arXiv:2109.04151

Nonlocal action at a distance also acts in the past

Mandip Singh

Published Sep 9, 2021• 0 citations

Abstract

The nonlocal action of a measurement performed on a quantum entangled particle can determine the quantum state of a distant entangled particle instantly. Since the relativistic simultaneity of events is frame dependent therefore, a physically valid question arises, does the nonlocal action at a distance determine the quantum state of the distant particle in its past, when quantum state collapse is observed from a different inertial frame of reference? From the relativity of simultaneity, Lorentz invariance of the quantum entangled state of photons under consideration and the validity of Bell's theorem in all inertial frames of reference, it is demonstrated that the measurement-induced collapse of a quantum entangled state also determines the quantum state of a distant photon in its past, provided one of the photons is located in the future. The past and future are defined with respect to the time of quantum state collapse in the rest frame of a quantum state measurement device.

DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2109.04151

Related papers

Spooky action at a distance also acts in the past

Mandip Singh

The term `spooky action at a distance' was coined by A. Einstein to show inconsistency of quantum mechanics with the principle of locality and reality. However, quantum mechanics is nonlocal and violates Bell's inequality. A quantum state measurement of a particle of an entangled pair collapses the total quantum state and the quantum state of the distant particle is immediately determined without making any interaction with it. The isolated collapsed quantum state of both particles remains unentangled in the future. An inertial frame of reference moving with a relativistic speed perceives these events differently is space and time and their simultaneity is relative. In this paper, it is shown that the quantum state collapse happens not only in the present but it also happens in the past of the collapse event.

Sep 9, 20211 citation

Multiple measurements on an uncollapsed entangled two-photon state

Dalibor Javůrek

The relativity of simultaneity together with the definition of a quantum state collapse results in experimental situations where multiple measurements can be taken on an uncollapsed quantum state. The quantum state's collapse is defined to be instantaneous in a rest inertial frame of a detector performing measurements on the quantum system. The definition is consistent with the Copenhagen interpretation and in agreement with all measurements performed with detectors at rest in an arbitrary Lorentz (laboratory) frame. From the introduced collapse model follows that under certain conditions multiple measurements are allowed on the same uncollapsed quantum state. An application of the developed approach is shown on measurement of photon-pair state entangled in polarization and energy. Conditions under which two measurements can be taken on the uncollapsed photon-pair state are derived. Serious consequences follow from the allowance of multiple measurements on the same uncollapsed state. For example, the measurements taken by both detectors in this situation are uncorrelated. Moreover, all the conservation laws could be violated in individual measurements, but not in mean values. This statement is proved on the two-photon state entangled in energy. This is in contradiction with experimental results observed by the detectors in rest relative to each other. It is shown that the property of measuring uncorrelated results with detectors in relative movement is related solely to the proposed collapse model. The remaining collapse models---the preferred Lorentz frame, Aharonov-Albert, and Hellwig-Kraus---are examined and discussed with respect to the designed experiment, which involves spacelike separated measurements.

arXiv:2210.06045Physical Review AAug 10, 20231 citation

Experimental test of relativistic quantum state collapse with moving reference frames

H Zbinden, J Brendel, Wolfgang Tittel +1 more

An experimental test of relativistic wave-packet collapse is presented. The tested model assumes that the collapse takes place in the reference frame determined by the massive measuring detectors. Entangled photons are measured at 10 km distance within a time interval of less than 5 ps. The two apparatuses are in relative motion so that both detectors, each in its own inertial reference frame, are first to perform the measurement. The data always reproduces the quantum correlations and thus rule out a class of collapse models. The results also set a lower bound on the `speed of quantum information' to 2/3 ×10 7 and 3/2 ×10 4 times the speed of light in the Geneva and the background radiation reference frames, respectively. The very difficult and deep question of where the collapse takes place—if it takes place at all—is considered in a concrete experimental context.

arXiv:quant-ph/0002031Journal of Physics A Mathematical and GeneralAug 24, 200114 citations

Lessons of Bell's Theorem: Nonlocality, Yes; Action at a Distance, Not Necessarily

