Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2012.02627 · Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical

Mass-coupled relativistic spontaneous collapse models

C. R. Jones, Giulio Gasbarri, Angelo Bassi

Published Apr 15, 2021• 19 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

Abstract Currently there is not a satisfactory relativistic spontaneous collapse model. Here we show the impossibility of a simple generalization of the continuous spontaneous collapse (CSL) model to the relativistic framework. We consider a mass coupled model as in the non-relativistic limit this gives the CSL model. We show that a Lorentz covariant collapse equation cannot simultaneously satisfy the following conditions: (i) to avoid a divergent rate of energy, (ii) to prevent superluminal signalling.

DOI
10.1088/1751-8121/abf871

Related papers

Relativistic dynamical collapse model

Philip Pearle

A model is discussed where all operators are constructed from a quantum scalar field whose energy spectrum takes on all real values. The Schr\"odinger picture wave function depends upon space and time coordinates for each particle, as well as an inexorably increasing evolution parameter $s$ which labels a foliation of spacelike hypersurfaces. The model is constructed to be manifestly Lorentz invariant in the interaction picture. Free particle states and interactions are discussed in this framework. Then, the formalism of the continuous spontaneous localization (CSL) theory of dynamical collapse is applied. The collapse-generating operator is chosen to be the particle number space-time density. Unlike previous relativistically invariant models, the vacuum state is not excited. The collapse dynamics depends upon two parameters, a parameter $\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Lambda}}$ which represents the collapse rate/volume and a scale factor $\ensuremath{\ell}$. A common example of collapse dynamics, involving a clump of matter in a superposition of two locations, is analyzed. The collapse rate is shown to be identical to that of nonrelativistic CSL when the GRW-CSL choice of $\ensuremath{\ell}=a=1{0}^{\ensuremath{-}5}\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{cm}$, is made, along with $\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Lambda}}=\ensuremath{\lambda}/{a}^{3}$ (GRW-CSL choice $\ensuremath{\lambda}=1{0}^{\ensuremath{-}16}{s}^{\ensuremath{-}1}$). The collapse rate is also satisfactory with the choice $\ensuremath{\ell}$ as the size of the Universe, with $\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Lambda}}=\ensuremath{\lambda}/\ensuremath{\ell}{a}^{2}$. Because the collapse narrows wave functions in space and time, it increases a particle's momentum and energy, altering its mass. It is shown that, with $\ensuremath{\ell}=a$, the change of mass of a nucleon is unacceptably large but, when $\ensuremath{\ell}$ is the size of the Universe, the change of mass over the age of the Universe is acceptably small.

arXiv:1412.6723•Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields•May 15, 2015•79 citations

Quasirelativistic quasilocal finite wave-function collapse model

Philip Pearle

A Markovian wave-function collapse model is presented where the collapse-inducing operator, constructed from quantum fields, is a manifestly covariant generalization of the mass-density operator utilized in the nonrelativistic continuous spontaneous localization (CSL) wave-function collapse model. However, the model is not Lorentz invariant because two such operators do not commute at spacelike separation, i.e., the time-ordering operation in one Lorentz frame, the ``preferred'' frame, is not the time-ordering operation in another frame. However, the characteristic spacelike distance over which the commutator decays is the particle's Compton wavelength so, since the commutator rapidly gets quite small, the model is ``almost'' relativistic. This quasirelativistic CSL (QRCSL) model is completely finite: unlike previous, relativistic, models, it has no (infinite) energy production from the vacuum state. QRCSL calculations are given of the collapse rate for a single free particle in a superposition of spatially separated packets, and of the energy production rate for any number of free particles: these reduce to the CSL rates if the particle's Compton wavelength is small compared to the model's distance parameter. One motivation for QRCSL is the realization that previous relativistic models entail excitation of nuclear states which exceeds that of experiment, whereas QRCSL does not; an example is given involving quadrupole excitation of the $^{74}\mathrm{Ge}$ nucleus.

arXiv:quant-ph/0502069•Physical Review A•Mar 4, 2005•44 citations

Dynamical collapse for photons

Philip Pearle

I suggest a simple alteration of my CSL (Continuous Spontaneous Localization) theory, replacing the mass density collapse-generating operators by relativistic energy density operators. Some consequences of the density matrix evolution equation are explored. First, the expression for the mean energy increase of free particles is calculated (which, in the non-relativistic limit, agrees with the usual result). Then, the density matrix evolution is applied to photons. The mean rate of loss of photon number from a laser beam pulse, the momentum distribution of the photons "excited" out of the laser beam pulse, and the alteration of the cosmic blackbody spectrum are all treated to first order in the collapse rate parameter $λ$. Associated possible experimental limits on $λ$ are discussed.

