Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2108.07159

Phases as Hidden Variables of Quantum Mechanics

S. V. Gantsevich

Published Jul 14, 2021• 0 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

Quantum mechanical wave functions have phases. These phases either initial or acquired during time evolution usually do not enter the final expressions for observable physical quantities. Nevertheless in many cases the observable physical quantities implicitly depend on the phases. Hence we may regard the phases as a sort of hidden variables of Quantum Mechanics. Neglecting the phase role makes inexplicable the peculiar quantum effects such as particle interference, Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen correlation and many others. To the contrary the adequate inclusion of phases into consideration reduces QM puzzles and mysteries to simple and obvious triviality.

DOI
10.48550/arxiv.2108.07159

Related papers

On the Hidden-Variables Issue

Enrico G. Beltrametti, Gianni Cassinelli, Peter Carruthers

The Question of the Completeness of Quantum Mechanics When a classical system is in a pure state, that is, when its preparation represents maximal information, the value of every physical quantity is uniquely predicted. In other words, classical pure states are dispersion-free, and classical mechanics is deterministic. Only in case the state is nonpure, thus representing nonmaximal information about the system, does probability enter into the theory. Things are different with quantum systems. Even in case the state of the system is pure, it is impossible to predict a definite value of every physical quantity: only the probability distributions of the physical quantities are given. Pure quantum states have dispersion (though, of course, they can be dispersion-free for particular physical quantities), and probability enters into quantum theory at a much more fundamental level. The basic idea of so-called hidden-variable theories is to reject the fundamental role of probability in quantum theory and to argue that probability arises because quantum states, even the pure ones, do not represent the ultimate information about the system. Accordingly, it is conjectured that there are certain hidden variables, not yet subject to experimental detection, which would complete the information carried by the quantum states, thus giving rise to so precise a knowledge of the system that probabilities would disappear and precise values of all physical quantities would be uniquely determined.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Dec 28, 1984•0 citations

Does the Wave Function Provide a Complete Description of Physical Reality?

Sheldon Goldstein, Joel L. Lebowitz

This is the introduction to the section on Quantum Mechanics in the centennial collection of noteworthy articles appearing in The Physical Review and Physical Review Letters through 1983, since it all began in 1893. The selections for this section are "Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete?" by Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen; Bohr's response, with the same title; Bohm's first hidden variables paper: "A Suggested Interpretation of the Quantum Theory in Terms of `Hidden' Variables. I"; Aharonov and Bohm's "Significance of Electromagnetic Potentials in the Quantum Theory"; and "Experimental Test of Bell's Inequalities Using Time-Varying Analyzers" by Aspect, Dalibard and Roger.

arXiv:quant-ph/9512028•Dec 29, 1995•1 citation

How the Hidden Variables of Classical Statistical Mechanics are Lost in Quantum Mechanics

Yutaka Toyozawa

The nonlocality of quantum mechanics, of which the paradoxical aspect was first pointed out by Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen and the experimental confirmation was recently done, is analysed to clarify its origin in the context of well established parallelism between classical statistical mechanics and quantum mechanics. In the former exist hidden variables, such as the impact parameter of inter-particle scattering, which governed the past interaction thereby causing the correlated state of now distant particles. The hidden variables must disappear in quantum mechanics where either the coordinate or its conjugate momentum drops out of the independent variables, being uncontrollable due to the uncertainty principle.

Journal of the Physical Society of Japan•Feb 15, 1989•1 citation

A tutorial on quantum distribution functions for spin-12 systems and Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen correlations

Marlan O. Scully, Hwang Lee, Eduardo García Gómez +1 more

In earlier paper entitled How to make quantum mechanics look like a hidden-variable theory and vice versa, Phys. Rev. D 28, 2477 (1983) [1], we developed a quantum distribution function analysis for spin-12 systems, which had many of the characteristics of a hidden variable theory but was rigorously quantum mechanical. In the same paper, we also presented a hidden variable theory which was modeled after the Wigner like quantum distribution analysis and which agreed with the predictions of Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen (EPR) experiments but was non-local. These considerations are useful in understanding various subtle aspects of locality and reality in EPR type experiments. This has not been widely appreciated by students of philosophy and of the foundations of quantum mechanics. This is at least in part no doubt because the mathematical underpinnings are of a somewhat different nature than those usually associated with quantum mechanics. That is, the elements of quantum distribution theory are not the usual material of quantum mechanics course. The main goal of the present notes is therefore to provide a tutorial on quantum distribution theory as applied to spin one half particles. To that end, the original Phys. Rev. paper is included, as are our extensions of that paper. The technical variations, which are naturally included in an abbreviated form in the Phys. Rev. paper, are here presented as a series of worked problems.

