The quantum state overlap is the textbook measure of the difference between two quantum states. Yet, it is inadequate to compare the complex configurations of many-body systems. The problem is inherited by the widely employed quantum state fidelity and related distances. We introduce the weighted distances, a new class of information-theoretic measures that overcome these limitations. They quantify how hard it is to discriminate between two quantum states of many particles, factoring in the structure of the required measurement apparatus. Therefore, they can be used to evaluate both the theoretical and the experimental performances of complex quantum devices. We also show that the newly defined "weighted Bures length" between the input and output states of a quantum process is a lower bound to the experimental cost of the transformation. The result uncovers an exact quantum limit to our ability to convert physical resources into computational ones.
The quantum state overlap is the textbook measure of the difference between two quantum states. Yet, it is inadequate to compare the complex configurations of many-body systems. The problem is inherited by the widely employed quantum state fidelity and related distances. We introduce the weighted distances, a new class of information-theoretic measures that overcome these limitations. They quantify how hard it is to discriminate between two quantum states of many particles, factoring in the structure of the required measurement apparatus. Therefore, they can be used to evaluate both the theoretical and the experimental performances of complex quantum devices. We also show that the newly defined "weighted Bures length" between the input and output states of a quantum process is a lower bound to the experimental cost of the transformation. The result uncovers an exact quantum limit to our ability to convert physical resources into computational ones.
Abstract The problem of evaluating the differences between quantum states before and after being affected by errors encoded in unitary transformations is addressed. Standard distance functions, e.g., the Bures length, are not fully adequate for such a task. Weighted distances are instead the appropriate information measures to quantify the distinguishability of multipartite states. Here, the previously introduced weighted Bures length and the newly defined weighted Hilbert‐Schmidt distance are employed to quantify how much single‐qubit Pauli errors alter cluster states. For both types of weighted distances, it is found that different errors of the same dimension change cluster states in a different way, i.e., their detectability is in general different. Indeed, they transform an ideal cluster state into a state whose weighted distances from the input depends on the specific chosen Pauli rotation, as well as the position of the affected qubit in the graph related to the cluster state. As these features are undetected by using standard distances, the study proves the usefulness of weighted distances to monitor key but elusive properties of many‐body quantum systems.
The fidelity function for quantum states has been widely used in quantum information science and frequently arises in the quantification of optimal performances for the estimation and distinguishing of quantum states. A fidelity function for quantum channels is expected to have the same wide applications in quantum information science. In this paper we propose a fidelity function for quantum channels and show that various distance measures on quantum channels can be obtained from this fidelity function; for example, the Bures angle and the Bures distance can be extended to quantum channels via this fidelity function. We then show that the distances between quantum channels lead naturally to a quantum channel Fisher information which quantifies the ultimate precision limit in quantum metrology; the ultimate precision limit can thus be seen as a manifestation of the distances between quantum channels. We also show that the fidelity of quantum channels provides a unified framework for perfect quantum channel discrimination and quantum metrology. In particular, we show that the minimum number of uses needed for perfect channel discrimination is exactly the counterpart of the precision limit in quantum metrology, and various useful lower bounds for the minimum number of uses needed for perfect channel discrimination can be obtained via this connection.
The advantage that quantum systems provide for certain quantum information processing tasks over their classical counterparts can be quantified within the general framework of resource theories. Certain distance functions between quantum states have successfully been used to quantify resources like entanglement and coherence. Perhaps surprisingly, such a distance-based approach has not been adopted to study resources of quantum measurements, where other geometric quantifiers are used instead. Here, we define distance functions between sets of quantum measurements and show that they naturally induce resource monotones for convex resource theories of measurements. By focusing on a distance based on the diamond norm, we establish a hierarchy of measurement resources and derive analytical bounds on the incompatibility of any set of measurements. We show that these bounds are tight for certain projective measurements based on mutually unbiased bases and identify scenarios where different measurement resources attain the same value when quantified by our resource monotone. Our results provide a general framework to compare distance-based resources for sets of measurements and allow us to obtain limitations on Bell-type experiments.
