Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2104.04698 · Symmetry

Kantian Equilibria in Classical and Quantum Symmetric Games

Piotr Frąckiewicz

Published Mar 8, 2022• 1 citation
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

The aim of the paper is to examine the notion of simple Kantian equilibrium in 2×2 symmetric games and their quantum counterparts. We focus on finding the Kantian equilibrium strategies in the general form of the games. As a result, we derive a formula that determines the reasonable strategies for any payoffs in the bimatrix game. This allowed us to compare the payoff results for classical and quantum way of playing the game. We showed that a very large part of 2×2 symmetric games, in which the arithmetic mean of the off-diagonal payoffs is greater than the other payoffs, have more beneficial Kantian equilibria when they are played with the use of quantum strategies. In that case, both players always obtain higher payoffs than when they use the classical strategies.

DOI
10.3390/sym14030546

Related papers

Nash Equilibria of Quantum Games in the Special Two-Parameter Strategy Space

Piotr Frąckiewicz, M. Szopa, Marcin Makowski +1 more

The aim of the paper is to examine pure Nash equilibria in a quantum game that extends the classical bimatrix game of dimension 2. The strategies of quantum players are specific types of two-parameter unitary operations such that the resulting quantum game is invariant under isomorphic transformations of the input classical game. We formulate general statements for the existence and form of Nash equilibria and discuss their Pareto efficiency. We prove that, depending on the payoffs of a classical game, the corresponding quantum game may or may not have Nash equilibria in the set of unitary strategies under study. Some of the equilibria cease to be equilibria if the players’ strategy set is the three-parameter special unitary group.

Applied Sciences•Nov 13, 2022•8 citations

Examining the effect of quantum strategies on symmetric conflicting interest games

Katarzyna Bolonek-Lasoń

The explicit construction is presented of two-player game satisfying: (i) symmetry with respect to the permutation of the players; (ii) the existence of upper bound on total payoff following from Bell inequality; (iii) the existence of unfair equilibrium with total payoff saturating the above bound. The quantum counterpart of the game is considered which possesses only fair equilibria and strategies outperforming the classical ones.

arXiv:1706.03323•International Journal of Quantum Information•Jul 12, 2017•2 citations

Nash Equilibrium Improvement in Quantum Extensions of Symmetric Games

Anna Gorczyca–Goraj, Krzysztof Grzegorz Grzanka, Piotr Frąckiewicz +2 more

Abstract Quantum strategies can alter the equilibrium structure of classical games, but apparent improvements may depend on arbitrary strategy labels or on the particular quantum operations admitted. Here, we characterize payoff improvement across all permissible three-strategy extensions of renaming-symmetric \(2 \times 2\) games within the Eisert-Wilkens-Lewenstein framework. We preserve the classical game as a subgame and add one fixed unitary strategy, restricting attention to the three extension classes that remain invariant under isomorphic transformations of the classical game. Across six canonical payoff orderings, including coordination, anti-coordination, and dominant-strategy dilemmas, we derive the conditions under which the extended games admit pure Nash equilibria whose payoffs are no lower than those of the corresponding symmetric classical equilibrium. The classical-type \(A_0\) extension produces no strict improvement, while \(B_0\) does so only in restricted regions and generally asymmetrically. By contrast, the genuinely quantum \(C_0\) extension supports non-inferior equilibria across all six classes and yields strict, mutually beneficial improvements in identifiable payoff regions. These results move beyond isolated game examples by showing precisely when representation-invariant quantum extensions can improve equilibrium payoffs and when they cannot. These conditions provide a design map for quantum-enabled multi-agent protocols by identifying the payoff structures under which an added quantum strategy can improve equilibrium outcomes without altering the players' underlying preferences.

•Aug 6, 2026•0 citations

A Note on Special Nash Equilibria of Quantum Games

Yoshitaka Sakagami

This note revisits Sakagami in [1] and studies whether quantum 2 × 2 games with full SU (2) strategy space admit Nash equilibria whose payoff curves do not intersect the classical (no entanglement) payoffs. By allowing duplicate payoffs in each player’s table, we construct an example that yields such “special” equilibria for any entanglement and describe a further equilibrium when there is no entanglement. We also relate the example to strong isomorphism results by Frackiewicz in [2].

