Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2102.11349 · Leibniz international proceedings in informatics

Quantum Query Complexity with Matrix-Vector Products

Andrew M. Childs, Shih-Han Hung, Tongyang Li

Published Jan 1, 2021• 2 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

We study quantum algorithms that learn properties of a matrix using queries that return its action on an input vector. We show that for various problems, including computing the trace, determinant, or rank of a matrix or solving a linear system that it specifies, quantum computers do not provide an asymptotic speedup over classical computation. On the other hand, we show that for some problems, such as computing the parities of rows or columns or deciding if there are two identical rows or columns, quantum computers provide exponential speedup. We demonstrate this by showing equivalence between models that provide matrix-vector products, vector-matrix products, and vector-matrix-vector products, whereas the power of these models can vary significantly for classical computation.

DOI
10.4230/lipics.icalp.2021.55

Related papers

Understanding the Kronecker Matrix-Vector Complexity of Linear Algebra

Raphael A. Meyer, William Swartworth, David Paul Woodruff

We study the computational model where we can access a matrix $\mathbf{A}$ only by computing matrix-vector products $\mathbf{A}\mathrm{x}$ for vectors of the form $\mathrm{x} = \mathrm{x}_1 \otimes \cdots \otimes \mathrm{x}_q$. We prove exponential lower bounds on the number of queries needed to estimate various properties, including the trace and the top eigenvalue of $\mathbf{A}$. Our proofs hold for all adaptive algorithms, modulo a mild conditioning assumption on the algorithm's queries. We further prove that algorithms whose queries come from a small alphabet (e.g., $\mathrm{x}_i \in \{\pm1\}^n$) cannot test if $\mathbf{A}$ is identically zero with polynomial complexity, despite the fact that a single query using Gaussian vectors solves the problem with probability 1. In steep contrast to the non-Kronecker case, this shows that sketching $\mathbf{A}$ with different distributions of the same subguassian norm can yield exponentially different query complexities. Our proofs follow from the observation that random vectors with Kronecker structure have exponentially smaller inner products than their non-Kronecker counterparts.

arXiv:2502.08029•Feb 12, 2025•0 citations

Quantum Time-Space Tradeoffs for Matrix Problems

Paul W. Beame, Niels Kornerup, Michael Whitmeyer

We prove lower bounds on the time and space required for quantum computers to solve a wide variety of problems involving matrices, many of which have only been analyzed classically in prior work. Using a novel way of applying recording query methods we show that for many linear algebra problems—including matrix-vector product, matrix inversion, matrix multiplication and powering—existing classical time-space tradeoffs also apply to quantum algorithms with at most a constant factor loss. For example, for almost all fixed matrices A, including the discrete Fourier transform (DFT) matrix, we prove that quantum circuits with at most T input queries and S qubits of memory require T=Ω(n2/S) to compute matrix-vector product Ax for x ∈ {0,1}n. We similarly prove that matrix multiplication for n× n binary matrices requires T=Ω(n3 / √S). Because many of our lower bounds are matched by deterministic algorithms with the same time and space complexity, our results show that quantum computers cannot provide any asymptotic advantage for these problems at any space bound. We also improve the previous quantum time-space tradeoff lower bounds for n× n Boolean (i.e. AND-OR) matrix multiplication from T=Ω(n2.5/S1/2) to T=Ω(n2.5/S1/4) which has optimal exponents for the powerful query algorithms to which it applies. Our method also yields improved lower bounds for classical algorithms.

ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC)•Jun 10, 2024•2 citations

Quantum lower bounds for convex optimization and real matrix-vector query problems

Andrew M. Childs

We (the author and the AI systems that did the heavy lifting) show that the quantum query complexity of minimizing a convex function over a convex subset of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with evaluation and membership queries is $\tildeΩ(n)$, nearly matching the best known upper bound. In particular, we show this even for quadratic minimization, which is equivalent to inverting an $n \times n$ real matrix using matrix-vector queries. We also show linear or nearly linear lower bounds on the quantum query complexity of computing the trace, the sign of the determinant, and the magnitude of the determinant of a real matrix in the matrix-vector query model. We use a novel quantum lower bound technique, the determinantal witness method, based on identifying a witness whose Fourier transform vanishes on low-rank matrices and that correlates well with the function being computed.