The advantage that quantum systems provide for certain quantum information processing tasks over their classical counterparts can be quantified within the general framework of resource theories. Certain distance functions between quantum states have successfully been used to quantify resources like entanglement and coherence. Perhaps surprisingly, such a distance-based approach has not been adopted to study resources of quantum measurements, where other geometric quantifiers are used instead. Here, we define distance functions between sets of quantum measurements and show that they naturally induce resource monotones for convex resource theories of measurements. By focusing on a distance based on the diamond norm, we establish a hierarchy of measurement resources and derive analytical bounds on the incompatibility of any set of measurements. We show that these bounds are tight for certain projective measurements based on mutually unbiased bases and identify scenarios where different measurement resources attain the same value when quantified by our resource monotone. Our results provide a general framework to compare distance-based resources for sets of measurements and allow us to obtain limitations on Bell-type experiments.
Quantum states and measurements are two central physical objects in the theory of quantum mechanics. The preparation, control and measurement of quantum states lies at the heart of modern quantum information processing protocols ranging from secure communication to quantum computation and precision sensing. And yet, the reliable operation of these advanced protocols ultimately rests on a far more essential prerequisite - our ability to calibrate, certify and benchmark the quantum states we prepare and the quantum measurements we perform. Quantum information theory provides a natural framework for these tasks, meaningfully connecting the resources we expend for characterisation with the accuracy and precision we can expect in return. While decades of advances in quantum information have refined our understanding of quantum characterisation and sharpened our practical ability to calibrate with enhanced precision, important questions about the fundamental limits of quantum characterisation remain unanswered. Although incorporating entanglement at the measurement stage is known to enhance the estimation of unknown quantum states, the extent of this improvement remains poorly understood. This leaves open a fundamental question on the utility of complex entangling measurement strategies, impeding progress towards bridging the significant gap between practically achievable precision and the ultimate theoretical quantum limit. Complementary to quantum state estimation, which is relatively well-established in theory and practice, the characterisation of quantum measurements lacks a rigorous information-theoretic foundation, leading to a dearth of principled benchmarks and provably optimal strategies despite growing experimental interest. This thesis develops and applies information-theoretic tools to answer questions in quantum characterisation, with an eye to enabling practical improvements beyond current techniques in the field. First, we introduce a computable measure of entanglement enhancement for quantum state estimation and study its variation across general multi-parameter estimation problems for higher-dimensional quantum states. We show that the entanglement enhancement is maximised for full qudit state tomography but grows only linearly with system dimension even when allowing an asymptotically large number of entangling operations. Our proposed tight upper bound to entanglement enhancement therefore constitutes a strong limitation on the utility of such entangling measurements. Next, we formulate the dual problem of quantum detector estimation, developing a comprehensive framework for maximally precise calibration centred around a newly introduced quantity - the detector quantum Fisher information. This information-theoretic measure stipulates the ultimate precision attainable for measurement calibration and identifies the optimal input states that achieve this precision. Further, our framework enables the first provably optimal detector estimation experiment and reveals the scope for entanglement-based enhancements, thereby placing measurement characterisation on equal footing with state characterisation. Considered together, these results suggest two contrasting conclusions about quantum characterisation. On the one hand, they show that for quantum state estimation, increasingly powerful entangling measurements offer only diminishing returns at the ultimate precision limit. On the other hand, they highlight practical quantum advantages available for detector estimation by providing a framework that can improve calibration performance and guide future experimental design. More broadly, these results complete and advance the triad of state, process, and detector characterisation, positioning quantum information measures as not merely abstract bounds, but practical guides for deciding when complex quantum resources are genuinely worth deploying and where near-term quantum advantages are most likely to be realised.
Quantum entanglement is a key physical resource in quantum information processing that allows for performing basic quantum tasks such as teleportation and quantum key distribution, which are impossible in the classical world. Ever since the rise of quantum information theory, it has been an open problem to quantify entanglement in an information-theoretically meaningful way. In particular, every previously defined entanglement measure bearing a precise information-theoretic meaning is not known to be efficiently computable, or if it is efficiently computable, then it is not known to have a precise information-theoretic meaning. In this Letter, we meet this challenge by introducing an entanglement measure that has a precise information-theoretic meaning as the exact cost required to prepare an entangled state when two distant parties are allowed to perform quantum operations that completely preserve the positivity of the partial transpose. Additionally, this entanglement measure is efficiently computable by means of a semidefinite program, and it bears a number of useful properties such as additivity and faithfulness. Our results bring key insights into the fundamental entanglement structure of arbitrary quantum states, and they can be used directly to assess and quantify the entanglement produced in quantum-physical experiments.