Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2112.01858 · Physical Review A

Nonlinear quantum error correction

Maximilian Reichert, Louis Tessler, Marcel Bergmann, Peter van Loock, Tim Byrnes

Published Jun 22, 2022• 1 citation
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

We introduce a theory of quantum error correction (QEC) for a subclass of states. In the standard theory of QEC, the set of all encoded states is formed by an arbitrary linear combination of the codewords. However, this can be more general than required for a given quantum protocol which may only traverse a subclass of states within the Hilbert space. Here we propose the concept of nonlinear QEC (NLQEC), where the encoded states are not necessarily a linear combination of codewords. We introduce a sufficiency criterion for NLQEC with respect to the subclass of states. The new criterion gives a more relaxed condition for the formation of a QEC code, such that under the assumption that the states are within the subclass of states, the errors are correctable. This allows us, for instance, to effectively circumvent the no-go theorems regarding optical QEC for Gaussian states and channels, for which we present explicit examples.

DOI
10.1103/physreva.105.062438

Related papers

A New Error Correction Intuitive Approach in Quantum Communications Protocols

Skander Aris, Merabtine Nadjim, Malek Benslama

Abstract: Quantum Error Correction will be necessary for preserving coherent states against noise and other unwanted interactions in quantum computation and communication. We develop a general theory of quantum error correction based on encoding states into larger Hilbert spaces subject to known interactions. We obtain necessary and sufficient conditions for the perfect recovery of an encoded state after its degradation by an interaction. The conditions depend only on the behavior of the logical states. We use them to give a recovery operator independent definition of error-correcting codes. We relate this definition to four others: The existence of a left inverse of the interaction, an explicit representation of the error syndrome using tensor products, perfect recovery of the completely entangled state and an information theoretic identity. Two notions of fidelity and error for imperfect recovery are introduced, one for pure and the other for entangled states. The latter is more appropriate when using codes in a quantum memory or in applications of quantum teleportation to communication. We show that the error for entangled states is bounded linearly by the error for pure states. A formal definition of independent interactions for qubits is given. This leads to lower bounds on the number of qubits required to correct errors and a formal proof that the classical bounds on the probability of errorcorrecting codes applies to error correcting quantum codes, provided that the interaction is dominated by an identity component.

American Journal of Applied Sciences•Aug 1, 2007•3 citations

Theory of quantum error-correcting codes

Emanuel H. Knill, Raymond Laflamme

Quantum error correction will be necessary for preserving coherent states against noise and other unwanted interactions in quantum computation and communication. We develop a general theory of quantum error correction based on encoding states into larger Hilbert spaces subject to known interactions. We obtain necessary and sufficient conditions for the perfect recovery of an encoded state after its degradation by an interaction. The conditions depend only on the behavior of the logical states. We use them to give a recovery-operator-independent definition of error-correcting codes. We relate this definition to four others: the existence of a left inverse of the interaction, an explicit representation of the error syndrome using tensor products, perfect recovery of the completely entangled state, and an information theoretic identity. Two notions of fidelity and error for imperfect recovery are introduced, one for pure and the other for entangled states. The latter is more appropriate when using codes in a quantum memory or in applications of quantum teleportation to communication. We show that the error for entangled states is bounded linearly by the error for pure states. A formal definition of independent interactions for qubits is given. This leads to lower bounds on the number of qubits required to correct e errors and a formal proof that the classical bounds on the probability of error of e-error-correcting codes applies to e-error-correcting quantum codes, provided that the interaction is dominated by an identity component.

Physical Review A•Feb 1, 1997•1,593 citations

Introduction to quantum error correction

Andrew M. Steane

An introduction to quantum error correction (QEC) is given, and some recent developments are described. QEC consists of two parts: the physics of error processes and their reversal, and the construction of quantum error–correcting codes. Errors are caused both by imperfect quantum operations, and by coupling between the quantum system and its environment. Any such process can be analysed into a sum of ‘error operators’, which are tensor products of Pauli spin operators. These are the analogues of classical error vectors. A quantum error correcting code is a set of orthogonal states, ‘quantum codewords’, which behave in a certain useful way under the action of the most likely error operators. A computer or channel which only uses such states can be corrected by measurements which determine the error while yielding no information about which codeword or superposition of codewords is involved. Powerful codes can be found using a construction based on classical error–correcting codes. An analysis which allows even the corrective operations themselves to be imperfect leads to powerful and counter–intuitive results: the quantum coherence of a long quantum computation can be preserved even though every qubit in the computer relaxes spontaneously many times before the computation is complete.

Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences•Aug 15, 1998•38 citations

Quantum Error Correction Beyond Completely Positive Maps

Alireza Shabani, Daniel A. Lidar

By introducing an operator sum representation for arbitrary linear maps, we develop a generalized theory of quantum error correction (QEC) that applies to any linear map, in particular maps that are not completely positive (CP). This theory of "linear quantum error correction" is applicable in cases where the standard and restrictive assumption of a factorized initial system-bath state does not apply.

arXiv:quant-ph/0610028•Oct 5, 2006•1 citation

Theory of approximate quantum error correction and the error-set model

Dor Elimelech, Victor V. Albert, Alexander Barg

We develop a theory of approximate quantum error correction (QEC) based on the error-set model, complemented by general methods for code construction. Exact QEC has a powerful error-set structure: by the Knill-Laflamme conditions, a code correcting a given error set automatically protects against every channel whose Kraus operators lie in their linear span. This linearity gives rise to code distance, the equivalence between erasures and general errors, and a theory of asymptotically good codes. A longstanding view has been that these features do not extend to AQEC, leaving the theory essentially channel-by-channel. We show instead that, although full Knill--Laflamme linearity fails, a restricted form survives and suffices to extend all three structural features to the approximate setting. Specifically, a common error-set criterion governs families of channels whose Kraus operators are linear combinations of a given error set and whose coefficient matrices satisfy a spectral constraint. Using the Bény-Oreshkov worst-case and Petz average-case frameworks, we derive uniform fidelity guarantees for these families in terms of two new code parameters--the \emph{environment-leakage distance}, controlling worst-case performance, and the \emph{Knill-Laflamme Hellinger distance}, characterizing the average-case performance of Petz recovery. To demonstrate the scope of this model, we develop partition-based constructions across diverse quantum systems and geometries, placing exact and approximate correction on equal footing. These constructions lead to a metric--error alignment hierarchy for Hilbert spaces, metrics, and error families, which in turn characterizes the resulting recovery guarantees. They yield the first known asymptotically good code families for fermionic systems, one-dimensional Rydberg-blockaded systems, and deletion errors, and extend to other physical platforms.

quant-pharXiv:2607.22995•Jul 28, 2026•0 citations

Quantum error correction

Quantum error correction is a set of methods to protect quantum information--that is, quantum states--from unwanted environmental interactions (decoherence) and other forms of noise. The information is stored in a quantum error-correcting code, which is a subspace in a larger Hilbert space. This code is designed so that the most common errors move the state into an error space orthogonal to the original code space while preserving the information in the state. It is possible to determine whether an error has occurred by a suitable measurement and to apply a unitary correction that returns the state to the code space, without measuring (and hence disturbing) the protected state itself. In general, codewords of a quantum code are entangled states. No code that stores information can protect against all possible errors; instead, codes are designed to correct a specific error set, which should be chosen to match the most likely types of noise. An error set is represented by a set of operators that can multiply the codeword state. Quantum error correction is used to protect information in quantum communication (where quantum states pass through noisy channels) and quantum computation (where quantum states are transformed through a sequence of imperfect computational steps in the presence of environmental decoherence to solve a computational problem). In quantum computation, error correction is just one component of fault-tolerant design.

