Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2108.05904

Relativistic limits on quantum operations

Tein van der Lugt

Published Aug 12, 2021• 0 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

In this essay, we explore the limits imposed by the impossibility of superluminal signalling on the class of physically realisable quantum operations, focusing on the difference in approaches one can take towards this problem in Hilbert space quantum theory and algebraic quantum field theory (AQFT). We review a recent proposal by Fewster and Verch for a generally covariant measurement scheme in AQFT, which we call the FV scheme; along the way, we argue that the framework as set up in its original proposal can be greatly simplified without losing generality or physical motivation. We then discuss the problem, introduced by Sorkin, that naive generalisations of the notion of operation to the relativistic context can lead to signalling between spacelike observers by introducing a third observer. We consider approaches to tackle this problem in Hilbert space quantum theory and argue that these are sometimes ambiguous, since the physical (im)possibility of operations depends in part on the specific spacetime embodiment of the quantum system under consideration, which lies outside the Hilbert space formalism. In the AQFT context, we review and generalise a recent result showing that operations induced by the FV measurement scheme do not enable superluminal signalling. We connect this result to Hilbert space by introducing a concrete model of AQFT, which we call the `hybrid model' as it provides a way to explicitly embed Hilbert space quantum theory into spacetime using the formalism of AQFT. Finally, we show that in this model, under suitable necessary and sufficient conditions, the converse result also holds: every operation that does not enable superluminal signalling can be implemented in the FV framework.

DOI
10.48550/arxiv.2108.05904

Related papers

Causality and realizability of local operations in quantum field theory

Jan Mandrysch, R. Simmons, Miguel Navascués

As noted by Sorkin, regarding quantum instruments whose Kraus operators are localizable within some spacetime region as operations accessible therein leads to superluminal communication. This so-called Sorkin paradox can be resolved by further constraining the set of allowed local operations in quantum field theory (QFT). In this spirit, Fewster and Verch proposed a framework for local QFT operations that generalizes non-relativistic quantum measurement theory and does not lead to Sorkin-like paradoxes. Shortly afterwards, Jubb (and later Oeckl) identified the minimal conditions that QFT instruments must satisfy to be compatible with Einstein's causality. In this work, we study both approaches in the quantum field theory of the free scalar field. First, we prove that a very wide class of causal instruments is FV-realizable: namely, those whose measurement channels are random displacements of the field operators. As we show, this class allows implementing arbitrary instruments in a heralded, probabilistic way, as well as non-demolition measurements deterministically. Second, we construct examples of causal channels that do not admit an approximate FV realization. Some of such causal, not FV-realizable channels violate basic physical principles, so they should not be part of any measurement theory for QFT. Third, we investigate the difficulty of characterizing the set of QFT channels that can be generated through the composition of several FV schemes. In this regard, we find a countable family of simple QFT channels for which no Turing machine can discriminate between channels within or far away from the implementable set.

arXiv:2607.12976•Jul 14, 2026•0 citations

Factorisation conditions and causality for local measurements in QFT

Robin Simmons, Maria Papageorgiou, Marios Christodoulou +1 more

Quantum operations that are perfectly admissible in non-relativistic quantum theory can enable signalling between spacelike separated regions when naively imported into quantum field theory (QFT). Prominent examples of such "impossible measurements" include certain unitary kicks and projective measurements. It is generally accepted that only those quantum operations whose physical implementation arises from a fully relativistically covariant interaction, between the quantum field and a suitable probe, should be regarded as admissible. While this idea has been realised at the level of abstract algebraic QFT, or via particular measurement models, there is still no general set of operational criteria characterising which measurements are physically implementable. In this work we adopt the local S-matrix formalism to describe local operations, and make use of a hierarchy of factorisation conditions that exclude both superluminal signalling and retrocausality, thereby providing such a criterion. Realising the local S-matrices through explicit interactions between smeared field operators and a pointer degree of freedom, we further derive local causality conditions for the induced Kraus operators, which guarantee the absence of signalling in "impossible measurement" scenarios. Finally, we show that the accuracy with which local field observables can be measured is fundamentally limited by the retarded propagator of the field, which plays an essential role in the factorisation identity we prove for the field Kraus operators.

quant-pharXiv:2511.21644•Physical review. D/Physical review. D.•Nov 27, 2025•0 citations

