Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2101.11545 · International Journal of Theoretical Physics

Sum Uncertainty Relations: Uncertainty Regions for Qubits and Qutrits

Seeta Vasudevrao, I. Reena, A. R. Usha Devi, Sudha, A. K. Rajagopal

Published Apr 1, 2021• 1 citation
arXivHTMLPDF
DOI
10.1007/s10773-021-04775-3

Related papers

Uncertainty Relations for the Entanglement Between a Qubit and a Qutrit

Manuél Ávila, Juvenal Rueda-Paz

International Journal of Theoretical Physics•Dec 2, 2019•0 citations

Minimum uncertainty states and squeezed states from a sum uncertainty relation

Yatindra Kumar, Yashraj Jha, Namrata Shukla

Physical Review A•May 13, 2026•0 citations

Sum uncertainty relation in quantum theory

Arun Kumar Pati, P.K. Sahu

arXiv:quant-ph/0608092•Physics Letters A•Mar 13, 2007•55 citations

Entanglement criterion for tripartite systems based on local sum uncertainty relations

Y. Akbari-Kourbolagh, M. Azhdargalam

We propose a sufficient criterion for the entanglement of tripartite systems based on local sum uncertainty relations for arbitrarily chosen observables of subsystems. This criterion generalizes the tighter criterion for bipartite systems introduced by Zhang et al. [C.-J. Zhang, H. Nha, Y.-S. Zhang, and G.-C. Guo, Phys. Rev. A 81, 012324 (2010)] and can be used for both discrete- and continuous-variable systems. It enables us to detect the entanglement of quantum states without having a complete knowledge of them. Its utility is illustrated by some examples of three-qubit, qutrit-qutrit-qubit, and three-mode Gaussian states. It is found that, in comparison with other criteria, this criterion is able to detect some three-qubit bound entangled states more efficiently.

Physical Review A•Apr 19, 2018•14 citations

Entropic uncertainty relation for qubits

G. M. Bosyk, M. Portesi, Steeve Zozor

•Aug 5, 2013•0 citations

On Quantum Uncertainty Relations and Uncertainty Regions

Paul Busch, Oliver Reardon-Smith

Given two or more non-commuting observables, it is generally not possible to simultaneously assign precise values to each. This quantum mechanical uncertainty principle is widely understood to be encapsulated by some form of uncertainty relation, expressing a trade-off between the standard deviations or other measures of uncertainty of two (or more) observables, resulting from their non-commutativity. Typically, such relations are coarse, and miss important features. It was not until very recently that a broader perspective on quantum uncertainty was envisaged and explored, one that utilises the notion of an uncertainty region. Here we review this new approach, illustrating it with pairs or triples of observables in the case of qubit and qutrit systems. We recall some of the shortcomings of traditional uncertainty relations, and highlight their inability to identify the full uncertainty region. These shortcomings suggest a precautionary note that, we surmise, ought to accompany the presentation of the uncertainty principle in introductory quantum mechanics courses.

arXiv:1901.03695•Jan 11, 2019•4 citations
We propose a sufficient criterion for the entanglement of tripartite systems based on local sum uncertainty relations for arbitrarily chosen observables of subsystems. This criterion generalizes the tighter criterion for bipartite systems introduced by Zhang et al. [C.-J. Zhang, H. Nha, Y.-S. Zhang, and G.-C. Guo, Phys. Rev. A 81, 012324 (2010)] and can be used for both discrete- and continuous-variable systems. It enables us to detect the entanglement of quantum states without having a complete knowledge of them. Its utility is illustrated by some examples of three-qubit, qutrit-qutrit-qubit, and three-mode Gaussian states. It is found that, in comparison with other criteria, this criterion is able to detect some three-qubit bound entangled states more efficiently.
Given two or more non-commuting observables, it is generally not possible to simultaneously assign precise values to each. This quantum mechanical uncertainty principle is widely understood to be encapsulated by some form of uncertainty relation, expressing a trade-off between the standard deviations or other measures of uncertainty of two (or more) observables, resulting from their non-commutativity. Typically, such relations are coarse, and miss important features. It was not until very recently that a broader perspective on quantum uncertainty was envisaged and explored, one that utilises the notion of an uncertainty region. Here we review this new approach, illustrating it with pairs or triples of observables in the case of qubit and qutrit systems. We recall some of the shortcomings of traditional uncertainty relations, and highlight their inability to identify the full uncertainty region. These shortcomings suggest a precautionary note that, we surmise, ought to accompany the presentation of the uncertainty principle in introductory quantum mechanics courses.