Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2011.03122

Quantum Noise and its Importance to the Quantum Classical Transition Problem: Energy Measurement Aspects

Adélcio C. Oliveira, Junior, Z. T. Oliveira, Nestor Santos Correia

Published Nov 5, 2020• 2 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

In the present contribution we discuss the role of experimental limitations in the classical limit problem. We studied some simple models and found that Quantum Mechanics does not re-produce classical mechanical predictions, unless we consider the experimental limitations ruled by uncertainty principle. We have shown that the discrete nature of energy levels of integrable systems can be accessed by classical measurements. We have defined a precise limit for this procedure. It may be used as a tool to define the classical limit as far as the discrete spectra of integrable systems are concerned.

DOI
10.48550/arxiv.2011.03122

Related papers

Complementarity and Classical Limit of Quantum Mechanics: Energy Measurement aspects

Adélcio C. Oliveira, Zolacir Trindade de Oliveira Junior, Nestor Santos Correia

In the present contribution we discuss the role of experimental limitations in the classical limit problem. We studied some simple models and found that Quantum Mechanics does not re-produce classical mechanical predictions, unless we consider the experimental limitations ruled by uncertainty principle. We have shown that the discrete nature of energy levels of integrable systems can be accessed by classical measurements. We have defined a precise limit for this procedure. It may be used as a tool to define the classical limit as far as the discrete spectra of integrable systems are concerned. If a diffusive environment is considered, we conclude that the "lifetime" of discreteness is approximately $1/κ$ ($κ$ is the diffusion constant), thus it was possible to relate the classical limit of a spectra with the action of an environment and experimental resolution.

arXiv:1307.0528•Jul 1, 2013•3 citations

Low-resolution measurements induced classicality

R. M. Angelo

The classical limit of quantum mechanics is discussed for closed quantum systems in terms of observational aspects. Initially, the failure of the limit h->0 is explicitly demonstrated in a model of two quantum mechanically interacting oscillators by showing that neither quantum expectations reduce to Newtonian trajectories nor entanglement vanishes. This result suggests that the quantum-to-classical transition occurs only at an approximative level, which is regulated by the low accuracy of the measurements. In order to verify the consistence of these ideas we take into account the experimental resolution of physical measurements by introducing a discretized formulation for the quantum structure of wave functions. As a result, in the low-resolution limit the quasi-determinism is recovered and hence the quantum-to-classical transition is shown to occur adequately. Other puzzling problems, such as the classical limit of quantum superpositions and nonlocal correlations, are naturally address as well.

arXiv:0809.4616•Sep 26, 2008•5 citations

Quantum limit for the measurement of a classical force coupled to a noisy quantum-mechanical oscillator

Camille Lombard Latune, Bruno M. Escher, R. L. de Matos Filho +1 more

Precise measurements of tiny forces and displacements play an important role in science and technology. The precision of recent experiments, while beginning to reach the limits imposed by quantum mechanics, is necessarily spoiled by the unavoidable influence of noise. Here we obtain a quantum limit for the uncertainty in the estimation of the amplitude of a classical force with arbitrary time dependence, acting on a noisy quantum-mechanical oscillator. We determine the best initial state of the oscillator and the best measurement procedure, thus getting a rigorous and useful benchmark for experiments aiming to detect extremely small forces.

arXiv:1210.3316•Physical Review A•Oct 16, 2013•32 citations

Quantum mechanics and precision measurements

Norman F. Ramsey

The accuracies of measurements of almost all fundamental physical constants have increased by factors of about 10 000 during the past 60 years. Although some of the improvements are due to greater care, most are due to new techniques based on quantum mechanics. Although the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle often limits measurement accuracies, in many cases the validity of quantum mechanics makes possible the vastly improved measurement accuracies. Seven quantum features that have a profound influence on the science of measurements are: (1) Existence of discrete quantum states of energy. (2) Energy conservation in transitions between two states. (3) Electromagnetic radiation of frequency v is quantized with energy hv per quantum. (4) The identity principle. (5) The Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle. (6) Addition of probability amplitudes (not probabilities). (7) Wave and coherent phase phenomena. Of these seven quantum features, only the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle limits the accuracy of measurements, and its affect is often negligibly small. The other six features make possible much more accurate measurements of quantum systems than with almost all classical systems. These effects are discussed and illustrated.

Physica Scripta•Jan 1, 1995•8 citations

Classical Properties

Bernard d’Espagnat

This chapter focuses on the notions of classical instruments and of classical measurements. It reviews the theories, based on the concept of macroscopic properties, that is, on the essential complexity of the measuring apparatus. One of the most distinctive features of quantum mechanics is the fact that it often assigns precise structures—or discrete "choices" among possible different structures—to the physical systems it describes. Hisenberg's uncertainty relations bear on the dispersions of ensembles as a whole, whereas the limitations that serve to define "classical measurements" essentially concern our possibilities of actually performing measurements in different elements of the ensemble. Thus from the uncertainty relations alone one can certainly not derive the conclusion that nonclassical measurements are impossible. The chapter considers the restricted set of observables. It is convenient to use the word "macrostate" to designate the whole set of microstates on which all the classical observables forming a definite complete set have definite values.