Journal of Quantum Information Science•Jan 1, 2025•0 citations

On Correlated Equilibria in Marinatto–Weber Type Quantum Games

Piotr Frąckiewicz

Players’ choices in quantum game schemes are often correlated by a quantum state. This enables players to obtain payoffs that may not be achievable when classical pure or mixed strategies are used. On the other hand, players’ choices can be correlated due to a classical probability distribution, and if no player benefits by a unilateral deviation from the vector of recommended strategies, the probability distribution is a correlated equilibrium. The aim of this paper is to investigate relation between correlated equilibria and Nash equilibria in the MW-type schemes for quantum games.

Applied Sciences•Dec 16, 2020•0 citations

On Topics in Quantum Games

Y. Avishai

This work concentrates on simultaneous move non-cooperating quantum games. Part of it is evidently not new, but it is included for the sake self consistence, as it is devoted to introduction of the mathematical and physical grounds of the pertinent topics, and the way in which a simple classical game is modified to become a quantum game (a procedure referred to as a quantization of a classical game). The connection between game theory and information science is briefly stressed, and the role of quantum entanglement (that plays a central role in the theory of quantum games), is exposed. Armed with these tools, we investigate some basic concepts like the existence (or absence) of a pure strategy and mixed strategy Nash equilibrium and its relation with the degree of entanglement. The main results of this work are as follows: 1) Construction of a numerical algorithm based on the method of best response functions, designed to search for pure strategy Nash equilibrium in quantum games. The formalism is based on the discretization of a continuous variable into a mesh of points, and can be applied to quantum games that are built upon two-players two-strategies classical games, based on the method of best response functions. 2) Application of this algorithm to study the question of how the existence of pure strategy Nash equilibrium is related to the degree of entanglement (specified by a continuous parameter γ ). It is shown that when the classical game GC has a pure strategy Nash equilibrium that is not Pareto efficient, then the quantum game GQ with maximal entanglement (γ = π/2) has no pure strategy Nash equilibrium. By studying a non-symmetric prisoner dilemma game, it is found that there is a critical value 0γc such that for γγc there is a pure strategy Nash equilibrium and for γ≥γc there is no pure strategy Nash equilibrium. The behavior of the two payoffs as function of γ starts at that of the classical ones at (D, D) and approaches the cooperative classical ones at (C, C) (C = confess, D = don’t confess). 3) We then study Bayesian quantum games and show that under certain conditions, there is a pure strategy Nash equilibrium in such games even when entanglement is maximal. 4) We define the basic ingredients of a quantum game based on a two-player three strategies classical game. This requires the introduction of trits (instead of bits) and quantum trits (instead of quantum bits). It is proved that in this quantum game, there is no classical commensurability in the sense that the classical strategies are not obtained as a special case of the quantum strategies.