Limits on Relativistic Quantum Measurement

Jonáš Fuksa

Requiring causality on measurements in quantum field theory seems to impose strong conditions on a self-adjoint operator to be really measurable. This may seem limiting and artificial in the operator language of algebraic quantum field theory (AQFT), but is essential for a truly relativistic theory. Recent publications attempt to deal with this issue by including the apparatus into the formalism, connecting AQFT with measurement theory, but other options have been suggested. In this essay, I discuss the causality conditions on self-adjoint operators both in the language of AQFT and in the language of quantum information theory. I then present measurement theory in AQFT, modelling the apparatus as a quantum field with coupling to the measured system restricted to a region of spacetime. I highlight how this approach leads to a causally well behaved theory. Finally, I attempt to formulate the causality conditions on measurements in the Feynman path integral approach, using the concept of decoherent histories. I claim that the path integral approach has problems with causality similar to the operator based approaches and that even here causality is an a posteriori condition.

arXiv:2109.03187•Sep 7, 2021•0 citations

Eliminating the ‘Impossible’: Recent Progress on Local Measurement Theory for Quantum Field Theory

Maria Papageorgiou, Doreen Fraser

Abstract Arguments by Sorkin (Impossible measurements on quantum fields. In: Directions in general relativity: proceedings of the 1993 International Symposium, Maryland, vol 2, pp 293–305, 1993) and Borsten et al. (Phys Rev D 104(2), 2021. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.104.025012 ) establish that a natural extension of quantum measurement theory from non-relativistic quantum mechanics to relativistic quantum theory leads to the unacceptable consequence that expectation values in one region depend on which unitary operation is performed in a spacelike separated region. Sorkin [1] labels such scenarios ‘impossible measurements’. We explicitly present these arguments as a no-go result with the logical form of a reductio argument and investigate the consequences for measurement in quantum field theory (QFT). Sorkin-type impossible measurement scenarios clearly illustrate the moral that Microcausality is not by itself sufficient to rule out superluminal signalling in relativistic quantum theories that use Lüders’ rule. We review three different approaches to formulating an account of measurement for QFT and analyze their responses to the ‘impossible measurements’ problem. Two of the approaches are: a measurement theory based on detector models proposed in Polo-Gómez et al. (Phys Rev D, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.105.065003 ) and a measurement framework for algebraic QFT proposed in Fewster and Verch (Commun Math Phys 378(2):851–889, 2020). Of particular interest for foundations of QFT is that they share common features that may hold general morals about how to represent measurement in QFT. These morals are about the role that dynamics plays in eliminating ‘impossible measurements’, the abandonment of the operational interpretation of local algebras $${\mathcal {A}}(O)$$ A ( O ) as representing possible operations carried out in region O , and the interpretation of state update rules. Finally, we examine the form that the ‘impossible measurements’ problem takes in histories-based approaches and we discuss the remaining challenges.

arXiv:2307.08524•Foundations of Physics•May 8, 2024•24 citations

Impossible measurements require impossible apparatus

Henning Bostelmann, Christopher J. Fewster, Maximilian H. Ruep

A well-recognized open conceptual problem in relativistic quantum field theory concerns the relation between measurement and causality. Naive generalizations of quantum measurement rules can allow for superluminal signaling (``impossible measurements''). This raises the problem of delineating physically allowed quantum measurements and operations. We analyze this issue in a recently proposed framework in which local measurements (in possibly curved spacetime) are described physically by coupling the system to a probe. We show that the state-update rule in this setting is consistent with causality provided that the coupling between the system and probe is local. Thus, by establishing a well-defined framework for successive measurements, we also provide a class of physically allowed operations. Conversely, impossible measurements can only be performed using impossible (nonlocal) apparatus.

arXiv:2003.04660•Physical review. D/Physical review. D.•Jan 20, 2021•55 citations

Relativistic Causality in Algebraic Quantum Field Theory

John Earman, Giovanni Valente

This paper surveys the issue of relativistic causality within the framework of algebraic quantum field theory (AQFT). In doing so, we distinguish various notions of causality formulated in the literature and study their relationships, and thereby we offer what we hope to be a useful taxonomy. We propose that the most direct expression of relativistic causality in AQFT is captured not (as has sometimes been claimed) by the spectrum condition but rather by the axiom of local primitive causality, in that it entails a form of local determinism for quantum fields which generalizes the constraint of no superluminal propagation of classical field theories to relativistic quantum field theory. We discuss the status of the axiom of micro-causality by locating its place within a large family of separability/independence/locality conditions developed for AQFT and also by relating it to so-called no-signalling theorems. And we also provide a critical survey of attempts to understand the implications for relativistic causality of the distant correlations endemic to the states in models of AQFT satisfying the standard axioms, and we provide an assessment of attempts to employ Reichenbach's common cause principle in AQFT to defuse worries that these distant correlations implicate direct causal connections between relatively spacelike events.

