Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2107.11910 · Physical Review Research

Einstein's quantum elevator: Hermitization of non-Hermitian Hamiltonians via a generalized vielbein formalism

Chia-Yi Ju, Adam Miranowicz, Fabrizio Minganti, Chuan-Tsung Chan, Guang-Yin Chen, Franco Nori

Published Apr 25, 2022• 48 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

The formalism for non-Hermitian quantum systems sometimes blurs the underlying physics. We present a systematic study of the vielbeinlike formalism which transforms the Hilbert space bundles of non-Hermitian systems into the conventional ones, rendering the induced Hamiltonian to be Hermitian. In other words, any non-Hermitian Hamiltonian can be ``transformed'' into a Hermitian one without altering the physics. Thus we show how to find a reference frame (corresponding to Einstein's quantum elevator) in which a non-Hermitian system, equipped with a nontrivial Hilbert space metric, reduces to a Hermitian system within the standard formalism of quantum mechanics.

DOI
10.1103/physrevresearch.4.023070

Related papers

Flattening the Curve with Einstein's Quantum Elevator: Hermitization of Non-Hermitian Hamiltonians via the Vielbein Formalism

Chia-Yi Ju, Adam Miranowicz, Fabrizio Minganti +3 more

The non-triviality of Hilbert space geometries in non-Hermitian quantum systems sometimes blurs the underlying physics. We present a systematic study of the vielbein formalism which transforms the Hilbert spaces of non-Hermitian systems into the conventional ones, rendering the induced Hamiltonian to be Hermitian. In other words, any non-Hermitian Hamiltonian can be transformed into a Hermitian one without altering the physics. Thus, we show how to find a reference frame (corresponding to Einstein's quantum elevator) in which a non-Hermitian system, described by a non-trivial Hilbert space, reduces to a Hermitian system within the standard formalism of quantum mechanics for a Hilbert space.

•Jul 25, 2021•0 citations

Heisenberg and Heisenberg-like representations via Hilbert-space-bundle geometry in the non-Hermitian regime

Chia-Yi Ju, Adam Miranowicz, Jacob L. Barnett +2 more

The equivalence between the Schr\"odinger and Heisenberg representations is a cornerstone of quantum mechanics. However, this relationship remains unclear in the non-Hermitian regime, particularly when the Hamiltonian is time dependent. In this paper, we address this gap by establishing the connection between the two representations, incorporating the metric of the Hilbert space bundle. We not only demonstrate the consistency between the Schr\"odinger and Heisenberg representations but also present a Heisenberg-like representation grounded in the generalized vielbein formalism, which provides a clear and intuitive geometric interpretation. Unlike the standard Heisenberg representation, where the metric of the Hilbert space is encoded solely in the dual states, the Heisenberg-like representation distributes the metric information between both the states and the dual states. Despite this distinction, it retains the same Heisenberg equation of motion for operators. Within this formalism, the Hamiltonian is replaced by a Hermitian counterpart, while the ``non-Hermiticity'' is transferred to the operators. Moreover, this approach extends to regimes with a dynamical metric (beyond the pseudo-Hermitian framework) and to systems governed by time-dependent Hamiltonians.

arXiv:2503.03527•Physical Review A•May 15, 2025•5 citations

Observables in non-Hermitian systems: A methodological comparison

Karin Sim, Nicolò Defenu, Paolo Molignini +1 more

Despite acute interest in the dynamics of non-Hermitian systems, there is a lack of consensus in the mathematical formulation of non-Hermitian quantum mechanics in the community. Different methodologies are used in the literature to study non-Hermitian dynamics. This ranges from consistent frameworks like biorthogonal quantum mechanics and metric approach characterized by modified inner products, to normalization by time-dependent norms inspired by open quantum systems. In this work, we systematically explore the similarities and differences among these various methods. Utilizing illustrative models with exact solutions, we demonstrate that these methods produce not only quantitatively different results but also distinct physical interpretations. For dissipative systems where non-Hermiticity arises as an approximation, we find that simply dividing by the norm in the PT -broken regime closely aligns with the full master equation solutions. In contrast, for quantum systems where non-Hermiticity can be engineered exactly, incorporating metric dynamics is crucial for the probabilistic interpretation of quantum mechanics, necessitating the generalizations of similarity transformations and unitarity to non-Hermitian systems. This study lays the groundwork for further exploration of non-Hermitian Hamiltonians, potentially leveraging generalized transformations for novel physical phenomena.