WORLD SCIENTIFIC eBooks•Dec 1, 2018•0 citations
We introduce a theory of quantum error correction (QEC) for a subclass of states. In the standard theory of QEC, the set of all encoded states is formed by an arbitrary linear combination of the codewords. However, this can be more general than required for a given quantum protocol which may only traverse a subclass of states within the Hilbert space. Here we propose the concept of nonlinear QEC (NLQEC), where the encoded states are not necessarily a linear combination of codewords. We introduce a sufficiency criterion for NLQEC with respect to the subclass of states. The new criterion gives a more relaxed condition for the formation of a QEC code, such that under the assumption that the states are within the subclass of states, the errors are correctable. This allows us, for instance, to effectively circumvent the no-go theorems regarding optical QEC for Gaussian states and channels, for which we present explicit examples.
Abstract: Quantum Error Correction will be necessary for preserving coherent states against noise and other unwanted interactions in quantum computation and communication. We develop a general theory of quantum error correction based on encoding states into larger Hilbert spaces subject to known interactions. We obtain necessary and sufficient conditions for the perfect recovery of an encoded state after its degradation by an interaction. The conditions depend only on the behavior of the logical states. We use them to give a recovery operator independent definition of error-correcting codes. We relate this definition to four others: The existence of a left inverse of the interaction, an explicit representation of the error syndrome using tensor products, perfect recovery of the completely entangled state and an information theoretic identity. Two notions of fidelity and error for imperfect recovery are introduced, one for pure and the other for entangled states. The latter is more appropriate when using codes in a quantum memory or in applications of quantum teleportation to communication. We show that the error for entangled states is bounded linearly by the error for pure states. A formal definition of independent interactions for qubits is given. This leads to lower bounds on the number of qubits required to correct errors and a formal proof that the classical bounds on the probability of errorcorrecting codes applies to error correcting quantum codes, provided that the interaction is dominated by an identity component.
Quantum error correction will be necessary for preserving coherent states against noise and other unwanted interactions in quantum computation and communication. We develop a general theory of quantum error correction based on encoding states into larger Hilbert spaces subject to known interactions. We obtain necessary and sufficient conditions for the perfect recovery of an encoded state after its degradation by an interaction. The conditions depend only on the behavior of the logical states. We use them to give a recovery-operator-independent definition of error-correcting codes. We relate this definition to four others: the existence of a left inverse of the interaction, an explicit representation of the error syndrome using tensor products, perfect recovery of the completely entangled state, and an information theoretic identity. Two notions of fidelity and error for imperfect recovery are introduced, one for pure and the other for entangled states. The latter is more appropriate when using codes in a quantum memory or in applications of quantum teleportation to communication. We show that the error for entangled states is bounded linearly by the error for pure states. A formal definition of independent interactions for qubits is given. This leads to lower bounds on the number of qubits required to correct e errors and a formal proof that the classical bounds on the probability of error of e-error-correcting codes applies to e-error-correcting quantum codes, provided that the interaction is dominated by an identity component.
An introduction to quantum error correction (QEC) is given, and some recent developments are described. QEC consists of two parts: the physics of error processes and their reversal, and the construction of quantum error–correcting codes. Errors are caused both by imperfect quantum operations, and by coupling between the quantum system and its environment. Any such process can be analysed into a sum of ‘error operators’, which are tensor products of Pauli spin operators. These are the analogues of classical error vectors. A quantum error correcting code is a set of orthogonal states, ‘quantum codewords’, which behave in a certain useful way under the action of the most likely error operators. A computer or channel which only uses such states can be corrected by measurements which determine the error while yielding no information about which codeword or superposition of codewords is involved. Powerful codes can be found using a construction based on classical error–correcting codes. An analysis which allows even the corrective operations themselves to be imperfect leads to powerful and counter–intuitive results: the quantum coherence of a long quantum computation can be preserved even though every qubit in the computer relaxes spontaneously many times before the computation is complete.
We develop a theory of approximate quantum error correction (QEC) based on the error-set model, complemented by general methods for code construction. Exact QEC has a powerful error-set structure: by the Knill-Laflamme conditions, a code correcting a given error set automatically protects against every channel whose Kraus operators lie in their linear span. This linearity gives rise to code distance, the equivalence between erasures and general errors, and a theory of asymptotically good codes. A longstanding view has been that these features do not extend to AQEC, leaving the theory essentially channel-by-channel. We show instead that, although full Knill--Laflamme linearity fails, a restricted form survives and suffices to extend all three structural features to the approximate setting. Specifically, a common error-set criterion governs families of channels whose Kraus operators are linear combinations of a given error set and whose coefficient matrices satisfy a spectral constraint. Using the Bény-Oreshkov worst-case and Petz average-case frameworks, we derive uniform fidelity guarantees for these families in terms of two new code parameters--the \emph{environment-leakage distance}, controlling worst-case performance, and the \emph{Knill-Laflamme Hellinger distance}, characterizing the average-case performance of Petz recovery. To demonstrate the scope of this model, we develop partition-based constructions across diverse quantum systems and geometries, placing exact and approximate correction on equal footing. These constructions lead to a metric--error alignment hierarchy for Hilbert spaces, metrics, and error families, which in turn characterizes the resulting recovery guarantees. They yield the first known asymptotically good code families for fermionic systems, one-dimensional Rydberg-blockaded systems, and deletion errors, and extend to other physical platforms.
Quantum error correction is a set of methods to protect quantum information--that is, quantum states--from unwanted environmental interactions (decoherence) and other forms of noise. The information is stored in a quantum error-correcting code, which is a subspace in a larger Hilbert space. This code is designed so that the most common errors move the state into an error space orthogonal to the original code space while preserving the information in the state. It is possible to determine whether an error has occurred by a suitable measurement and to apply a unitary correction that returns the state to the code space, without measuring (and hence disturbing) the protected state itself. In general, codewords of a quantum code are entangled states. No code that stores information can protect against all possible errors; instead, codes are designed to correct a specific error set, which should be chosen to match the most likely types of noise. An error set is represented by a set of operators that can multiply the codeword state. Quantum error correction is used to protect information in quantum communication (where quantum states pass through noisy channels) and quantum computation (where quantum states are transformed through a sequence of imperfect computational steps in the presence of environmental decoherence to solve a computational problem). In quantum computation, error correction is just one component of fault-tolerant design.