Journal of Quantum Information Science•Jan 1, 2023•9 citations
The aim of the paper is to examine the notion of simple Kantian equilibrium in 2×2 symmetric games and their quantum counterparts. We focus on finding the Kantian equilibrium strategies in the general form of the games. As a result, we derive a formula that determines the reasonable strategies for any payoffs in the bimatrix game. This allowed us to compare the payoff results for classical and quantum way of playing the game. We showed that a very large part of 2×2 symmetric games, in which the arithmetic mean of the off-diagonal payoffs is greater than the other payoffs, have more beneficial Kantian equilibria when they are played with the use of quantum strategies. In that case, both players always obtain higher payoffs than when they use the classical strategies.
The aim of the paper is to examine pure Nash equilibria in a quantum game that extends the classical bimatrix game of dimension 2. The strategies of quantum players are specific types of two-parameter unitary operations such that the resulting quantum game is invariant under isomorphic transformations of the input classical game. We formulate general statements for the existence and form of Nash equilibria and discuss their Pareto efficiency. We prove that, depending on the payoffs of a classical game, the corresponding quantum game may or may not have Nash equilibria in the set of unitary strategies under study. Some of the equilibria cease to be equilibria if the players’ strategy set is the three-parameter special unitary group.
Abstract Quantum strategies can alter the equilibrium structure of classical games, but apparent improvements may depend on arbitrary strategy labels or on the particular quantum operations admitted. Here, we characterize payoff improvement across all permissible three-strategy extensions of renaming-symmetric 2×22 \times 22×2 games within the Eisert-Wilkens-Lewenstein framework. We preserve the classical game as a subgame and add one fixed unitary strategy, restricting attention to the three extension classes that remain invariant under isomorphic transformations of the classical game. Across six canonical payoff orderings, including coordination, anti-coordination, and dominant-strategy dilemmas, we derive the conditions under which the extended games admit pure Nash equilibria whose payoffs are no lower than those of the corresponding symmetric classical equilibrium. The classical-type A0A_0A0​ extension produces no strict improvement, while B0B_0B0​ does so only in restricted regions and generally asymmetrically. By contrast, the genuinely quantum C0C_0C0​ extension supports non-inferior equilibria across all six classes and yields strict, mutually beneficial improvements in identifiable payoff regions. These results move beyond isolated game examples by showing precisely when representation-invariant quantum extensions can improve equilibrium payoffs and when they cannot. These conditions provide a design map for quantum-enabled multi-agent protocols by identifying the payoff structures under which an added quantum strategy can improve equilibrium outcomes without altering the players' underlying preferences.
Players’ choices in quantum game schemes are often correlated by a quantum state. This enables players to obtain payoffs that may not be achievable when classical pure or mixed strategies are used. On the other hand, players’ choices can be correlated due to a classical probability distribution, and if no player benefits by a unilateral deviation from the vector of recommended strategies, the probability distribution is a correlated equilibrium. The aim of this paper is to investigate relation between correlated equilibria and Nash equilibria in the MW-type schemes for quantum games.
This work concentrates on simultaneous move non-cooperating quantum games. Part of it is evidently not new, but it is included for the sake self consistence, as it is devoted to introduction of the mathematical and physical grounds of the pertinent topics, and the way in which a simple classical game is modified to become a quantum game (a procedure referred to as a quantization of a classical game). The connection between game theory and information science is briefly stressed, and the role of quantum entanglement (that plays a central role in the theory of quantum games), is exposed. Armed with these tools, we investigate some basic concepts like the existence (or absence) of a pure strategy and mixed strategy Nash equilibrium and its relation with the degree of entanglement. The main results of this work are as follows: 1) Construction of a numerical algorithm based on the method of best response functions, designed to search for pure strategy Nash equilibrium in quantum games. The formalism is based on the discretization of a continuous variable into a mesh of points, and can be applied to quantum games that are built upon two-players two-strategies classical games, based on the method of best response functions. 2) Application of this algorithm to study the question of how the existence of pure strategy Nash equilibrium is related to the degree of entanglement (specified by a continuous parameter γ ). It is shown that when the classical game GC has a pure strategy Nash equilibrium that is not Pareto efficient, then the quantum game GQ with maximal entanglement (γ = π/2) has no pure strategy Nash equilibrium. By studying a non-symmetric prisoner dilemma game, it is found that there is a critical value 0γc such that for γγc there is a pure strategy Nash equilibrium and for γ≥γc there is no pure strategy Nash equilibrium. The behavior of the two payoffs as function of γ starts at that of the classical ones at (D, D) and approaches the cooperative classical ones at (C, C) (C = confess, D = don’t confess). 3) We then study Bayesian quantum games and show that under certain conditions, there is a pure strategy Nash equilibrium in such games even when entanglement is maximal. 4) We define the basic ingredients of a quantum game based on a two-player three strategies classical game. This requires the introduction of trits (instead of bits) and quantum trits (instead of quantum bits). It is proved that in this quantum game, there is no classical commensurability in the sense that the classical strategies are not obtained as a special case of the quantum strategies.