Wayne C. Myrvold

Introduction Fifty years after the publication of Bell's theorem, there remains some controversy regarding what the theorem is telling us about quantum mechanics, and what the experimental violations of Bell inequalities are telling us about the world. This chapter represents my best attempt to be clear about what I think the lessons are. In brief: There is some sort of nonlocality inherent in any quantum theory, and, moreover, in any theory that reproduces, even approximately, the quantum probabilities for the outcomes of experiments. But not all forms of nonlocality are the same; there is a distinction to be made between action at a distance and other forms of nonlocality, and I will argue that the nonlocality needed to violate the Bell inequalities need not involve action at a distance. Furthermore, the distinction between forms of nonlocality makes a difference when it comes to compatibility with relativistic causal structure. The Bell locality condition is a condition which, if satisfied, renders possible a completely local account of the correlations between outcomes of spatially separated experiments. Bell's theorem tells us that the probabilities that we compute from quantum mechanics do not admit of such an account. Modulo auxiliary assumptions that, in my opinion, should be noncontroversial, this yields the conclusion that there must be something nonlocal about any theory that yields the quantum mechanical probabilities or anything close to them. One way to violate the Bell locality condition – and this is the way that any deterministic theory must do it – is via straightforward action at a distance. However, we should also consider the possibility of a stochastic theorywith probabilistic laws that involve irreducible correlations. The sort of nonlocality inherent in such a theory involves relations between events that are significantly different from causal relations as usually conceived. Perhaps surprisingly, such a theory, unlike its deterministic cousins, need not invoke a distinguished relation of distant simultaneity. This makes a difference for the situation of the two sorts of theories vis-a-vis relativity. Though a deterministic theory can achieve the appearance of being relativistic, at the level of observable phenomena, it can do so only by introducing a preferred foliation and with it a causal structure at odds with relativistic causal structures. Things are otherwise with dynamical collapse theories.

Cambridge University Press eBooksAug 31, 201615 citations

Wave Function Collapse, Lorentz Invariance, and the Third Postulate of Relativity

Edward J. Gillis

The changes that quantum states undergo during measurement are both probabilistic and nonlocal. These two characteristics complement one another to insure compatibility with relativity and maintain conservation laws. The probabilistic nature of nonlocal effects prevents the superluminal transmission of information, while nonlocal entanglement relations provide a means to enforce conservation laws in a probabilistic theory. In order to explain measurement-induced changes in terms of fundamental physical processes it is important to take these two key characteristics into account. One way to do this is to modify the Schroedinger equation by adding stochastic, nonlinear terms. A number of such proposals have been made over the past few decades. A recently proposed equation based on the assumption that wave function collapse is induced by a sequence of correlating interactions of the kind that constitute measurements has been shown to maintain strict adherence to conservation laws in individual instances, and has also eliminated the need to introduce any new, ad hoc physical constants. In this work it is shone that the proposed stochastic modification to the Schroedinger equation is also Lorentz invariant, even though it is formulated in a preferred reference frame. It is further argued that the additional spacetime structure that the proposed modification requires provides a way to implement the assumption that spacelike-separated operators (and measurements) commute, and that this assumption of local commutativity should be regarded as a third postulate of relativity.

arXiv:2405.05335May 8, 20240 citations

Quantum Entanglement and Special Relativity: A Possible Solution to the Paradox?

Yoram Kirsh

Demonstrations of quantum entanglement which confirm the violation of Bell's inequality indicate that under certain conditions action at a distance is possible. This consequence seems to contradict the relativistic principle of causality, which asserts that an effect never precedes its cause, in any reference frame. By analyzing a numerical example of Bell's experiment with entangled pairs of photons, we show how observers in two inertial reference frames can disagree about the causality relation between two events. One observer claims that event 1 is the cause of event 2, while the other claims that event 1 is the result of event 2. The solution we suggest to the paradox is that in entangled systems, one can find pairs of "entangled events" which have symmetrical causality relations. Each of the events can serve as a cause or as an effect, depending on the frame of reference in which they are observed.

arXiv:1811.00378Oct 29, 20180 citations