Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2102.01103 · Physical Review Research

Machine-learned phase diagrams of generalized Kitaev honeycomb magnets

Nihal Rao, Ke Liu, Marc Machaczek, Lode Pollet

Published Sep 8, 2021• 18 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

We use a recently developed interpretable and unsupervised machine-learning method, the tensorial kernel support vector machine, to investigate the low-temperature classical phase diagram of a generalized Heisenberg-Kitaev-$\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Gamma}}$ ($J\text{\ensuremath{-}}K\text{\ensuremath{-}}\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Gamma}}$) model on a honeycomb lattice. Aside from reproducing phases reported by previous quantum and classical studies, our machine finds a hitherto missed nested zigzag-stripy order and establishes the robustness of a recently identified modulated ${S}_{3}\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{Z}_{3}$ phase, which emerges through the competition between the Kitaev and $\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Gamma}}$ spin liquids, against Heisenberg interactions. The results imply that, in the restricted parameter space spanned by the three primary exchange interactions---$J$, $K$, and $\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Gamma}}$, the representative Kitaev material $\ensuremath{\alpha}\text{\ensuremath{-}}{\mathrm{RuCl}}_{3}$ lies close to the boundaries of several phases, including a simple ferromagnet, the unconventional ${S}_{3}\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{Z}_{3}$, and nested zigzag-stripy magnets. A zigzag order is stabilized by a finite ${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Gamma}}}^{\ensuremath{'}}$ and/or ${J}_{3}$ term, whereas the four magnetic orders may compete in particular if ${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Gamma}}}^{\ensuremath{'}}$ is antiferromagnetic.

DOI
10.1103/physrevresearch.3.033223

Related papers

Revealing the phase diagram of Kitaev materials by machine learning: Cooperation and competition between spin liquids

Ke Liu, Nicolas Sadoune, Nihal Rao +2 more

Kitaev materials are promising materials for hosting quantum spin liquids and investigating the interplay of topological and symmetry-breaking phases.We use an unsupervised and interpretable machine-learning method, the tensorial-kernel support vector machine, to study the honeycomb Kitaev-model in a magnetic field.Our machine learns the global classical phase diagram and the associated analytical order parameters, including several distinct spin liquids, two exotic S 3 magnets, and two modulated S 3 × Z 3 magnets.We find that the extension of Kitaev spin liquids and a field-induced suppression of magnetic order already occur in the large-S limit, implying that critical parts of the physics of Kitaev materials can be understood at the classical level.Moreover, the two S 3 × Z 3 orders are induced by competition between Kitaev and spin liquids and feature a different type of spin-lattice entangled modulation, which requires a matrix description instead of scalar phase factors.Our work provides a direct instance of a machine detecting new phases and paves the way towards the development of automated tools to explore unsolved problems in many-body physics.

arXiv:2004.14415•Physical Review Research•Apr 5, 2021•32 citations

Tuning into the Kitaev spin liquid phase: A spin model on the honeycomb lattice with two types of Heisenberg exchange couplings

Yue Yu, Long Liang, Qian Niu +1 more

We study a spin model on honeycomb lattice with two types of Heisenberg exchange couplings, $J$ and $\stackrel{\ifmmode \tilde{}\else \~{}\fi{}}{J}$, where $J$ is for the conventional spin and $\stackrel{\ifmmode \tilde{}\else \~{}\fi{}}{J}$ is for rotated spin. When $J=0$, the system is either in a stripy antiferromagnetic order ($\stackrel{\ifmmode \tilde{}\else \~{}\fi{}}{J}<0$, ferromagnetic for rotated spin) or a zigzag antiferromagnetic order ($\stackrel{\ifmmode \tilde{}\else \~{}\fi{}}{J}>0$, antiferromagnetic for rotated spin). The competition between two ferromagnetic orders or between two antiferromagnetic orders induces Kitaev's spin liquid phase, characterized by the exactly solvable Kitaev model ($J=\stackrel{\ifmmode \tilde{}\else \~{}\fi{}}{J}$). Our model can be applied to layered Mott insulators $A$${}_{2}$IrO${}_{3}$ ($A=\text{Li}$, Na). For a monolayer of Li${}_{2}$IrO${}_{3}$, we show that it is possible to tune the controlling parameter into the Kitaev spin liquid regime by a link-dependent Rashba spin-orbital coupling.

arXiv:1202.1610•Physical Review B•Jan 29, 2013•14 citations

Phase diagram and spin correlations of the Kitaev-Heisenberg model: Importance of quantum effects

