The D_Wave quantum computer is an analog device that approximates optimal solutions to optimization problems. The traveling salesman problems in the TSP Library are too large to process on the D_Wave quantum computer DW_2000Q_6. We report favorable approximations for solving the smallest, symmetric traveling salesman problems in the TSP Library by two D_Wave hybrid solvers, Kerberos and LeapHybridSampler. This is useful work about results from new quantum tools on problems that have been studied. It is expected to show a quantum way forward with larger problems when the hardware is upgraded. Also this work demonstrates that the TSP Library is a source of benchmarks for quantum processing of combinatorial problems. The hybrid solvers combine quantum and classical methods in a manner that is D_Wave proprietary information. The results from Kerberos were closer to optimal than the results from LeapHybridSampler. We show that the error percent from optimal increases as the problem size increases, which is consistent with results on D-Wave_s quantum computer for other optimization problems. An appendix contains outcomes from the two hybrid solvers for two asymmetric traveling salesman problems that are in the TSP Library. Again, the Kerberos results were closer to optimal than those from LeapHybridSampler, which indicates that Kerberos is superior to LeapHybridSampler on traveling salesman problems.
The D_Wave quantum computer is an analog device that approximates optimal solutions to optimization problems. The traveling salesman problems in the TSP Library are too large to process on the D_Wave quantum computer DW_2000Q_6. We report favorable approximations for solving the smallest, symmetric traveling salesman problems in the TSP Library by two D_Wave hybrid solvers, Kerberos and LeapHybridSampler. This is useful work about results from new quantum tools on problems that have been studied. It is expected to show a quantum way forward with larger problems when the hardware is upgraded. Also this work demonstrates that the TSP Library is a source of benchmarks for quantum processing of combinatorial problems. The hybrid solvers combine quantum and classical methods in a manner that is D_Wave proprietary information. The results from Kerberos were closer to optimal than the results from LeapHybridSampler. We show that the error percent from optimal increases as the problem size increases, which is consistent with results on D-Wave_s quantum computer for other optimization problems. An appendix contains outcomes from the two hybrid solvers for two asymmetric traveling salesman problems that are in the TSP Library. Again, the Kerberos results were closer to optimal than those from LeapHybridSampler, which indicates that Kerberos is superior to LeapHybridSampler on traveling salesman problems.
The development of advanced quantum-classical algorithms is among the most prominent strategies in quantum computing. Numerous hybrid solvers have been introduced recently. Many of these methods are created ad hoc to address specific use cases. However, several well-established schemes are frequently utilized to address optimization problems. In this context, D-Wave launched theHybrid Solver Servicein 2020, offering a portfolio of methods designed to accelerate time-to-solution for users aiming to optimize performance and operational processes. Recently, a new technique has been added to this portfolio: theNonlinear-Program Hybrid Solver. This paper describes this solver and evaluates its performance through a benchmark of 45 instances across three combinatorial optimization problems: the Traveling Salesman Problem, the Knapsack Problem, and the Maximum Cut Problem. To facilitate the use of this relatively unexplored solver, we provide details of the implementation used to solve these three optimization problems.
We study small traveling salesman problems (TSPs) because current quantum computers can find optional solutions for TSPs with up to 14 cities. Also, we study small TSPs because TSPs have been recommended to be benchmarks to measure quantum optimization on all types of quantum hardware. This means comparisons of quantum data about small TSPs. We extent previous numerical results that were reported in “Small Traveling Salesman Problems” for 6, 8 and 10 cities. The new results in this paper are for 10 – 14 cities in symmetric TSPs. The data for this new range of cities is consistent with the previous data and can be the basis for estimates of results from quantum computers that are upgraded to handle more than 14 cities. The work and analysis suggest two conjectures that we discuss. The paper also contains an annotated survey of recent publications about TSPs.
