Causal modeling is a tool for generating causal explanations of observed correlations and has led to a deeper understanding of correlations in quantum networks. Existing frameworks for quantum causality tend to focus on acyclic causal structures that are not fine-tuned i.e., where causal connections between variables necessarily create correlations between them. However, fine-tuned causal models (which permit causation without correlation) play a crucial role in cryptography, and cyclic causal models can be used to model physical processes involving feedback and may also be relevant in exotic solutions of general relativity. Here we develop a causal modeling framework capable of dealing with these general scenarios. The key feature of our framework is that it allows operational and relativistic notions of causality to be independently defined and for connections between them to be established in a theory-independent manner. The framework first gives an operational way to study causation that allows for cyclic, fine-tuned, and nonclassical causal influences. We then consider how a causal model can be embedded in a space-time structure (modeled as a partial order) and propose a compatibility condition for ensuring that the embedded causal model does not allow signaling outside the space-time future. We identify several distinct classes of causal loops that can arise in our framework, showing that compatibility with a space-time can rule out only some of them. We discuss conditions for preventing superluminal signaling within arbitrary (and possibly cyclic) causal structures and consider models of causation in postquantum theories admitting so-called jamming correlations. Finally, this work introduces the concept of a higher-order affects relation, which is useful for causal discovery in fined-tuned causal models.
Causal modeling is a tool for generating causal explanations of observed correlations and has led to a deeper understanding of correlations in quantum networks. Existing frameworks for quantum causality tend to focus on acyclic causal structures that are not fine-tuned i.e., where causal connections between variables necessarily create correlations between them. However, fine-tuned causal models (which permit causation without correlation) play a crucial role in cryptography, and cyclic causal models can be used to model physical processes involving feedback and may also be relevant in exotic solutions of general relativity. Here we develop a causal modeling framework capable of dealing with these general scenarios. The key feature of our framework is that it allows operational and relativistic notions of causality to be independently defined and for connections between them to be established in a theory-independent manner. The framework first gives an operational way to study causation that allows for cyclic, fine-tuned, and nonclassical causal influences. We then consider how a causal model can be embedded in a space-time structure (modeled as a partial order) and propose a compatibility condition for ensuring that the embedded causal model does not allow signaling outside the space-time future. We identify several distinct classes of causal loops that can arise in our framework, showing that compatibility with a space-time can rule out only some of them. We discuss conditions for preventing superluminal signaling within arbitrary (and possibly cyclic) causal structures and consider models of causation in postquantum theories admitting so-called jamming correlations. Finally, this work introduces the concept of a higher-order affects relation, which is useful for causal discovery in fined-tuned causal models.
By relating and ordering events, causality constitutes a pivotal feature of our world. On the one hand, there are information-theoretic notions of causality defined in terms of the information processing ability of agents and on the other hand, there are relativistic notions of causality tied to a spacetime. In this thesis, we improve upon a framework introduced by V. Vilasini and R. Colbeck in PRA, 106, 032204 (2022) and PRL, 129, 110401 (2022) for connecting these notions, where the possibility of operationally detectable causal loops embedded in (1+1)-Minkowski spacetime without superluminal signalling was demonstrated. In the first part, we take the information-theoretic point of view, where the concept of higher-order (HO) affects relations was proposed to generically model signalling in the presence of cyclic, fine-tuned and non-classical causal influences. We establish new properties of HO affects relations and apply them to infer causal structures. We then demonstrate a complete and constructive way to detect causal loops from a set of HO affects relations. In the second part, we study the embedding of information-theoretic causal structures into partially ordered spacetimes. We propose stability conditions on the spacetime embedding to rule out a class of operationally detectable loops that cannot be ruled out by the principle of no-signalling (outside the relativistic future) alone. We then propose novel order-theoretic properties that we conjecture to hold in Minkowski spacetime with d≥2 spatial dimensions. This would imply that in contrast to (1+1)-Minkowski spacetime, in higher dimensions, the no-signalling principle is indeed sufficient for ruling out this class of loops. Finally, we introduce a relation which allows for causal inference through knowledge about the absence of signalling relations and we relate it to novel order-theoretic features of spacetime.