arXiv:1610.00671•Oct 3, 2016•0 citations

Relativistic Dynamical Collapse Model for a Scalar Field

Philip Pearle

A natural generalization of the CSL (Continuous Spontaneous Localization) theory of dynamical collapse is applied to a relativistic quantum scalar field $ϕ({\bf x},t)$. It is shown that the modified Schrödinger equation is relativistically invariant, that the probabilities associated to all possible values of the classical scalar random field $w({\bf x},t)$ (which determines the eventual state of collapse) add up to 1, that there is no energy production out of the vacuum and, in the limit of large time, the collapse is toward eigenstates of $ϕ({\bf x},0)$.

arXiv:1404.5074•Apr 20, 2014•1 citation

CSL Collapse Model And Spontaneous Radiation: An Update

Philip Pearle, Ring, James, J. I. Collar +1 more

A brief review is given of the Continuous Spontaneous Localization (CSL) model in which a classical field interacts with quantized particles to cause dynamical wavefunction collapse. One of the model's predictions is that particles "spontaneously" gain energy at a slow rate. When applied to the excitation of a nucleon in a Ge nucleus, it is shown how a limit on the relative collapse rates of neutron and proton could be obtained, and a rough estimate is made from data. When applied to the spontaneous excitation of 1s electrons in Ge, by a more detailed analysis of more accurate data than previously given, an updated limit is obtained on the relative collapse rates of the electron and proton, suggesting that the coupling of the field to electrons and nucleons is mass proportional.

arXiv:quant-ph/0001041•Jan 12, 2000•61 citations

Non–Relativistic CSL

Philip Pearle

Abstract CSL so far is a general framework to describe dynamical collapse of a statevector to one or another joint eigenstate of a set of mutually commuting collapse-generating operators. This chapter makes the final selection of the collapse generating operators. First, the choice of mass-density operators, A(x)= D(x), is discussed. This leads to an infinite rate of energy increase for particles, which is ameliorated by a slightly different choice, “smeared” mass-density operators, A(x)=∫dx’f(x-x’)D(x’), where f is a Gaussian of width a, f(z) exp-z2/2a2. This introduces a second parameter to the theory (in addition to the collapse rate λ), the width parameter a. This completes construction of non-relativistic CSL, the theory proposed to describe Nature. The chapter goes on to discuss the density matrix, followed by two important calculations, the first consequences of the theory. First, for an initial state that is an object in a superposition of two different places, is the rate to collapse to one or another place, and second, the rate of energy increase of an object due to the wave function narrowing inherent in collapse.