Dorota Gotfryd, Juraj Rusnačko, Krzysztof Wohlfeld +3 more

We explore the phase diagram of the Kitaev-Heisenberg model with nearest neighbor interactions on the honeycomb lattice using the exact diagonalization of finite systems combined with the cluster mean field approximation, and supplemented by the insights from analytic approaches: the linear spin-wave and second-order perturbation theories. This study confirms that by varying the balance between the Heisenberg and Kitaev term, frustrated exchange interactions stabilize in this model either one of four phases with magnetic long range order: N\'eel phase, ferromagnetic phase, and two other phases with coexisting antiferromagnetic and ferromagnetic bonds, zigzag and stripy phase, or one of two distinct spin-liquid phases. Out of these latter disordered phases, the one with ferromagnetic Kitaev interactions has a substantially broader range of stability as the neighboring competing ordered phases, ferromagnetic and stripy, have very weak quantum fluctuations. Focusing on the quantum spin-liquid phases, we study spatial spin correlations and dynamic spin structure factor of the model by the exact diagonalization technique, and discuss the evolution of gapped low-energy spin response across the quantum phase transitions between the disordered spin liquid and phases with long range magnetic order.

arXiv:1608.05333•Physical review. B./Physical review. B•Jan 23, 2017•75 citations

Ground-state phase diagram of spin- S Kitaev-Heisenberg models

Kiyu Fukui, Yasuyuki Kato, Joji Nasu +1 more

The Kitaev model, whose ground state is a quantum spin liquid (QSL), was originally conceived for spin $S=1/2$ moments on a honeycomb lattice. In recent years, the model has been extended to higher $S$ from both theoretical and experimental interests, but the stability of the QSL ground state has not been systematically clarified for general $S$, especially in the presence of other additional interactions, which inevitably exist in candidate materials. Here we study the spin-$S$ Kitaev-Heisenberg models by using an extension of the pseudofermion functional renormalization group method to general $S$. We show that, similar to the $S=1/2$ case, the phase diagram for higher $S$ contains the QSL phases in the vicinities of the pristine ferromagnetic and antiferromagnetic Kitaev models, in addition to four magnetically ordered phases. We find, however, that the QSL phases shrink rapidly with increasing $S$, becoming vanishingly narrow for $S\ensuremath{\ge}2$, whereas the phase boundaries between the ordered phases remain almost intact. Our results provide a reference for the search for higher-$S$ Kitaev materials.

arXiv:2207.03786•Physical review. B./Physical review. B•Nov 16, 2022•31 citations

Ground-State Phase Diagram of the Kitaev–Heisenberg Model on a Three-dimensional Hyperhoneycomb Lattice

Kiyu Fukui, Yasuyuki Kato, Yukitoshi Motome

The Kitaev model, which hosts a quantum spin liquid (QSL) in the ground state, was originally defined on a two-dimensional honeycomb lattice, but can be straightforwardly extended to any tricoordinate lattices in any spatial dimensions. In particular, the three-dimensional (3D) extensions are of interest as a realization of 3D QSLs, and some materials like $β$-Li$_{2}$IrO$_{3}$, $γ$-Li$_2$IrO$_3$, and $β$-ZnIrO$_{3}$ were proposed for the candidates. However, the phase diagrams of the models for those candidates have not been fully elucidated, mainly due to the limitation of numerical methods for 3D frustrated quantum spin systems. Here we study the Kitaev-Heisenberg model defined on a 3D hyperhoneycomb lattice, by using the pseudofermion functional renormalization group method. We show that the ground-state phase diagram contains the QSL phases in the vicinities of the pristine ferromagnetic and antiferromagnetic Kitaev models, in addition to four magnetically ordered phases, similar to the two-dimensional honeycomb case. Our results respect the four-sublattice symmetry inherent in the model, which was violated in the previous study. Moreover, we also show how the phase diagram changes with the anisotropy in the interactions. The results provide a reference for the search of the hyperhoneycomb Kitaev materials.

arXiv:2303.09156•Journal of the Physical Society of Japan•May 26, 2023•8 citations

Heisenberg-Kitaev model on the hyperhoneycomb lattice

Eric Kin-Ho Lee, Robert Schaffer, Subhro Bhattacharjee +1 more

Motivated by recent experiments on $\ensuremath{\beta}$-Li${}_{2}$IrO${}_{3}$, we study the phase diagram of the Heisenberg-Kitaev model on a three-dimensional lattice of tricoordinated Ir${}^{4+}$, dubbed the hyperhoneycomb lattice. The lattice geometry of this material, along with Ir${}^{4+}$ ions carrying ${J}_{\mathrm{eff}}=1/2$ moments, suggests that the Heisenberg-Kitaev model may effectively capture the low-energy spin-physics of the system in the strong-coupling limit. Using a combination of semiclassical analysis, exact solution, and slave-fermion mean-field theory, we find, in addition to the spin liquid, four different magnetically ordered phases depending on the parameter regime. All four magnetic phases---the N\'eel, the polarized ferromagnet, the skew-stripy, and the skew-zig-zag---have collinear spin ordering. The three-dimensional ${Z}_{2}$ spin liquid, which extends over an extended parameter regime around the exactly solvable Kitaev point, has a gapless Majorana mode with a deformed Fermi circle (codimensions, ${d}_{c}=2$). We discuss the effect of the magnetic field and finite temperature on different phases that may be relevant for future experiments.

