The main argument by proponents of Many-World interpretations of quantum mechanics is that as more and more previously disentangled degrees of freedom become entangled with the microscopic degree we measure, there is no way of telling when the measurement (in the sense of a collapse of the wave function) should occur. Here, we introduce the concept of quantum interlinking, and argue that all macroscopic objects in the universe are connected through links of mutual entanglement while the objects themselves are (for the most part) not entangled. The measurement occurs when the degree we measure becomes entangled with any macroscopic object, and hence interlinked with all of them. This picture resolves long standing paradoxes such as Schrödinger's cat and EPR.
The main argument by proponents of Many-World interpretations of quantum mechanics is that as more and more previously disentangled degrees of freedom become entangled with the microscopic degree we measure, there is no way of telling when the measurement (in the sense of a collapse of the wave function) should occur. Here, we introduce the concept of quantum interlinking, and argue that all macroscopic objects in the universe are connected through links of mutual entanglement while the objects themselves are (for the most part) not entangled. The measurement occurs when the degree we measure becomes entangled with any macroscopic object, and hence interlinked with all of them. This picture resolves long standing paradoxes such as Schrödinger's cat and EPR.
The theory of Quantum Mechanics is one of the mainstay of modern physics, a well-established mathematical clockwork whose strength and accuracy in predictions are currently experienced in worldwide research laboratories. As a matter of fact, Quantum Mechanics laid the groundwork of a rich variety of studies ranging from solid state physics to cosmology, from bio-physics to particle physics. The up-to-date ability of manipulating single quantum states is paving the way for emergent quantum technologies as quantum information and computation, quantum communication, quantum metrology and quantum imaging. In spite of the impressive matemathical capacity, a long-standing debate is even revolving around the foundational axioms of this theory, the main bones of content being the non-local effects of entangled states, the wave function collapse and the concept of measurement in Quantum Mechanics, the macro-objectivation problem (the transition from a microscopic probabilistic world to a macroscopic deterministic world described by classical mechanics). Problems that, beyond their fundamental interest in basic science, now also concern the impact of these developing technologies. Without claiming to be complete, this article provides in outline the living matter concerning some of these problems, the implications of which extend deeply on the connection between entanglement and space-time structure.
Quantum measurement theory addresses several problems. All of them arise from applying a microscopically valid theory to the macroscopic domain. The most famous is the Schrödinger cat example in which the ordinary use of quantum rules suggests a superposition of macroscopically different states, something we do not seem to experience. Another problem is the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen (EPR) paradox in which a fundamental quantum concept, entanglement, creates subtle and non-classical correlations among remote sets of measurements. Although it seems mere word play to observe that such an apparent micro-macro conflict ought to be viewed as a problem in statistical mechanics—by virtue of the way that discipline is defined—until recently the importance of this observation was seldom recognized. The founders, Bohr, Schrödinger, Heisenberg, Einstein did not emphasize this direction, but over the years the realization that measurement necessarily involves macroscopic objects—objects with potentially mischievous degrees of freedom of their own—began to be felt. For me this was brought home by the now classic fourth chapter of Gottfried's text on quantum mechanics. He takes up the following problem. The density matrix ρ 0 for a normalized pure state is ρ 0 = |ψ〉 〈ψ|. It follows that Tr ρ 0 = Tr ρ 0 2 = 1. After a non-trivial measurement, the density matrix ρ is supposed to be diagonal in the basis denned by the measured observable, with Tr ρ = 1 but Tr ρ 2 < 1.
For over a century, scientists have been fascinated by the strange behaviour of matter at the quantum level, where particles can exist in many states at once and affect each other instantly across distances. This paper explores this realm of quantum mechanics by focusing on wave–particle duality, superposition, entanglement and the measurement problem. It shows how these concepts defy the foundations of clas-sical physics to challenge assumptions about determinism, locality, interconnection and objectivity. The paper maintains that although quantum theory works remarkably well, we lack a clear account of what kind of reality it describes, as major interpretations such as Copenhagen, Many-Worlds and objective collapse still struggle to match quantum theory’s success with a clear picture of reality. yet as its major interpretations offer com-peting and unresolved pictures of the world. Schrödinger’s cat illustrates this tension to showcase how macroscopic systems can expose the limits of observation and the line be-tween classical and quantum worlds. The paper concludes that these quantum principles are underpinned by both technical and philosophical challenges and they force us to re-think causality and the role of the observer in explaining reality.
