Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2111.04667

Comment on "Using an atom interferometer to infer gravitational entanglement generation''

Daniel Carney, Holger Müller, Jacob M. Taylor

Published Nov 8, 2021• 2 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

Our paper arXiv:2101.11629 contains a technical error which changes some of the conclusions. We thank Streltsov, Pedernales, and Plenio for bringing the essence of this error to our attention. Here we explain the error, examine its consequences, and suggest methods to overcome the resulting weakness in the proposed experiment.
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.2111.04667

Related papers

Comment on "Quasideterministic Generation of Entangled Atoms in a Cavity "

Guangri Jin, Dong Zhou

This paper has been withdrawn by the author(s), due a crucial sign error in conclusion .

arXiv:quant-ph/0212144•Dec 26, 2002•0 citations

Reply to comments arXiv:2512.07881 and arXiv:2601.06104 on quantum structure in human and AI-generated language

Massimiliano Sassoli de Bianchi, Roberto Leporini

We reply to the comments by M. Sienicki and K. Sienicki (arXiv:2512.07881) and by K. Sienicki (arXiv:2601.06104) on our work on quantum-mechanical statistics in human language (arXiv:2407.14924) and on quantum structure in AI-generated language (arXiv:2511.21731). We thank the authors for their careful reading and address what we consider to be the main points of criticism: the exploratory nature of the protocol used in the experiments with large language models; the role of marginal-law violations, and of the Contextuality-by-Default criterion, in the identification of entanglement; the limited diagnostic value of a Bose-Einstein fit taken in isolation; the meaning of assigning the lowest energy levels to the most frequent words; and the relation between the vector spaces used by LLMs and quantum state spaces. We also correct a typographical error in Table 3 of arXiv:2511.21731, which does not affect the reported CHSH value.

arXiv:2609.25797•Sep 22, 2026•0 citations

Reply to comment on: ‘Does an atom interferometer test the gravitational redshift at the Compton frequency?’

Peter Wolf, Luc Blanchet A, Christian Bordé +3 more

We reply to a comment by Hohensee et al on: 'Does an atom interferometer test the gravitational redshift at the Compton frequency' and show that the main result of that paper, namely that atom interferometric gravimeters do not test the gravitational redshift at the Compton frequency, remains valid.

arXiv:1201.1778•Classical and Quantum Gravity•Jan 26, 2012•15 citations

Reply to comment on "Interaction of a BEC with a gravitational wave"

Ralf Schützhold

This reply contains a brief response to the comment by R. Howl, D. Rätzel, and I. Fuentes [arXiv:1811.10306]

arXiv:1901.08999•Jan 25, 2019•1 citation

Using an Atom Interferometer to Infer Gravitational Entanglement Generation

Daniel Carney, Holger Müller, Jacob M. Taylor

If gravitational perturbations are quantized into gravitons in analogy with the electromagnetic field and photons, the resulting graviton interactions should lead to an entangling interaction between massive objects. We suggest a test of this prediction. To do this, we introduce the concept of interactive quantum information sensing. This novel sensing protocol is tailored to provable verification of weak dynamical entanglement generation between a pair of systems. We show that this protocol is highly robust to typical thermal noise sources. The sensitivity can moreover be increased both using an initial thermal state and/or an initial phase of entangling via a non-gravitational interaction. We outline a concrete implementation testing the ability of the gravitational field to generate entanglement between an atomic interferometer and mechanical oscillator. Preliminary numerical estimates suggest that near-term devices could feasibly be used to perform the experiment.

•Aug 1, 2021•69 citations

Comment on ``Experimental Simulation of Two-Particle Quantum Entanglement using Classical Fields''

Aloysius F. Kracklauer

We assert that the reported results consitute an empirical counterexample to Bell's theorem

arXiv:quant-ph/0208099•Aug 15, 2002•0 citations
We reply to the comments by M. Sienicki and K. Sienicki (arXiv:2512.07881) and by K. Sienicki (arXiv:2601.06104) on our work on quantum-mechanical statistics in human language (arXiv:2407.14924) and on quantum structure in AI-generated language (arXiv:2511.21731). We thank the authors for their careful reading and address what we consider to be the main points of criticism: the exploratory nature of the protocol used in the experiments with large language models; the role of marginal-law violations, and of the Contextuality-by-Default criterion, in the identification of entanglement; the limited diagnostic value of a Bose-Einstein fit taken in isolation; the meaning of assigning the lowest energy levels to the most frequent words; and the relation between the vector spaces used by LLMs and quantum state spaces. We also correct a typographical error in Table 3 of arXiv:2511.21731, which does not affect the reported CHSH value.
If gravitational perturbations are quantized into gravitons in analogy with the electromagnetic field and photons, the resulting graviton interactions should lead to an entangling interaction between massive objects. We suggest a test of this prediction. To do this, we introduce the concept of interactive quantum information sensing. This novel sensing protocol is tailored to provable verification of weak dynamical entanglement generation between a pair of systems. We show that this protocol is highly robust to typical thermal noise sources. The sensitivity can moreover be increased both using an initial thermal state and/or an initial phase of entangling via a non-gravitational interaction. We outline a concrete implementation testing the ability of the gravitational field to generate entanglement between an atomic interferometer and mechanical oscillator. Preliminary numerical estimates suggest that near-term devices could feasibly be used to perform the experiment.