In this work, we initiate the study of the Minimum Circuit Size Problem (MCSP) in the quantum setting. MCSP is a problem to compute the circuit complexity of Boolean functions. It is a fascinating problem in complexity theory - its hardness is mysterious, and a better understanding of its hardness can have surprising implications to many fields in computer science. We first define and investigate the basic complexity-theoretic properties of minimum quantum circuit size problems for three natural objects: Boolean functions, unitaries, and quantum states. We show that these problems are not trivially in NP but in QCMA (or have QCMA protocols). Next, we explore the relations between the three quantum MCSPs and their variants. We discover that some reductions that are not known for classical MCSP exist for quantum MCSPs for unitaries and states, e.g., search-to-decision reductions and self-reductions. Finally, we systematically generalize results known for classical MCSP to the quantum setting (including quantum cryptography, quantum learning theory, quantum circuit lower bounds, and quantum fine-grained complexity) and also find new connections to tomography and quantum gravity. Due to the fundamental differences between classical and quantum circuits, most of our results require extra care and reveal properties and phenomena unique to the quantum setting. Our findings could be of interest for future studies, and we post several open problems for further exploration along this direction.
In this work, we initiate the study of the Minimum Circuit Size Problem (MCSP) in the quantum setting. MCSP is a problem to compute the circuit complexity of Boolean functions. It is a fascinating problem in complexity theory - its hardness is mysterious, and a better understanding of its hardness can have surprising implications to many fields in computer science. We first define and investigate the basic complexity-theoretic properties of minimum quantum circuit size problems for three natural objects: Boolean functions, unitaries, and quantum states. We show that these problems are not trivially in NP but in QCMA (or have QCMA protocols). Next, we explore the relations between the three quantum MCSPs and their variants. We discover that some reductions that are not known for classical MCSP exist for quantum MCSPs for unitaries and states, e.g., search-to-decision reductions and self-reductions. Finally, we systematically generalize results known for classical MCSP to the quantum setting (including quantum cryptography, quantum learning theory, quantum circuit lower bounds, and quantum fine-grained complexity) and also find new connections to tomography and quantum gravity. Due to the fundamental differences between classical and quantum circuits, most of our results require extra care and reveal properties and phenomena unique to the quantum setting. Our findings could be of interest for future studies, and we post several open problems for further exploration along this direction.
Quantum computation was proposed as an alternate computing process in the late-20th century, when classical computing models faced limitation in solving quantum mechanical problems. Major breakthroughs came in the 1990s, when quantum algorithms for integer factoring and black-box searching were invented that are faster than the best classical algorithms known even today. In this thesis, we look at quantum circuits with limited depth and size and analyse their power and limitations.
Computer Science is about the study of computational problems, many of which are motivated by real-world applications. We are interested as much in an actual method to solve a problem as in its unsolvability. In computational complexity theory we separate out the actual problem from the computing apparatus (e.g. a Turing machine, an AND-OR circuit) and analyse the hardness of the computation, due both to the intrinsic complexity of the problem and to the underlying model.
In this thesis, we consider quantum circuits built with a universal set of gates and show that non-constant depth is required to compute a particular function (parity) and other similar functions. The parity function, extensively studied previously, was shown to take non-constant depth for classical circuits too, thus providing an evidence of an inherent hardness in the function itself. On the other hand we show that the quantum circuit model is rich enough to build a universal circuit (one circuit that can simulate all circuits) that has roughly the same depth or size as the simulated circuit. We also consider a fault model in which some of the inputs to a gate might not be connected to the gate's output. We ask if we can detect the faulty inputs by testing the gate on different inputs. Our goal is to minimise the number of tests. We show that this is very hard for general gates but for certain gates it can be provably easier to detect faulty inputs. We even show that quantum algorithms can provably outperform classical algorithms for these gates. These results give us a sense of wherein lies the power of quantum computation and quantum circuits in particular.
Many natural problems in quantum computing involve constructing a quantum state or implementing a unitary transformation. However, relatively little is known about the computational complexity of these problems compared to that of computing boolean functions. In this thesis we do the following:• We prove upper bounds on the complexity of constructing arbitrary states and implementing arbitrary unitaries with the help of a classical oracle. • We prove bounds on the complexity of computing parity in QAC0, a quantum analogue of AC0, by way of a reduction to the task of constructing a certain type of state. • We prove upper bounds on the circuit size and depth required to construct arbitrary states and implement arbitrary unitaries, in various quantum circuit models. Many of these bounds are tight. • We define models of interactive proofs for constructing states and implementing unitaries with the help of an untrusted prover. We prove a quantum state analogue of the inclusion PSPACE ⊆ QIP, and obtain somewhat analogous results for unitaries and with multiple entangled provers. • We present barriers to improving several of the above results.
