Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2011.01532 · Foundations of Physics

A Puzzle for the Field Ontologists

Shan Gao

Published Oct 31, 2020• 8 citations
arXivHTMLPDF
DOI
10.1007/s10701-020-00390-0

Related papers

A Puzzle for the Field Ontologists

Shan Gao

•Oct 31, 2020•10 citations

Towards a New Ontology

Michel Bitbol

Boston studies in the philosophy of science•Jan 1, 1996•0 citations

Quantum states for primitive ontologists

Gordon Belot

European Journal for Philosophy of Science•Feb 7, 2011•118 citations

The Ontology Problem

Travis Norsen

Undergraduate lecture notes in physics•Jan 1, 2017•0 citations

Quantum ontology without textbooks. Nor overlapping

Cristian López

In this paper, I critically assess two recent proposals for an interpretation-independent understanding of non-relativistic quantum mechanics: the overlap strategy (Fraser & Vickers, 2022) and the textbook account (Egg, 2021). My argument has three steps. I first argue that they presume a Quinean-Carnapian meta-ontological framework that yields flat, structureless ontologies. Second, such ontologies are unable to solve the problems that quantum ontologists want to solve. Finally, only structured ontologies are capable of solving the problems that quantum ontologists want to solve. But they require some dose of speculation. In the end, I defend the conservative way to do quantum ontology, which is (and must be) speculative and non-neutral.

European Journal for Philosophy of Science•Feb 21, 2024•20 citations

The New Ontological Principle

Milad Ahmady

•Jan 1, 2025•0 citations
In this paper, I critically assess two recent proposals for an interpretation-independent understanding of non-relativistic quantum mechanics: the overlap strategy (Fraser & Vickers, 2022) and the textbook account (Egg, 2021). My argument has three steps. I first argue that they presume a Quinean-Carnapian meta-ontological framework that yields flat, structureless ontologies. Second, such ontologies are unable to solve the problems that quantum ontologists want to solve. Finally, only structured ontologies are capable of solving the problems that quantum ontologists want to solve. But they require some dose of speculation. In the end, I defend the conservative way to do quantum ontology, which is (and must be) speculative and non-neutral.