AIP conference proceedings•Jan 1, 1999•0 citations

The Problem of Hidden Variables in Quantum Mechanics

Simon Kochen, Ernst P. Specker

Forty years after the advent of quantum mechanics the problem of hidden variables, that is, the possibility of imbedding quantum theory into a classical theory, remains a controversial and obscure subject. Whereas to most physicists the possibility of a classical reinterpretation of quantum mechanics remains remote and perhaps irrelevant to current problems, a minority have kept the issue alive throughout this period. (See Freistadt [5] for a review of the problem and a comprehensive bibliography up to 1957.) As far as results are concerned there are on the one hand purported proofs of the non-existence of hidden variables, most notably von Neumann’s proof, and on the other, various attempts to introduce hidden variables such as de Broglie [4] and Bohm [1] and [2]. One of the difficulties in evaluating these contradictory results is that no exact mathematical criterion is given to enable one to judge the degree of success of these proposals. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Birkhäuser Basel eBooks•Jan 1, 1990•43 citations

Quantum phase and quantum phase operators: some physics and some history

Michael Martin Nieto

After reviewing the role of phase in quantum mechanics, I discuss, with the aid of a number of unpublished documents, the development of quantum phase operators in the 1960's. Interwoven in the discussion are the critical physics questions of the field: are there (unique) quantum phase operators and are there quantum systems which can determine their nature? I conclude with a critique of recent proposals which have shed new light on the problem.

arXiv:hep-th/9304036•Physica Scripta•Jan 1, 1993•61 citations
Quantum mechanical wave functions have phases. These phases either initial or acquired during time evolution usually do not enter the final expressions for observable physical quantities. Nevertheless in many cases the observable physical quantities implicitly depend on the phases. Hence we may regard the phases as a sort of hidden variables of Quantum Mechanics. Neglecting the phase role makes inexplicable the peculiar quantum effects such as particle interference, Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen correlation and many others. To the contrary the adequate inclusion of phases into consideration reduces QM puzzles and mysteries to simple and obvious triviality.
The Question of the Completeness of Quantum Mechanics When a classical system is in a pure state, that is, when its preparation represents maximal information, the value of every physical quantity is uniquely predicted. In other words, classical pure states are dispersion-free, and classical mechanics is deterministic. Only in case the state is nonpure, thus representing nonmaximal information about the system, does probability enter into the theory. Things are different with quantum systems. Even in case the state of the system is pure, it is impossible to predict a definite value of every physical quantity: only the probability distributions of the physical quantities are given. Pure quantum states have dispersion (though, of course, they can be dispersion-free for particular physical quantities), and probability enters into quantum theory at a much more fundamental level. The basic idea of so-called hidden-variable theories is to reject the fundamental role of probability in quantum theory and to argue that probability arises because quantum states, even the pure ones, do not represent the ultimate information about the system. Accordingly, it is conjectured that there are certain hidden variables, not yet subject to experimental detection, which would complete the information carried by the quantum states, thus giving rise to so precise a knowledge of the system that probabilities would disappear and precise values of all physical quantities would be uniquely determined.
This is the introduction to the section on Quantum Mechanics in the centennial collection of noteworthy articles appearing in The Physical Review and Physical Review Letters through 1983, since it all began in 1893. The selections for this section are "Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete?" by Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen; Bohr's response, with the same title; Bohm's first hidden variables paper: "A Suggested Interpretation of the Quantum Theory in Terms of `Hidden' Variables. I"; Aharonov and Bohm's "Significance of Electromagnetic Potentials in the Quantum Theory"; and "Experimental Test of Bell's Inequalities Using Time-Varying Analyzers" by Aspect, Dalibard and Roger.
The nonlocality of quantum mechanics, of which the paradoxical aspect was first pointed out by Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen and the experimental confirmation was recently done, is analysed to clarify its origin in the context of well established parallelism between classical statistical mechanics and quantum mechanics. In the former exist hidden variables, such as the impact parameter of inter-particle scattering, which governed the past interaction thereby causing the correlated state of now distant particles. The hidden variables must disappear in quantum mechanics where either the coordinate or its conjugate momentum drops out of the independent variables, being uncontrollable due to the uncertainty principle.
In earlier paper entitled How to make quantum mechanics look like a hidden-variable theory and vice versa, Phys. Rev. D 28, 2477 (1983) [1], we developed a quantum distribution function analysis for spin-12 systems, which had many of the characteristics of a hidden variable theory but was rigorously quantum mechanical. In the same paper, we also presented a hidden variable theory which was modeled after the Wigner like quantum distribution analysis and which agreed with the predictions of Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen (EPR) experiments but was non-local. These considerations are useful in understanding various subtle aspects of locality and reality in EPR type experiments. This has not been widely appreciated by students of philosophy and of the foundations of quantum mechanics. This is at least in part no doubt because the mathematical underpinnings are of a somewhat different nature than those usually associated with quantum mechanics. That is, the elements of quantum distribution theory are not the usual material of quantum mechanics course. The main goal of the present notes is therefore to provide a tutorial on quantum distribution theory as applied to spin one half particles. To that end, the original Phys. Rev. paper is included, as are our extensions of that paper. The technical variations, which are naturally included in an abbreviated form in the Phys. Rev. paper, are here presented as a series of worked problems.
Forty years after the advent of quantum mechanics the problem of hidden variables, that is, the possibility of imbedding quantum theory into a classical theory, remains a controversial and obscure subject. Whereas to most physicists the possibility of a classical reinterpretation of quantum mechanics remains remote and perhaps irrelevant to current problems, a minority have kept the issue alive throughout this period. (See Freistadt [5] for a review of the problem and a comprehensive bibliography up to 1957.) As far as results are concerned there are on the one hand purported proofs of the non-existence of hidden variables, most notably von Neumann’s proof, and on the other, various attempts to introduce hidden variables such as de Broglie [4] and Bohm [1] and [2]. One of the difficulties in evaluating these contradictory results is that no exact mathematical criterion is given to enable one to judge the degree of success of these proposals. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.