Abstract Given a unitary transformation, what is the size of the smallest quantum circuit that implements it? This quantity, known as the quantum circuit complexity, is a fundamental property of quantum evolutions that has widespread applications in many fields, including quantum computation, quantum field theory, and black hole physics. In this paper, we obtain a new lower bound for the quantum circuit complexity in terms of a novel complexity measure that we propose for quantum circuits, which we call the quantum Wasserstein complexity. Our proposed measure is based on the quantum Wasserstein distance of order one (also called the quantum earth mover’s distance), a metric on the space of quantum states. We also prove several fundamental and important properties of our new complexity measure, which stand to be of independent interest. Finally, we show that our new measure also provides a lower bound for the experimental cost of implementing quantum circuits, which implies a quantum limit on converting quantum resources to computational resources. Our results provide novel applications of the quantum Wasserstein distance and pave the way for a deeper understanding of the resources needed to implement a quantum computation.
We establish the first general connection between the design of quantum algorithms and circuit lower bounds. Specifically, letCbe a class of polynomial-size concepts, and suppose thatCcan be PAC-learned with membership queries under the uniform distribution with error1/2−γby a timeTquantum algorithm. We prove that ifγ2⋅T≪2n/n, thenBQE⊂C, whereBQE=BQTIME[2O(n)]is an exponential-time analogue ofBQP. This result is optimal in bothγandT, since it is not hard to learn any classCof functions in (classical) timeT=2n(with no error), or in quantum timeT=poly(n)with error at most1/2−Ω(2−n/2)via Fourier sampling. In other words, even a marginal quantum speedup over these generic learning algorithms would lead to major consequences in complexity lower bounds. As a consequence, our result shows that the study of quantum learning speedups is intimately connected to fundamental open problems about algorithms, quantum computing, and complexity theory. Our proof builds on several works in learning theory, pseudorandomness, and computational complexity, and on a connection between non-trivial classical learning algorithms and circuit lower bounds established by Oliveira and Santhanam (CCC 2017). Extending their approach to quantum learning algorithms turns out to create significant challenges, since extracting computational hardness from a quantum computation is inherently more complicated. To achieve that, we show among other results how pseudorandom generators imply learning-to-lower-bound connections in a generic fashion, construct the first conditional pseudorandom generator secure against uniform quantum computations, and extend the local list-decoding algorithm of Impagliazzo, Jaiswal, Kabanets and Wigderson (SICOMP 2010) to quantum circuits via a delicate analysis. We believe that these contributions are of independent interest and might find other applications.
The last decade witnessed a great surge of fruitful studies in the new paradigm of quantum computing. Remarkable progress has been made in all the areas including quantum algorithms, quantum complexity theory, quantum error-correcting code, quantum information theory, quantum cryptography and physical implementations of quantum computers. However, quantum algorithm design, probably the most important task in quantum computing, did not make as much progress as people expected. This thesis aims at both designing new quantum algorithms and studying why efficient quantum algorithms are so hard to design by proving many lower bounds on quantum query complexity for various problems.
We first review (and generalize) known techniques for designing quantum algorithms and for proving quantum lower bounds. Using these techniques, we then study the quantum query complexity for many problems, including some specific problems such as Graph Matching and other natural graph properties, the general tuple search, and local search. We also study the lowest possible quantum query complexity for a class of functions as a whole, such as graph properties, circular functions, and functions invariant of a transitive permutation group, where tight results are given in all these cases.
Finally for the quantum lower bounds techniques themselves, we study the main two techniques and show that they are incomparable in power. For the most widely used one, which has a lot of parameters to choose, we show limitations for it in terms of certificate complexity. This implies that we cannot use the method to prove better lower bounds for almost all known open problems in this area.
We have seen in the previous chapters that quantum computers seem to be more powerful than classical computers for certain problems. There are limits on the power of quantum computers, however. Since a classical computer can simulate a quantum computer, a quantum computer can only compute the same set of functions that a classical computer can. The advantage of using a quantum computer is that the amount of resources needed by a quantum algorithm might be much less than what is needed by the best classical algorithm. In Section 9.1 we briefly define some classical and quantum complexity classes and give some relationships between them. Most of the interesting questions relating classical and quantum complexity classes remain open. For example, we do not yet know if a quantum computer is capable of efficiently solving an NP-complete problem (defined later). One can prove upper bounds on the difficulty of a problem by providing an algorithm that solves that problem, and proving that it will work within in a given running time. But how does one prove a lower bound on the computational complexity of a problem? For example, if we wish to find the product of two n-bit numbers, computing the answer requires outputting roughly 2n bits and that requires Ω(n) steps (in any computing model with finite-sized gates). The best-known upper bound for integer multiplication is O(n log n log log n) steps. It has proved extremely difficult to derive non-trivial lower bounds on the computational complexity of a problem. Most of the known non-trivial lower bounds are in the ‘black-box’ model (for both classical and quantum computing), where we only query the input via a ‘black-box’ of a specific form. We discuss the black-box model in more detail in Section 9.2. We then sketch several approaches for proving black-box lower bounds. The first technique has been called the ‘hybrid method’ and was used to prove that quantum searching requires Ω(√n) queries to succeed with constant probability. The second technique is called the ‘polynomial method’. We then describe a technique based on ‘block sensitivity’, and conclude with a technique known as the ‘adversary method’.