We extend on ideas from standard thermodynamics to show that temperature can be assigned to a general nonequilibrium quantum system. By choosing a physically motivated complete set of observables and expanding the system state thereupon, one can read a set of relevant, independent thermodynamic variables which include internal energy. This expansion allows us to read a nonequilibrium temperature as the partial derivative of the von Neumann entropy with respect to internal energy. We show that this definition of temperature is one of a set of thermodynamics parameters unambiguously describing the system state. It has appealing features such as positivity for passive states and consistency with the standard temperature for thermal states. By attributing temperature to correlations in a bipartite system, we obtain a universal relation which connects the temperatures of subsystems, total system as a whole, and correlation. All these temperatures can be different even when the composite system is in a well-defined Gibbsian thermal state.
We extend on ideas from standard thermodynamics to show that temperature can be assigned to a general nonequilibrium quantum system. By choosing a physically motivated complete set of observables and expanding the system state thereupon, one can read a set of relevant, independent thermodynamic variables which include internal energy. This expansion allows us to read a nonequilibrium temperature as the partial derivative of the von Neumann entropy with respect to internal energy. We show that this definition of temperature is one of a set of thermodynamics parameters unambiguously describing the system state. It has appealing features such as positivity for passive states and consistency with the standard temperature for thermal states. By attributing temperature to correlations in a bipartite system, we obtain a universal relation which connects the temperatures of subsystems, total system as a whole, and correlation. All these temperatures can be different even when the composite system is in a well-defined Gibbsian thermal state.
A central open question in quantum thermodynamics is the identification of thermodynamic entropy away from equilibrium. Although thermodynamic entropy coincides with the von Neumann entropy for a Gibbs state at equilibrium, the thermodynamic role of quantum coherence generated during nonequilibrium evolution remains unclear. Here, we show that von Neumann entropy does not, in general, represent the thermodynamic entropy governing heat exchange in coherent nonequilibrium quantum systems. By integrating the resource theory of quantum coherence with thermodynamic principles, we develop a general framework for nonequilibrium quantum thermodynamics. We identify thermodynamic entropy with the energy entropy derived from energy-measurement statistics and introduce a dynamical temperature extending the equilibrium concept to nonequilibrium states. Consequently, we obtain an exact entropy-balance relation separating the entropy flux associated with heat exchange from the coherence-loss contribution to entropy production, establishing an operational connection between quantum coherence, heat flow, and total entropy change. Unlike approaches relying on equilibrium reference states or stationary Gibbs ensembles, our framework uses instantaneous dynamical quantities and remains valid throughout transient nonequilibrium evolution. It provides consistent dynamical definitions of temperature, work, heat, and free energy. Applying the formalism to an exactly solvable open quantum system, we show that the first and second laws hold throughout transient evolution and that equilibrium thermodynamics emerges dynamically in the weak-coupling long-time limit. Our results establish a unified framework for coherent nonequilibrium quantum thermodynamics and suggest opportunities for controlling heat dissipation through coherence engineering in quantum thermal technologies.
Abstract Quantum thermodynamics describes dynamic processes by means of the operators of entropy production P and time t . P and t do not commute. It exists the non-vanishing t–P commutator [ t , P ]=ik. Here the Boltzmann constant k has the physical meaning of a quantum of entropy. The t–P commutator immediately leads us to the t–P uncertainty relation ΔtΔP≥k/2. Hence the observables t and P are not sharply defined simultaneously. Similar uncertainty relations can also be expected for other pairs of conjugate variables with products of the physical meaning of an entropy. The free energy F and the reciprocal temperature (1/T) are the respective conjugate variables of an isolated system of many particles, which leads us to the F–(1/T) uncertainty relation ǀΔFǁΔ(1/T)ǀ≥k/2. It can be traced back to the t–P uncertainty relation mentioned above. In this way the Helmholtz free energy F and the temperatur T are introduced into quantum thermodynamics. The uncertainties ǀΔFǀ→0 and ǀΔTǀ→0 are negligible at low temperatures T→0, and quantum thermodynamics turns into the time-independent classical thermodynamics. Against this the uncertainties ǀΔFǀ→∞ and ǀΔTǀ→∞ grow unlimited at high temperatures T→∞, and classical thermodynamics loses its sense. In the limit of one particle the uncertainties cannot be neglected even at low temperatures. However a detailed discussion shows that the free energy f of a single particle vanishes within the whole range of temperatures T. This defines the particle entropy σ=ε/T=ak. The dimensionless entropy number a connects the particle energy ε=akT with the temperature T. The entropy number a of a single (s) independent particle can be calculated with the extended, temperature-dependent Schrödinger equation A s φ=aφ. Here A s=−(Λ 2/4π)∇2 means the dimensionless entropy operator describing the entropy number a and thus the particle entropy σ=ak. Λ is the thermal de Broglie wave length. Finally we calculate by means of quantized particle entropies σ the internal energy E, the Helmholtz free energy F, the entropy S, the chemical potential μ, and the equation of state of an ideal gas of N monatomic free particles in full agreement with classical thermodynamics. We also calculate the partition function q=V/Λ 3 of a single free particle within the volume V. Here Λ 3 is a small volume element taking into account the wave–particle dualism of a single free particle of mass m at temperature T. Extension to a system of N free particles leads us to a simple geometrical model and to the conclusion that an ideal gas of independent particles becomes instable below a critical temperature T C. T C corresponds to the critical temperature T BE of Bose–Einstein condensation.
