Simulating quantum many‐body dynamics on classical computers is a challenging problem due to the exponential growth of the Hilbert space. Artificial neural networks have recently been introduced as a new tool to approximate quantum many‐body states. The variational power of the restricted Boltzmann machine quantum states and different shallow and deep neural autoregressive quantum states to simulate the global quench dynamics of a non‐integrable quantum Ising chain is benchmarked. It is found that the number of parameters required to represent the quantum state at a given accuracy increases exponentially in time. The growth rate is only slightly affected by the network architecture over a wide range of different design choices: shallow and deep networks, small and large filter sizes, dilated and normal convolutions, and with and without shortcut connections.
Simulating quantum many‐body dynamics on classical computers is a challenging problem due to the exponential growth of the Hilbert space. Artificial neural networks have recently been introduced as a new tool to approximate quantum many‐body states. The variational power of the restricted Boltzmann machine quantum states and different shallow and deep neural autoregressive quantum states to simulate the global quench dynamics of a non‐integrable quantum Ising chain is benchmarked. It is found that the number of parameters required to represent the quantum state at a given accuracy increases exponentially in time. The growth rate is only slightly affected by the network architecture over a wide range of different design choices: shallow and deep networks, small and large filter sizes, dilated and normal convolutions, and with and without shortcut connections.
Abstract Part of the challenge for quantum many-body problems comes from the difficulty of representing large-scale quantum states, which in general requires an exponentially large number of parameters. Neural networks provide a powerful tool to represent quantum many-body states. An important open question is what characterizes the representational power of deep and shallow neural networks, which is of fundamental interest due to the popularity of deep learning methods. Here, we give a proof that, assuming a widely believed computational complexity conjecture, a deep neural network can efficiently represent most physical states, including the ground states of many-body Hamiltonians and states generated by quantum dynamics, while a shallow network representation with a restricted Boltzmann machine cannot efficiently represent some of those states.
Part of the challenge for quantum many-body problems comes from the difficulty of representing large-scale quantum states, which in general requires an exponentially large number of parameters. Neural networks provide a powerful tool to represent quantum many-body states. An important open question is what characterizes the representational power of deep and shallow neural networks, which is of fundamental interest due to the popularity of deep learning methods. Here, we give a proof that, assuming a widely believed computational complexity conjecture, a deep neural network can efficiently represent most physical states, including the ground states of many-body Hamiltonians and states generated by quantum dynamics, while a shallow network representation with a restricted Boltzmann machine cannot efficiently represent some of those states.One of the challenges in studies of quantum many-body physics is finding an efficient way to record the large system wavefunctions. Here the authors present an analysis of the capabilities of recently-proposed neural network representations for storing physically accessible quantum states.
ABSTRACT The field of quantum chemistry has long been defined by the central computational challenge of the quantum many‐body fermionic system problem—namely, the electronic Schrödinger equation. The exponential scaling of this equation makes it computationally intractable to solve exactly. As a result, various approximation methods have been developed, ranging from the widely used Density Functional Theory (DFT) to Coupled Cluster (CC) theory. While powerful, these conventional approaches often involve controlled truncations which cause a trade‐off between accuracy and computational cost, leaving many systems—particularly those with strong electron correlation—beyond the reach of ab initio simulation. Furthermore, the famous fermionic sign problem is particularly severe in stochastic methods like Quantum Monte Carlo (QMC). Traditional ansatz are also frequently engineered specifically for particular systems, which results in a fragmentation of methodologies and fundamentally limits their transferability. Recent research demonstrates that with carefully designed architectures, ANNs can not only represent ground states of model systems with high precision but also tackle the sign problem, offering a promising path forward for strongly correlated electronic structure calculations. This review charts the paradigm shift driven by Neural Network Quantum States (NNQS), which leverage the representational power of deep learning to overcome these barriers. We detail the architectural evolution from Restricted Boltzmann Machines to autoregressive models like RNNs and Transformers, which enable exact, uncorrelated sampling and bypass critical bottlenecks. The high‐efficiency optimization via neural networks was also explored, which decouples optimization cost from model complexity. Furthermore, the frontier of the field is marked by the integration of operator learning and hybrid quantum‐classical frameworks, such as Reinforcement Learning for contractive quantum eigen‐solvers to generate quantum circuits for simulating many‐body molecular systems, and Quantum‐Enhanced Neural Networks, which leverage quantum processors to enhance expressivity for hardware‐efficient ansatz. By framing the problem through the lens of computational resource allocation and quantum hardware integration—specifically, trading exponential memory demands for polynomial‐complexity optimization and sampling—this review elucidates how recent advances at the intersection of artificial neural networks and quantum computing have evolved. The emergence of these methods represents not merely progress toward powerful simulation tools, but also the creation of a hybrid computational interface. This convergence offers a versatile and systematically improvable framework for potentially addressing some of the most challenging problems in quantum physics and chemistry.