Causality is fundamental to science, but it appears in several different forms. One is relativistic causality, which is tied to a spacetime structure and forbids signaling outside the future. A second is an operational notion of causation that considers the flow of information between physical systems and interventions on them. In [V. Vilasini and R. Colbeck, General framework for cyclic and fine-tuned causal models and their compatibility with space-time, Phys. Rev. A 106, 032204 (2022).PLRAAN2469-992610.1103/PhysRevA.106.032204], we propose a framework for characterizing when a causal model can coexist with relativistic principles such as no superluminal signaling, while allowing for cyclic and nonclassical causal influences and the possibility of causation without signaling. In a theory without superluminal causation, both superluminal signaling and causal loops are not possible in Minkowski spacetime. Here we demonstrate that if we only forbid superluminal signaling, superluminal causation remains possible and show the mathematical possibility of causal loops that can be embedded in a Minkowski spacetime without leading to superluminal signaling. The existence of such loops in the given spacetime could in principle be operationally verified using interventions. This establishes that the physical principle of no superluminal signaling is not by itself sufficient to rule out causal loops between Minkowski spacetime events. Interestingly, the conditions required to rule out causal loops in a spacetime depend on the dimension. Whether such loops are possible in three spatial dimensions remains an important open question.
Non-classical correlations resulting from entangled quantum systems have sparked debates about the compatibility of quantum theory and relativity, and about the right way to think about causation. Key to a causal theory is that superluminal signalling is forbidden, which holds in quantum theory. In Bell scenarios, relativistic causality principles like no superluminal signalling are often assumed to follow from the standard no-signalling constraints on correlations. We explore the connections between a range of relativistic principles, including no superluminal signalling and no causal loops, and constraints on correlations that can arise with arbitrary interventions, within multi-party Bell scenarios. This includes standard no-signalling conditions and proposed relaxations allowing phenomena like jamming, where it was suggested that superluminal signalling and causal loops remain impossible. Using our recent framework combining relativistic principles with causal modelling, we show that any theory (classical or non-classical) allowing jamming must rely on causal fine-tuning and superluminal causal influences. Additionally, we show that jamming theories can lead to superluminal signalling in certain situations, highlighting limitations for their physicality. However, we identify cases where jamming correlations avoid superluminal signalling under general interventions, demonstrating that standard no-signalling constraints are not necessary for this purpose. We also show that these constraints are insufficient to rule out superluminal signalling and are neither necessary nor sufficient for ensuring no causal loops under general interventions. Finally, we derive necessary and sufficient conditions for ruling out superluminal signalling and operationally detectable causal loops, solidifying our understanding of relativistic causality principles in information processing tasks in space-time.
In his seminal paper, Bell [Physics Physique Fizika 1, 195 (1964)] considers the correlations that result from space-like separated measurements on a pair of entangled particles. He uses relativity theory to motivate the Bell causal structure, then shows the existence of quantum correlations that cannot be explained classically within this causal structure. Classical explanations of such quantum correlations are possible in alternative causal structures, for instance, those that allow superluminal causal influences, but, as shown in [New Journal of Physics 17 033002 (2015)], all such alternative explanations require fine tuning (causation without correlation). Here we discuss the existence of spurious quantum correlations --- correlations that look quantum in one causal structure, but have a natural classical explanation in another. More precisely, there are causal structures that admit non-classical quantum correlations, but for which the same correlations have a classical explanation in another causal structure without fine tuning. The realisation in the other causal structure can also be achieved without breaking any natural constraints on the causal structure that follow from relativity theory. However, similarly to non-classical quantum correlations in the Bell causal structure, we find other causal structures with non-classical quantum correlations that do not have a classical causal explanation in any alternative causal structure without fine tuning.
