Complex techniques of general relativity are used to determine all the states in two- and three-dimensional momentum spaces in which the equality holds in uncertainty relations for non-commuting basic observables of Euclidean invariant elementary quantum mechanical systems, even with non-zero intrinsic spin. It is shown that while there is a 1-parameter family of such states for any two components of the angular momentum vector operator with any angle between them, such states exist for a component of the linear and angular momenta only if these components are orthogonal to each other, and hence, the problem is reduced to the two-dimensional Euclidean invariant case. We also show that analogous states exist for a component of the linear momentum and of the center-of-mass vector only if the angle between them is zero or an acute angle. No such state (represented by a square integrable and differentiable wave function) can exist for any pair of components of the center-of-mass vector operator. Therefore, the existence of such states depends not only on the Lie algebra but on the choice of its generators as well.
Complex techniques of general relativity are used to determine all the states in two- and three-dimensional momentum spaces in which the equality holds in uncertainty relations for non-commuting basic observables of Euclidean invariant elementary quantum mechanical systems, even with non-zero intrinsic spin. It is shown that while there is a 1-parameter family of such states for any two components of the angular momentum vector operator with any angle between them, such states exist for a component of the linear and angular momenta only if these components are orthogonal to each other, and hence, the problem is reduced to the two-dimensional Euclidean invariant case. We also show that analogous states exist for a component of the linear momentum and of the center-of-mass vector only if the angle between them is zero or an acute angle. No such state (represented by a square integrable and differentiable wave function) can exist for any pair of components of the center-of-mass vector operator. Therefore, the existence of such states depends not only on the Lie algebra but on the choice of its generators as well.
Complex and spinorial techniques of general relativity are used to determine all the states of SU(2) invariant quantum mechanical systems in which the equality holds in uncertainty relations for the components of the angular momentum vector operator in two given directions. The expectation values depend on a discrete quantum number and two parameters, one of them is the angle between two angular momentum components and the other is the quotient of two standard deviations. Allowing the angle between two angular momentum components to be arbitrary, a new genuine quantum mechanical phenomenon emerges: it is shown that although standard deviations change continuously, one of the expectation values changes discontinuously on this parameter space. Since physically neither of the angular momentum components is distinguished over the other, this discontinuity suggests that the genuine parameter space must be a double cover of this classical one: it must be diffeomorphic to a Riemann surface known in connection with the complex function z. Moreover, the angle between angular momentum components plays the role of the parameter of an interpolation between the continuous range of expectation values in the special case of orthogonal angular momentum components and the discrete point spectrum of one angular momentum component. The consequences in the simultaneous measurements of these angular momentum components are also discussed briefly.
Abstract Penrose’s Spin Geometry Theorem is extended further, from SU(2) and E(3) (Euclidean) to E(1, 3) (Poincaré) invariant elementary quantum mechanical systems. The Lorentzian spatial distance between any two non-parallel timelike straight lines of Minkowski space, considered to be the centre-of-mass world lines of E(1, 3)-invariant elementary classical mechanical systems with positive rest mass, is expressed in terms of E(1, 3)-invariant basic observables, viz. the 4-momentum and the angular momentum of the systems. An analogous expression for E(1, 3)-invariant elementary quantum mechanical systems in terms of the basic quantum observables in an abstract, algebraic formulation of quantum mechanics is given, and it is shown that, in the classical limit, it reproduces the Lorentzian spatial distance between the timelike straight lines of Minkowski space with asymptotically vanishing uncertainty. Thus, the metric structure of Minkowski space can be recovered from quantum mechanics in the classical limit using only the observables of abstract quantum mechanical systems.
Abstract The spin geometry theorem of Penrose is extended from SU(2) to E(3) (Euclidean) invariant elementary quantum mechanical systems. Using the natural decomposition of the total angular momentum into its spin and orbital parts, the distance between the centre-of-mass lines of the elementary subsystems of a classical composite system can be recovered from their relative orbital angular momenta by E(3)-invariant classical observables. Motivated by this observation, an expression for the ‘empirical distance’ between the elementary subsystems of a composite quantum mechanical system, given in terms of E(3)-invariant quantum observables, is suggested. It is shown that, in the classical limit, this expression reproduces the a priori Euclidean distance between the subsystems, though at the quantum level it has a discrete character. ‘Empirical’ angles and 3-volume elements are also considered.
