Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2105.07374 · Symmetry

Time-Dependent Conformal Transformations and the Propagator for Quadratic Systems

Qiliang Zhao, Pengming Zhang, P. A. Horváthy

Published Oct 3, 2021• 5 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

The method proposed by Inomata and his collaborators allows us to transform a damped Caldirola–Kanai oscillator with a time-dependent frequency to one with a constant frequency and no friction by redefining the time variable, obtained by solving an Ermakov–Milne–Pinney equation. Their mapping “Eisenhart–Duval” lifts as a conformal transformation between two appropriate Bargmann spaces. The quantum propagator is calculated also by bringing the quadratic system to free form by another time-dependent Bargmann-conformal transformation, which generalizes the one introduced before by Niederer and is related to the mapping proposed by Arnold. Our approach allows us to extend the Maslov phase correction to an arbitrary time-dependent frequency. The method is illustrated by the Mathieu profile.

DOI
10.3390/sym13101866

Related papers

The quantum Arnold transformation and the Ermakov–Pinney equation

Julio Guerrero, Francisco F. López-Ruiz

The previously introduced quantum Arnold transformation, a unitary operator mapping the solutions of the Schrödinger equation for time dependent quadratic Hamiltonians into the solutions for the free particle, is revised and some interesting extensions are introduced, providing in particular a generalization of the Ermakov–Pinney equation.

arXiv:1302.1316•Physica Scripta•Feb 11, 2013•22 citations

The Quantum Arnold Transformation for the damped harmonic oscillator: from the Caldirola-Kanai model toward the Bateman model

Francisco F. López-Ruiz, Julio Guerrero, V. Aldaya +1 more

Using a quantum version of the Arnold transformation of classical mechanics, all quantum dynamical systems whose classical equations of motion are non-homogeneous linear second-order ordinary differential equations (LSODE), including systems with friction linear in velocity such as the damped harmonic oscillator, can be related to the quantum free-particle dynamical system. This implies that symmetries and simple computations in the free particle can be exported to the LSODE-system. The quantum Arnold transformation is given explicitly for the damped harmonic oscillator, and an algebraic connection between the Caldirola-Kanai model for the damped harmonic oscillator and the Bateman system will be sketched out.

Journal of Physics Conference Series•Aug 24, 2012•1 citation

On the Lewis–Riesenfeld (Dodonov–Man’ko) invariant method

Julio Guerrero, Francisco F. López-Ruiz

We revise the Lewis–Riesenfeld invariant method for solving the quantum time-dependent harmonic oscillator in light of the quantum Arnold transformation previously introduced and its recent generalization to the quantum Arnold–Ermakov–Pinney transformation. We prove that both methods are equivalent and show the advantages of the quantum Arnold–Ermakov–Pinney transformation over the Lewis–Riesenfeld invariant method. We show that, in the quantum time-dependent and damped harmonic oscillator, the invariant proposed by Dodonov and Man’ko is more suitable, and provide some examples to illustrate it, focusing on the damped case.

arXiv:1503.01371•Physica Scripta•Jun 1, 2015•24 citations

The propagator of the time-dependent forced harmonic oscillator with time-dependent damping

Bin Kang Cheng

By using the Caldirola–Kanai Hamiltonian and by applying Feynman polygonal paths, exact evaluation of the propagator of one-dimensional time-dependent forced and damped harmonic oscillator, based on the work of Montroll in deriving the propagator of the harmonic oscillator with time-dependent frequency, is possible. The results are compared with previously found results.

Journal of Mathematical Physics•Jan 1, 1986•11 citations

Time Evolution of Quadratic Quantum Systems: Evolution Operators, Propagators, and Invariants

Sh. M. Nagiyev, A. I. Ahmadov

We use the evolution operator method to describe time-dependent quadratic quantum systems in the framework of nonrelativistic quantum mechanics. For simplicity, we consider a free particle with a variable mass M(t), a particle with a variable mass M(t) in an alternating homogeneous field, and a harmonic oscillator with a variable mass M(t) and frequency ω(t) subject to a variable force F(t). To construct the evolution operators for these systems in an explicit disentangled form, we use a simple technique to find the general solution of a certain class of differential and finite-difference nonstationary Schrödinger-type equations of motion and also the operator identities of the Baker–Campbell–Hausdorff type. With known evolution operators, we can easily find the most general form of the propagators, invariants of any order, and wave functions and establish a unitary relation between systems. Results known in the literature follow from the obtained general results as particular cases.