arXiv:2406.05411•Physical Review Research•Mar 28, 2025•12 citations

The metric for non-Hermitian Hamiltonians: a case study

Dibwe Pierrot Musumbu

We are studying a possible implementation of an appropriate framework for a proper non-Hermitian quantum theory.We present the case where for a non-Hermitian Hamiltonian with real eigenvalues, we define a new inner product on the Hilbert space with respect to which the non-Hermitian Hamiltonian is Quasi-Hermitian.The Quasi-hermiticity of the Hamiltonian introduces the bi-orthogonality between the left-hand eigenstates and the right-hand eigenstates, in which case the metric becomes a basis transformation.We use the non-Hermitian quadratic Hamiltonian to show that such a metric is not unique but can be uniquely defined by requiring to hermitize all elements of one of the irreducible sets defined on the set of all observables.We compare the constructed metric with specific known examples in the literature in which cases a unique choice is made.Opsomming Ons ondersoek die implementering van n gepaste raamwerk virn nie-Hermitiese kwantumteorie.Ons beskoun nie-Hermitiese Hamilton-operator met reele eiewaardes en definieer in gepaste binneproduk ten opsigte waarvan die operator kwasi-Hermitiese is.Die kwasi-Hermities aard van die Hamilton operator lei dan tot n stel bi-ortogonale toestande.Ons konstrueer n basistransformasie wat die linker en regter eietoestande van hierdie stel koppel.Hierdie transformasie word dan gebruik omn nuwe binneproduk op die Hilbert-ruimte te definieer.Die oorspronklike nie-HermitieseHamilton-operator is danHermitiesmet betrekking tot hierdie nuwe binneproduk.Ons gebruik die nie-Hermitiese kwadratieseHamilton-operator om te toon dat hierdie metriek nie uniek is nie, maar wel uniek bepaal kan word deur verder te vereis dat dit al die elemente van n onherleibare versameling operatoreHermitiseer. Ons vergelyk hierdie konstruksie met die bekende voorbeelde in die literatuur en toon dat die metriek in beide gevalle uniek bepaal kan word.

•Dec 1, 2006•0 citations

Metric Congruence in Finite-Dimensional Non-Hermitian Quantum Mechanics

Ramirez Romina, M. Reboiro

We study metric representations in finite-dimensional non-Hermitian quantum mechanics. The main purpose of this work is to emphasize that the physical description of a non-Hermitian system may be formulated in different, but isomorphic, Hilbert spaces. In particular, within the Krein-space formalism, we show that the vector space endowed with an indefinite Krein metric can be explicitly related to the standard Hilbert space through a suitable isomorphism. This observation is essential for a consistent description of non-Hermitian Hamiltonians. Physical states, metrics, and operators must be transported through the corresponding Hilbert-space isomorphism. In this way, equivalent representations of the same system can be used without changing the physical content of the theory. We illustrate these theoretical aspects by studying a two-level non-Hermitian spin model. We use the Robertson uncertainty relation as a consistency test. Apparent violations can arise when operators and states are kept fixed while the metric is changed, and therefore reflect a mismatch of representations rather than a failure of the uncertainty principle.

arXiv:2606.28868•Jun 27, 2026•0 citations

A Gauge-Covariant Geometric Framework for Non-Hermitian Quantum Systems

Gargi Das, Sudhanshu Shekhar, Bhabani Prasad Mandal

We develop a comprehensive, gauge-covariant geometric framework for non-Hermitian quantum systems in the quasi-Hermitian regime, that is, the region of parameter space where the non-Hermitian Hamiltonian admits a real spectrum and a positive-definite metric operator. We build this framework by elevating the Dyson map to a central geometric object. This map is the transformation that converts a non-Hermitian Hamiltonian into an equivalent Hermitian one. From it we construct the Dyson connection and decompose it into Hermitian and anti-Hermitian parts, identified respectively as {\it stretching } and {\it rotation } components. This decomposition cleanly separates the genuine physical metric deformations from the unitary gauge redundancies. Working with manifestly gauge-covariant states, we then derive the complex non-Hermitian Berry phase and the quantum geometric tensor (QGT), and show that the non-Hermitian geometric curvature originates from the non-commutativity of the stretching components at the operator level. We further analyse the geometric singularities near an exceptional point (EP) and uncover a distinct hierarchy of divergences. For a general two-level non-Hermitian model, the quantum metric tensor (QMT) exhibits a leading-order divergence $\sim |ε_μ|^{-2}$, while the Berry curvature shows a weaker, subleading divergence $\sim |ε_μ|^{-3/2}$, with $ε_μ$ denoting the parameter displacement from the EP along an individual parameter axis $μ$. Finally, we examine physical realizations of this model, including the non-Hermitian Su--Schrieffer--Heeger (SSH) and Hatano--Nelson (HN) models, where exact analytical results confirm the predicted critical scaling laws and illustrate the metric-deformation-driven non-Hermitian geometries.