•Jan 30, 2024•0 citations
Abstract Currently there is not a satisfactory relativistic spontaneous collapse model. Here we show the impossibility of a simple generalization of the continuous spontaneous collapse (CSL) model to the relativistic framework. We consider a mass coupled model as in the non-relativistic limit this gives the CSL model. We show that a Lorentz covariant collapse equation cannot simultaneously satisfy the following conditions: (i) to avoid a divergent rate of energy, (ii) to prevent superluminal signalling.
A model is discussed where all operators are constructed from a quantum scalar field whose energy spectrum takes on all real values. The Schr\"odinger picture wave function depends upon space and time coordinates for each particle, as well as an inexorably increasing evolution parameter sss which labels a foliation of spacelike hypersurfaces. The model is constructed to be manifestly Lorentz invariant in the interaction picture. Free particle states and interactions are discussed in this framework. Then, the formalism of the continuous spontaneous localization (CSL) theory of dynamical collapse is applied. The collapse-generating operator is chosen to be the particle number space-time density. Unlike previous relativistically invariant models, the vacuum state is not excited. The collapse dynamics depends upon two parameters, a parameter $\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Lambda}}$ which represents the collapse rate/volume and a scale factor $\ensuremath{\ell}$. A common example of collapse dynamics, involving a clump of matter in a superposition of two locations, is analyzed. The collapse rate is shown to be identical to that of nonrelativistic CSL when the GRW-CSL choice of $\ensuremath{\ell}=a=1{0}^{\ensuremath{-}5}\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{cm}$, is made, along with $\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Lambda}}=\ensuremath{\lambda}/{a}^{3}$ (GRW-CSL choice $\ensuremath{\lambda}=1{0}^{\ensuremath{-}16}{s}^{\ensuremath{-}1}$). The collapse rate is also satisfactory with the choice $\ensuremath{\ell}$ as the size of the Universe, with $\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Lambda}}=\ensuremath{\lambda}/\ensuremath{\ell}{a}^{2}$. Because the collapse narrows wave functions in space and time, it increases a particle's momentum and energy, altering its mass. It is shown that, with $\ensuremath{\ell}=a$, the change of mass of a nucleon is unacceptably large but, when $\ensuremath{\ell}$ is the size of the Universe, the change of mass over the age of the Universe is acceptably small.
A Markovian wave-function collapse model is presented where the collapse-inducing operator, constructed from quantum fields, is a manifestly covariant generalization of the mass-density operator utilized in the nonrelativistic continuous spontaneous localization (CSL) wave-function collapse model. However, the model is not Lorentz invariant because two such operators do not commute at spacelike separation, i.e., the time-ordering operation in one Lorentz frame, the ``preferred'' frame, is not the time-ordering operation in another frame. However, the characteristic spacelike distance over which the commutator decays is the particle's Compton wavelength so, since the commutator rapidly gets quite small, the model is ``almost'' relativistic. This quasirelativistic CSL (QRCSL) model is completely finite: unlike previous, relativistic, models, it has no (infinite) energy production from the vacuum state. QRCSL calculations are given of the collapse rate for a single free particle in a superposition of spatially separated packets, and of the energy production rate for any number of free particles: these reduce to the CSL rates if the particle's Compton wavelength is small compared to the model's distance parameter. One motivation for QRCSL is the realization that previous relativistic models entail excitation of nuclear states which exceeds that of experiment, whereas QRCSL does not; an example is given involving quadrupole excitation of the 74Ge^{74}\mathrm{Ge}74Ge nucleus.
I suggest a simple alteration of my CSL (Continuous Spontaneous Localization) theory, replacing the mass density collapse-generating operators by relativistic energy density operators. Some consequences of the density matrix evolution equation are explored. First, the expression for the mean energy increase of free particles is calculated (which, in the non-relativistic limit, agrees with the usual result). Then, the density matrix evolution is applied to photons. The mean rate of loss of photon number from a laser beam pulse, the momentum distribution of the photons "excited" out of the laser beam pulse, and the alteration of the cosmic blackbody spectrum are all treated to first order in the collapse rate parameter λλλ. Associated possible experimental limits on λλλ are discussed.
A natural generalization of the CSL (Continuous Spontaneous Localization) theory of dynamical collapse is applied to a relativistic quantum scalar field ϕ(x,t)ϕ({\bf x},t)ϕ(x,t). It is shown that the modified Schrödinger equation is relativistically invariant, that the probabilities associated to all possible values of the classical scalar random field w(x,t)w({\bf x},t)w(x,t) (which determines the eventual state of collapse) add up to 1, that there is no energy production out of the vacuum and, in the limit of large time, the collapse is toward eigenstates of ϕ(x,0)ϕ({\bf x},0)ϕ(x,0).
A brief review is given of the Continuous Spontaneous Localization (CSL) model in which a classical field interacts with quantized particles to cause dynamical wavefunction collapse. One of the model's predictions is that particles "spontaneously" gain energy at a slow rate. When applied to the excitation of a nucleon in a Ge nucleus, it is shown how a limit on the relative collapse rates of neutron and proton could be obtained, and a rough estimate is made from data. When applied to the spontaneous excitation of 1s electrons in Ge, by a more detailed analysis of more accurate data than previously given, an updated limit is obtained on the relative collapse rates of the electron and proton, suggesting that the coupling of the field to electrons and nucleons is mass proportional.
Abstract CSL so far is a general framework to describe dynamical collapse of a statevector to one or another joint eigenstate of a set of mutually commuting collapse-generating operators. This chapter makes the final selection of the collapse generating operators. First, the choice of mass-density operators, A(x)= D(x), is discussed. This leads to an infinite rate of energy increase for particles, which is ameliorated by a slightly different choice, “smeared” mass-density operators, A(x)=∫dx’f(x-x’)D(x’), where f is a Gaussian of width a, f(z) exp-z2/2a2. This introduces a second parameter to the theory (in addition to the collapse rate λ), the width parameter a. This completes construction of non-relativistic CSL, the theory proposed to describe Nature. The chapter goes on to discuss the density matrix, followed by two important calculations, the first consequences of the theory. First, for an initial state that is an object in a superposition of two different places, is the rate to collapse to one or another place, and second, the rate of energy increase of an object due to the wave function narrowing inherent in collapse.