quant-pharXiv:2609.05679•Sep 8, 2026•0 citations

Quantum Time-Space Tradeoffs for Matrix Problems

Paul W. Beame, Niels Kornerup, Michael Whitmeyer

Abstract. We consider the time and space required for quantum computers to solve a wide variety of problems involving matrices, many of which have only been analyzed classically in prior work. Our main results show that for a range of linear algebra problems—including matrix-vector product, matrix inversion, matrix multiplication and powering—existing classical time-space tradeoffs, several of which are tight for every space bound, also apply to quantum algorithms with at most a constant factor loss. For example, for almost all fixed matrices [Formula: see text], including the discrete Fourier transform matrix, we prove that quantum circuits with at most [Formula: see text] input queries and [Formula: see text] qubits of memory require [Formula: see text] to compute matrix-vector product [Formula: see text] for [Formula: see text]. We similarly prove that matrix multiplication for [Formula: see text] binary matrices requires [Formula: see text]. Because many of our lower bounds are matched by deterministic algorithms with the same time and space complexity, our results show that quantum computers cannot provide any asymptotic advantage for these problems with any space bound. We obtain matching lower bounds for the stronger notion of quantum cumulative memory complexity—the sum of the space per layer of a circuit. We also consider Boolean (i.e., AND-OR) matrix multiplication and matrix-vector products, improving the previous quantum time-space tradeoff lower bounds for [Formula: see text] Boolean matrix multiplication to [Formula: see text] from [Formula: see text]. Our improved lower bound for Boolean matrix multiplication is based on a new coloring argument that extracts more from the strong direct product theorem that was the basis for prior work. To obtain our tight lower bounds for linear algebra problems, we require much stronger bounds than strong direct product theorems. We obtain these bounds by adding a new bucketing method to the quantum recording-query technique of Zhandry that lets us apply classical arguments to upper bound the success probability of quantum circuits.

arXiv:2401.05321•SIAM Journal on Computing•May 20, 2026•1 citation

Quantum Algorithms for Matrix Problems and Machine Learning

Sathyawageeswar Subramanian

This dissertation presents a study of quantum algorithms for problems that can be posed as matrix function tasks. In Chapter 1 we demonstrate a simple unifying framework for implementing of smooth functions of matrices on a quantum computer. This framework captures a variety of problems that can be solved by evaluating properties of some function of a matrix, and we identify speedups over classical algorithms for some problem classes. The analysis combines ideas from the classical theory of function approximation with the quantum algorithmic primitive of implementing linear combinations of unitary operators. In Chapter 2 we continue this study by looking at the role of sparsity of input matrices in constructing efficient quantum algorithms. We show that classically pre-processing an input matrix by spectral sparsification can be profitable for quantum Hamiltonian simulation algorithms, without compromising the simulation error or complexity. Such preprocessing incurs a one time cost linear in the size of the matrix, but can be exploited to exponentially speed up subsequent subroutines such as inversion. In Chapter 3, we give an application of this theory of matrix functions to the problem of estimating the Renyi entropy of an unknown quantum state. We combine matrix function techniques with mixed state quantum computation in the one-clean qubit model, and are able to bound of the expected runtime of our algorithm in terms of the unknown target quantity. In addition to the theme of analysing the complexity of our algorithms, we also identify instances that are of practical relevance, leading us to some problems of machine learning. In Chapter 4 we investigate kernel based learning methods using random features. We work with the QRAM input model suitable for big data, and show how matrix functions and the quantum Fourier transform can be used to devise a quantum algorithm for sampling random features that are optimised for given input data and choice of kernel. We obtain a potential exponential speedup over the best known classical algorithm even without explicit assumptions of sparsity or low rank. Finally in Chapter 5 we consider the technique of beamsearch decoding used in natural language processing. We work in the query model, and show how quantum search with advice can be used to construct a quantum search decoder that can find the optimal parse (which may for instance be a best translation, or text-to-speech transcript) at least quadratically faster than the best known classical algorithms, and obtain super-quadratic speedups in the expected runtime.