International Studies in the Philosophy of Science•Jan 2, 2014•52 citations
In this essay, we explore the limits imposed by the impossibility of superluminal signalling on the class of physically realisable quantum operations, focusing on the difference in approaches one can take towards this problem in Hilbert space quantum theory and algebraic quantum field theory (AQFT). We review a recent proposal by Fewster and Verch for a generally covariant measurement scheme in AQFT, which we call the FV scheme; along the way, we argue that the framework as set up in its original proposal can be greatly simplified without losing generality or physical motivation. We then discuss the problem, introduced by Sorkin, that naive generalisations of the notion of operation to the relativistic context can lead to signalling between spacelike observers by introducing a third observer. We consider approaches to tackle this problem in Hilbert space quantum theory and argue that these are sometimes ambiguous, since the physical (im)possibility of operations depends in part on the specific spacetime embodiment of the quantum system under consideration, which lies outside the Hilbert space formalism. In the AQFT context, we review and generalise a recent result showing that operations induced by the FV measurement scheme do not enable superluminal signalling. We connect this result to Hilbert space by introducing a concrete model of AQFT, which we call the `hybrid model' as it provides a way to explicitly embed Hilbert space quantum theory into spacetime using the formalism of AQFT. Finally, we show that in this model, under suitable necessary and sufficient conditions, the converse result also holds: every operation that does not enable superluminal signalling can be implemented in the FV framework.
As noted by Sorkin, regarding quantum instruments whose Kraus operators are localizable within some spacetime region as operations accessible therein leads to superluminal communication. This so-called Sorkin paradox can be resolved by further constraining the set of allowed local operations in quantum field theory (QFT). In this spirit, Fewster and Verch proposed a framework for local QFT operations that generalizes non-relativistic quantum measurement theory and does not lead to Sorkin-like paradoxes. Shortly afterwards, Jubb (and later Oeckl) identified the minimal conditions that QFT instruments must satisfy to be compatible with Einstein's causality. In this work, we study both approaches in the quantum field theory of the free scalar field. First, we prove that a very wide class of causal instruments is FV-realizable: namely, those whose measurement channels are random displacements of the field operators. As we show, this class allows implementing arbitrary instruments in a heralded, probabilistic way, as well as non-demolition measurements deterministically. Second, we construct examples of causal channels that do not admit an approximate FV realization. Some of such causal, not FV-realizable channels violate basic physical principles, so they should not be part of any measurement theory for QFT. Third, we investigate the difficulty of characterizing the set of QFT channels that can be generated through the composition of several FV schemes. In this regard, we find a countable family of simple QFT channels for which no Turing machine can discriminate between channels within or far away from the implementable set.
Quantum operations that are perfectly admissible in non-relativistic quantum theory can enable signalling between spacelike separated regions when naively imported into quantum field theory (QFT). Prominent examples of such "impossible measurements" include certain unitary kicks and projective measurements. It is generally accepted that only those quantum operations whose physical implementation arises from a fully relativistically covariant interaction, between the quantum field and a suitable probe, should be regarded as admissible. While this idea has been realised at the level of abstract algebraic QFT, or via particular measurement models, there is still no general set of operational criteria characterising which measurements are physically implementable. In this work we adopt the local S-matrix formalism to describe local operations, and make use of a hierarchy of factorisation conditions that exclude both superluminal signalling and retrocausality, thereby providing such a criterion. Realising the local S-matrices through explicit interactions between smeared field operators and a pointer degree of freedom, we further derive local causality conditions for the induced Kraus operators, which guarantee the absence of signalling in "impossible measurement" scenarios. Finally, we show that the accuracy with which local field observables can be measured is fundamentally limited by the retarded propagator of the field, which plays an essential role in the factorisation identity we prove for the field Kraus operators.