arXiv:1308.6592•Physical Review B•Jan 13, 2014•99 citations
We use a recently developed interpretable and unsupervised machine-learning method, the tensorial kernel support vector machine, to investigate the low-temperature classical phase diagram of a generalized Heisenberg-Kitaev-\ensuremathΓ\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Gamma}}\ensuremathΓ (J\ensuremath-K\ensuremath-\ensuremathΓJ\text{\ensuremath{-}}K\text{\ensuremath{-}}\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Gamma}}J\ensuremath-K\ensuremath-\ensuremathΓ) model on a honeycomb lattice. Aside from reproducing phases reported by previous quantum and classical studies, our machine finds a hitherto missed nested zigzag-stripy order and establishes the robustness of a recently identified modulated S3\ifmmode×\else\texttimes\fiZ3{S}_{3}\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{Z}_{3}S3​\ifmmode×\else\texttimes\fiZ3​ phase, which emerges through the competition between the Kitaev and \ensuremathΓ\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Gamma}}\ensuremathΓ spin liquids, against Heisenberg interactions. The results imply that, in the restricted parameter space spanned by the three primary exchange interactions---JJJ, KKK, and \ensuremathΓ\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Gamma}}\ensuremathΓ, the representative Kitaev material \ensuremathα\ensuremath-RuCl3\ensuremath{\alpha}\text{\ensuremath{-}}{\mathrm{RuCl}}_{3}\ensuremathα\ensuremath-RuCl3​ lies close to the boundaries of several phases, including a simple ferromagnet, the unconventional S3\ifmmode×\else\texttimes\fiZ3{S}_{3}\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{Z}_{3}S3​\ifmmode×\else\texttimes\fiZ3​, and nested zigzag-stripy magnets. A zigzag order is stabilized by a finite \ensuremathΓ\ensuremath′{\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Gamma}}}^{\ensuremath{'}}\ensuremathΓ\ensuremath′ and/or J3{J}_{3}J3​ term, whereas the four magnetic orders may compete in particular if \ensuremathΓ\ensuremath′{\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Gamma}}}^{\ensuremath{'}}\ensuremathΓ\ensuremath′ is antiferromagnetic.
Kitaev materials are promising materials for hosting quantum spin liquids and investigating the interplay of topological and symmetry-breaking phases.We use an unsupervised and interpretable machine-learning method, the tensorial-kernel support vector machine, to study the honeycomb Kitaev-model in a magnetic field.Our machine learns the global classical phase diagram and the associated analytical order parameters, including several distinct spin liquids, two exotic S 3 magnets, and two modulated S 3 × Z 3 magnets.We find that the extension of Kitaev spin liquids and a field-induced suppression of magnetic order already occur in the large-S limit, implying that critical parts of the physics of Kitaev materials can be understood at the classical level.Moreover, the two S 3 × Z 3 orders are induced by competition between Kitaev and spin liquids and feature a different type of spin-lattice entangled modulation, which requires a matrix description instead of scalar phase factors.Our work provides a direct instance of a machine detecting new phases and paves the way towards the development of automated tools to explore unsolved problems in many-body physics.
We study a spin model on honeycomb lattice with two types of Heisenberg exchange couplings, JJJ and $\stackrel{\ifmmode \tilde{}\else \~{}\fi{}}{J}$, where JJJ is for the conventional spin and $\stackrel{\ifmmode \tilde{}\else \~{}\fi{}}{J}$ is for rotated spin. When J=0J=0J=0, the system is either in a stripy antiferromagnetic order ($\stackrel{\ifmmode \tilde{}\else \~{}\fi{}}{J}<0$, ferromagnetic for rotated spin) or a zigzag antiferromagnetic order ($\stackrel{\ifmmode \tilde{}\else \~{}\fi{}}{J}>0$, antiferromagnetic for rotated spin). The competition between two ferromagnetic orders or between two antiferromagnetic orders induces Kitaev's spin liquid phase, characterized by the exactly solvable Kitaev model ($J=\stackrel{\ifmmode \tilde{}\else \~{}\fi{}}{J}$). Our model can be applied to layered Mott insulators AAA2{}_{2}2​IrO3{}_{3}3​ (A=LiA=\text{Li}A=Li, Na). For a monolayer of Li2{}_{2}2​IrO3{}_{3}3​, we show that it is possible to tune the controlling parameter into the Kitaev spin liquid regime by a link-dependent Rashba spin-orbital coupling.