•Jul 24, 2020•0 citations

Quantum Communication Complexity of Linear Regression

Ashley Montanaro, Changpeng Shao

Quantum computers may achieve speedups over their classical counterparts for solving linear algebra problems. However, in some cases—such as for low-rank matrices—dequantized algorithms demonstrate that there cannot be an exponential quantum speedup. In this work, we show that quantum computers have provable polynomial and exponential speedups in terms of communication complexity for some fundamental linear algebra problems if there is no restriction on the rank. We mainly focus on solving linear regression and Hamiltonian simulation. In the quantum case, the task is to prepare the quantum state of the result. To allow for a fair comparison, in the classical case, the task is to sample from the result. We investigate these two problems in two-party and multiparty models, propose near-optimal quantum protocols, and prove quantum/classical lower bounds. In this process, we propose an efficient quantum protocol for quantum singular value transformation, which is a powerful technique for designing quantum algorithms. We feel this will be helpful in developing efficient quantum protocols for many other problems.

arXiv:2210.01601•ACM Transactions on Computation Theory•Sep 23, 2023•8 citations
We study quantum algorithms that learn properties of a matrix using queries that return its action on an input vector. We show that for various problems, including computing the trace, determinant, or rank of a matrix or solving a linear system that it specifies, quantum computers do not provide an asymptotic speedup over classical computation. On the other hand, we show that for some problems, such as computing the parities of rows or columns or deciding if there are two identical rows or columns, quantum computers provide exponential speedup. We demonstrate this by showing equivalence between models that provide matrix-vector products, vector-matrix products, and vector-matrix-vector products, whereas the power of these models can vary significantly for classical computation.
We study the computational model where we can access a matrix A\mathbf{A}A only by computing matrix-vector products Ax\mathbf{A}\mathrm{x}Ax for vectors of the form x=x1⊗⋯⊗xq\mathrm{x} = \mathrm{x}_1 \otimes \cdots \otimes \mathrm{x}_qx=x1​⊗⋯⊗xq​. We prove exponential lower bounds on the number of queries needed to estimate various properties, including the trace and the top eigenvalue of A\mathbf{A}A. Our proofs hold for all adaptive algorithms, modulo a mild conditioning assumption on the algorithm's queries. We further prove that algorithms whose queries come from a small alphabet (e.g., xi∈{±1}n\mathrm{x}_i \in \{\pm1\}^nxi​∈{±1}n) cannot test if A\mathbf{A}A is identically zero with polynomial complexity, despite the fact that a single query using Gaussian vectors solves the problem with probability 1. In steep contrast to the non-Kronecker case, this shows that sketching A\mathbf{A}A with different distributions of the same subguassian norm can yield exponentially different query complexities. Our proofs follow from the observation that random vectors with Kronecker structure have exponentially smaller inner products than their non-Kronecker counterparts.
We prove lower bounds on the time and space required for quantum computers to solve a wide variety of problems involving matrices, many of which have only been analyzed classically in prior work. Using a novel way of applying recording query methods we show that for many linear algebra problems—including matrix-vector product, matrix inversion, matrix multiplication and powering—existing classical time-space tradeoffs also apply to quantum algorithms with at most a constant factor loss. For example, for almost all fixed matrices A, including the discrete Fourier transform (DFT) matrix, we prove that quantum circuits with at most T input queries and S qubits of memory require T=Ω(n2/S) to compute matrix-vector product Ax for x ∈ {0,1}n. We similarly prove that matrix multiplication for n× n binary matrices requires T=Ω(n3 / √S). Because many of our lower bounds are matched by deterministic algorithms with the same time and space complexity, our results show that quantum computers cannot provide any asymptotic advantage for these problems at any space bound. We also improve the previous quantum time-space tradeoff lower bounds for n× n Boolean (i.e. AND-OR) matrix multiplication from T=Ω(n2.5/S1/2) to T=Ω(n2.5/S1/4) which has optimal exponents for the powerful query algorithms to which it applies. Our method also yields improved lower bounds for classical algorithms.
We (the author and the AI systems that did the heavy lifting) show that the quantum query complexity of minimizing a convex function over a convex subset of Rn\mathbb{R}^nRn with evaluation and membership queries is Ω~(n)\tildeΩ(n)Ω~(n), nearly matching the best known upper bound. In particular, we show this even for quadratic minimization, which is equivalent to inverting an n×nn \times nn×n real matrix using matrix-vector queries. We also show linear or nearly linear lower bounds on the quantum query complexity of computing the trace, the sign of the determinant, and the magnitude of the determinant of a real matrix in the matrix-vector query model. We use a novel quantum lower bound technique, the determinantal witness method, based on identifying a witness whose Fourier transform vanishes on low-rank matrices and that correlates well with the function being computed.