quant-pharXiv:2606.15922•Jun 16, 2026•0 citations
The formalism for non-Hermitian quantum systems sometimes blurs the underlying physics. We present a systematic study of the vielbeinlike formalism which transforms the Hilbert space bundles of non-Hermitian systems into the conventional ones, rendering the induced Hamiltonian to be Hermitian. In other words, any non-Hermitian Hamiltonian can be ``transformed'' into a Hermitian one without altering the physics. Thus we show how to find a reference frame (corresponding to Einstein's quantum elevator) in which a non-Hermitian system, equipped with a nontrivial Hilbert space metric, reduces to a Hermitian system within the standard formalism of quantum mechanics.
The non-triviality of Hilbert space geometries in non-Hermitian quantum systems sometimes blurs the underlying physics. We present a systematic study of the vielbein formalism which transforms the Hilbert spaces of non-Hermitian systems into the conventional ones, rendering the induced Hamiltonian to be Hermitian. In other words, any non-Hermitian Hamiltonian can be transformed into a Hermitian one without altering the physics. Thus, we show how to find a reference frame (corresponding to Einstein's quantum elevator) in which a non-Hermitian system, described by a non-trivial Hilbert space, reduces to a Hermitian system within the standard formalism of quantum mechanics for a Hilbert space.
The equivalence between the Schr\"odinger and Heisenberg representations is a cornerstone of quantum mechanics. However, this relationship remains unclear in the non-Hermitian regime, particularly when the Hamiltonian is time dependent. In this paper, we address this gap by establishing the connection between the two representations, incorporating the metric of the Hilbert space bundle. We not only demonstrate the consistency between the Schr\"odinger and Heisenberg representations but also present a Heisenberg-like representation grounded in the generalized vielbein formalism, which provides a clear and intuitive geometric interpretation. Unlike the standard Heisenberg representation, where the metric of the Hilbert space is encoded solely in the dual states, the Heisenberg-like representation distributes the metric information between both the states and the dual states. Despite this distinction, it retains the same Heisenberg equation of motion for operators. Within this formalism, the Hamiltonian is replaced by a Hermitian counterpart, while the ``non-Hermiticity'' is transferred to the operators. Moreover, this approach extends to regimes with a dynamical metric (beyond the pseudo-Hermitian framework) and to systems governed by time-dependent Hamiltonians.
Despite acute interest in the dynamics of non-Hermitian systems, there is a lack of consensus in the mathematical formulation of non-Hermitian quantum mechanics in the community. Different methodologies are used in the literature to study non-Hermitian dynamics. This ranges from consistent frameworks like biorthogonal quantum mechanics and metric approach characterized by modified inner products, to normalization by time-dependent norms inspired by open quantum systems. In this work, we systematically explore the similarities and differences among these various methods. Utilizing illustrative models with exact solutions, we demonstrate that these methods produce not only quantitatively different results but also distinct physical interpretations. For dissipative systems where non-Hermiticity arises as an approximation, we find that simply dividing by the norm in the PT -broken regime closely aligns with the full master equation solutions. In contrast, for quantum systems where non-Hermiticity can be engineered exactly, incorporating metric dynamics is crucial for the probabilistic interpretation of quantum mechanics, necessitating the generalizations of similarity transformations and unitarity to non-Hermitian systems. This study lays the groundwork for further exploration of non-Hermitian Hamiltonians, potentially leveraging generalized transformations for novel physical phenomena.