Classical formulations of the entropy concept and its interpretation are introduced. This is to motivate the definition of the quantum von Neumann entropy. Some general properties of quantum entropy are developed, such as the quantum entropy which always increases. The current state of the area that includes thermodynamics and quantum mechanics is reviewed. This interaction shall be critical for the development of nonequilibrium thermodynamics. The Jarzynski inequality is developed in two separate but related ways. The nature of irreversibility and its role in physics are considered as well. Finally, a specific quantum spin model is defined and is studied in such a way as to illustrate many of the subjects that have appeared.
A definition of nonequilibrium free energy Fs is proposed for dynamical Gaussian quantum open systems strongly coupled to a heat bath and the formal relation with the generating functional, the coarse-grained effective action and the influence action is indicated. For Gaussian open quantum systems exemplified by the quantum Brownian motion model studied here, a time-varying effective temperature can be introduced in a natural way, and, with it, the nonequilibrium free energy Fs, von Neumann entropy SvN and internal energy Us of the reduced system (S) can be defined accordingly. In contrast to the nonequilibrium free energy found in the literature which references the bath temperature, the nonequilibrium thermodynamic functions we find here obey the familiar relation ${\mathcal{F}}_{\mathrm{s}}(t)={\mathcal{U}}_{\mathrm{s}}(t)\ensuremath{-}{T}_{\mathrm{EFF}}(t){\mathcal{S}}_{vN}(t)$ at any and all moments of time in the system's fully nonequilibrium evolution history. After the system equilibrates they coincide, in the weak coupling limit, with their counterparts in conventional equilibrium thermodynamics. Since the effective temperature captures both the state of the system and its interaction with the bath, upon the system's equilibration, it approaches a value slightly higher than the initial bath temperature. Notably, it remains nonzero for a zero-temperature bath, signaling the existence of system-bath entanglement. Reasonably, at high bath temperatures and under ultraweak couplings, it becomes indistinguishable from the bath temperature. The nonequilibrium thermodynamic functions and relations discovered here for dynamical Gaussian quantum systems should open up useful pathways toward establishing meaningful theories of nonequilibrium quantum thermodynamics.
Deriving the laws of thermodynamics from a microscopic picture is a central quest of statistical mechanics.This tutorial focuses on the derivation of the first and second law for isolated and open quantum systems far from equilibrium, where such foundational questions also become practically relevant for emergent nanotechnologies.The derivation is based on a microscopic definition of five essential quantities: internal energy, thermodynamic entropy, work, heat, and temperature.These definitions are shown to satisfy the phenomenological laws of nonequilibrium thermodynamics for a large class of states and processes.The consistency with previous results is demonstrated.The framework applies to multiple baths including particle transport and accounts for processes with, e.g., a changing temperature of the bath, which is determined microscopically.An integral fluctuation theorem for entropy production is satisfied.In summary, this tutorial introduces a consistent and versatile framework to understand and apply the laws of thermodynamics in the quantum regime and beyond.
A system, or a set of systems, is said to be in thermal equilibrium when no net flow of heat energy occurs between its constituent parts when they are connected by a path permeable to heat (a diathermal wall).1 This condition is the endpoint of a spontaneous process: if two bodies at different temperatures are brought into thermal contact, energy will flow from the higher-temperature object to the lower-temperature object until this flow ceases and the equilibrium state is achieved.3 Within a single system, thermal equilibrium is characterized by a temperature that is both spatially uniform (the same at all points) and temporally constant (unchanging over time).4 This uniformity of macroscopic properties—such as temperature and pressure—is what defines the state of the system.1 It is important to distinguish this from the broader state of thermodynamic equilibrium. Thermal equilibrium (uniform temperature) is a necessary component, but full thermodynamic equilibrium also requires mechanical equilibrium (uniform pressure) and diffusive equilibrium (uniform chemical potential).6 Systems can achieve thermal equilibrium without achieving full thermodynamic equilibrium.6 The Zeroth Law of Thermodynamics: The "Discovery" of Temperature The concept of temperature, while intuitive, requires a formal physical principle to exist as a measurable, fundamental property. This principle is the Zeroth Law of Thermodynamics. Although it was formulated and named after the First and Second Laws, its foundational role was recognized as a logical prerequisite for the entire structure of thermodynamics.8 The law states: If system A is in thermal equilibrium with system C, and system B is in thermal equilibrium with system C, then systems A and B are in thermal equilibrium with each other.1 In this construction, system C plays the role of a thermometer.13 The profound implication of this law is mathematical: it establishes thermal equilibrium as a transitive relation 9, or more formally, an equivalence relation.14 In mathematics, any equivalence relation partitioning a set of objects implies the existence of a common, scalar property shared by all members of a given equivalence class. The Zeroth Law thus proves the existence of a scalar function of state—a property we call temperature—that is common to all systems in mutual thermal equilibrium.9 The law is, therefore, the fundamental basis for defining temperature and building consistent, reproducible temperature scales.1 This axiomatic foundation also provides the logical origin for one of temperature's most critical characteristics: it is an intensive property. An intensive property is one that does not depend on the size or amount of the system.15 If a large system 'A' is in internal thermal equilibrium 6, any two parts of it, subsystems 'A1' and 'A2', must also be in thermal equilibrium with each other. By the Zeroth Law, a thermometer 'C' that is in thermal equilibrium with the whole system 'A' must also be in thermal equilibrium with 'A1' and 'A2' individually.13 The thermometer, therefore, gives the same reading for all three. This demonstrates that the temperature of a system in thermal equilibrium is the same as the temperature of any part of it.16