arXiv:2104.10800 · Physical Review A

Uncertainty limits of the information exchange between a quantum system and an external meter

Tomonori Matsushita, Holger Friedrich Hofmann

Published Jul 27, 2021• 6 citations

Abstract

It is not possible to obtain information about the observable properties of a quantum system without a physical interaction between the system and an external meter. This physical interaction is described by a unitary transformation of the joint quantum state of the system and the meter, which means that the information transfer from the system to the meter depends on the initial quantum coherence of the meter. In the present paper, we analyze the measurement interaction in terms of the changes of the meter state caused by the interaction with the system. The sensitivity of the meter can then be defined by evaluating the distinguishability of meter states for different values of the target observable. It is shown that the sensitivity of the meter requires quantum coherences in the generator observable that determines the magnitude of the backaction of the meter on the system. The tradeoff between measurement resolution and backaction is decided by the relation between sensitivity and quantum coherent uncertainty in the external meter. No matter how macroscopic the device used as a meter is, it must necessarily be quantum coherent in the degrees of freedom that interact with the system being measured.

DOI: 10.1103/physreva.104.012219

Related papers

Dependence of measurement outcomes on the dynamics of quantum coherent interactions between the system and the meter

Tomonori Matsushita, Holger Friedrich Hofmann

Information about the internal properties of a system can only be obtained through interactions of the system with an external meter. However, such interactions generally result in entanglement between the system and the meter, making it difficult to trace the measurement result back to a specific value of the physical property in the system. It is therefore possible that the outcomes of quantum measurements depend in a nontrivial manner on the dynamics of the measurement interaction, possibly providing a physical explanation for the role of measurement contexts in quantum mechanics. Here we show that the effects of the measurement interaction on the meter can be described entirely in terms of the quantum coherent system dynamics associated with the back-action on the system. For sufficiently small back-action uncertainties, the physical property of the system is described by a weak value obtained from the Hamilton-Jacobi equation of the back-action dynamics. At higher measurement resolutions, the observed values are determined by quantum interferences between different amounts of back-action. Eigenvalues emerge when the quantum interferences between different back-actions correspond to a Fourier transform in the back-action parameter. We conclude that the values of physical properties obtained in quantum measurements originate from the quantum coherent properties of the back-action dynamics generated by that physical property during an interaction. Measurement outcomes represent elements of the dynamics and cannot be explained by measurement independent elements of reality.

arXiv:2209.00751Physical Review ResearchJul 31, 20238 citations

The role of system–meter entanglement in controlling the resolution and decoherence of quantum measurements

Kartik Patekar, Holger F Hofmann

Abstract Measurement processes can be separated into an entangling interaction between the system and a meter and a subsequent readout of the meter state that does not involve any further interactions with the system. In the interval between these two stages, the system and the meter are in an entangled state that encodes all possible effects of the readout in the form of non-local quantum correlations between the system and the meter. Here, we show that the entanglement generated in the system–meter interaction expresses a fundamental relation between the amount of decoherence and the conditional probabilities that describe the resolution of the measurement. Specifically, the entanglement generated by the measurement interaction correlates both the target observable and the back-action effects on the system with sets of non-commuting physical properties in the meter. The choice of readout in the meter determines the trade-off between irreversible decoherence and measurement information by steering the system into a corresponding set of conditional output states. The Hilbert space algebra of entanglement ensures that the irreversible part of the decoherence is exactly equal to the Hellinger distance describing the resolution achieved in the measurement. We can thus demonstrate that the trade-off between measurement resolution and back-action is a fundamental property of the entanglement generated in measurement interactions.

arXiv:1905.09978New Journal of PhysicsSep 13, 201914 citations

Origin of meter fluctuations in weak measurement interactions

Tomonori Matsushita, Holger Friedrich Hofmann

Measurements map the value of a target observable onto a meter shift, resulting in a meter readout that combines the initial statistics of the meter state with the quantum statistics of the target observable. Even in the limit of weak measurement interactions, some information about the fluctuations of the target observable can be extracted from the change in the readout fluctuations caused by the measurement interaction. Here, we apply the Heisenberg picture to analyze the changes in the meter readout statistics caused by sufficiently weak measurement interactions, including the effects of nonlinearities in the meter response. When additional information is obtained in a subsequent measurement of the system, the meter fluctuations are modified based on the postselected statistics of the target observable. In addition, our analysis reveals a direct modification of the meter fluctuations due to the dependence of the postselection probability on the dynamics induced by the meter in the measurement interaction. We point out that the quantum formalism makes it difficult to distinguish this dynamic term from the physical fluctuations of the target observable and stress the importance of distinguishing between genuine conditional fluctuations of the target observable and the dynamic pseudovariance associated with the measurement back-action.

arXiv:2309.01932Physical Review AFeb 20, 20240 citations

Uncertainty limits for quantum metrology obtained from the statistics of weak measurements

Holger Friedrich Hofmann

Quantum metrology uses small changes in the output probabilities of a quantum measurement to estimate the magnitude of a weak interaction with the system. The sensitivity of this procedure depends on the relation between the input state, the measurement results, and the generator observable describing the effect of the weak interaction on the system. This is similar to the situation in weak measurements, where the weak value of an observable exhibits a symmetric dependence on initial and final conditions. In this paper, it is shown that the phase sensitivity of a quantum measurement is in fact given by the variance of the imaginary parts of the weak values of the generator over the different measurement outcomes. It is then possible to include the limitations of a specific quantum measurement in the uncertainty bound for phase estimates by subtracting the variance of the real parts of the weak values from the initial generator uncertainty. This uncertainty relation can be interpreted as the time-symmetric formulation of the uncertainty limit of quantum metrology, where the real parts of the weak values represent the information about the generator observable in the final measurement result.

arXiv:1005.4741Physical Review AFeb 22, 201151 citations

Classical motion of meter variables in the quantum theory of measurement

Fritz Haake, Marek Żukowski

We describe the measurement process for a model system whose Schr\"odinger equation yields to explicit solution. Any device for an effectively irreversible measurement must not just be a ``meter'' with a single degree of freedom; it must also contain a ``heat bath'' with many degrees of freedom. Such a bath may cause an effectively instantaneous decay of quantum coherences between macroscopically distinct meter readings, i.e., impart practically classical behavior to the meter. In turn, such a meter can be read without thereby suffering back reactions. We establish the limits in which a meter reading is uniquely related, with reasonable certainty, to a definite eigenvalue of the measured observable.

Physical Review AApr 1, 199330 citations

Sequential measurements of non-commuting observables with quantum controlled interactions

Holger Friedrich Hofmann

The origin of non-classical correlations is difficult to identify since the uncertainty principle requires that information obtained about one observable invariably results in the disturbance of any other non-commuting observable. Here, this problem is addressed by investigating the uncertainty trade-off between measurement errors and disturbance for measurement interactions controlled by the state of a single qubit, where the measurement is described by a quantum coherent superposition of a fully projective measurement and the identity operation. It is shown that the measurement statistics obtained from a quantum controlled measurement of followed by a projective measurement of can be explained in terms of a simple combination of resolution and back-action errors acting on an intrinsic joint probability of the non-commuting observables defined by the input state of the system. These intrinsic joint probabilities are consistent with the complex-valued joint probabilities recently observed in weak measurements of quantum systems and provide direct evidence of non-commutativity in the form of imaginary correlations between the non-commuting operators. In quantum controlled measurements, these imaginary correlations can be converted into well-defined contributions to the real measurement statistics, allowing a direct experimental observation of the less intuitive aspects of quantum theory.

Aug 16, 201613 citations