We are studying a possible implementation of an appropriate framework for a proper non-Hermitian quantum theory.We present the case where for a non-Hermitian Hamiltonian with real eigenvalues, we define a new inner product on the Hilbert space with respect to which the non-Hermitian Hamiltonian is Quasi-Hermitian.The Quasi-hermiticity of the Hamiltonian introduces the bi-orthogonality between the left-hand eigenstates and the right-hand eigenstates, in which case the metric becomes a basis transformation.We use the non-Hermitian quadratic Hamiltonian to show that such a metric is not unique but can be uniquely defined by requiring to hermitize all elements of one of the irreducible sets defined on the set of all observables.We compare the constructed metric with specific known examples in the literature in which cases a unique choice is made.Opsomming Ons ondersoek die implementering van n gepaste raamwerk virn nie-Hermitiese kwantumteorie.Ons beskoun nie-Hermitiese Hamilton-operator met reele eiewaardes en definieer in gepaste binneproduk ten opsigte waarvan die operator kwasi-Hermitiese is.Die kwasi-Hermities aard van die Hamilton operator lei dan tot n stel bi-ortogonale toestande.Ons konstrueer n basistransformasie wat die linker en regter eietoestande van hierdie stel koppel.Hierdie transformasie word dan gebruik omn nuwe binneproduk op die Hilbert-ruimte te definieer.Die oorspronklike nie-HermitieseHamilton-operator is danHermitiesmet betrekking tot hierdie nuwe binneproduk.Ons gebruik die nie-Hermitiese kwadratieseHamilton-operator om te toon dat hierdie metriek nie uniek is nie, maar wel uniek bepaal kan word deur verder te vereis dat dit al die elemente van n onherleibare versameling operatoreHermitiseer. Ons vergelyk hierdie konstruksie met die bekende voorbeelde in die literatuur en toon dat die metriek in beide gevalle uniek bepaal kan word.
We study metric representations in finite-dimensional non-Hermitian quantum mechanics. The main purpose of this work is to emphasize that the physical description of a non-Hermitian system may be formulated in different, but isomorphic, Hilbert spaces. In particular, within the Krein-space formalism, we show that the vector space endowed with an indefinite Krein metric can be explicitly related to the standard Hilbert space through a suitable isomorphism. This observation is essential for a consistent description of non-Hermitian Hamiltonians. Physical states, metrics, and operators must be transported through the corresponding Hilbert-space isomorphism. In this way, equivalent representations of the same system can be used without changing the physical content of the theory. We illustrate these theoretical aspects by studying a two-level non-Hermitian spin model. We use the Robertson uncertainty relation as a consistency test. Apparent violations can arise when operators and states are kept fixed while the metric is changed, and therefore reflect a mismatch of representations rather than a failure of the uncertainty principle.
We develop a comprehensive, gauge-covariant geometric framework for non-Hermitian quantum systems in the quasi-Hermitian regime, that is, the region of parameter space where the non-Hermitian Hamiltonian admits a real spectrum and a positive-definite metric operator. We build this framework by elevating the Dyson map to a central geometric object. This map is the transformation that converts a non-Hermitian Hamiltonian into an equivalent Hermitian one. From it we construct the Dyson connection and decompose it into Hermitian and anti-Hermitian parts, identified respectively as {\it stretching } and {\it rotation } components. This decomposition cleanly separates the genuine physical metric deformations from the unitary gauge redundancies. Working with manifestly gauge-covariant states, we then derive the complex non-Hermitian Berry phase and the quantum geometric tensor (QGT), and show that the non-Hermitian geometric curvature originates from the non-commutativity of the stretching components at the operator level. We further analyse the geometric singularities near an exceptional point (EP) and uncover a distinct hierarchy of divergences. For a general two-level non-Hermitian model, the quantum metric tensor (QMT) exhibits a leading-order divergence ∼∣εμ∣−2\sim |ε_μ|^{-2}∼∣εμ​∣−2, while the Berry curvature shows a weaker, subleading divergence ∼∣εμ∣−3/2\sim |ε_μ|^{-3/2}∼∣εμ​∣−3/2, with εμε_μεμ​ denoting the parameter displacement from the EP along an individual parameter axis μμμ. Finally, we examine physical realizations of this model, including the non-Hermitian Su--Schrieffer--Heeger (SSH) and Hatano--Nelson (HN) models, where exact analytical results confirm the predicted critical scaling laws and illustrate the metric-deformation-driven non-Hermitian geometries.