The entangled Schrodinger cat state obtained immediately upon measurement of a superposed two-state quantum system is often considered paradoxical because it appears to predict two macroscopically different outcomes, such as an alive and dead cat. However, nonlocal interferometry experiments testing momentum-entangled photon pairs over all phases demonstrate that the cat state does not fit this description and is not paradoxical. Both experiment and theory imply that it instead represents a superposition of two nonlocally coherent (i.e. phase-dependent) statistical correlations between its sub-systems. This is not paradoxical. Standard quantum theory rigorously predicts the experimentally-observed outcomes of this state. Neither sub-system is superposed; rather, the correlations between the states of the subsystems are superposed. This resolves the problem of definite outcomes. The nonlocal properties of entanglement then ensure that only one outcome occurs while the other outcome simultaneously does not occur, resolving a problem posed by Einstein in 1927. The single outcome that occurs then triggers an irreversible process leading to macroscopic registration of the outcome. This resolves the quantum measurement problem. Collapse occurs because of entanglement and does not require a special collapse postulate. Collapse is a consequence of standard quantum physics and the irreversible nature of the macroscopic registration.
In connection with the recent experiments on quantum measurement, such as the “which-way”detection using the Bragg scattering of cold atoms and quantum interference using a small molecular C 60 quantum system, we introduce the quantum measurement problem and its relevant fundamental concepts and ideas, such as quantum coherence, quantum decoherence and quantum entanglement. In order to understand the loss of quantum coherence for a quantum system due to its interaction with another system behaving classically or macroscopically, we discuss some quantum dynamical models to describe the quantum decoherence and quantum dissipation induced by couplings to the external environment or inner motions. In the classical or macroscopic limit, it is shown that the wave function of the total system formed by the quantum system plus another system interacting with it is factorized as an entangled state with correlation between the measured quantum states and the configurations of the external large system or the inner degrees of freedom. In association with a novel viewpoint about quantum measurement, which has been directly verified by recent experiments (e.g.,S. Durr et al., Nature,1998,33:359), it is shown that quantum entanglement is indeed responsible for the quantum decoherence, and thus it can be regarded as a “clean” quantum measurement when the large system behaves as a classical object. These arguments give us a possible solution to the “Schrdinger cat paradox” and to whether the coherent superposition of macroscopic states exists. These discussions are also applied to the quantum decoherence problems in quantum information including quantum computing and quantum communication.
Speedy developments in Quantum Technologies mandate that fundamentals of Quantum Computing are well explained and understood. Meanwhile, paradigms of so-called quantum non-locality, wave function (WF) “collapse”, “Schrödinger cat” and some other historically popular misconceptions continue to feed mysteries around quantum phenomena. Arguing that above misinterpretations stem from classically minded and experimentally unverifiable perceptions, recasting Principle of Superposition (PS) and key experimental details into classical notions. Revisiting main components of general quantum measurement protocols (analyzers and detectors), and explaining paradoxes of WF collapse and Schrödinger cat. Reminding that quantum measurements routinely reveal correlations dictated by conservation laws in each individual realization of the quantum ensemble, manifesting “correlation-by-initial conditions” in contrast to traditional “correlation-by-interactions”. We reiterate: Quantum Mechanics (QM) is not a dynamical theory in the same sense the Classical Mechanics (CM) is – it is a statistical phenomenology, as established in 1926 by Born’s postulate. That is, while QM rests on conservation laws in each individual outcome, it does not indicate how exactly a specific outcome is selected. This selection remains fundamentally random and represents true randomness of QM, the latter being a statistical paradigm with a WF standing for a complex-valued distribution function. Finally, PS is the backbone of a quantum measurement process: PS can be conveniently viewed as a composition of partial distributions into the total distribution – similar to classical probability mixtures – and is effectuated experimentally by the analyzer part of a measuring device.