Theoretical and Mathematical Physics•Mar 1, 2019•8 citations

Time-dependent coupled harmonic oscillators: Classical and quantum solutions

D. X. Macedo, I. Guedes

In this work we present the classical and quantum solutions for an arbitrary system of time-dependent coupled harmonic oscillators, where the masses (m), frequencies (ω) and coupling parameter (k) are functions of time. To obtain the classical solutions, we use a coordinate and momentum transformations along with a canonical transformation to write the original Hamiltonian as the sum of two Hamiltonians of uncoupled harmonic oscillators with modified time-dependent frequencies and unitary masses. To obtain the exact quantum solutions we use a unitary transformation and the Lewis and Riesenfeld (LR) invariant method. The exact wave functions are obtained by solving the respective Milne–Pinney (MP) equation for each system. We obtain the solutions for the system with m1 = m2 = m0eγt, ω1 = ω01e-γt/2, ω2 = ω02e-γt/2 and k = k0.

International Journal of Modern Physics E•Aug 25, 2014•4 citations
The method proposed by Inomata and his collaborators allows us to transform a damped Caldirola–Kanai oscillator with a time-dependent frequency to one with a constant frequency and no friction by redefining the time variable, obtained by solving an Ermakov–Milne–Pinney equation. Their mapping “Eisenhart–Duval” lifts as a conformal transformation between two appropriate Bargmann spaces. The quantum propagator is calculated also by bringing the quadratic system to free form by another time-dependent Bargmann-conformal transformation, which generalizes the one introduced before by Niederer and is related to the mapping proposed by Arnold. Our approach allows us to extend the Maslov phase correction to an arbitrary time-dependent frequency. The method is illustrated by the Mathieu profile.
Using a quantum version of the Arnold transformation of classical mechanics, all quantum dynamical systems whose classical equations of motion are non-homogeneous linear second-order ordinary differential equations (LSODE), including systems with friction linear in velocity such as the damped harmonic oscillator, can be related to the quantum free-particle dynamical system. This implies that symmetries and simple computations in the free particle can be exported to the LSODE-system. The quantum Arnold transformation is given explicitly for the damped harmonic oscillator, and an algebraic connection between the Caldirola-Kanai model for the damped harmonic oscillator and the Bateman system will be sketched out.
We revise the Lewis–Riesenfeld invariant method for solving the quantum time-dependent harmonic oscillator in light of the quantum Arnold transformation previously introduced and its recent generalization to the quantum Arnold–Ermakov–Pinney transformation. We prove that both methods are equivalent and show the advantages of the quantum Arnold–Ermakov–Pinney transformation over the Lewis–Riesenfeld invariant method. We show that, in the quantum time-dependent and damped harmonic oscillator, the invariant proposed by Dodonov and Man’ko is more suitable, and provide some examples to illustrate it, focusing on the damped case.
We use the evolution operator method to describe time-dependent quadratic quantum systems in the framework of nonrelativistic quantum mechanics. For simplicity, we consider a free particle with a variable mass M(t), a particle with a variable mass M(t) in an alternating homogeneous field, and a harmonic oscillator with a variable mass M(t) and frequency ω(t) subject to a variable force F(t). To construct the evolution operators for these systems in an explicit disentangled form, we use a simple technique to find the general solution of a certain class of differential and finite-difference nonstationary Schrödinger-type equations of motion and also the operator identities of the Baker–Campbell–Hausdorff type. With known evolution operators, we can easily find the most general form of the propagators, invariants of any order, and wave functions and establish a unitary relation between systems. Results known in the literature follow from the obtained general results as particular cases.
In this work we present the classical and quantum solutions for an arbitrary system of time-dependent coupled harmonic oscillators, where the masses (m), frequencies (ω) and coupling parameter (k) are functions of time. To obtain the classical solutions, we use a coordinate and momentum transformations along with a canonical transformation to write the original Hamiltonian as the sum of two Hamiltonians of uncoupled harmonic oscillators with modified time-dependent frequencies and unitary masses. To obtain the exact quantum solutions we use a unitary transformation and the Lewis and Riesenfeld (LR) invariant method. The exact wave functions are obtained by solving the respective Milne–Pinney (MP) equation for each system. We obtain the solutions for the system with m1 = m2 = m0eγt, ω1 = ω01e-γt/2, ω2 = ω02e-γt/2 and k = k0.