We show that both the classical as well as the quantum definitions of the Fisher information faithfully identify resourceful quantum states in general quantum resource theories, in the sense that they can always distinguish between states with and without a given resource. This shows that all quantum resources confer an advantage in metrology, and establishes the Fisher information as a universal tool to probe the resourcefulness of quantum states. We provide bounds on the extent of this advantage, as well as a simple criterion to test whether different resources are useful for the estimation of unitarily encoded parameters. Finally, we extend the results to show that the Fisher information is also able to identify the dynamical resourcefulness of quantum operations.
We show that both the classical as well as the quantum definitions of the Fisher information faithfully identify resourceful quantum states in general quantum resource theories, in the sense that they can always distinguish between states with and without a given resource. This shows that all quantum resources confer an advantage in metrology, and establishes the Fisher information as a universal tool to probe the resourcefulness of quantum states. We provide bounds on the extent of this advantage, as well as a simple criterion to test whether different resources are useful for the estimation of unitarily encoded parameters. Finally, we extend the results to show that the Fisher information is also able to identify the dynamical resourcefulness of quantum operations.
We propose a resource theory of the quantum invasiveness of general quantum operations, i.e., those defined by quantum channels in Leggett-Garg scenarios. We are able to compare the resource-theoretic framework of quantum invasiveness to the resource theory of coherence. We also show that the Fisher information is a quantifier of quantum invasiveness. This result allows us to establish a direct connection between the concept of quantum invasiveness and quantum metrology, by exploring the utility of the definition of quantum invasiveness in the context of metrological protocols.
Quantum-enhanced sensing is commonly benchmarked using the quantum Fisher information (QFI), often interpreted as a direct indicator of achievable precision. However, such an interpreta- tion is only justified within a fully specified inference framework that consistently incorporates state preparation, measurement design, resource accounting, estimator construction, prior information, and finite data effects. Here we develop an operational, end-to-end framework for quantum sensing under finite resources and identify general principles required for meaningful performance assess- ment. A central conceptual point is that the relevant unit of estimation is not a single detection event, but the complete data set required to construct a consistent estimator. Rather than relying on abstract statistical formalism, we analyze a set of paradigmatic and experimentally relevant ex- amples that expose common pitfalls in widely discussed quantum sensing strategies. These include quantum interferometry, sensing with squeezed states, and criticality-inspired protocols. Our results clarify when large Fisher information or nonclassical resources translate into genuine metrological advantage, and when they do not. They further provide a practical methodology for designing and evaluating quantum sensing protocols under realistic experimental constraints.
We demonstrate that quantum Fisher information and superradiance can be formulated as coherence measures in accordance with the resource theory of coherence, thus establishing a direct link between metrological resources, superradiance, and coherence. The arguments are generalized to show that coherence may be considered as the underlying fundamental resource for any functional of state that is first of all faithful, and second, concave or linear. It is also shown that quantum Fisher information and the superradiant quantity are in fact antithetical resources in the sense that if coherence were directed to saturate one quantity, then it must come at the expense of the other. Finally, a key result of the paper is to demonstrate that coherence, quantum Fisher information, superradiant quantity, and entanglement are mutually interconvertible resources under incoherent operations.
Informationally complete measurements form the foundation of universal quantum state reconstruction, while quantum parameter estimation is based on the local structure of the manifold of quantum states. Here we establish a general link between these two aspects, in the context of a single informationally complete measurement, by employing a suitably adapted operator frame theory. In particular, we bound the ratio between the classical and quantum Fisher information in terms of the spectral decomposition of the associated frame operator, and connect these bounds to the optimal and least optimal directions for parameter encoding. The geometric and operational characterization of information extraction thus obtained reveals the fundamental tradeoff imposed by informational completeness on local quantum parameter estimation.
Quantum measurements lie at the core of quantum information processing, enabling tasks ranging from state reconstruction and parameter estimation to sensing and computation. As quantum technologies scale and become increasingly precise, a central question emerges: what does it mean for a quantum measurement to be good? This thesis addresses this question by developing quantitative, operational, and physically grounded frameworks for assessing the quality and informational power of quantum measurements.The first part of the thesis focuses on the intrinsic quality of quantum measurements independent of any particular input state. Adopting the formalism of quantum resource theories, measurements are treated as resources ordered under classical post-processing, which cannot increase informational content. Restricting attention to informationally complete measurements, we employ frame theory to introduce a novel resource monotone termed completeness stability, defined as the minimum eigenvalue of a suitably scaled frame operator. We establish its operational significance by showing that the average error in quantum state tomography and the average variance in shadow tomography are tightly bounded by the inverse of the completeness stability. Maximizing this monotone identifies weighted complex projective 2-designs, including symmetric informationally complete POVMs and mutually unbiased bases, as optimal measurement configurations.The second part of the thesis extends these ideas to quantum parameter estimation, where measurement performance necessarily depends on correlations between the measurement and the encoded quantum state. By introducing a state-dependent inner product on operator space, we develop an operator-theoretic formulation in which both the classical and quantum Fisher information arise naturally from a single frame operator associated with the measurement and the reference state. Within this framework, the spectral properties of the frame operator provide a complete characterization of estimation performance. The maximum and minimum eigenvalues identify the best- and worst-case parameter-encoding directions, respectively, yielding sharp bounds on the achievable ratio of classical and quantum Fisher information. This establishes a direct connection between informational completeness, estimation robustness, and resource-theoretic monotonicity.The final part of the thesis returns to foundational questions concerning quantum measurement and arrival time. Using Bohmian mechanics, we develop a microscopic, first-principles account of the Hong–Ou–Mandel effect, a paradigmatic two-particle interference phenomenon. By analyzing particle trajectories guided by the wave function, we show how bosonic bunching and fermionic anti-bunching emerge dynamically from the guiding equation without invoking wave-function collapse. Beyond reproducing the Hong–Ou–Mandel dip, we demonstrate how experimental parameters such as barrier strength, phase velocity, and path asymmetry influence both coincidence probabilities and temporal correlations.Taken together, this thesis provides a unified treatment of quantum measurement quality across operational, metrological, and dynamical regimes. By bridging resource theory, frame theory, Fisher information, and trajectory-based quantum dynamics, it offers new insights into the structure, limitations, and physical interpretation of quantum measurements in both applied and foundational contexts.
Quantum Fisher information (QFI) quantifies the sensitivity of a quantum state to a parameter change and plays a key role in quantum metrology. Meanwhile, quantum coherence is a crucial resource for quantum information processing. However, despite extensive studies on various aspects of quantum metrology, the interplay between the dynamics of the QFI and quantum coherence remains unexplored. Here, we explore the factorization relationship between the QFI and quantum coherence, both theoretically and experimentally. We prepare pure states in qubit and qutrit systems and apply unitary evolution to investigate this relationship. Our results confirm the factorization law, offering strong evidence for this relationship. Furthermore, we establish a lower bound on the variance of the estimated parameter that does not require the final state information. This approach reveals a deep connection between the QFI and quantum coherence, providing insights into quantum parameter estimation. These findings have potential applications in quantum sensing and quantum metrology.