Causality is pivotal to our understanding of the world, presenting itself in different forms: information-theoretic and relativistic, the former linked to the flow of information, and the latter to the structure of space-time.To operationally infer causal relations across a variety of different theories, the operational notion of signalling plays a central role.In particular, this includes the affects framework, formalising signalling in general physical theories using a causal modelling approach, and notions of signalling in quantum theory.In the first part of this thesis, we leverage the affects framework to improve the characterisation of information-theoretic signalling as defined through so-called affects relations. Specifically, we provide conditions for identifying redundancies in such a relation, introducing techniques for causal inference in unfaithful causal models (where the observable data does not “faithfully” reflect the causal dependences), and demonstrate how affects relations can be applied to describe signalling in quantum theory.Beyond capturing information-theoretic signalling alone, the affects framework allows one to study its interplay with relativistic principles. We define an order-theoretic property called conicality, showing that it is satisfied for Minkowski space-times with d > 1 spatial dimensions. Embedding of information-theoretic causal models in space-time without violating relativistic principles such as no superluminal signalling (NSS), we observe that constraints imposed by NSS in a space-time and those imposed by purely information-theoretic causal inference behave differently. We then prove a correspondence between conical space-times and faithful causal models: in both cases, there emerges a parallel between these two types of constraints. This indicates a connection between informational and geometric notions of causality, which we use to prove the impossibility of non-degenerate embeddings of causal loops into conical spacetimes.In the second part of this thesis, we study quantum processes with indefinite causal order (ICO), for which various frameworks have been proposed. In particular, quantum circuits with quantum control of causal order (QC-QCs) form a broad class of higher-order maps which are believed to represent all quantum processes physically realisable in a fixed spacetime. Complementarily, the formalism of routed quantum circuits introduces quantum operations constrained by “routes” to represent processes in terms of a more fine-grained routed circuit decomposition, representing the information flow in the respective process. However, the existence of routed circuit decompositions has only been established for a small set of processes so far.We remedy this fact by connecting these two frameworks, proving that for any given N, one can systematically obtain a routed circuit decomposition for any QC-QC with N parties. We detail this construction explicitly and contrast it with alternative routed circuit decompositions of QC-QCs.We additionally provide representations of subclasses of QC-QCs, including a proposed class of agent-localised processes and the QC-supFO class capturing processes with non-dynamical causal order. We conclude this part by applying affects relations to describe processes with dynamical causal order.
In quantum causality and quantum information, there is a vast landscape of abstract quantum protocols permitting cyclic or non-acyclic causal structures between operations, including frameworks for indefinite causal order and higher-order quantum processes such as process matrices. A longstanding open question is what is the largest class of abstract processes that admit physical realisations without post-selection. In this work, we provide a rigorous answer using a top-down approach grounded in relativistic causality principles. Building on the framework of causal boxes, which characterise the most general quantum information-processing protocols compatible with fixed background spacetimes, we formalise additional constraints (Acting Once + Local Order) capturing the closed-laboratory assumptions of the process matrix framework at a fine-grained spacetime level. We prove that any protocol in a classical acyclic spacetime satisfying these conditions is behaviourally equivalent to a quantum circuit with quantum control of causal order (QC-QC), providing a top-down derivation of QC-QCs from physical principles. Our results show that QC-QCs constitute precisely the class of higher-order quantum processes, including those with indefinite order, that can be physically realised within classical spacetime, ruling out more general non-causal processes under the closed-labs assumption. This clarifies the relationship between abstract higher-order process matrix frameworks and experimentally accessible quantum protocols, as well as the interplay between coarse-grained cyclic and fine-grained acyclic operational causal structures. We also develop characterisation techniques for process box protocols that lead to new causality-based open questions concerning spacetime quantum protocols and relativistic quantum experiments.