Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2106.09479 · IEEE Access

Reply to “Comment on ‘Dr. Bertlmann’s Socks in a Quaternionic World of Ambidextral Reality”’

Joy Christian

Published Jan 1, 2021• 25 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

In this paper, I respond to a critique of one of my papers previously published in this journal, entitled ‘Dr. Bertlmann’s socks in a quaternionic world of ambidextral reality.’ The geometrical framework presented in my paper is based on a quaternionic 3-sphere, or$S^{3}$, taken as a model of the physical space in which we are inescapably confined to perform all our experiments. The framework intrinsically circumvents Bell’s theorem by reproducing the singlet correlations local-realistically, without resorting to backward causation, superdeterminism, or any other conspiracy loophole. In this response, I demonstrate point by point that, contrary to its claims, the critique has not found any mistakes in my paper, either in the analytical model of the singlet correlations or in its event-by-event numerical simulation based on Geometric Algebra.

DOI
10.1109/access.2021.3076449

Related papers

Reply to “Comment on ‘Bell’s Theorem Versus Local Realism in a Quaternionic Model of Physical Space”’

Joy Christian

In this paper, I respond to a critique of one of my papers previously published in this journal, entitled “Bell’s Theorem Versus Local Realism in a Quaternionic Model of Physical Space.” That paper presents a local-realistic model of quantum correlations based on a quaternionic 3-sphere, taken as a physical space in which we are confined to perform all our experiments. The critique, on the other hand, considers two entirely different models within a flat Euclidean space, neither related to my quaternionic 3-sphere model. It then criticizes its own flat space models and claims that it has thereby criticized the model presented in my paper. Along the way, without providing evidence or proof, it claims that the results in my paper are based on mistakes. I demonstrate that there are no mistakes of any kind in my paper. On the contrary, I bring out a number of elementary mathematical and conceptual mistakes from the critique and the critiques it relies on.

arXiv:2202.05615•IEEE Access•Jan 1, 2022•23 citations

Comment on “Dr. Bertlmann’s Socks in a Quaternionic World of Ambidextral Reality”

Richard David Gill

I point out critical errors in the article “Dr. Bertlmann's Socks in a Quaternionic World of Ambidextral Reality” by J. Christian, published in IEEE ACCESS. Christian's model does not generate the singlet correlations but in fact simply reproduces the Bertlmann effect. John Bell's colleague Reinhold Bertlmann of CERN, in his younger days, always wore one pink and one blue sock, at random. The moment you saw his left foot, you knew what colour sock would be on his right foot. Action at a distance? As John Bell liked to explain, quantum entanglement cannot be explained away in such an easy way. Yet Christian's model assigns the two particles of the EPR-B experiment an equal and opposite spin at the source, the choice being determined by a fair coin toss. However they are measured, these spins are recovered. Christian's computer simulation works by not actually simulating his model at all but by almost directly tracing the negative cosine built into his computer algebra package. Bell's theorem has not been disproved. Debate as to what it means for the foundations of physics as well as for quantum information engineering (quantum communication, computation) is more lively today than ever before. A possible role for Geometric Algebra is still wide open and deserves further investigation, informed by a proper understanding of the mathematical content of Bell's theorem.

arXiv:2001.11338•IEEE Access•Jan 1, 2021•6 citations

Dr. Bertlmann’s Socks in a Quaternionic World of Ambidextral Reality

Joy Christian

Unlike our basic theories of space and time, quantum mechanics is not a locally causal theory. Moreover, it is widely believed that any hopes of restoring local causality within any realistic theory have been undermined by Bell's theorem and the experimental investigations it has inspired. In this pedagogical paper, John S. Bell's amusing example of Dr. Bertlmann's socks to illustrate the results of these experiments is reconsidered, first within a toy model of a two-dimensional one-sided world of a non-orientable Möbius strip, and then within a real world of three-dimensional quaternionic sphere, S3, which results from an addition of a single point to IR3at infinity. In the latter quaternionic world, which happens to be the spatial part of a solution of Einstein's field equations of general relativity, the singlet correlations between a pair of entangled fermions can be understood as classically as those between Dr. Bertlmann's colorful socks.

arXiv:1911.11578•IEEE Access•Jan 1, 2020•33 citations

Response to ‘Comment on “Quantum correlations are weaved by the spinors of the Euclidean primitives”’

Joy Christian

In this paper, I respond to a critique of one of my papers previously published in the Royal Society Open Science entitled ‘Quantum correlations are weaved by the spinors of the Euclidean primitives.’ Without engaging with the geometrical framework presented in my paper, the critique incorrectly claims that there are mathematical errors in it. I demonstrate that the critique is based on a series of misunderstandings, and refute each of its claims of error. I also bring out a number of logical, mathematical and conceptual errors from the critique and the critiques it relies on.