Abstract One of the main challenges of quantum many‐body physics is the exponential growth in the dimensionality of the Hilbert space with system size. This growth makes solving the Schrödinger equation of the system extremely difficult. Nonetheless, many physical systems have a simplified internal structure that typically makes the parameters needed to characterize their ground states exponentially smaller. Many numerical methods then become available to capture the physics of the system. Among modern numerical techniques, neural networks, which show great power in approximating functions and extracting features of big data, are now attracting much interest. In this work, the progress in using artificial neural networks to build quantum many‐body states is reviewed. The Boltzmann machine representation is taken as a prototypical example to illustrate various aspects of the neural network states. The classical neural networks are also briefly reviewed, and it is illustrated how to use neural networks to represent quantum states and density operators. Some physical properties of the neural network states are discussed. For applications, the progress in many‐body calculations based on neural network states, the neural network state approach to tomography, and the classical simulation of quantum computing based on Boltzmann machine states are briefly reviewed.
One of the main challenges of quantum many-body physics is that the dimensionality of the Hilbert space grows exponentially with the system size, which makes it extremely difficult to solve the Schrodinger equations of the system. But typically, many physical systems have a simplified internal structure which makes the parameters needed to characterize their ground states exponentially smaller. This makes many numerical methods possible in capture the physics of the system. Among these modern numerical techniques, neural networks, which show great power in approximating functions and extracting features of the big data, are now attracting many interests. Neural network representation of quantum many-body states shows great potential in solving some traditionally difficult quantum problems involving large number of freedoms. In this work, we briefly review the progress of using the artificial neural network to build quantum many-body ansatz states. We take Boltzmann machine representation as a prototypical example to illustrate various aspects of neural network representation of quantum many-body states. We first briefly review the classical neural networks, then we illustrate how to use neural networks to represent quantum states and density operators. Some physical properties of the neural network states, including entanglement features, representational power, and the relation with tensor network states, are discussed. For applications, we briefly review the progress of many-body calculating based on neural network states, neural network state approach to tomography, and also the classical simulation of quantum computing based on Boltzmann machine states. At the end of the work, some outlooks and open problems are given.
The field of quantum chemistry has long been defined by the central computational challenge of the quantum many-body fermionic system problem, main the electronic Schrödinger equation. This exponential scaling makes it computationally intractable to solve, the exact governing electronic Schrödinger equation. Approximation methods have been developed, ranging from the widely used Density Functional Theory (DFT) to Coupled Cluster (CC) theory. While powerful, these conventional approaches often involve controlled truncations which caused a trade-off between accuracy, leaving many systems—particularly those with strong electron correlation—beyond the reach of ab initio simulation. Furthermore, the famous fermionic sign oscillation problem is particularly severe in stochastic methods like Quantum Monte Carlo (QMC). 1 Traditional Ansätze are also frequently engineered specifically for particular systems, which results in a fragmentation of results and fundamentally limits the transferability. Recent research demonstrates that with carefully designed architectures, ANNs can not only represent ground states of model systems with high precision but also tackle the sign problem, offering a promising path forward for strongly correlated electronic structure calculations.2,3 This review charts the paradigm shift driven by Neural Network Quantum States (NNQS), which leverage the representational power of deep learning to overcome these barriers. We detail the architectural evolution from Restricted Boltzmann Machines to autoregressive models like RNNs and Transformers, which enable exact, uncorrelated sampling and bypass critical bottlenecks.2,4,5Furthermore, we explore the geometric foundation of high-efficiency optimization via the neural networks, which decouples optimization cost from model complexity.6 The frontier of the field is marked by the integration of operator learning and hybrid quantum-classical frameworks, such as Reinforcement Learning for contracted quantum eigen-solvers and Quantum-Enhanced Neural Networks, which leverage quantum processors to enhance expressivity for hardware-efficient Ansätze.7,8 By framing the problem through the lens of computational resource allocation—specifically, trading exponential memory demands for polynomialcomplexity optimization and sampling—this review elucidates how recent advances at the intersection of artificial neural networks and quantum computing have evolved. The emergence of those methods not merely progress into a powerful simulation-tools, but also a hybrid computational interface.9 This convergence offers a versatile and systematically improvable framework for potentially addressing some of the most challenging problems in quantum physics and chemistry.