Abstract. We consider the time and space required for quantum computers to solve a wide variety of problems involving matrices, many of which have only been analyzed classically in prior work. Our main results show that for a range of linear algebra problems—including matrix-vector product, matrix inversion, matrix multiplication and powering—existing classical time-space tradeoffs, several of which are tight for every space bound, also apply to quantum algorithms with at most a constant factor loss. For example, for almost all fixed matrices [Formula: see text], including the discrete Fourier transform matrix, we prove that quantum circuits with at most [Formula: see text] input queries and [Formula: see text] qubits of memory require [Formula: see text] to compute matrix-vector product [Formula: see text] for [Formula: see text]. We similarly prove that matrix multiplication for [Formula: see text] binary matrices requires [Formula: see text]. Because many of our lower bounds are matched by deterministic algorithms with the same time and space complexity, our results show that quantum computers cannot provide any asymptotic advantage for these problems with any space bound. We obtain matching lower bounds for the stronger notion of quantum cumulative memory complexity—the sum of the space per layer of a circuit. We also consider Boolean (i.e., AND-OR) matrix multiplication and matrix-vector products, improving the previous quantum time-space tradeoff lower bounds for [Formula: see text] Boolean matrix multiplication to [Formula: see text] from [Formula: see text]. Our improved lower bound for Boolean matrix multiplication is based on a new coloring argument that extracts more from the strong direct product theorem that was the basis for prior work. To obtain our tight lower bounds for linear algebra problems, we require much stronger bounds than strong direct product theorems. We obtain these bounds by adding a new bucketing method to the quantum recording-query technique of Zhandry that lets us apply classical arguments to upper bound the success probability of quantum circuits.
This dissertation presents a study of quantum algorithms for problems that can be posed as matrix function tasks. In Chapter 1 we demonstrate a simple unifying framework for implementing of smooth functions of matrices on a quantum computer. This framework captures a variety of problems that can be solved by evaluating properties of some function of a matrix, and we identify speedups over classical algorithms for some problem classes. The analysis combines ideas from the classical theory of function approximation with the quantum algorithmic primitive of implementing linear combinations of unitary operators. In Chapter 2 we continue this study by looking at the role of sparsity of input matrices in constructing efficient quantum algorithms. We show that classically pre-processing an input matrix by spectral sparsification can be profitable for quantum Hamiltonian simulation algorithms, without compromising the simulation error or complexity. Such preprocessing incurs a one time cost linear in the size of the matrix, but can be exploited to exponentially speed up subsequent subroutines such as inversion. In Chapter 3, we give an application of this theory of matrix functions to the problem of estimating the Renyi entropy of an unknown quantum state. We combine matrix function techniques with mixed state quantum computation in the one-clean qubit model, and are able to bound of the expected runtime of our algorithm in terms of the unknown target quantity. In addition to the theme of analysing the complexity of our algorithms, we also identify instances that are of practical relevance, leading us to some problems of machine learning. In Chapter 4 we investigate kernel based learning methods using random features. We work with the QRAM input model suitable for big data, and show how matrix functions and the quantum Fourier transform can be used to devise a quantum algorithm for sampling random features that are optimised for given input data and choice of kernel. We obtain a potential exponential speedup over the best known classical algorithm even without explicit assumptions of sparsity or low rank. Finally in Chapter 5 we consider the technique of beamsearch decoding used in natural language processing. We work in the query model, and show how quantum search with advice can be used to construct a quantum search decoder that can find the optimal parse (which may for instance be a best translation, or text-to-speech transcript) at least quadratically faster than the best known classical algorithms, and obtain super-quadratic speedups in the expected runtime.
Quantum computers may achieve speedups over their classical counterparts for solving linear algebra problems. However, in some cases—such as for low-rank matrices—dequantized algorithms demonstrate that there cannot be an exponential quantum speedup. In this work, we show that quantum computers have provable polynomial and exponential speedups in terms of communication complexity for some fundamental linear algebra problems if there is no restriction on the rank. We mainly focus on solving linear regression and Hamiltonian simulation. In the quantum case, the task is to prepare the quantum state of the result. To allow for a fair comparison, in the classical case, the task is to sample from the result. We investigate these two problems in two-party and multiparty models, propose near-optimal quantum protocols, and prove quantum/classical lower bounds. In this process, we propose an efficient quantum protocol for quantum singular value transformation, which is a powerful technique for designing quantum algorithms. We feel this will be helpful in developing efficient quantum protocols for many other problems.