arXiv:2211.09867•Royal Society Open Science•Nov 1, 2022•21 citations

Comment on “Bell’s Theorem Versus Local Realism in a Quaternionic Model of Physical Space”

Richard David Gill

I point out critical errors in the paper “Bell’s Theorem Versus Local Realism in a Quaternionic Model of Physical Space” by J. Christian, published in IEEE Access. Christian’s paper in fact contains several conflicting models. None of them form counterexamples to Bell’s theorem. Most of Christian’s paper is devoted to a model based on the detection loophole due to Pearle (1970).

arXiv:2103.00225•IEEE Access•Jan 1, 2021•0 citations

Comment on “Bell’s Theorem Versus Local Realism in a Quaternionic Model of Physical Space”

Richard David Gill

In this paper, critical errors found in the paper “Bell’s theorem versus local realism in a quaternionic model of physical space,” by J. Christian, published in IEEE Access, are pointed out. The above paper, in fact, contains several conflicting models. None of them form counterexamples to Bell’s theorem. Most of Christian’s paper is devoted to a model based on the detection loophole due to Pearle (1970).

•Jan 1, 2021•5 citations
In this paper, I respond to a critique of one of my papers previously published in this journal, entitled ‘Dr. Bertlmann’s socks in a quaternionic world of ambidextral reality.’ The geometrical framework presented in my paper is based on a quaternionic 3-sphere, orS3S^{3}S3, taken as a model of the physical space in which we are inescapably confined to perform all our experiments. The framework intrinsically circumvents Bell’s theorem by reproducing the singlet correlations local-realistically, without resorting to backward causation, superdeterminism, or any other conspiracy loophole. In this response, I demonstrate point by point that, contrary to its claims, the critique has not found any mistakes in my paper, either in the analytical model of the singlet correlations or in its event-by-event numerical simulation based on Geometric Algebra.
In this paper, I respond to a critique of one of my papers previously published in this journal, entitled “Bell’s Theorem Versus Local Realism in a Quaternionic Model of Physical Space.” That paper presents a local-realistic model of quantum correlations based on a quaternionic 3-sphere, taken as a physical space in which we are confined to perform all our experiments. The critique, on the other hand, considers two entirely different models within a flat Euclidean space, neither related to my quaternionic 3-sphere model. It then criticizes its own flat space models and claims that it has thereby criticized the model presented in my paper. Along the way, without providing evidence or proof, it claims that the results in my paper are based on mistakes. I demonstrate that there are no mistakes of any kind in my paper. On the contrary, I bring out a number of elementary mathematical and conceptual mistakes from the critique and the critiques it relies on.
I point out critical errors in the article “Dr. Bertlmann's Socks in a Quaternionic World of Ambidextral Reality” by J. Christian, published in IEEE ACCESS. Christian's model does not generate the singlet correlations but in fact simply reproduces the Bertlmann effect. John Bell's colleague Reinhold Bertlmann of CERN, in his younger days, always wore one pink and one blue sock, at random. The moment you saw his left foot, you knew what colour sock would be on his right foot. Action at a distance? As John Bell liked to explain, quantum entanglement cannot be explained away in such an easy way. Yet Christian's model assigns the two particles of the EPR-B experiment an equal and opposite spin at the source, the choice being determined by a fair coin toss. However they are measured, these spins are recovered. Christian's computer simulation works by not actually simulating his model at all but by almost directly tracing the negative cosine built into his computer algebra package. Bell's theorem has not been disproved. Debate as to what it means for the foundations of physics as well as for quantum information engineering (quantum communication, computation) is more lively today than ever before. A possible role for Geometric Algebra is still wide open and deserves further investigation, informed by a proper understanding of the mathematical content of Bell's theorem.
Unlike our basic theories of space and time, quantum mechanics is not a locally causal theory. Moreover, it is widely believed that any hopes of restoring local causality within any realistic theory have been undermined by Bell's theorem and the experimental investigations it has inspired. In this pedagogical paper, John S. Bell's amusing example of Dr. Bertlmann's socks to illustrate the results of these experiments is reconsidered, first within a toy model of a two-dimensional one-sided world of a non-orientable Möbius strip, and then within a real world of three-dimensional quaternionic sphere, S3, which results from an addition of a single point to IR3at infinity. In the latter quaternionic world, which happens to be the spatial part of a solution of Einstein's field equations of general relativity, the singlet correlations between a pair of entangled fermions can be understood as classically as those between Dr. Bertlmann's colorful socks.
In this paper, I respond to a critique of one of my papers previously published in the Royal Society Open Science entitled ‘Quantum correlations are weaved by the spinors of the Euclidean primitives.’ Without engaging with the geometrical framework presented in my paper, the critique incorrectly claims that there are mathematical errors in it. I demonstrate that the critique is based on a series of misunderstandings, and refute each of its claims of error. I also bring out a number of logical, mathematical and conceptual errors from the critique and the critiques it relies on.