This study compares the performance of D-Wave’s two quantum-classical hybrid optimization solvers, which integrate quantum computing principles with classical optimization techniques to solve complex optimization problems. It focuses on the Binary Quadratic Model (BQM) solver, which encodes optimization problems using a binary quadratic formulation, and the Constrained Quadratic Model (CQM) solver, which can incorporate constraints into the model. The solvers were tested on five combinatorial optimization problems: Traveling Salesman Problem (TSP), Quadratic Knapsack Problem (QKP), Quadratic Assignment Problem (QAP), Weighted Max-Cut Problem (WMP), and Maximum Clique Problem (MCP). The goal is to quantify the accuracy of solutions compared to the optimal ones. Experiments on multiple instances with known optimal solutions examined solver behavior and solution quality. At default execution durations, the CQM solver generally outperforms BQM with lower error and higher consistency. Across all test problem instances in TSP, QKP, QAP, and WMP, the CQM solver achieved lower average absolute errors by 48.38, 27.83, 21.29, and 0.05 percentage points, respectively, compared to the BQM solver. An exception was found in MCP, where the BQM solver outperformed the CQM solver by 0.75 percentage points. These findings provide a guide for end users to understand the characteristics of the solvers and to select the appropriate solver for their specific optimization problems.
This paper implements a new way of solving a problem called the traveling salesman problem (TSP) using quantum genetic algorithm (QGA). We compared how well this new approach works to the traditional method known as a classical genetic algorithm (CGA). The TSP is a well-established challenge in combinatorial optimization where the objective is to find the most efficient path to visit a series of cities, minimizing the total distance, and returning to the starting point. We chose the TSP to test the performance of both algorithms because of its computational complexity and importance in practical applications. We choose the dataset from the international standard library TSPLIB for our experiments. By designing and implementing both algorithms and conducting experiments on various sizes and types of TSP instances, we provide an in-depth analysis of the accuracy of the optimal solution, the number of iterations, the execution time, and the stability of the algorithms for both. The empirical findings indicate that the CGA outperforms the QGA in terms of finding superior solutions more quickly in most of the test instances, especially when the problem size is large. This suggests that although the principle of quantum computing provides a new way to solve complex combinatorial optimisation problems, the implementation of quantum phenomena and the setting of parameters such as the optimal angle for a quantum revolving gate is challenging and need further optimisation to achieve the desired results. Additionally, it is important to note that the QGA has not been tested on real quantum hardware, so its true performance remains unverified. These limitations provide rich opportunities for further research in the future.
The Traveling Salesman Problem (TSP) serves as a standard benchmark for assessing potential quantum advantage in combinatorial optimization. This paper provides a critical comparative analysis of quantum annealing, gate-based approaches based on quantum phase estimation, and hybrid quantum–classical dynamic programming methods within a unified complexity and implementation framework. While theoretical results indicate reductions of the classical O ( 2 n ) scaling to approximately O ( 1.728 n ) for general instances and to O ( 1.110 n ) for structured cases, these improvements remain largely asymptotic. In practice, all current quantum approaches are strongly constrained by hardware limitations. Quantum annealing suffers from embedding overhead and noise, hybrid methods rely extensively on classical decomposition without guaranteed optimality, and gate-based implementations are limited by circuit depth and error accumulation. As a result, no clear quantum advantage over classical algorithms has been demonstrated at practically relevant problem scales. By systematically separating intrinsic algorithmic scaling from hardware-induced resource constraints, this work clarifies the origin of the gap between theoretical quantum speedups and experimental performance, providing a critical assessment of the current status and realistic prospects of quantum TSP methods.
The traveling salesman problem is a well-known NP-hard problem in combinatorial optimization. This paper shows how to solve it on an Ising Hamiltonian based quantum annealer by casting it as a quadratic unconstrained binary optimization (QUBO) problem. Results of practical experiments are also presented using D-Wave’s 5,000 qubit Advantage 1.1 quantum annealer and the performance is compared to a classical solver. It is found the quantum annealer can only handle a problem size of 8 or less nodes and its performance is subpar compared to the classical solver both in terms of time and accuracy.