The quantum switch is a quantum process that creates a coherent control between different unitary operations, which is often described as a quantum process which transforms a pair of unitary operations (U1,U2) into a controlled unitary operation that coherently applies them in different orders as |0⟩⟨0|⊗U1U2+|1⟩⟨1|⊗U2U1 . This description, however, does not directly define its action on non-unitary operations. The action of the quantum switch on non-unitary operations is then chosen to be a ``natural'' extension of its action on unitary operations. In general, the action of a process on non-unitary operations is not uniquely determined by its action on unitary operations. It may be that there could be a set of inequivalent extensions of the quantum switch for non-unitary operations. We prove, however, that the natural extension is the only possibility for the quantum switch for the 2-slot case. In other words, contrary to the general case, the action of the quantum switch on non-unitary operations (as a linear and completely CP preserving supermap) is completely determined by its action on unitary operations. We also discuss the general problem of when the complete description of a quantum process is uniquely determined by its action on unitary operations and identify a set of single-slot processes which are completely defined by their action on unitary operations.
The quantum switch is a quantum process that creates a coherent control between different unitary operations, which is often described as a quantum process which transforms a pair of unitary operations (U1,U2) into a controlled unitary operation that coherently applies them in different orders as |0⟩⟨0|⊗U1U2+|1⟩⟨1|⊗U2U1 . This description, however, does not directly define its action on non-unitary operations. The action of the quantum switch on non-unitary operations is then chosen to be a ``natural'' extension of its action on unitary operations. In general, the action of a process on non-unitary operations is not uniquely determined by its action on unitary operations. It may be that there could be a set of inequivalent extensions of the quantum switch for non-unitary operations. We prove, however, that the natural extension is the only possibility for the quantum switch for the 2-slot case. In other words, contrary to the general case, the action of the quantum switch on non-unitary operations (as a linear and completely CP preserving supermap) is completely determined by its action on unitary operations. We also discuss the general problem of when the complete description of a quantum process is uniquely determined by its action on unitary operations and identify a set of single-slot processes which are completely defined by their action on unitary operations.
A quantum switch is a superoperator that, in general, creates a superposition of various causal orders of two or more quantum dynamics that are all divisible in the complete positivity (CP) sense. We introduce a process that we term as the universal quantum switch (UQS), which unlike conventional quantum switches, allows for the construction of a quantum switch that can superpose different causal orders of any set of quantum dynamics, regardless of their CP-divisibility. Our approach also enables the construction of a quantum switch while considering a single environment connected with the system, in contrast to the traditional one. Moreover, we show the UQS provides more advantages in performance for a certain state discrimination task compared to traditional quantum switches. The next question that we address is the following: What is the CP-divisibility characteristic of a dynamics built by acting a quantum switch on CP-divisible or -indivisible dynamics? In this regard, an example is presented where the dynamics created by the action of the UQS on two CP-indivisible dynamics is CP-indivisible. Additionally, we prove a necessary and sufficient condition for the channel created by acting the traditional quantum switch on two CP-divisible dynamics to be CP-divisible. Furthermore, we present some examples of CP-divisible dynamics on which, when the usual quantum switch is operated, the resulting dynamics not only becomes CP-indivisible but also turns into P-indivisible. Our findings demonstrate that quantum switches can build CP-divisible, CP-indivisible, and even P-indivisible dynamics from CP-divisible dynamics, underscoring the versatility of this technique.
In contrast to a classical bit, which can only take the value 0 or 1, its quantum counterpart -- a qubit -- can exist in a superposition of 0 and 1. This is a superposition of data values, naturally raising the question of whether one can superpose not only data but also programs. For example, a particular superposition of programs, known as the quantum SWITCH, has attracted much attention, and its implementations and computational advantages have been studied extensively within the physics community.
A naive way to control a program by a qubit is by means of a controlled operation. Given an operation F, this amounts to considering an operation that behaves as F when the control qubit is ∣1⟩, and as the identity operation when the control qubit is ∣0⟩. This idea works well when F is a unitary operation, but it is not well-defined for a general quantum channel. By contrast, the quantum SWITCH is free from the well-definedness issue. This contrast leads to the key insight of this paper: controlled operations and the quantum SWITCH should be regarded as different kinds of quantum control mechanisms.
