such as Longest Repeated Substring, Longest Lyndon Substring, and Minimal Suffix.

AlgorithmicaJan 27, 202311 citations

Improved Classical and Quantum Algorithms for the Shortest Vector Problem via Bounded Distance Decoding

Divesh Aggarwal, Yanlin Chen, Rajendra Kumar +1 more

Abstract. The most important computational problem on lattices is the shortest vector problem ([Formula: see text]). In this paper, we present new algorithms that improve the state-of-the-art for provable classical/quantum algorithms for [Formula: see text]. We present the following results: (1) A new algorithm for [Formula: see text] that provides a smooth tradeoff between time complexity and memory requirement. For any positive integer [Formula: see text], our algorithm takes [Formula: see text] time and requires [Formula: see text] memory. This tradeoff, which ranges from enumeration ([Formula: see text]) to sieving ([Formula: see text] constant), is a consequence of a new time-memory tradeoff for discrete Gaussian sampling above the smoothing parameter. (2) A quantum algorithm for [Formula: see text] that runs in time [Formula: see text] and requires [Formula: see text] classical memory and [Formula: see text] qubits. In a quantum random access memory (QRAM) model, this algorithm takes only [Formula: see text] time and requires a QRAM of size [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text] qubits and [Formula: see text] classical space. This improves over the previously fastest classical (which is also the fastest quantum) algorithm due to [D. Aggarwal et al., Solving the shortest vector problem in 2 n time using discrete Gaussian sampling: Extended abstract, in Proceedings of the Forty-Seventh Annual ACM on Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC), 2015, pp. 733–742] that has a time and space complexity [Formula: see text]. (3) A classical algorithm for [Formula: see text] that runs in time [Formula: see text] time and [Formula: see text] space. This improves over an algorithm of [Y. Chen, K. Chung, and C. Lai, Quantum Inf. Comput., 18 (2018), pp. 285–306] that has the same space complexity. The time complexity of our classical and quantum algorithms are obtained using a known upper bound on a quantity related to the lattice kissing number, which is [Formula: see text]. We conjecture that for most lattices this quantity is a [Formula: see text]. Assuming that this is the case, our classical algorithm runs in time [Formula: see text], our quantum algorithm runs in time [Formula: see text], and our quantum algorithm in a QRAM model runs in time [Formula: see text]. As a direct application of our result, using the reduction in [L. Ducas, Des. Codes. Cryptogr., 92 (2024), pp. 909–916], we obtain a provable quantum algorithm for the lattice isomorphism problem in the case of the trivial lattice [Formula: see text] ([Formula: see text] LIP ) that runs in time [Formula: see text]. Our algorithm requires a QRAM of size [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text] qubits and [Formula: see text] classical space.Abstract. The most important computational problem on lattices is the shortest vector problem ([Formula: see text]). In this paper, we present new algorithms that improve the state-of-the-art for provable classical/quantum algorithms for [Formula: see text]. We present the following results: (1) A new algorithm for [Formula: see text] that provides a smooth tradeoff between time complexity and memory requirement. For any positive integer [Formula: see text], our algorithm takes [Formula: see text] time and requires [Formula: see text] memory. This tradeoff, which ranges from enumeration ([Formula: see text]) to sieving ([Formula: see text] constant), is a consequence of a new time-memory tradeoff for discrete Gaussian sampling above the smoothing parameter. (2) A quantum algorithm for [Formula: see text] that runs in time [Formula: see text] and requires [Formula: see text] classical memory and [Formula: see text] qubits. In a quantum random access memory (QRAM) model, this algorithm takes only [Formula: see text] time and requires a QRAM of size [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text] qubits and [Formula: see text] classical space. This improves over the previously fastest classical (which is also the fastest quantum) algorithm due to [D. Aggarwal et al., Solving the shortest vector problem in 2 n time using discrete Gaussian sampling: Extended abstract, in Proceedings of the Forty-Seventh Annual ACM on Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC), 2015, pp. 733–742] that has a time and space complexity [Formula: see text]. (3) A classical algorithm for [Formula: see text] that runs in time [Formula: see text] time and [Formula: see text] space. This improves over an algorithm of [Y. Chen, K. Chung, and C. Lai, Quantum Inf. Comput., 18 (2018), pp. 285–306] that has the same space complexity. The time complexity of our classical and quantum algorithms are obtained using a known upper bound on a quantity related to the lattice kissing number, which is [Formula: see text]. We conjecture that for most lattices this quantity is a [Formula: see text]. Assuming that this is the case, our classical algorithm runs in time [Formula: see text], our quantum algorithm runs in time [Formula: see text], and our quantum algorithm in a QRAM model runs in time [Formula: see text]. As a direct application of our result, using the reduction in [L. Ducas, Des. Codes. Cryptogr., 92 (2024), pp. 909–916], we obtain a provable quantum algorithm for the lattice isomorphism problem in the case of the trivial lattice [Formula: see text] ([Formula: see text] LIP ) that runs in time [Formula: see text]. Our algorithm requires a QRAM of size [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text] qubits and [Formula: see text] classical space.