We explore the phase diagram of the Kitaev-Heisenberg model with nearest neighbor interactions on the honeycomb lattice using the exact diagonalization of finite systems combined with the cluster mean field approximation, and supplemented by the insights from analytic approaches: the linear spin-wave and second-order perturbation theories. This study confirms that by varying the balance between the Heisenberg and Kitaev term, frustrated exchange interactions stabilize in this model either one of four phases with magnetic long range order: N\'eel phase, ferromagnetic phase, and two other phases with coexisting antiferromagnetic and ferromagnetic bonds, zigzag and stripy phase, or one of two distinct spin-liquid phases. Out of these latter disordered phases, the one with ferromagnetic Kitaev interactions has a substantially broader range of stability as the neighboring competing ordered phases, ferromagnetic and stripy, have very weak quantum fluctuations. Focusing on the quantum spin-liquid phases, we study spatial spin correlations and dynamic spin structure factor of the model by the exact diagonalization technique, and discuss the evolution of gapped low-energy spin response across the quantum phase transitions between the disordered spin liquid and phases with long range magnetic order.
The Kitaev model, whose ground state is a quantum spin liquid (QSL), was originally conceived for spin S=1/2S=1/2S=1/2 moments on a honeycomb lattice. In recent years, the model has been extended to higher SSS from both theoretical and experimental interests, but the stability of the QSL ground state has not been systematically clarified for general SSS, especially in the presence of other additional interactions, which inevitably exist in candidate materials. Here we study the spin-SSS Kitaev-Heisenberg models by using an extension of the pseudofermion functional renormalization group method to general SSS. We show that, similar to the S=1/2S=1/2S=1/2 case, the phase diagram for higher SSS contains the QSL phases in the vicinities of the pristine ferromagnetic and antiferromagnetic Kitaev models, in addition to four magnetically ordered phases. We find, however, that the QSL phases shrink rapidly with increasing SSS, becoming vanishingly narrow for $S\ensuremath{\ge}2$, whereas the phase boundaries between the ordered phases remain almost intact. Our results provide a reference for the search for higher-SSS Kitaev materials.
The Kitaev model, which hosts a quantum spin liquid (QSL) in the ground state, was originally defined on a two-dimensional honeycomb lattice, but can be straightforwardly extended to any tricoordinate lattices in any spatial dimensions. In particular, the three-dimensional (3D) extensions are of interest as a realization of 3D QSLs, and some materials like βββ-Li2_{2}2​IrO3_{3}3​, γγγ-Li2_22​IrO3_33​, and βββ-ZnIrO3_{3}3​ were proposed for the candidates. However, the phase diagrams of the models for those candidates have not been fully elucidated, mainly due to the limitation of numerical methods for 3D frustrated quantum spin systems. Here we study the Kitaev-Heisenberg model defined on a 3D hyperhoneycomb lattice, by using the pseudofermion functional renormalization group method. We show that the ground-state phase diagram contains the QSL phases in the vicinities of the pristine ferromagnetic and antiferromagnetic Kitaev models, in addition to four magnetically ordered phases, similar to the two-dimensional honeycomb case. Our results respect the four-sublattice symmetry inherent in the model, which was violated in the previous study. Moreover, we also show how the phase diagram changes with the anisotropy in the interactions. The results provide a reference for the search of the hyperhoneycomb Kitaev materials.
Motivated by recent experiments on $\ensuremath{\beta}$-Li2{}_{2}2​IrO3{}_{3}3​, we study the phase diagram of the Heisenberg-Kitaev model on a three-dimensional lattice of tricoordinated Ir4+{}^{4+}4+, dubbed the hyperhoneycomb lattice. The lattice geometry of this material, along with Ir4+{}^{4+}4+ ions carrying Jeff=1/2{J}_{\mathrm{eff}}=1/2Jeff​=1/2 moments, suggests that the Heisenberg-Kitaev model may effectively capture the low-energy spin-physics of the system in the strong-coupling limit. Using a combination of semiclassical analysis, exact solution, and slave-fermion mean-field theory, we find, in addition to the spin liquid, four different magnetically ordered phases depending on the parameter regime. All four magnetic phases---the N\'eel, the polarized ferromagnet, the skew-stripy, and the skew-zig-zag---have collinear spin ordering. The three-dimensional Z2{Z}_{2}Z2​ spin liquid, which extends over an extended parameter regime around the exactly solvable Kitaev point, has a gapless Majorana mode with a deformed Fermi circle (codimensions, dc=2{d}_{c}=2dc​=2). We discuss the effect of the magnetic field and finite temperature on different phases that may be relevant for future experiments.