Building on this insight, we develop a novel quantum programming language with quantum control and measurement that can express the quantum SWITCH over quantum channels. Using a semantic analysis based on program transformations, we identify the source of the ill-behavedness of controlled operations as the \emph{correspondence problem}: a lack of coordination between the measurements performed in the then- and else-branches of quantum conditional branching. We address this problem with a linear type system that enforces alignment of the quantum operations used in the two branches, yielding a well-behaved language capable of expressing the quantum SWITCH.
Similarly to quantum states, quantum operations can also be transformed by means of quantum superchannels, also known as process matrices. Quantum superchannels with multiple slots are deterministic transformations which take independent quantum operations as inputs. While they are enforced to respect the laws of quantum mechanics, the use of input operations may lack a definite causal order, and characterizations of general superchannels in terms of quantum objects with a physical implementation have been missing. In this paper, we provide a mathematical characterization for pure superchannels with two slots (also known as bipartite pure processes), which are superchannels preserving the reversibility of quantum operations. We show that the reversibility preserving condition restricts all pure superchannels with two slots to be either a quantum circuit only consisting of unitary operations or a coherent superposition of two unitary quantum circuits where the two input operations are differently ordered. The latter may be seen as a generalization of the quantum switch, allowing a physical interpretation for pure two-slot superchannels. An immediate corollary is that purifiable bipartite processes cannot violate device-independent causal inequalities.
Quantum superchannels are maps whose input and output are quantum channels. Rather than taking the domain to be the space of all linear maps we motivate and define superchannels on the operator system spanned by quantum channels. Extension theorems for completely positive maps allow us to apply the characterisation theorem for superchannels to this smaller set of maps. These extensions are non unique, showing two different superchannels act the same on all input quantum channels, and so this new definition on the smaller domain captures more precisely the action of superchannels as transformations between quantum channels. The non uniqueness can affect the auxilliary dimension needed for the characterisation as well as the tensor product of the superchannels.
Processes with indefinite causal orders (ICOs), such as the quantum switch, are higher-order quantum processes that superpose the order in which quantum operations are performed. Such coherent control yields computational advantages but is not faithfully captured by existing quantum programming languages: either they are restricted to the unitary case, and thus cannot combine ICOs with measurement, or they treat coherent control nonlinearly. In both cases, they do not realize the full computational power of ICOs. We introduce a higher-order quantum functional language that supports general quantum computation, not merely the permutation of channels, and whose linear type system allows quantum control to be well-defined beyond the unitary case, on arbitrary quantum channels. We equip this language with a small-step operational semantics that synchronizes measurement outcomes across superposed branches, using device references and a memory function. We also give a denotational semantics by means of completely positive maps. With linearity as the only constraint, some well-typed terms would denote unphysical maps. We therefore impose a typing discipline that goes beyond linearity, and interpret programs in the causal category Caus[CPM], under which every well-typed program is physically meaningful, a property that can be checked statically and efficiently. We prove soundness, and study the language's expressive power: it can express every quantum channel at first order, and at second order a large subclass of the so-called quantum circuits with quantum control (QC-QCs), containing the quantum switch. Last but not least, we show that this language is well-designed enough to be extended to the nonlinear setting with recursion.
Quantum supermaps are transformations that map quantum operations to quantum operations.It is known that quantum supermaps which respect a definite, predefined causal order between their input operations correspond to fixed-order quantum circuits, also called quantum combs.A systematic understanding of the physical interpretation of more general types of quantum supermaps-in particular, those incompatible with a definite causal structure-is however lacking.In this paper, we identify two types of circuits that naturally generalize the fixed-order case and that likewise correspond to distinct classes of quantum supermaps, which we fully characterize.We first introduce "quantum circuits with classical control of causal order," in which the order of operations is still well defined, but not necessarily fixed in advance: it can, in particular, be established dynamically, in a classically controlled manner, as the circuit is being used.We then consider "quantum circuits with quantum control of causal order," in which the order of operations is controlled coherently.The supermaps described by these classes of circuits are physically realizable, and the latter encompasses all known examples of physically realizable processes with indefinite causal order, including the celebrated "quantum switch."Interestingly, it also contains other examples arising from the combination of dynamical and coherent control of causal order, and we detail explicitly one such process.Nevertheless, we show that quantum circuits with quantum control of causal order can only generate "causal" correlations, compatible with a well-defined causal order.We furthermore extend our considerations to probabilistic circuits that produce also classical outcomes, and we demonstrate by an example how the characterizations derived in this work allow us to identify advantages for quantum information processing tasks that could be demonstrated in practice.