CRC Press eBooks•Mar 5, 2018•0 citations

Introduction to Continuous Quantum Measurements

Michael B. Mensky

This chapter explores the path-integral theory of continuous quantum measurements. It explains the principal ideas of this theory on a qualitative level with a minimum of mathematical apparatus. Quantum mechanics appeared as a theory of microscopic bodies when it had been proved that the motion of microscopic systems cannot be described in the framework of classical physics. However, quantum effects may be important even for macroscopic bodies. From a certain point of view the main object in quantum mechanics is probability amplitude because it expresses the principal difference between quantum and classical theory. Quantum mechanics differs in that not probabilities but probability amplitudes should be summed up for a quantum system. The uncertainty principle is good for expressing features of instantaneous quantum measurements but it is inconvenient for continuous measurements. The variance of outputs of a precise measurement may be considered to be quantum measurement noise.

CRC Press eBooks•Oct 19, 2017•0 citations
In the present contribution we discuss the role of experimental limitations in the classical limit problem. We studied some simple models and found that Quantum Mechanics does not re-produce classical mechanical predictions, unless we consider the experimental limitations ruled by uncertainty principle. We have shown that the discrete nature of energy levels of integrable systems can be accessed by classical measurements. We have defined a precise limit for this procedure. It may be used as a tool to define the classical limit as far as the discrete spectra of integrable systems are concerned.
In the present contribution we discuss the role of experimental limitations in the classical limit problem. We studied some simple models and found that Quantum Mechanics does not re-produce classical mechanical predictions, unless we consider the experimental limitations ruled by uncertainty principle. We have shown that the discrete nature of energy levels of integrable systems can be accessed by classical measurements. We have defined a precise limit for this procedure. It may be used as a tool to define the classical limit as far as the discrete spectra of integrable systems are concerned. If a diffusive environment is considered, we conclude that the "lifetime" of discreteness is approximately 1/κ1/κ1/κ (κκκ is the diffusion constant), thus it was possible to relate the classical limit of a spectra with the action of an environment and experimental resolution.
The classical limit of quantum mechanics is discussed for closed quantum systems in terms of observational aspects. Initially, the failure of the limit h->0 is explicitly demonstrated in a model of two quantum mechanically interacting oscillators by showing that neither quantum expectations reduce to Newtonian trajectories nor entanglement vanishes. This result suggests that the quantum-to-classical transition occurs only at an approximative level, which is regulated by the low accuracy of the measurements. In order to verify the consistence of these ideas we take into account the experimental resolution of physical measurements by introducing a discretized formulation for the quantum structure of wave functions. As a result, in the low-resolution limit the quasi-determinism is recovered and hence the quantum-to-classical transition is shown to occur adequately. Other puzzling problems, such as the classical limit of quantum superpositions and nonlocal correlations, are naturally address as well.
Precise measurements of tiny forces and displacements play an important role in science and technology. The precision of recent experiments, while beginning to reach the limits imposed by quantum mechanics, is necessarily spoiled by the unavoidable influence of noise. Here we obtain a quantum limit for the uncertainty in the estimation of the amplitude of a classical force with arbitrary time dependence, acting on a noisy quantum-mechanical oscillator. We determine the best initial state of the oscillator and the best measurement procedure, thus getting a rigorous and useful benchmark for experiments aiming to detect extremely small forces.
The accuracies of measurements of almost all fundamental physical constants have increased by factors of about 10 000 during the past 60 years. Although some of the improvements are due to greater care, most are due to new techniques based on quantum mechanics. Although the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle often limits measurement accuracies, in many cases the validity of quantum mechanics makes possible the vastly improved measurement accuracies. Seven quantum features that have a profound influence on the science of measurements are: (1) Existence of discrete quantum states of energy. (2) Energy conservation in transitions between two states. (3) Electromagnetic radiation of frequency v is quantized with energy hv per quantum. (4) The identity principle. (5) The Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle. (6) Addition of probability amplitudes (not probabilities). (7) Wave and coherent phase phenomena. Of these seven quantum features, only the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle limits the accuracy of measurements, and its affect is often negligibly small. The other six features make possible much more accurate measurements of quantum systems than with almost all classical systems. These effects are discussed and illustrated.
This chapter focuses on the notions of classical instruments and of classical measurements. It reviews the theories, based on the concept of macroscopic properties, that is, on the essential complexity of the measuring apparatus. One of the most distinctive features of quantum mechanics is the fact that it often assigns precise structures—or discrete "choices" among possible different structures—to the physical systems it describes. Hisenberg's uncertainty relations bear on the dispersions of ensembles as a whole, whereas the limitations that serve to define "classical measurements" essentially concern our possibilities of actually performing measurements in different elements of the ensemble. Thus from the uncertainty relations alone one can certainly not derive the conclusion that nonclassical measurements are impossible. The chapter considers the restricted set of observables. It is convenient to use the word "macrostate" to designate the whole set of microstates on which all the classical observables forming a definite complete set have definite values.
This chapter explores the path-integral theory of continuous quantum measurements. It explains the principal ideas of this theory on a qualitative level with a minimum of mathematical apparatus. Quantum mechanics appeared as a theory of microscopic bodies when it had been proved that the motion of microscopic systems cannot be described in the framework of classical physics. However, quantum effects may be important even for macroscopic bodies. From a certain point of view the main object in quantum mechanics is probability amplitude because it expresses the principal difference between quantum and classical theory. Quantum mechanics differs in that not probabilities but probability amplitudes should be summed up for a quantum system. The uncertainty principle is good for expressing features of instantaneous quantum measurements but it is inconvenient for continuous measurements. The variance of outputs of a precise measurement may be considered to be quantum measurement noise.