Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2108.00031 · Letters in Mathematical Physics

On the closedness and geometry of tensor network state sets

Thomas Barthel, Jianfeng Lu, Gero Friesecke

Published Jul 25, 2022• 13 citations
arXivHTMLPDF
DOI
10.1007/s11005-022-01552-z

Related papers

Tensor Network States and Geometry

Glen Evenbly, Guifré Vidal

arXiv:1106.1082•Journal of Statistical Physics•Jun 10, 2011•266 citations

On the geometry of tensor network states of 2 × N grids

Parth Sarin

arXiv:1806.03567•Linear Algebra and its Applications•Apr 5, 2019•0 citations

Algebraic Geometry of Tree Tensor Network States

Shahrzad Jamshidi, Jason Morton

Bulletin of the American Physical Society•Oct 4, 2014•0 citations

Normal projected entangled pair states generating the same state

Molnár, A., Garre-Rubio, J., Pérez-García, D. +2 more

Tensor networks (TNs) are generated by a set of small rank tensors and define many-body quantum states in a succinct form. The corresponding map is not one-to-one: different sets of tensors may generate the very same state. A fundamental question in the study of TNs naturally arises: what is then the relation between those sets? The answer to this question in one-dimensional setups has found several applications, like the characterization of local and global symmetries, the classification of phases of matter and unitary evolutions, or the determination of the fixed points of renormalization procedures. Here we answer this question for projected entangled pair states in any dimension and lattice geometry (including, for example, the Kagome lattice, hyperbolic lattices, or tree tensor networks), as long as the tensors generating the states are normal, which constitute an important and generic class.

•Nov 12, 2018•31 citations

Normal projected entangled pair states generating the same state

András Molnár, José Garre-Rubio, David Pérez-García +2 more

Tensor networks (TNs) are generated by a set of small rank tensors and define many-body quantum states in a succinct form. The corresponding map is not one-to-one: different sets of tensors may generate the very same state. A fundamental question in the study of TNs naturally arises: what is then the relation between those sets? The answer to this question in one-dimensional setups has found several applications, like the characterization of local and global symmetries, the classification of phases of matter and unitary evolutions, or the determination of the fixed points of renormalization procedures. Here we answer this question for projected entangled pair states in any dimension and lattice geometry (including, for example, the Kagome lattice, hyperbolic lattices, or tree tensor networks), as long as the tensors generating the states are normal, which constitute an important and generic class.

arXiv:1804.04964•New Journal of Physics•Oct 22, 2018•31 citations

Foundations of tensor network theory

Harvey H. Happ

Journal of the Franklin Institute•Dec 1, 1968•4 citations
Tensor networks (TNs) are generated by a set of small rank tensors and define many-body quantum states in a succinct form. The corresponding map is not one-to-one: different sets of tensors may generate the very same state. A fundamental question in the study of TNs naturally arises: what is then the relation between those sets? The answer to this question in one-dimensional setups has found several applications, like the characterization of local and global symmetries, the classification of phases of matter and unitary evolutions, or the determination of the fixed points of renormalization procedures. Here we answer this question for projected entangled pair states in any dimension and lattice geometry (including, for example, the Kagome lattice, hyperbolic lattices, or tree tensor networks), as long as the tensors generating the states are normal, which constitute an important and generic class.
Tensor networks (TNs) are generated by a set of small rank tensors and define many-body quantum states in a succinct form. The corresponding map is not one-to-one: different sets of tensors may generate the very same state. A fundamental question in the study of TNs naturally arises: what is then the relation between those sets? The answer to this question in one-dimensional setups has found several applications, like the characterization of local and global symmetries, the classification of phases of matter and unitary evolutions, or the determination of the fixed points of renormalization procedures. Here we answer this question for projected entangled pair states in any dimension and lattice geometry (including, for example, the Kagome lattice, hyperbolic lattices, or tree tensor networks), as long as the tensors generating the states are normal, which constitute an important and generic class.