The present series of papers is devoted to the localization problem in relativistic quantum mechanics. The consequences of imposing the condition that the descriptions of a localized state seen from two different frames of reference should be physically consistent were investigated in Paper II. Only instantaneous localization was studied. Considering elementary systems of nonzero mass and spin 0 and \textonehalf{}, the following results were found. (a) As regards the localization problem, one cannot avoid accepting at least one of the following strong departures from the usual ideas: (i) Position has no meaning; (ii) it violates the physical equivalence of inertial frames; (iii) it is the only quantum variable which cannot be represented by an operator; (iv) it is non-Hermitian; (v) some unusual interaction effects do not disappear when the interaction is switched off. (b) If a component of position is to be precisely measurable as a point, then for spin 0 there is only one possible position operator; for spin \textonehalf{} the operator is unique up to a parameter; in both cases the operators are non-Hermitian with respect to the relativistically invariant scalar product, but in spite of this the eigenvalues of all components are real. The components of position are compatible with each other for spin 0 and incompatible for spin \textonehalf{}. The communication relations of position with linear momentum are the standard ones. The velocity operator, which is Hermitian, has the expected form. Several authors have stated that the localization problem can have a solution for mass greater than zero, but for the zero-mass case a solution does not exist. In this paper the localization problem is studied for zero-mass elementary systems by only imposing, as in Paper II, the above requirement of physical consistency. We consider systems with spin 0, \textonehalf{}, and 1. We prove that the consequences are essentially the same as those obtained for systems of mass greater than zero. The parameter is no longer arbitrary.
The purpose of this paper is to find to what extent the notion of position in the relativistic quantum mechanics of free elementary systems of nonzero mass is defined (or precluded) by the requirement that the descriptions of a localized state as seen from two observers in different frames of reference should be physically consistent. Neither the existence of a time component of the position operator nor the compatibility of the space components of position is assumed. Hermiticity with respect to the quantum-relativistic scalar product in state-vector space is neither assumed nor rejected. There are three possibilities: (i) The position is represented as usual by a Hermitian operator; this is the point-type position. (ii) Non-Hermitian operators are accepted, and the k component of position can represent segments of the k axis with length of the order of m1; when the operator is not only non-Hermitian, but also non-normal, this is the extended-type position. (iii) Non-Hermitian operators are accepted, but the segments are reduced to points; this is the limiting case of the extended-type position. Case (ii) is not studied in this paper. General conditions are found for any spin as regards cases (i) and (iii), and their consequences are obtained for spin 0 and spin \textonehalf{}. The results are the following: There is no position operator in case (i), but in case (iii) the position operator is unique for spin 0 and unique up to a parameter for spin \textonehalf{}. For both spins, in spite of the lack of relativistic Hermiticity, the eigenvalues of position are real, and the velocity is the expected one. The eigenstates of one component of the position are found. The components of the position are compatible with each other for spin 0, and incompatible for spin \textonehalf{}. In the former case, the simultaneous eigenstates of all components are Philip's class-I localized states. Related work is discussed.
This chapter shows that the three operators are Hermitian and (in a rotationally invariant system) commute with the Hamiltonian; therefore they are observable constants of the motion. It finds out what their physical significance is. By knowing from classical mechanics, the constant of the motion arising from rotational invariance is the angular momentum. The angular momentum may split up into two parts: orbital and intrinsic. The orbital part can always be described by the dependence of a wave function, whereas the intrinsic part is by definition contained in the transformation property of the wave function. In the case of a single component (scalar), no intrinsic angular momentum exists. There are—apart from the vector addition and the scalar product—two other ways of combining two vectors: the direct sum and the direct product. Both occur in the theory of angular momentum, in fact whenever symmetry is involved.