Requiring causality on measurements in quantum field theory seems to impose strong conditions on a self-adjoint operator to be really measurable. This may seem limiting and artificial in the operator language of algebraic quantum field theory (AQFT), but is essential for a truly relativistic theory. Recent publications attempt to deal with this issue by including the apparatus into the formalism, connecting AQFT with measurement theory, but other options have been suggested. In this essay, I discuss the causality conditions on self-adjoint operators both in the language of AQFT and in the language of quantum information theory. I then present measurement theory in AQFT, modelling the apparatus as a quantum field with coupling to the measured system restricted to a region of spacetime. I highlight how this approach leads to a causally well behaved theory. Finally, I attempt to formulate the causality conditions on measurements in the Feynman path integral approach, using the concept of decoherent histories. I claim that the path integral approach has problems with causality similar to the operator based approaches and that even here causality is an a posteriori condition.
Abstract Arguments by Sorkin (Impossible measurements on quantum fields. In: Directions in general relativity: proceedings of the 1993 International Symposium, Maryland, vol 2, pp 293–305, 1993) and Borsten et al. (Phys Rev D 104(2), 2021. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.104.025012 ) establish that a natural extension of quantum measurement theory from non-relativistic quantum mechanics to relativistic quantum theory leads to the unacceptable consequence that expectation values in one region depend on which unitary operation is performed in a spacelike separated region. Sorkin [1] labels such scenarios ‘impossible measurements’. We explicitly present these arguments as a no-go result with the logical form of a reductio argument and investigate the consequences for measurement in quantum field theory (QFT). Sorkin-type impossible measurement scenarios clearly illustrate the moral that Microcausality is not by itself sufficient to rule out superluminal signalling in relativistic quantum theories that use Lüders’ rule. We review three different approaches to formulating an account of measurement for QFT and analyze their responses to the ‘impossible measurements’ problem. Two of the approaches are: a measurement theory based on detector models proposed in Polo-Gómez et al. (Phys Rev D, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.105.065003 ) and a measurement framework for algebraic QFT proposed in Fewster and Verch (Commun Math Phys 378(2):851–889, 2020). Of particular interest for foundations of QFT is that they share common features that may hold general morals about how to represent measurement in QFT. These morals are about the role that dynamics plays in eliminating ‘impossible measurements’, the abandonment of the operational interpretation of local algebras A(O){\mathcal {A}}(O)A(O) A ( O ) as representing possible operations carried out in region O , and the interpretation of state update rules. Finally, we examine the form that the ‘impossible measurements’ problem takes in histories-based approaches and we discuss the remaining challenges.
A well-recognized open conceptual problem in relativistic quantum field theory concerns the relation between measurement and causality. Naive generalizations of quantum measurement rules can allow for superluminal signaling (``impossible measurements''). This raises the problem of delineating physically allowed quantum measurements and operations. We analyze this issue in a recently proposed framework in which local measurements (in possibly curved spacetime) are described physically by coupling the system to a probe. We show that the state-update rule in this setting is consistent with causality provided that the coupling between the system and probe is local. Thus, by establishing a well-defined framework for successive measurements, we also provide a class of physically allowed operations. Conversely, impossible measurements can only be performed using impossible (nonlocal) apparatus.
This paper surveys the issue of relativistic causality within the framework of algebraic quantum field theory (AQFT). In doing so, we distinguish various notions of causality formulated in the literature and study their relationships, and thereby we offer what we hope to be a useful taxonomy. We propose that the most direct expression of relativistic causality in AQFT is captured not (as has sometimes been claimed) by the spectrum condition but rather by the axiom of local primitive causality, in that it entails a form of local determinism for quantum fields which generalizes the constraint of no superluminal propagation of classical field theories to relativistic quantum field theory. We discuss the status of the axiom of micro-causality by locating its place within a large family of separability/independence/locality conditions developed for AQFT and also by relating it to so-called no-signalling theorems. And we also provide a critical survey of attempts to understand the implications for relativistic causality of the distant correlations endemic to the states in models of AQFT satisfying the standard axioms, and we provide an assessment of attempts to employ Reichenbach's common cause principle in AQFT to defuse worries that these distant correlations implicate direct causal connections between relatively spacelike events.