Studying sequential measurements is of the utmost importance to both the foundational aspects of quantum theory and the practical implementations of quantum technologies, with both of these applications being abstractly described by the concatenation of quantum instruments into a sequence of a certain length. In general, the choice of instrument at any given step in the sequence can be conditionally chosen based on the classical results of all preceding instruments. For two instruments in a sequence we consider the conditional second instrument as an effective way of postprocessing the first instrument into a new one. This is similar to how a measurement described by a positive operator-valued measure (POVM) can be postprocessed into another by way of classical randomization of its outcomes using a stochastic matrix. In this work we study the postprocessing relation of instruments and the partial order it induces on their equivalence classes. We characterize the greatest and the least element of this order, give examples of postprocessings between different types of instruments, and draw connections between postprocessings of some of these instruments and their induced POVMs.
Studying sequential measurements is of the utmost importance to both the foundational aspects of quantum theory and the practical implementations of quantum technologies, with both of these applications being abstractly described by the concatenation of quantum instruments into a sequence of a certain length. In general, the choice of instrument at any given step in the sequence can be conditionally chosen based on the classical results of all preceding instruments. For two instruments in a sequence we consider the conditional second instrument as an effective way of postprocessing the first instrument into a new one. This is similar to how a measurement described by a positive operator-valued measure (POVM) can be postprocessed into another by way of classical randomization of its outcomes using a stochastic matrix. In this work we study the postprocessing relation of instruments and the partial order it induces on their equivalence classes. We characterize the greatest and the least element of this order, give examples of postprocessings between different types of instruments, and draw connections between postprocessings of some of these instruments and their induced POVMs.
This thesis studies the field of quantum measurements and more precisely sequential measurements. The aim is to provide answers to questions like when is performing a sequential or a repeated measurement meaningful, or even possible. This is important in order to understand what type of information can be acquired when performing measurements on quantum states. In basic quantum theory observables are identified with self-adjoint operators. We introduce the concept of a positive operator valued measure (POVM) to gain better understanding on observables. The downside to POVMs is that they don't produce a new state after the measurement, only measurement statistics. In order to perform multiple measurements on a quantum state, the concepts of measurement model and instrument are defined in this thesis. Using instruments to perform measurements is essential in order to describe a state after the initial measurement is performed. This way it's possible to make measurements sequentially. After defining the necessary tools for sequential measurements and a few different properties related to them, some applicable situations for these kind of measurements are shown. This way sequential measurements end up being somewhat meaningful in order to gain information from quantum systems.
In adaptive quantum circuits classical results of mid-circuit measurements determine the upcoming gates. This allows POVMs, quantum channels or more generally quantum instruments to be implemented sequentially, so that fewer qubits need to be used at each of the N measurement steps. In this paper, we mathematically describe these problems via adaptive sequence of instruments (ASI) and show how any instrument can be decomposed into it. Number of steps N and number of ancillary qubits nA needed for actual implementation are crucial parameters of any such ASI. We show an achievable lower bound on the product N.nA and we determine in which situations this tradeoff is likely to be optimal. Contrary to common intuition we show that for quantum instruments which transform n to m(>n) qubits, there exist N-step ASI implementing them just with (m−n) ancillary qubits, which are remeasured (N−1) times and finally used as output qubits.
Quantum instruments describe outcome probability as well as state change induced by measurement of a quantum system. Incompatibility of two instruments, i. e. the impossibility to realize them simultaneously on a given quantum system, generalizes incompatibility of channels and incompatibility of positive operator-valued measures (POVMs). We derive implications of instrument compatibility for the induced POVMs and channels. We also study relation of instrument compatibility to the concept of non-disturbance. Finally, we prove equivalence between instrument compatibility and postprocessing of certain instruments, which we term complementary instruments. We illustrate our findings on examples of various classes of instruments.
Abstract We investigate four partial orderings on the space of quantum measurements (i.e. on POVMs or positive operator valued measures), describing four notions of coarse/fine-ness of measurement. These are the partial orderings induced by: (1) classical post-processing, (2) measured relative entropy, (3) observational entropy, and (4) linear relation of POVMs. The orderings form a hierarchy of implication, where e.g. post-processing relation implies all the others. We show that this hierarchy is strict for general POVMs, with examples showing that all four orderings are strictly inequivalent. Restricted to projective measurements, all are equivalent. Finally we show that observational entropy equality S M = S N (for all ρ) holds if and only if POVMs M ≡ N are post-processing equivalent, which shows that the first three orderings induce identical equivalence classes.
Incompatibility of quantum devices is one of the cornerstones of quantum theory, and the incompatibility of quantum measurements and channels has been linked to quantum advantage in certain information-theoretic tasks. In this work, we focus on the less well explored question of the incompatibility of quantum instruments, that is, devices that describe the measurement process in its entirety, accounting for both the classical measurement outcome and the quantum postmeasurement state. In particular, we focus on the recently introduced notion of parallel compatibility of instruments, which has been argued to be a natural notion of instrument compatibility. We introduce, in a manner similar to the case of measurements and channels, the incompatibility robustness of quantum instruments and derive universal bounds on it. We then prove that postprocessing of quantum instruments is a free operation for parallel compatibility. Last, we provide families of instruments for which our bounds are tight and families of compatible indecomposable instruments.
The projection postulate and spectral representation of observables remain central in quantum theory but describe only an idealized measurement limit. Realistic measurements may be inefficient, unsharp, weak, indirect, adaptive, destructive, or informationally incomplete. Positive-operator-valued measures (POVMs) provide the probability rule for processes, whereas quantum instruments specify state transformation. This review traces the hierarchy from von Neumann projective measurement to generalized measurement, emphasizing distinctions among effects, instruments, channels, and implementations. Naimark dilation realizes arbitrary POVMs through unitary coupling to an ancillary meter and projective readout. Stinespring dilation represents completely positive trace-preserving dynamics by unitary evolution on an enlarged system followed by partial trace. A qubit–ancilla interaction yields a partial-measurement instrument, its POVM effects, and its information–disturbance trade-off. It compares projective, generalized, and ancilla-mediated schemes; examines compatibility, instrument incompatibility, and disturbance; and surveys applications to state discrimination, tomography, control, and error correction. Recent developments in dynamic-circuit measurements and noisy-POVM compatibility are integrated with questions concerning measurement back-action and outcome definiteness. The review stresses that a POVM does not uniquely determine state update, dilation theorems establish realizability rather than unique mechanisms, and operational measurement theory does not settle definite outcomes, arguing quantum instruments provide a complete description of measurement.