SIAM Journal on ComputingMar 3, 20252 citations

Many problems that can be solved in quadratic time have bit-parallel speed-ups with factor

w

, where

w

is the computer word size. For example, edit distance of two strings of length

n

can be solved in

O(n^2/w)

time. In a reasonable classical model of computation, one can assume

w=Θ(\log n)

. There are conditional lower bounds for such problems stating that speed-ups with factor

n^ε

for any

ε>0

3

in sub-quadratic time

O(n^{1.81})

n

. The technique we use is simple and general enough to apply to many bit-parallel algorithms that use Boolean logics and bit-shifts. To apply it to edit distance, we first show that the famous

O(n^2/w)

Many problems that can be solved in quadratic time have bit-parallel speed-ups with factor

w

, where

w

is the computer word size. A classic example is computing the edit distance of two strings of length

n

, which can be solved in

O(n^2/w)

time. In a reasonable classical model of computation, one can assume

w=Θ(\log n)

, and obtaining significantly better speed-ups is unlikely in the light of conditional lower bounds obtained for such problems. In this paper, we study the connection of bit-parallelism to quantum computation, aiming to see if a bit-parallel algorithm could be converted to a quantum algorithm with better than logarithmic speed-up. We focus on string matching in labeled graphs, the problem of finding an exact occurrence of a string as the label of a path in a graph. This problem admits a quadratic conditional lower bound under a very restricted class of graphs (Equi et al. ICALP 2019), stating that no algorithm in the classical model of computation can solve the problem in time

O(|P||E|^{1-ε})

O(|P|^{1-ε}|E|)

. We show that a simple bit-parallel algorithm on such restricted family of graphs (level DAGs) can indeed be converted into a realistic quantum algorithm that attains subquadratic time complexity

O(|E|\sqrt{|P|})

Classically, the edit distance of two length-

n

strings can be computed in

O(n^2)

time, whereas an

O(n^{2-ε})

-time procedure would falsify the Orthogonal Vectors Hypothesis. If the edit distance does not exceed

k

, the running time can be improved to

O(n+k^2)

, which is near-optimal (conditioned on OVH) as a function of

n

and

k

. Our first main contribution is a quantum

\tilde{O}(\sqrt{nk}+k^2)

-time algorithm that uses

\tilde{O}(\sqrt{nk})

queries, where

\tilde{O}(\cdot)

hides polylogarithmic factors. This query complexity is unconditionally optimal, and any significant improvement in the time complexity would resolve a long-standing open question of whether edit distance admits an

O(n^{2-ε})

-time quantum algorithm. Our divide-and-conquer quantum algorithm reduces the edit distance problem to a case where the strings have small Lempel-Ziv factorizations. Then, it combines a quantum LZ compression algorithm with a classical edit-distance subroutine for compressed strings. The LZ factorization problem can be classically solved in

O(n)

time, which is unconditionally optimal in the quantum setting. We can, however, hope for a quantum speedup if we parameterize the complexity in terms of the factorization size

z

. Already a generic oracle identification algorithm yields the optimal query complexity of

\tilde{O}(\sqrt{nz})

at the price of exponential running time. Our second main contribution is a quantum algorithm that achieves the optimal time complexity of

\tilde{O}(\sqrt{nz})

. The key tool is a novel LZ-like factorization of size

O(z\log^2n)

whose subsequent factors can be efficiently computed through a combination of classical and quantum techniques. We can then obtain the string's run-length encoded Burrows-Wheeler Transform (BWT), construct the

r

-index, and solve many fundamental string processing problems in time

\tilde{O}(\sqrt{nz})

\tilde{O}(n^{2/3})

O ~ ( n 2 / 3 ) time, improving upon the recent

\tilde{O}(n^{5/6})

O ~ ( n 5 / 6 ) -time algorithm by Le Gall and Seddighin (in: Proceedings of the 13th innovations in theoretical computer science conference (ITCS 2022), pp 97:1–97:23, 2022. https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2022.97 ). Our algorithm uses the MNRS quantum walk framework, together with a careful combination of string synchronizing sets (Kempa and Kociumaka, in: Proceedings of the 51st annual ACM SIGACT symposium on theory of computing (STOC 2019), ACM, pp 756–767, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313276.3316368 ) and generalized difference covers. Lexicographically Minimal String Rotation can be solved by a quantum algorithm in

n^{1/2 + o(1)}

n 1 / 2 + o ( 1 ) time, improving upon the recent

\tilde{O}(n^{3/4})

O ~ ( n 3 / 4 ) -time algorithm by Wang and Ying (in: Quantum algorithm for lexicographically minimal string rotation. CoRR, 2020. arXiv:2012.09376 ). We design our algorithm by first giving a new classical divide-and-conquer algorithm in near-linear time based on exclusion rules, and then speeding it up quadratically using nested Grover search and quantum minimum finding. Longest Square Substring can be solved by a quantum algorithm in

\tilde{O}(\sqrt{n})

O ~ ( n ) time. Our algorithm is an adaptation of the algorithm by Le Gall and Seddighin (2022) for the Longest Palindromic Substring problem, but uses additional techniques to overcome the difficulty that binary search no longer applies. Our techniques naturally extend to other related string problems, such as Longest Repeated Substring, Longest Lyndon Substring, and Minimal Suffix.